ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cancer Endocrinology
This article is part of the Research TopicUnveiling the Complexity of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Biomarkers, Classification, and Translational PerspectivesView all 3 articles
Pituitary Hormone Deficiencies in Prolactinomas: Prevalence, Predictors, and Functional Recovery
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, Palermo, Italy
- 2Universita degli Studi di Catania Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Catania, Italy
- 3Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Università degli studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction. To evaluate the prevalence of pituitary hormone deficiencies in patients with prolactinomas, identify clinical and radiological predictors of non-gonadal hypopituitarism at diagnosis, and evaluate the potential for pituitary function recovery over long-term follow-up. Methods. We conducted a retrospective multicentre study including 145 patients with prolactinomas diagnosed between 2000 and 2024 at two tertiary centers. All anterior pituitary axes were evaluated at diagnosis and during follow-up. Results. At diagnosis, 54 of 145 patients (37.2%) had at least one pituitary hormone deficiency. Hypogonadism was the most common deficit (34.5%), followed by non-gonadal hypopituitarism in 14.5%, including secondary adrenal insufficiency: 8.3%, central hypothyroidism: 7.6%, growth hormone deficiency (GHD): 6.9%. Macroadenomas were significantly more prevalent than microadenomas (25.8% vs. 2.7%, p<0.001). Tumor size was the only independent predictor of non-gonadal hypopituitarism at diagnosis (OR: 1.1, 95%CI: 1.03–1.20; p=0.007). ROC analysis identified 17 mm as the optimal cut-off to predict non-gonadal pituitary hormone deficiencies at diagnosis (sensitivity 84%, specificity 77%, AUC=0.836). During follow-up (median 70 months), 66.7% of patients recovered at least one pituitary axis, with higher recovery in microadenomas (100% vs. 63.0%, p=0.038). Tumor size remained the strongest predictor of recovery (OR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.34– 0.94; p=0.029). Conclusions. Non-gonadal hypopituitarism is common in prolactinomas, especially larger tumors. Tumor size was the strongest predictor of both the presence and recovery of hormonal deficits, with an optimal cut-off of 17 mm. Long-term follow-up is essential, as many patients, especially those with smaller tumors, recover pituitary function after treatment, with gonadal and adrenal axes showing the highest likelihood.
Keywords: prolactinomas, pituitary adenoma, Hypopituitarism, Pituitary function recovery, Neuroendocrine Tumors
Received: 14 Sep 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Prinzi, Fava, Bacchi, Spitali, Galvano, Arnaldi, Frasca, Guarnotta and Malandrino. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Valentina Guarnotta, valentina.guarnotta@unipa.it
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
