Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Endocrinol., 08 December 2025

Sec. Adrenal Endocrinology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1737160

Primary aldosteronism: adrenalectomy could save more lives

  • 1Carling Adrenal Center, Tampa, FL, United States
  • 2Hospital for Endocrine Surgery Research Center, HCA Healthcare Research Institute, HCA Florida Healthcare, Tampa, FL, United States

Primary aldosteronism (PA), a leading cause of secondary hypertension, remains profoundly underdiagnosed and, contributes to vast preventable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. Affecting 4.5–20% of patients with high blood pressure, PA drives excess aldosterone production, substantially elevating risks of heart failure, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and renal damage, with untreated cases facing 10–20% higher mortality rates over 5–10 years compared to essential hypertension. Adrenalectomy for unilateral PA driven by somatic mutations (e.g., KCNJ5) offers markedly superior outcomes over medical therapy, yielding an absolute risk reduction in all-cause mortality that rivals or exceeds many major cardiovascular surgeries and greatly improves quality of life by resolving hypertension, hypokalemia, and associated symptoms. Advanced surgical approaches such as mini back scope adrenalectomy (posterior retroperitoneoscopic) minimize risks and enable precise, function-preserving surgery. Yet, current surgical rates, ranging from 1.2 to 8.4 per million across countries like Sweden, Taiwan, France, UK, Germany, and USA, represent less than 4% of the optimal rate of 212 operations/million. Achieving optimal adrenalectomy rates requires increasing surgical capacity 25–170-fold, potentially saving 5,627 lives annually in the USA alone. Disparities arise from diagnostic barriers, including underutilization of aldosterone-to-renin ratio screening, complex confirmatory testing, and limited access to adrenal vein sampling and high-volume adrenal surgeons. This perspective highlights PA’s severe burden, compares adrenalectomy’s efficacy to major cardiac and vascular operations, and examines international caseload variations linked to research infrastructure, PA guidelines, and access to high-volume centers. We strongly urge enhanced PA screening, improved case detection, diagnostic workflows, and expanded surgical access to avert this silent epidemic.

Introduction

Primary aldosteronism (PA), a prevalent yet underrecognized cause of secondary hypertension, contributes significantly to preventable cardiovascular-related deaths (15). The disease is due to unifocal (aldosterone-producing adenoma; APA) or multifocal tumors, or more rarely aldosterone-producing diffuse hyperplasia (APDH) (6). Despite the proven efficacy of adrenalectomy in curing this condition, its application remains limited (7, 8). Optimizing surgical intervention rates for PA in nations such as Sweden, Taiwan, France, the UK, Germany, and the USA could prevent thousands of premature deaths, achieving a life-saving impact similar to some major cardiovascular operations. In other international regions, where PA adrenalectomy rates are likely even lower, millions remain undiagnosed and untreated, fueling a silent yet devastating public health crisis. We evaluated the mortality reduction achieved through adrenalectomy for PA compared to major cardiac and vascular surgeries, alongside their impact on quality of life (Table 1), and estimated current versus optimal global PA adrenalectomy rates (Table 2). This perspective examines the multifaceted burden of PA, its diagnostic challenges, the superior efficacy of surgical intervention, and actionable strategies to shift to a proactive, life-saving paradigm for PA management.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Mortality impact of adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism (PA) compared to commonly employed major cardiovascular operations and the effect on quality of life.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Current annual rates of adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism (PA) and optimal rates (212 per million population, in bold) in various countries.

Primary aldosteronism as driver of morbidity and mortality

PA is increasingly acknowledged as a significant health challenge due to its high prevalence and profound cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic consequences (14). Affecting an estimated 4.5–20% of individuals with hypertension, equivalent to up to 12,100 cases per million, PA is characterized by excessive aldosterone production, which significantly elevates mortality risk by 10–20% over 5–10 years compared to essential hypertension (35). Predominantly impacting working-age adults, PA imposes substantial societal burdens through chronic morbidity, reduced workforce productivity, and escalating healthcare costs. Without intervention, patients face markedly elevated risks, including a 2.5–4-fold increase in stroke, a 2.6–6.5-fold increase in non-fatal myocardial infarction, and a 3.2–12-fold increase in atrial fibrillation compared to those with essential hypertension (4, 911). These data underscore the urgent need for enhanced screening, diagnosis, and management strategies to mitigate the far-reaching impacts of this condition. Excess aldosterone causes extensive target organ damage beyond blood pressure elevation. In the cardiovascular system, it promotes myocardial fibrosis, left ventricular hypertrophy, and endothelial dysfunction, leading to heart failure, arrhythmias, and accelerated atherosclerosis risk (2, 4, 9, 12). In the kidneys, aldosterone induces glomerular hyperfiltration, proteinuria, and progressive renal fibrosis, contributing to chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal failure (13, 14). Additionally, PA exacerbates metabolic disturbances, including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and vascular inflammation, amplifying systemic damage and cardiovascular risk (3, 4, 13). Concomitant hypercortisolism in PA is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to morbidity, as well. Co-secretion of cortisol in APAs or bilateral PA, reported in up to 20–30% of PA cases, compounds cardiovascular and metabolic risks by promoting visceral obesity, glucose intolerance, and osteoporosis, while exacerbating hypertension and hypokalemia (15, 16). This dual hormonal excess intensifies end-organ damage, and worsens quality of life, underscoring the need for comprehensive hormonal screening in PA patients to guide targeted surgical or medical interventions (15, 16).

Frequently mistaken for essential hypertension, PA escapes detection in millions, sustaining a hidden epidemic. Innovative procedures like mini back scope adrenalectomy (MBSA, also known as posterior retroperitoneoscopic), completed in under 20 minutes by experienced surgeons, can restore hormonal balance, resolve hypertension, and reduce cardiovascular mortality, with very low risks of complications (7, 17, 18). Approximately 35% of PA cases stem from a unilateral APA curable by surgery, although data from different centers range between 25-70% dependent on referral patterns, and stringency of diagnostic tools such as confirmatory testing and AVS methodology (19).

Unfortunately, many patients suffer prolonged poor blood pressure control, either undiagnosed, or managed by ever-increasing pharmacological therapies without identifying the root cause and a severely reduced quality of life, unaware that a low-risk operation could prevent severe complications (1, 7, 20, 21). Recent meta-analyses confirm surgery’s edge in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events, with quicker and more pronounced benefits than medical management (10, 2022). A comprehensive nationwide study evaluated mortality in PA and the effect of adrenalectomy in 2,419 patients with PA and 24,187 controls with a follow up of 8.1 years. PA was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality from cardiovascular disease and stroke. Patients with cardiovascular disease at diagnosis, patients treated with a low dose of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and untreated patients had excess mortality. Conversely, patients treated with unilateral adrenalectomy had a decreased mortality risk, which was similar to age- and sex-matched controls without PA, i.e. patients who underwent adrenalectomy remarkably returned to a baseline risk similar to the general population (23). Furthermore, genetic research reveals somatic mutations in aldosterone-producing adenomas, including: KCNJ5 potassium channel mutations in 43-73% of cases, CACNA1D calcium channel mutations in 9-21%, ATP1A1 sodium/potassium ATPase mutations in 5-8%, and ATP2B3 plasma membrane calcium ATPase mutations in 1-3%. These mutations provide potential molecular targets for diagnostics and therapies as they disrupt ion homeostasis leading to autonomous aldosterone secretion. KCNJ5 mutations, in particular, are linked to better post-adrenalectomy outcomes often with more complete hypertension remission due to distinct adenoma features (2426). Bilateral PA, traditionally managed medically, is increasingly treated with staged, partial (function-preserving) adrenalectomy in select cases, negating the need for lifelong glucocorticoid replacement, particularly in patients with ARMC5 germline mutations that promote bilateral macronodular hyperplasia predisposing to bilateral disease (7, 17, 27, 28).

Admittedly, adrenalectomy’s risk reduction in PA relies on relatively limited data, hindering definitive answers to two key management questions: the extent of PA’s contribution to morbidity and mortality, and its reversibility by adrenalectomy. Current literature is restricted by incomplete data on PA’s biochemical severity and duration before surgery, difficulties in accounting for common comorbidities like essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and diabetes, dependence on retrospective cohort studies, and meta-analyses of mainly observational data. Still, growing evidence supports substantial morbidity and mortality benefits following adrenalectomy (14).

The efficacy of adrenalectomy in PA

We evaluated the mortality reduction achieved through adrenalectomy for PA, comparing its efficacy to major cardiovascular surgeries and their effects on quality of life (Table 1). The mortality impact of adrenalectomy for PA was estimated using previously published data (1, 2, 20, 23), and then compared to commonly employed major cardiovascular operations. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) and a number needed to treat (NNT, i.e. the number of procedures performed to save one life) were calculated for each surgical intervention. Adrenalectomy for PA achieves a 7.9% ARR in cardiovascular mortality over six years, with an NTT of 13 (1, 2, 20). This significant ARR, strongly derived from several meta-analyses and nationwide retrospective studies of appropriately selected surgical cohorts for PA, indicates the profound benefit of adrenalectomy (1, 2, 20, 23), which is comparable only to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (29). While this ARR represents a powerful health gain, it is important to note that it is based on studies of patients deemed eligible for surgery. Consequently, its applicability to older individuals or those with significant comorbidities may be reduced, and absolute benefits may be smaller in low-risk or elderly populations, especially since age-specific variations in ARR for adrenalectomy in PA are not yet widely available in the literature (23). Adrenalectomy for PA ranks above elective repair of a 5 cm abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), where untreated rupture poses significant mortality risks (30), as well as elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for stable coronary artery disease and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis for reduction in stroke risk (31, 32). Furthermore, PA primarily affects younger, working-age adults, with an average age of 50–55 years at the time of adrenalectomy (1, 7, 23). This is significantly younger than the average age for the listed major cardiovascular surgeries, which typically occur in a patient’s 70s or 80s (Table 1). Thus, treating PA surgically can lead to several decades of improved lifespan, quality of life, reduced productivity losses, and healthcare costs.

Beyond survival, adrenalectomy significantly improves quality of life by correcting hormonal imbalances, easing hypertension, muscle cramps, headaches, obesity, sleep apnea, fatigue, and anxiety, with minimal complications in skilled hands (7, 24, 33). Minimally invasive approaches, including partial (function-preserving) adrenalectomy, enhance safety and preserve adrenal function, particularly important in bilateral and/or multifocal PA (7, 17, 18). Long-term studies show sustained reductions in cardiovascular events post-surgery, with unilateral PA patients achieving better outcomes than medically treated counterparts, notably in those with ATP1A1 mutations tied to more severe preoperative profiles (1, 10, 20, 23, 34). In bilateral PA, international cohorts demonstrate feasibility of less-than total adrenalectomy with biochemical cure rates ranging from 65-85%, while maintaining a very low risk of postoperative hypocortisolism, negating the need for glucocorticoid replacement therapy (7, 27). Similar to PA, adrenalectomy seems underused also in various types of adrenal hypercortisolism and pheochromocytoma (35).

Global potential for surgery in PA

We estimated the current and optimal rates of PA adrenalectomy across various countries using data from national registries, administrative datasets, peer-reviewed studies and personal communications (Table 2). Briefly, the estimates are based on data from Socialstyrelsen (Sweden), National Health Insurance (NHI) (Taiwan), ATIH (France), Hospital Episode Statistics (UK), DRG data (Germany) and Nationwide Inpatient Sample and NSQIP (USA), and supplemented with data from publications using the Scandinavian Quality Register for Thyroid, Parathyroid and Adrenal Surgery (SQRTPA; Sweden), Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation group TAIPAI (Taiwan), Eurocrine/AFCE (France), UK Registry of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery (UKRETS; UK), Eurocrine (Germany), and Collaborative Endocrine Surgery Quality Improvement Program (CESQIP; USA) and, personal communications. Current PA adrenalectomy rates vary widely across Sweden, Taiwan, France, the UK, Germany, and the USA. For example, France performs approximately 83 adrenalectomies per year (1.2 per million), similar to Sweden’s 88 cases (8.4 per million), despite France’s population being 6.2 times larger (36, 37). Similarly, the proportion of adrenal operation for PA as a percentage of all stand-alone adrenalectomies (and not as part of other operations, e.g. radical nephrectomy) was highest in Sweden (~39%) and lowest in France and the USA (~5.0%, and 8.2%), respectively. However, assuming 35% of PA cases (i.e. curable unilateral PA) were properly referred for surgery, the PA adrenalectomy rates in all analyzed countries fall dramatically short of the optimal (38, 39). This assumption, reflecting the proportion of diagnosed PA cases amenable to surgical cure (as opposed to all undiagnosed PA patients), highlights a dramatic shortfall in current adrenalectomy rates. This shortfall translates to ~73,130 missed procedures annually in the USA alone, causing ~5,627 deaths per ARR estimates (1, 39). It is crucial to acknowledge that these estimations, which inherently represent upper-bound projections assuming complete case detection and surgical candidacy, while based on diagnosed unilateral PA and representing an ideal scenario, may overstate the true number of surgical candidates. This is because the actual fraction of surgically eligible patients in unselected hypertensive populations remains uncertain and is likely lower after accounting for age, comorbidities, and patient preference. However, given the vast underdiagnosis, the potential for increasing lives saved remains substantial. Conversely, it may also underestimate such numbers as in some populations the prevalence of surgically curable PA may actually be higher. To reach optimal rates of PA adrenalectomies, each analyzed country would need to increase its current number of adrenal operations for PA by a factor of ~25 to 170 times. In regions with less developed diagnostic and surgical infrastructure, PA adrenalectomy rates are surely even lower, leaving millions of patients undiagnosed and without optimal treatment globally (4, 19).

Country-specific rates reveal disparities tied to healthcare and screening variations. Sweden leads with both the highest rate of PA adrenalectomies both per million, and as a percentage of all adrenalectomies, aided by universal healthcare coverage, national registries like SQRTPA, strong PA research, and rapid implementation of novel science into clinical practice (23, 33, 36, 40). Taiwan at 3.9 PA adrenalectomies per million, benefits from robust research via the Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation (TAIPAI) group, capturing ~80% of national cases, and national clinical practice guidelines (24, 41). Taiwanese scientists have been early proponents of both partial (function-preserving) adrenalectomy and adrenalectomy for select cases of bilateral PA, reflecting a proactive, and evidence-based approach (27, 41, 42). Germany, with a comparably high rate of PA adrenalectomies, benefits from high-volume centers and Eurocrine registries, similar to Sweden and Taiwan (17, 43). In contrast, the USA, the UK and France trail, with abysmally low PA case detection, scant patients appropriately referred for surgery, and very low percentage PA adrenalectomy rates (3739). These disparities reflect variations in research ecosystems, national registries, clinical guidelines, and access to high-volume centers, which drive higher caseloads in countries like Sweden, Taiwan, and Germany.

Diagnostic challenges

The underuse of adrenalectomy for PA arises from substantial diagnostic challenges. The aldosterone-to-renin ratio test, essential for PA screening, is performed in fewer than 2-5% of hypertensive patients, despite guideline recommendations (19, 40, 44). The July 2025 Endocrine Society guidelines now advocate for universal biochemical screening for PA in all hypertensive patients, signaling a major shift toward detecting this overlooked condition (19, 44). Yet, confirmatory tests like saline loading or adrenal vein sampling (AVS) are complex and resource-intensive, delaying referrals in strained healthcare systems (7, 45, 46). AVS, essential for determining lateralization in unilateral PA, has limitations including technical failure rates, variable interpretation and inadequate availability, prompting calls for imaging-based alternatives in select cases (3, 45, 46). The lack of endocrinology expertise among primary care providers and insufficient specialists exacerbates the issue. Unlike well-established screening for other conditions (e.g. AAA and certain cancers), PA lacks routine hormone checks in annual physician visits or national monitoring similar to those via cancer registries.

Discussion and path forward

Tackling PA underdiagnosis requires a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic overhaul. Routine screening for PA, measuring aldosterone, renin, and potassium, should be standard in primary care for all hypertensive patients, as advocated by the new 2025 Endocrine Society PA guidelines, potentially uncovering thousands of surgical candidates (19, 44). Such screening could yield substantial healthcare savings by preventing costly cardiovascular events. Extending universal screening to high-risk groups, such as those with resistant hypertension, hypokalemia, atrial fibrillation, sleep apnea, early-onset hypertension, or a family history of cardiovascular events, could further enhance case detection (3, 4). Improved patient stratification into mild, moderate, and severe disease categories, as outlined in recent expert consensus, allows for tailored management (47). For instance, patients with moderate to severe PA can often bypass confirmatory testing and AVS, proceeding directly to surgery when imaging is unequivocal (47). Conversely, mild cases can often be managed by pharmacotherapy alone avoiding AVS and surgery, which has a lower yield in such cases, unless progressive PA occurs. The advent of functional positron emission tomography (PET) scanning for PA, offers a non-invasive alternative for lateralization, reducing the reliance on AVS, which has a 10–92% failure rate (largely dependent on the operator experience) and frequently limited availability (45, 46, 4851). PET imaging further shows high sensitivity and specificity in subtyping PA, enabling faster and more accessible diagnosis, although it is not yet widely available (49, 51). Postoperative histopathological evaluation using the HISTOALDO consensus, incorporating CYP11B2 immunohistochemistry to map aldosterone-producing zones, is critical for accurate postoperative PA subtyping, guiding prognosis and follow-up care as well as determining whether additional contralateral function-preserving adrenalectomy is indicated (6, 7, 27). Such a surgical approach preserves adrenal tissue, minimizing the risk of adrenal insufficiency, even in the subset of patients requiring bilateral surgery (7, 17). Furthermore, expanding adrenalectomy to bilateral PA, through unilateral or function-preserving bilateral procedures, may offer better control than medical therapy in select patients, reducing long-term MRA-related complications like lack of libido, erectile dysfunction, gynecomastia, menstrual irregularities, and hyperkalemia. Admittedly, the long-term results in biochemical cure and effects of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are currently unknown with this approach, but the risk of adrenal insufficiency seems very low (<1-2%) (7, 27). To address surgical capacity and disparities, establishing high-volume adrenal centers worldwide is critical to ensure equitable access to specialized care (7). For example, the Carling Adrenal Center, where one author (TC) performs approximately 130 PA adrenalectomies annually, ~1.6 times France’s national total, demonstrates the potential for rapid capacity expansion (37). Some propose using non-surgical approaches like radiofrequency ablation, especially for carefully selected patients with exclusively left-sided APAs who are inoperable or refuse surgery. However, such approaches provide no pathological data and will likely lead to unacceptably high rates of both biochemical persistence and recurrence of PA (52).

Streamlining diagnostics with using artificial intelligence and machine learning of clinical and biochemical data could potentially enhance scalability, while public campaigns could raise awareness and encourage testing for PA (53). Boosting primary care training in endocrinology and increasing specialist access are essential to bridge the diagnostic divide, particularly in resource-limited settings. Emerging therapies, such as aldosterone synthase inhibitors, offer promising non-surgical options for managing mild or bilateral PA without tumors, particularly for patients intolerant to MRAs, or those unsuitable for surgery, thereby expanding treatment options (5355).

In conclusion, the ongoing underuse of adrenalectomy for PA claims preventable lives, making delay highly concerning, and thus, action to optimize case detection, diagnostic and treatment stratification and surgical rates is imperative. By emulating and enhancing the models of Sweden, Taiwan, and Germany, e.g. integrating research, registries, and high-volume centers, global healthcare systems can close disparities, prioritize PA, and realize adrenalectomy’s full potential in saving lives and improving quality of life.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for this Perspectives article since it only evaluates previously published studies. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

TC: Data curation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FF: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Acknowledgments

The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily represent those of HCA Healthcare or its affiliates.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During the preparation of this work SuperGrok (Grok 4, xAI) and ChatGPT (GPT-5, OpenAI) were used as research tools to generate data on mortality effects of various non-adrenalectomy surgical procedures and, at the initiation of the project, develop the thinking regarding the thesis discussed. The authors declare that no other Generative AI was used in the creation of the actual manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Chen SY, Chen JY, Huang WC, Puar THK, Chin Kek P, Chueh JS, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in primary aldosteronism after adrenalectomy or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment: a meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. (2022) 187:S47–58. doi: 10.1530/EJE-22-0375

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Hundemer GL, Curhan GC, Yozamp N, Wang M, and Vaidya A. Cardiometabolic outcomes and mortality in medically treated primary aldosteronism: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2018) 6:51–9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30367-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Reincke M, Bancos I, Mulatero P, Scholl UI, Stowasser M, and Williams TA. Diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2021) 9:876–92. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00210-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Turcu AF, Yang J, and Vaidya A. Primary aldosteronism - a multidimensional syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2022) 18:665–82. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00730-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Parasiliti-Caprino M, Ghigo E, and Maccario M. Primary aldosteronism is a clinical issue that should not be underestimated anymore. J Endocrinol Invest. (2023) 46:639–40. doi: 10.1007/s40618-022-01981-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Mete O, Erickson LA, Juhlin CC, de Krijger RR, Sasano H, Volante M, et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of adrenal cortical tumors. Endocr Pathol. (2022) 33:155–96. doi: 10.1007/s12022-022-09710-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Carling T and LaRue M. Improved and individualized approach to adrenal surgery. Endocr Relat Cancer. (2025) 32(7):e240296. doi: 10.1530/ERC-24-0296

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Williams TA, Lenders JWM, Mulatero P, Burrello J, Rottenkolber M, Adolf C, et al. Outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: an international consensus on outcome measures and analysis of remission rates in an international cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2017) 5:689–99. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30135-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Funder JW and Carey RM. Primary aldosteronism: where are we now? Where to from here? Hypertension. (2022) 79:726–35. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18761

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Huang M, Li J, Zhao X, Fu R, Li X, and Jiang W. Global and regional prevalence and cardiovascular risk of primary aldosteronism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol. (2024) 49:102791. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102791

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hundemer GL. Primary aldosteronism: cardiovascular outcomes pre- and post-treatment. Curr Cardiol Rep. (2019) 21:93. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1185-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Marzano L, Zoccatelli F, Pizzolo F, and Friso S. Adrenalectomy versus medical therapy in primary aldosteronism: A meta-analysis of long-term cardiac remodeling and function: medical versus adrenalectomy treatment compared in hyperaldosteronism (MATCH) study. Hypertension. (2025) 82:e142–e53. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.125.25104

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Rossi GP, Rossi FB, Guarnieri C, Rossitto G, and Seccia TM. Clinical management of primary aldosteronism: an update. Hypertension. (2024) 81:1845–56. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.22642

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Araujo-Castro M, Paja Fano M, Gonzalez-Boillos M, Pascual-Corrales E, Martin Rojas-Marcos P, Garcia-Cano A, et al. Impact of primary aldosteronism on kidney function: results from the SPAIN-ALDO registry. J Hypertens. (2024) 42:1805–12. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003813

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Arlt W, Lang K, Sitch AJ, Dietz AS, Rhayem Y, Bancos I, et al. Steroid metabolome analysis reveals prevalent glucocorticoid excess in primary aldosteronism. JCI Insight. (2017) 2(8):e93136. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.93136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Tsai CH, Liao CW, Wu XM, Chen ZW, Pan CT, Chang YY, et al. Mild autonomous cortisol secretion in patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma and risk for cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. Eur J Endocrinol. (2025) 192:81–90. doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvaf007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Alesina PF, Knyazeva P, Hinrichs J, and Walz MK. Tailored approach in adrenal surgery: retroperitoneoscopic partial adrenalectomy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2022) 13:855326. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.855326

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Carling T. Retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomy is safe and effective (Br J Surg 2010; 97:1667-1672). Br J Surg. (2010) 97:1672–3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7193

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Adler GK, Stowasser M, Correa RR, Khan N, Kline G, McGowan MJ, et al. Primary aldosteronism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2025) 110(9):2453–95. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaf284

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Huang CW, Huang TY, Yang YF, Chang LM, Tu YK, Wu VC, et al. Major adverse cardiovascular events in primary aldosteronism after adrenalectomy or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. (2025) 14:e038714. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038714

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Samnani S, Cenzer I, Kline GA, Lee SJ, Hundemer GL, McClurg C, et al. Time to benefit of surgery vs targeted medical therapy for patients with primary aldosteronism: A meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2024) 109:e1280–e9. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad654

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Yang J, Burrello J, Goi J, Reincke M, Adolf C, Asbach E, et al. Outcomes after medical treatment for primary aldosteronism: an international consensus and analysis of treatment response in an international cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2025) 13:119–33. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00308-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Gkaniatsa E, Zverkova Sandstrom T, Rosengren A, Trimpou P, Olsson DS, Lind M, et al. Mortality in patients with primary aldosteronism: A swedish nationwide study. Hypertension. (2023) 80:2601–10. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21895

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Chan CK, Yang WS, Lin YH, Chang CC, Wu VC, and Chueh JS. KCNJ5 somatic mutations are associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2025) 110:e2918–e28. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaf007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Choi M, Scholl UI, Yue P, Bjorklund P, Zhao B, Nelson-Williams C, et al. K+ channel mutations in adrenal aldosterone-producing adenomas and hereditary hypertension. Science. (2011) 331:768–72. doi: 10.1126/science.1198785

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Lenzini L, Rossitto G, Maiolino G, Letizia C, Funder JW, and Rossi GP. A meta-analysis of somatic KCNJ5 K(+) channel mutations in 1636 patients with an aldosterone-producing adenoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2015) 100:E1089–95. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Williams TA, Gong S, Tsurutani Y, Tezuka Y, Thuzar M, Burrello J, et al. Adrenal surgery for bilateral primary aldosteronism: an international retrospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2022) 10:769–71. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00253-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zilbermint M, Xekouki P, Faucz FR, Berthon A, Gkourogianni A, Schernthaner-Reiter MH, et al. Primary aldosteronism and ARMC5 variants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2015) 100:E900–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4167

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, Makkar R, Kodali SK, Russo M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380:1695–705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Lederle FA, Kyriakides TC, Stroupe KT, Freischlag JA, Padberg FT Jr., Matsumura JS, et al. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380:2126–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715955

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Halliday A, Harrison M, Hayter E, Kong X, Mansfield A, Marro J, et al. 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. (2010) 376:1074–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61197-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T, Kennedy JW, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. (8922) 1994:344. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91963-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Sellgren F, Koman A, Nordenstrom E, Hellman P, Hennings J, and Muth A. Outcomes after surgery for unilateral dominant primary aldosteronism in Sweden. World J Surg. (2020) 44:561–9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05265-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Wu VC, Wang SM, Huang KH, Tsai YC, Chan CK, Yang SY, et al. Long-term mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism after targeted treatments. Eur J Endocrinol. (2021) 186:195–205. doi: 10.1530/EJE-21-0836

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Carling T. Adrenalectomy is underused: a call to reduce mortality. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2025) S1043-2760(25)00225-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2025.10.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Scandinavian Quality Register for Thyroid, Parathyroid and Adrenal Surgery (SQRTPA) (2024), Årsrapport 2024. (in Swedish).

Google Scholar

37. Vignaud T, Baud G, Nomine-Criqui C, Donatini G, Santucci N, Hamy A, et al. Surgery for primary aldosteronism in France from 2010 to 2020 - results from the french-speaking association of endocrine surgery (AFCE): eurocrine study group. Ann Surg. (2023) 278:717–24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Gray WK, Day J, Briggs TWR, Wass JAH, and Lansdown M. Volume-outcome relationship for adrenalectomy: analysis of an administrative dataset for the Getting It Right First Time Programme. Br J Surg. (2021) 108:1112–9. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab142

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Sung TY, Tennakoon L, Alobuia WM, Seib C, Cisco R, Lin D, et al. Factors associated with postoperative complications and costs for adrenalectomy in benign adrenal disorders. Surgery. (2022) 171:1519–25. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.065

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Makhnov N, Skov J, Akerstrom T, Axling F, Andernord D, Bergenheim M, et al. Screening for primary aldosteronism in 1,181 Swedish primary care patients with hypertension. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2025) 16:1555572. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1555572

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Tseng CS, Chan CK, Lee HY, Pan CT, Peng KY, Wang SM, et al. Treatment of primary aldosteronism: Clinical practice guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Aldosteronism. J Formos Med Assoc. (2024) 123 Suppl 2:S125–S34. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.05.032

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Lee TN, Chang CC, Chueh JS, Tseng CS, Wu VC, Peng KY, et al. Speculating suitability of partial adrenalectomy for lateralized primary aldosteronism: With emphasis on partial and complete success as optimistic outcomes. Hypertens Res. (2025) 48:1739–48. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02101-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Staubitz JI, Clerici T, Riss P, Watzka F, Bergenfelz A, Bareck E, et al. EUROCRINE(R): adrenal surgery 2015-2019- surprising initial results. Chirurg. (2021) 92:448–63. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01277-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Farah MH, Hegazi M, Firwana M, Abusalih M, Saadi S, Al-Kordi M, et al. A systematic review supporting the endocrine society clinical practice guideline on management of primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2025) 110:e2833–e44. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaf290

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Turcu AF and Auchus R. Approach to the patient with primary aldosteronism: utility and limitations of adrenal vein sampling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2021) 106:1195–208. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa952

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Deinum J and Turcu AF. Adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism-is the gold standard losing its luster? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2025) 110:e2800–e3. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaf204

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Murakami M, Naruse M, Kobayashi H, Parasiliti-Caprino M, Bioletto F, Brudgam D, et al. Expert Consensus on the Primary Aldosteronism Severity Classification and its strategic application in indicating adrenal venous sampling. Eur J Endocrinol. (2025) 193:85–96. doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvaf117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Chaman Baz AH, van de Wiel E, Groenewoud H, Arntz M, Gotthardt M, Deinum J, et al. CXCR4-directed [(68)Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT versus adrenal vein sampling performance: a study protocol for a randomised two-step controlled diagnoStic Trial Ultimately comparing hypertenSion outcome in primary aldosteronism (CASTUS). BMJ Open. (2022) 12:e060779. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060779

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Peng Y, Chen F, Yao R, Lan J, Fu Y, Ye K, et al. The value of targeted CXCR4 (18)F-AlF-NOTA-pentixafor PET/CT for subtyping primary aldosteronism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2025) 16:1533295. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1533295

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Wu X, Senanayake R, Goodchild E, Bashari WA, Salsbury J, Cabrera CP, et al. (11)C]metomidate PET-CT versus adrenal vein sampling for diagnosing surgically curable primary aldosteronism: a prospective, within-patient trial. Nat Med. (2023) 29:190–202. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02114-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Zhang X, Song Y, Jing Y, Hu J, Shen H, Zhang A, et al. Comparison of different diagnostic criteria of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT for the classification of primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2025) 110:e2583–e90. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae747

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Argentesi G, Wu X, Ney A, Goodchild E, Laycock K, Lee YN, et al. Endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, radiofrequency ablation of aldosterone-producing adenomas (FABULAS): a UK, multicentre, prospective, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. (2025) 405:637–47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02755-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Mullen N, Curneen J, Donlon PT, Prakash P, Bancos I, Gurnell M, et al. Treating primary aldosteronism-induced hypertension: novel approaches and future outlooks. Endocr Rev. (2024) 45:125–70. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnad026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Turcu AF, Freeman MW, Bancos I, Ben-Shlomo A, Hamidi O, Hamrahian AH, et al. Phase 2a study of baxdrostat in primary aldosteronism. N Engl J Med. (2025) 393:515–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2508629

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Carling T and Scholl UI. More about the phase 2a study of baxdrostat in primary aldosteronism. N Engl J Med. (2025) 393:1550. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2512324

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: adrenalectomy, primary aldosteronism, aldosterone, mortality, underdiagnosis, Conn syndrome, hyperaldosteronism

Citation: Carling T and Faucz FR (2025) Primary aldosteronism: adrenalectomy could save more lives. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1737160. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1737160

Received: 01 November 2025; Accepted: 25 November 2025; Revised: 24 November 2025;
Published: 08 December 2025.

Edited by:

Fabio Bioletto, University of Turin, Italy

Reviewed by:

Chiara Lopez, University of Turin, Italy
Chi-Shin Tseng, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan

Copyright © 2025 Carling and Faucz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tobias Carling, dGNhcmxpbmdAYWRyZW5hbC5jb20=

ORCID: Tobias Carling, orcid.org/0000-0002-1308-187X

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.