Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1703958

The Effects of Liraglutide and Metformin Treatment on Fracture Healing in Partially Insulinopenic Diabetic Rats

Provisionally accepted
Banu  TurhanBanu Turhan1*Sönmez  SağlamSönmez Sağlam2Mücahid  Osman YücelMücahid Osman Yücel2Raşit  Emin DalaslanRaşit Emin Dalaslan2Mehmet  Ali SungurMehmet Ali Sungur3Fatih  DemirFatih Demir4Zekeriya  Okan KaradumanZekeriya Okan Karaduman2Mehmet  ArıcanMehmet Arıcan2
  • 1Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Ankara Ataturk Sanatoryum Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Ankara, Türkiye
  • 2Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Duzce Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Düzce, Türkiye
  • 3Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Duzce Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Düzce, Türkiye
  • 4Department of Pathology, Duzce Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Düzce, Türkiye

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Purpose: Although Metformin has been studied, the comparative or synergistic effect with GLP-1 agonists like Liraglutide on fracture healing remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of metformin, liraglutide, and their combination on fracture healing in a rat model of partially insulinopenic diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: Sixty male Wistar rats (10-14 weeks old, 350±50g) were divided into five groups of twelve rats each: Control, DM, Met (Metformin), L (Liraglutide), and Met+L. Partially insulinopenic DM was induced in all experimental rats except the control group using streptozotocin (STZ) and nicotinamide (NA) combination. A femoral fracture was created, and a Kirschner wire was inserted retrogradely into the femoral canal. Liraglutide was injected subcutaneously at a daily dose of 0.6 mg/kg into the rats in the L and Met+L groups, and oral metformin was administered to the rats in the Met and Met+L groups daily at a dose of 180 mg/kg. On the 15th, 30th, and 45th days, four rats from each group were selected randomly and euthanized, and the femurs were examined radiographically, biomechanically, and histopathologically. Results: The baseline characteristics of the rats before the study showed no significant differences between the groups (p>0.05). Biomechanical test results showed a significant main effect of group (p<0.001), indicating that overall Newton values varied across groups. Additionally, a significant main effect of experimental day was found (p<0.001), suggesting that Newton values changed across days regardless of group. Histopathological scores showed a statistically significant difference between the groups on the 15th day, with the L group having 75% scoring 7 (p=0.047), and on the 45th day, with the L and Met+L groups both having 75% scoring 9 (p=0.036). Conversely, no significant difference was found in radiological scores between the groups on the 15th day (p=0.934), 30th day (p=0.649), and 45th day (p=0.502) of the experiment. Conclusion: Both metformin and liraglutide improve fracture healing in a partially insulinopenic diabetic rat model, and these findings suggest that liraglutide may offer a superior therapeutic advantage over metformin in accelerating fracture repair in patients with diabetes.

Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus, liraglutide, Metformin, rat, Fracture Healing

Received: 12 Sep 2025; Accepted: 08 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Turhan, Sağlam, Yücel, Dalaslan, Sungur, Demir, Karaduman and Arıcan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Banu Turhan, benguulkuturhan@yahoo.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.