Abstract
We discuss the process of human re-occupation of the Southern Puna (25°-27°S) during the Late Holocene through a variety of lines of evidence, such as ceramics, faunal bones, lithic technology, sources of raw materials like obsidian, and rock art, and their integration with spatial analyses using least-cost paths. Our results indicate a process in which niches were formed in the puna, focused on a variety of activities such as vicuña hunting; exploitation of lithic sources, minerals and pigments; camelid grazing; symbolic manifestations, and inter-Andean circulation. This suggests that human dynamics in the highlands of the Southern Puna toward the Late Holocene were motivated by a range of biotic and abiotic resources, and different modes of occupation, which tended to become diversified in the long term; nevertheless, they retained a common base in vicuña hunting and obsidian procurement, circulation and exchange.
1 Introduction
Human subsistence in high altitude environments poses unique biological and cultural adaptive challenges. Nonetheless, human exploration and settlement of these spaces in various regions of the world occurred at an early date, from the end of the Pleistocene (Aldenderfer, ; Brantingham et al., ; Barton, ; Borrero and Santoro, ; Zhao et al., 2023). In the case of the Andean Puna, recent investigations have shown that the initial peopling of the highlands occurred at different times for each region, triggering independent cultural courses (Rademaker et al., 2014; Capriles et al., ; Yacobaccio, 2017; Borrero and Santoro, ). The local sequences reconstructed in each area show large fluctuations in the long term, both in intensity and in the modes of occupation of the highlands. In particular, in the South-Central Andes a remarkable drop occurs in the intensity of the archaeological signal in the Middle Holocene (Núñez et al., , ; Yacobaccio and Morales, 2005; Pintar, , 2014; Barberena et al., , etc.), recovering at the start of the Late Holocene with the improvement in climatic conditions.
Recent studies in the southern part of the Andean Puna, known locally as the Puna de Copiapó, appear to confirm and expand the southern extent of this event. Many sites and finds recorded in the basins of the Infieles, Pedernales, Maricunga, and Alto Jorquera present a remarkable lacuna in occupation during the Middle Holocene (López et al., , ). The area was gradually re-occupied only well into the Late Holocene, with a notable increase in the material evidence in later periods. Based on the spatial and temporal variability of the archaeological record, our principal object in the present work is to evaluate the process of human re-occupation of the Puna de Copiapó during the Late Holocene. To attain this objective, our study uses an interdisciplinary approach to address various aspects relating to the mobility, settlement and technology of human societies, and how these relate with climate change events on a regional scale.
Our result points to three main directions. The first indicates that the arid event of the Middle Holocene had a significant impact on human mobility, manifested in lower or non-existent occupation of the area from 7,600 to 4,000 cal. BP. Second, the reappearance of the archaeological signal during the Late Holocene agrees with an improvement in environmental conditions ~3,000 years ago. The re-establishment of a wetter environment resulted in the formation of productive zones like wetlands and marshes, attracting hunter-gatherer groups who exploited the highlands on a seasonal basis as part of seasonal mobility circuits connecting different eco-zones like valleys and the coast. Finally, more extensive and diverse occupation of these environments occurred during later agro-ceramic periods, based on niche construction (sensu Zedeño et al., 2014). This required a significant investment of effort, the mobilization of communal work, and a certain knowledge of animal ethology, and would also have created tensions over territorial ownership, especially in pastoral societies (Lemke, ). Factors like the introduction of domestic animals and plants encouraged expansion to the highest limits of the agricultural systems in which they were produced, and also to the limits of the human physiological capacity to resist high altitude (over 2,500 masl), requiring and fostering new cultural solutions for high altitude environments (Barton, ).
2 Study area and environmental context
The Andes Mountains form the western border of South America over its whole length. The Atacama Region (26°-29°S), in the extreme north of Chile, holds the largest concentration of peaks over 6,000 masl in the country, such as Nevado San Francisco, Incahuasi, Tres Cruces and Nevado Ojos del Salado, the latter being the highest mountain in Chile at 6,893 masl. To the west, the Andes are flanked by the almost parallel Domeyko Range; between the two ranges lies the Great Pre-Altiplano Depression, formed by a chain of basins at altitudes between 3,300 and 4,200 masl. In recent years, we have carried out a high-mountain archaeology project in the salares (salt flats) of Infieles (26°S), Pedernales (26°S), Maricunga (26°S), Laguna Negro Francisco (27°S) and the basin of the upper Jorquera River (27°S) (Figures 1, 2a–d). The basin of Salar de Infieles covers an area of 293 km2 and the actual salt flat is around 6.7 km2 at a mean altitude of 3,520 masl. The basin of Salar de Pedernales (26°S) covers an area of 3,620 km2 and the salt flat covers around 335 km2 with a mean altitude of 3,356 masl. The Salar de Maricunga is an endorheic basin at 3,760 masl with affluents like the Colorado, Lamas and Ciénaga Redonda rivers. The salt flat covers 145 km2, while the area of the basin is 3,045 km2 and the area of its lagoons is 6 km2. The Negro Francisco lagoon is a salt-water lake at an altitude of 4,110 masl; the basin covers 933 km2 and the area covered by lagoons is 24.8 km2. Finally, the upper basin of the Jorquera River is one of the affluents of the Copiapó River; it is located in a transitional zone between the Puna and the principal range of the Andes, with rougher, more mountainous relief. This area is known as Vegas de Caspiche, due to the numerous marshes (vegas) that have formed at the base of Caspiche mountain. Lakes, wetlands and extensive salt flats form in the floors of all the basins, with abundant populations of flamingos (Phoenicoparrus andinus and Phoenicopterus chilensis) and other water birds such as egrets (Egretta thula and Ardea alba), various species of ducks (Anas flavirostris, Spatula puna, Lophonetta specularioides, etc.), camelids (Lama guanicoe and Vicugna vicugna), foxes (Lycalopex culpaeus and Lycalopex griseus), rodents like the tucu-tucu (Ctenomys spp.) and vizcachas (Lagidium viscacia), lizards (Liolaemus spp.), iguanas (Callopistes maculatus), and amphibians (Rhinella spinulosa).
Figure 1
Figure 2
The vegetation is Andean, dominated by grasslands, geophytes, marshes and bogs (bofedales), consisting principally of small bushes and grasses characteristic of the high steppes. There are also azonal formations, in the form of wetlands in the bottom of the ravines. Although the current climate is arid, the paleo-environmental records indicate various fluctuations in the past (Figure 2e). A climate marked by pulses of greater humidity has been inferred for the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene (Lamy et al.,
3 Archaeological background
Dates obtained in sites studied in the Puna de Copiapó allow us to contextualize human dynamics according to the chrono-cultural sequences proposed for the region. Recent studies in the Salar de Infieles (25°S) indicate an initial event of human occupation in site IN-1 at the end of the Pleistocene, from 12,800 to 11,900 cal. BP (López et al.,
For the period corresponding to the Middle Archaic, there is an abrupt hiatus in occupation between 7,500 and 4,000 cal. BP. During this period, human occupations in the Atacama Region were concentrated on the coast, and formed part of the so-called Cultura Anzuelo de Concha (shell fish-hook culture) recorded throughout the whole Atacama Region (Cervellino,
A third block of time marks the appearance of pottery-making groups. According to local summaries, the first occupations of the Early Ceramic Period occurred between 2,000 and 1,300 cal. BP, and form part of the Molle Cultural Complex, which spanned a territory from the Salado river in the north (26°S) to the Choapa river in the south (31°S) (Cabello et al.,
4 Materials and methods
Table 1 shows the Late Holocene sites in the study area, the size of the excavations carried out in each case, and the characteristics of each site. The dates available from each site are summarized in Table 2. MA-34 is the only site for which no 14C dates were obtained. For the purposes of this work, we focused on lithic, zooarchaeological, ceramic and spatial analyses of the evidence recovered in recent excavations and surface collections. We include complementary evidence obtained during field surveys, as well as data such as identification of obsidian sources defined in previous studies (Loyola et al.,
Table 1
| Site | Basin | Altitude | Size of excavation | Geoform | Time block |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN-1 | Infieles | 3,553 | 1 by 1 m | Salt flat beach | Late Pleistocene Early Holocene Late Holocene |
| PE-2 | Pedernales | 3,728 | 1 by 1 m | Mountainside | Late Holocene |
| PE-3 | Pedernales | 3,644 | 1 by 1 m | Rockshelter | Late Holocene |
| PE-38 | Pedernales | 3,780 | 2 by 1 m | Rockshelter and fluvial terrace | Early Holocene Late Holocene |
| MA-41 | Maricunga | 3,773 | 1 by 1 m | Rockshelter on shore of Santa Rosa lagoon | Late Holocene |
| MA-34 | Maricunga | 3,784 | Surface collection | Mountainside | Possibly Late Holocene |
| YH-1 | Jorquera | 3,830 | 1 by 1 m | Alluvial cone | Possibly Late Holocene |
| YH-2 | Jorquera | 3,829 | Column 30 cm wide | Fluvial terrace | Late Holocene |
Late Holocene archaeological sites in the study area.
Table 2
| Basin | Site | Laboratory code | Unit | SU | Feature | Level | Material | 14C years BP (1 sigma) | 14C calibrated BP (2 sigmas, 95.4%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jorquera | YH-2 | D-AMS 049680 | 1 | – | – | – | Charcoal | 3,723±24 | 4,146–3,909 |
| Jorquera | YH-2 | D-AMS 049681 | 1 | – | – | – | Bone | 2,161±22 | 2,290–2,013 |
| Maricunga | MA-41 | D-AMS 049678 | 1 | 1 | – | 6 (25–30 cm) | Vicugna vicugnabone | 512±21 | 535–496 |
| Maricunga | MA-41 | D-AMS 049679 | 1 | – | 4 | 10 (45–50 cm) | Charcoal | 665±22 | 653–552 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 040188 | 1 | – | 1 | 2 (5–10 cm) | Vicugna vicugnabone | 628±23 | 634–539 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 040191 | 1 | – | 1 | 1 (0–5 cm) | Charcoal | 650±19 | 645–549 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 039009 | 1 | – | 1 | 1 (0–5 cm) | Vicugna vicugnabone | 675±23 | 655–556 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 039007 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 (0–5 cm) | Vicugna vicugnabone | 1,121±23 | 1,054–928 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 039010 | 1 | – | 3 | 3 (10–15 cm) | Charcoal | 1,270±24 | 1,260–1,066 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 040192 | 1 | – | 4 | 4 (15–20 cm) | Charcoal | 1,739±23 | 1,698–1,536 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 040193 | 1 | – | 4 | 5 (20–25 cm) | Charcoal | 1,875±21 | 1,826–1,708 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 039008 | 1 | 2 | – | 4 (15–20 cm) | Vicugna vicugnabone | 1,786±25 | 1,709–1,585 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 039011 | 1 | – | 4 | 5 (20–25 cm) | Charcoal | 1,832±23 | 1,814–1,612 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 040190 | 1 | – | 4 | 5 (20–25 cm) | Charcoal | 2,010±23 | 1,998–1,839 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 040189 | 1 | – | 4 | 4 (15–20 cm) | Vicugna vicugnabone | 2,070±22 | 2,050–1,924 |
| Pedernales | PE-1 | D-AMS 039012 | 1 | 3 | – | 6 (25–30 cm) | Charcoal | 2.,484±26 | 2,705–2,357 |
| Pedernales | PE-2 | D-AMS 044475 | 1 | – | 1 | 5 (20–25 cm) | Charcoal | 1.597±20 | 1,522–1,374 |
| Pedernales | PE-2 | D-AMS 047322 | 1 | – | 1 | 5 (20–25 cm) | Vicugna vicugnabone | 1.484±22 | 1,366–1,301 |
| Pedernales | PE-2 | D-AMS 047321 | 1 | – | 4 | 9 (40–45 cm) | Vicugna vicugnabone | 1,360±23 | 1,290–1,177 |
| Pedernales | PE-3 | D-AMS 044476 | 1 | 1 | G | 12 (55–60 cm) | Charcoal | 570±22 | 556–510 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | UGAMS 53068 | 1 | 3 | – | 7 (30–35 cm) | Vicugna vicugnabone | 2,460±25 | 2,699–2,349 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | UGAMS 53067 | 2 | 2 | – | 5 (20–25 cm) | Charcoal | 2,620±20 | 2,763–2,522 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | D-AMS 040489 | 2 | – | 1 | 6 (50–60 cm) | Charcoal | 2,969±26 | 3,205–2,963 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | UGAMS 53069 | 2 | – | 3 | 10 (45–50 cm) | Vicugna vicugna bone | 6,870 ± 30 | 7,744–7,584 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | UGAMS 53066 | 1 | 1 | – | 3 (10–15 cm) | Vicugna vicugna bone | 7,370 ± 30 | 8,283–8,022 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | UGAMS 53072 | 2 | 3 | – | 11 (50–55 cm) | Charcoal | 7,660 ± 30 | 8,520–8,365 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | UGAMS 53071 | 2 | 3 | – | 12 (55–60 cm) | Vicugna vicugna bone | 8,060 ± 30 | 9,017–8,724 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | D-AMS 044474 | 2 | 3 | – | 12 (55–60 cm) | Charcoal | 8,422 ± 30 | 9,489–9,294 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | UGAMS 53070 | 2 | – | 3 | 11 (50–55 cm) | Vicugna vicugna bone | 8,740 ± 30 | 9,885–9,543 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | D-AMS 040490 | 2 | 3 | – | 11 (50–55 cm) | Charcoal | 8,867 ± 36 | 10.151–9,696 |
| Pedernales | PE-38 | D-AMS 044473 | 2 | – | 3 | 11 (50–55 cm) | Charcoal | 8,884 ± 32 | 10,158–9,733 |
| Pedernales | PE-5 | D-AMS 047320 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 (0–5 cm) | Vicugna vicugna bone | 9,768 ± 38 | 11,241–10,879 |
| Pedernales | PE-5 | D-AMS 047317 | 1 | – | 1 | 8 (35–40 cm) | Charcoal | 9,499 ± 39 | 11,067–10,570 |
| Pedernales | PE-5 | D-AMS 047313 | 1 | 5 | – | 11 (50–55 cm) | Charcoal | 9,447 ± 36 | 10,749–10,511 |
| Pedernales | PE-5 | D-AMS 047315 | 1 | – | 3 | 11 (50–55 cm) | Charcoal | 9,437 ± 36 | 10,736–10,509 |
| Pedernales | PE-5 | D-AMS 047314 | 1 | – | 3 | 12 (55–60 cm) | Charcoal | 9,536 ± 37 | 11,072–10,589 |
| Pedernales | PE-5 | D-AMS 047316 | 1 | – | 3 | 12 (55–60 cm) | Charcoal | 9,933 ± 39 | 11,612–11,201 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 047318 | 1 | – | 2 | 2 (5–10 cm) | Charcoal | 1,086±22 | 1,041–921 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 053485 | F1 | – | 2 | 4 (15–20 cm) | Charcoal | 2,240±23 | 2,326 -,2119 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 053486 | F1 | 3 | – | 12 (55–60 cm) | Charcoal | 9,349 ± 41 | 10,658–10,301 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 047324 | 1 | 5 | – | 12 (55–60 cm) | Vicugna vicugna bone | 9,733 ± 46 | 11,228–10,799 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 053488 | F1 | – | 4 | 14 (65–70 cm) | Charcoal | 10,053 ± 34 | 11,710–11,286 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 053487 | F1 | – | 4 | 13 (60–65 cm) | Charcoal | 10,100 ± 42 | 11,831–11,319 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 047325 | 1 | 6 | – | 13 (60–65 cm) | Vicugna vicugna bone | 10,350 ± 38 | 12,443–11,891 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 047319 | 1 | 6–7 | – | 13 (60–65 cm) | Charcoal | 10,209 ± 46 | 11,967–11,633 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 048105 | 1 | 6–7 | – | 13 (60–65 cm) | Vicugna vicugna bone | 10,327 ± 46 | 12,440–11,846 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 053490 | F1 | 4 | – | 15 (70–75 cm) | Mammalia bone | 10,394 ± 41 | 12,467–11,975 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 053489 | F1 | – | 5 | 16 (75–80 cm) | Charcoal | 10,397 ± 41 | 12,469–11,979 |
| Infieles | IN-1 | D-AMS 053491 | F1 | 4 | – | 16 (75–80 cm) | Vicugna vicugna bone | 10,849 ± 41 | 12,830–12,717 |
Radiocarbon dates of the Infieles, Pedernales, Maricunga, and Jorquera sites during the Late Holocene.
Late Holocene dates marked in black.
Analysis of ceramic remains was based on macroscopic observation of the material noting the following variables: (a) superficial treatment, e.g., smooth, brushed or polished; (b) thickness of walls; (c) shapes, defining segments such as rim, neck and body; (d) firing, determined by categories such as absence and presence, as well as (c) complete or incomplete. The number of zooarchaeological remains is defined by the Number of Identified Specimens (NISP). Analysis of taxonomic abundance is calculated based on the Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI). The frequency of anatomical units was measured by the minimum number of skeletal elements (MNE), the Minimum Number of Animal Units (MAU) and the %MAU. We calculated the indices of Species Richness (NTaxa), Diversity (Shannon Index, H′) and Evenness (J′) in order to compare the sites from the whole cultural sequence of the basins studied. The last two indices were calculated by multiplying the MNI by the average weight of each taxon in life. The taxonomic categories of Mammalia, Rodentia and Aves were eliminated from the calculation due to the problems of quantifying fragments involving species of different sizes.
Lithic analysis focused on two sites, PE-38 and IN-1, as they contained the longest sequences found in any of the salt flats. The materials were separated into general technical classes (core, retouched tools, bifacial pieces, and knapping remains), and subdivided into specific typological groups. The following variables were then recorded: (a) class of rock and variety of raw material; (b) percentage of cortex in increasing intervals; (c) dimensions (length, width, thickness) and weight; (d) type of blank; (e) preparation procedure and knapping technique; (f) knapping accidents; (g) types of fracture; (h) intensity and extent of thermal alterations; (i) intensity and extent of abrasion. The knapping operational chains were reconstructed based on diacritical schemes of selected pieces. Knapping techniques were inferred from comparison with references pieces and the recognition of technical attributes proposed in experimental works (Pelegrin,
Spatial analysis focused on calculating the least-cost paths between various locations with archaeological evidences (Table 3), such as malacological remains, ceramic and rock art motifs, typological affinities and obsidian sources. The archaeological obsidian samples included are detailed in Supplementary material 1 and mainly consist of knapping remains; the samples from IN-1 and MA-34 were collected on the surface (Loyola et al.,
Where š and s are the slope in percentage terms.
Table 3
| Location | Description | X | Y | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cerro Manchado | Obsidian source | 512,672 | 6,985,484 | Chile |
| Ciénaga Redonda | Obsidian source | 490,202 | 7,007,025 | Chile |
| Hualfín | Rock art | 713,424 | 6,986,031 | Argentina |
| IN-1 | Site | 495,920 | 7,129,276 | Chile |
| MA-34 | Site | 482,476 | 7,004,695 | Chile |
| MA-41 | Site | 482,754 | 7,003,699 | Chile |
| Ona-Las Cuevas | Obsidian source | 600,347 | 7,185,397 | Argentina |
| Pacific Ocean | Malacological | 337,497.732 | 7,085,352.701 | Chile |
| PE-2 | Site | 500,797 | 7,065,278 | Chile |
| PE-22 | Site | 475,610 | 7,085,984 | Chile |
| PE-3 | Site | 500,991 | 7,064,833 | Chile |
| PE-38 | Site | 475,711.0584 | 7,086,237.731 | Chile |
| Salar de Punta Negra | Projectile point | 511,565.6924 | 7,299,566.461 | Chile |
| Salar del Hombre Muerto | Obsidian source | 694,867 | 7,190,801 | Argentina |
Locations used to calculate least-cost paths.
Table 4
| From | To | Connection |
|---|---|---|
| IN-1 | Hualfín | Rock art at Punta del Pueblo and ceramic of the Condorhuasi tradition from Río Diablo |
| IN-1 | Ona-Las Cuevas | Obsidian |
| IN-1 | Salar de Punta Negra | Projectile point |
| MA-34 | Cerro Manchado | Obsidian |
| MA-34 | Ciénaga Redonda | Obsidian |
| MA-41 | Cerro Manchado | Obsidian |
| MA-41 | Ciénaga Redonda | Obsidian |
| PE-2 | Cerro Manchado | Obsidian |
| PE-2 | Ciénaga Redonda | Obsidian |
| PE-2 | Ona-Las Cuevas | Obsidian |
| PE-2 | Pacific Ocean | Malacological (olive snail) |
| PE-2 | Salar del Hombre Muerto | Obsidian |
| PE-22 | Salar de Punta Negra | Obsidian |
| PE-3 | Pacific Ocean | Malacological (olive snail) |
| PE-3 | Salar del Hombre Muerto | Obsidian |
| PE-38 | Cerro Manchado | Obsidian |
| PE-38 | Pacific Ocean | Malacological (olive snail) |
| PE-38 | Ciénaga Redonda | Obsidian |
Least-cost paths calculated and the hypothetical connection between the locations.
Apart from the gradient, we considered it important to include the possible cost of moving across different soil types; we therefore added the Land Use Registers for the Atacama Region (Corporación Nacional Forestal,
A multiplication cost was assigned to the soil types present; in other words, for a soil type that presented no difficulty in crossing, the slope would be multiplied by 1; while for a high-cost type, such as crossing a lagoon, the slope would be multiplied by 10 (details available in Supplementary material 2a–c). We then added a border to the resulting raster with a cost value of 300 to increase the efficiency of the analysis and avoid errors of direction; finally, we calculated the least-cost path by Dijkstra's (
5 Results
Our inter-disciplinary study involved chronological, paleoenvironmental, and different artifactual and ecofactual analyses of the evidence obtained. It is important to discuss the ecofactual evidence within a comparative framework including different periods. Data such as the origin of obsidian sources, ceramic types and their origin, rock art styles and other complementary evidence are also addressed, as they are basic information for calculating least-cost paths.
5.1 Zooarchaeology
The samples studied to calculate the NISP are detailed in Table 5, and for MNI in Supplementary material 3. Wild camelid hunting is undoubtedly one of the economic activities most frequently represented throughout the sequence. In almost all the sites, except PE-5, vicuña (Vicugna vicugna) is by far the preferred prey (Figure 3A). Although the NTaxa indicates that the numbers of some taxa decline toward the Late Holocene, the trend in the type of species is relatively similar from the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene, considering the inclusion of remains by natural means, especially rodents (Cricetidae) and lizards (Liolaemus spp.) in sites located on blocks of ignimbrite like PE-5 and PE-38 (Table 5). This is reflected in the Diversity and Evenness indices, which present no remarkable changes over the whole sequence, considering that the greatest species diversity in the puna is found in birds, which are scarcely present in the archaeological record (Figure 3B).
Table 5
| Taxa | PE-1 | PE-2 | PE-3 | PE-38 | PE-38 | IN-1 | IN-1 | MA-41 | YH-2 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late Holocene | Late Holocene | Late Holocene | Late Holocene | Early Holocene Middle Holocene | Late Pleistocene Early Holocene | Late Holocene | Late Holocene | Late Holocene | ||
| 1 × 1 m | 1 × 1 m | 1 × 1 m | 2 × 1 m | 1 × 1 m | 1 × 1m | 30 cm | ||||
| 0.63 m3 | 0.65 m3 | 1.6 m3 | 2.46 m3 | 0.05 m3 | 0.66 m3 | column | ||||
| Mammalia | 1,354 | 3,393 | 649 | 396 | 504 | 112 | 4 | 398 | 93 | 6,903 |
| Camelidae | 24 | 161 | 46 | 25 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 294 |
| Lama guanicoe-Lama sp. | 7 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 35 |
| Vicugna vicugna | 337 | 309 | 83 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 2 | 62 | 18 | 844 |
| Puma concolor | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Lycalopex culpaeus | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Rodentia | 18 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| Cricetidae | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Chinchillidae | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| Lagidium viscacia | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Aves (bones) | 15 | 0 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 82 |
| Passeriformes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Phoenicpoteridae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Liolaemus sp. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Indeterminate taxa | 37 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 54 |
| Total | 1,804 | 3,869 | 822 | 450 | 555 | 144 | 6 | 502 | 131 | 8,283 |
Taxonomic representation expressed in NISP for each site studied.
Figure 3

(A) General characteristics of Vicugna vicugna, (B) Indices: NTaxa, Diversity, and Evenness from the Late Pleistocene to the Late Holocene, and (C) remains of metapodial bones with signs of intentional fracture.
In previous works carried out in the study area we have discussed a series of expectations related to the use of logistical camps or residential base camps (López et al.,
The frequency of bones in Early Holocene events is consistent with the expectations for logistical camps, while for later events (especially pottery-making groups), the similar frequency of bones from the skeletal axis and the appendices reflects a pattern consistent with residential bases used for long periods during summer seasons. Several remains of metapodial bones present signs of intentional breakage (Figure 3C). In both time blocks there are indicators of seasonal use, such as eggshells from Phoenicopteridae, which lay from December to March. These trends suggest summer use, around the time when vicuña young are born. However, a notable change in mobility occurs during the Late Holocene, indicating a shift to residential use.
5.2 Hunting structures
Other evidence related to camelid hunting in the area includes a series of structures used during hunting and carcass processing. These structures consist of trenches-shelters and work surfaces (see Moreno,
Figure 4

(a) Activities performed in the hunting structures: 1. Prey sighting, 2. Encounter hunting, and 3. Butchering, (b) shelter and trench in Salar de Pedernales, (c) possible work surface at site PE-18, (d) possible warning beacon at site PE-18, and (e) basal fragment of projectile point from PE-18.
5.3 Lithic technology and raw material procurement
Another strongly represented activity is lithic procurement and tool manufacture. Of the sites studied, we have lithic technology information only for PE-38 and IN-1. The lithic assemblage from PE-38 consists of 1,270 pieces, of which 345 date to the Late Holocene occupation between levels 3 and 7 (Figure 5A). Of this group, 88.41% are siliceous rocks; 71.30% are of a greenish, grained variety probably of local origin. The (much smaller) second-largest group consists of tuff (8.99%), and there are other minority rock types including obsidian from the Ciénaga Redonda-Cerro Manchado source 70 km further south, in the Salar de Maricunga (Loyola et al.,
Figure 5

(A) Frequency of lithic pieces by level of excavation at PE-38, (B) frequency of lithic pieces by level of excavation at IN-1, and (C) distribution of lithic pieces by weight bands.
The sample consists mainly of non-diagnostic knapping remains (Table 6). There are a few flakes from advanced bifacial shaping (n = 22) and pressure knapping (n = 15), related to projectile point manufacture. Other pieces, like a retouch flake of a unifacial tool and a circular end-scraper with indications of re-sharpening (Supplementary material 4a), suggest to a lesser degree the production and use of retouched tools (Loyola et al.,
Table 6
| Category | PE-38 | IN-1 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retouched tools | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Spike-shaped lithic | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| End-scraper | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lithic remains | 344 | 137 | 481 |
| Cortical flake | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Non-cortical flake | 54 | 16 | 70 |
| Non-modified blank | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Bifacial shaping flake | 22 | 5 | 27 |
| Unidirectional retouch flake | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Pressure flake | 15 | 2 | 17 |
| Splinter bladelet | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Indeterminate flake | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Flake fragment | 223 | 61 | 284 |
| Indeterminate fragment | 14 | 43 | 57 |
| Splintered piece | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Indeterminate | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Core | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Non-modified nodule | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Unidirectional core | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Thermal-shock fragment | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Indeterminate | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 345 | 142 | 487 |
Technological classes of the lithic assemblages.
The majority of the non-diagnostic knapping remains fall into groups of small size and low weight, confirming that the final stages of the operative chains for the manufacture of unifacial and bifacial tools were performed at the site. All this suggests that the tools entered the settlement already finished, or at least as preforms and blanks to be used, maintained and exported at the end of occupation; in some cases, the tools were discarded in the site. These trends agree with the expected activities of a short-stay hunting camp in the highlands during the Late Archaic Period, probably occupied during the summer by task-groups.
The IN-1 assemblage consists of 281 pieces, of which 142 come from levels 3 to 7. These levels contain dates from the Late Holocene. The predominant rocks in this group are chalcedony (55.63%) and siliceous rocks (31.69%) (Figure 5B). Both raw materials form part of the same outcrop located in the neighborhood of the site (López et al.,
Retouched tools are scarce in the Late Holocene levels. However, surface finds of these and other types in the study area indicate a great typological diversity in projectile points during this period. In PE-38, several small and medium-sized stemmed projectile points were recorded (Figure 6A) which present dimensional and technological differences from the points known for the Early Holocene in the site (Loyola et al.,
Figure 6

Types of projectile points and bifaces recorded in the basins studied: (A) PE-38, (B) IN-1, (C) PE-18, (D) PE-3, (E) PE-2, and (F–H) YH-2.
To analyze the origin of the obsidian pieces used as references in the least-cost path analyses, we included 46 archaeological samples analyzed in previous works. Of these, 29 come from the Cerro Manchado-Ciénaga Redonda source (Salar de Maricunga), 11 from Ona-Las Cuevas and four from the Salar del Hombre Muerto (Catamarca, NWA); the last two samples are unassigned (Supplementary material 5).
5.4 Ceramics
The fragments recovered at IN-1 belong to one or two similar vessels, of restricted compound profile, with thin walls, polished exterior and smooth interior. The exterior decoration is incised in dotted fields with traces of red pigment, delimited by straight lines, which indicate a link with the Río Diablo phase of the Condorhuasi tradition of NWA (González et al.,
Figure 7

(a, b) Ceramic fragments from IN-1 ascribed to the Río Diablo phase, (c–e1) monochrome fragments from PE-2, (e2) detail of red pigment, and (e3) cross section, (f) fragment of Inka ceramic from PE-2, (g) incised fragment, possibly Historical, from PE-2, (h–l) ceramic fragments from PE-3, (m) Copiapó type fragment from YH-1, (n) mineralized copper including a collar-bead pre-form from site PE-3, and (o)Felicioliva peruviana from site PE-3.
Table 7
| Site | n | Cultural affiliation | Chronology |
|---|---|---|---|
| IN-1 | 5 | Condorhuasi Río Diablo | Formative (ca. 2,650–2,450 BP) |
| PE-2 | 18 | Indeterminate, probably pre-hispanic tradition | Indeterminate |
| PE-2 | – | Inka (surface observation) | Late period (550/500–414 BP) |
| PE-3 | 9 | Possibly historical | Later than 414 AP |
| PE-2 | 1 | Possibly historical | Later than 414 AP |
| YH-1 | 1 | Copiapó culture | Late intermediate/late period (ca. 650–414 BP) |
Detail of the ceramic remains found in Infieles (IN), Pedernales (PE) and Jorquera (YH), together with their cultural ascription and chronology.
5.5 Production and circulation of personal adornments
In sites such as PE-2 and PE-3, remains of copper ore were recovered. This can be associated with bead production (Figure 7n), although not on the same scale as in the areas where mass production occurred, like the surroundings of Mina Las Turquesas, exploited from the Formative Period (ca. 3,150–1,350 BP) to the Late Period (ca. 550–414 BP) (González et al.,
5.6 Rock art
In Infieles we find a remarkable record of rock paintings and carvings, both pre-Hispanic and Historical, the former including both non-figurative (lines, rectangles, ovals, triangles, irregular forms), and figurative designs (anthropomorphic and zoomorphic, see Supplementary material 6). These rock paintings represent styles associated with Punta del Pueblo in Antofagasta de la Sierra (1,450–950 BP), typical of NWA; Las Ánimas motifs (1,450–950 BP); the Late Intermediate/Late Period (950–414 BP) based on rock-art styles from the northern and central parts of the Atacama Region (González et al.,
The representations associated with Punta del Pueblo are linked to caravan groups from Antofagasta de la Sierra, reflecting possible ceremonial activities at the site, as indicated by Martel et al. (
5.7 Integrating the information: spatial analysis and inter-regional connection
Based on the multiple types of evidence recovered and described above, integration of the information and application of spatial analysis enabled us to calculate successfully 18 least-cost paths (Figures 8a, b), showing paths indicating high interconnectivity between sites. At a first level of analysis, we may consider that circulation paths existed from and between the salt flats of the puna during the Late Holocene, providing interconnections between points on the west or Pacific slope and coast, and the intermediate sectors of Argentina. The Infieles, Pedernales, and Maricunga salt flats present spatial configurations that favor circulation paths, as has been shown by other lines of evidence (see Supplementary material 7–13).
Figure 8

(a) Map of least-cost paths by location and link, (b) section of the study area.
The novel aspect of this work is the finding that the paths are superimposed, with the same path used from different starting points. This is the case of the best paths from PE-2 and PE-3, and from PE-38 to the Pacific, which, although the starting points are more than 32 km apart, both follow the course of the Salado river. Furthermore, to reach the start of the climb up the Cuesta Montandón from PE-2 and PE-3, the path necessarily passes by the path to PE-38 and PE-22. The Cerro Manchado obsidian source is more difficult to reach than the relatively nearby Ciénaga Redonda, due to its high altitude and the need to climb up toward Los Patos volcano (see Loyola et al.,
The access paths to the raw material sources of Ona-Las Cuevas from sites IN-1 and PE-2 differ completely. From IN-1, passing through Salar de Aguilar and then Salar de la Isla, a direct crossing through the mountains is established at the latitude of Laguna Aguas Calientes, passing subsequently through Laguna Los Patos. From PE-2, on the other hand, the path would cross Salar de Piedra Parada in an easterly direction, reaching the frontier almost level with Laguna Brava Norte, and then deviating northwards close to Salar del León Muerto. From there, the path continues to the north-east, passing between Salinas del Fraile to the east and Laguna Vega Larga to the west, to reach a number of small lakes such as Laguna Cajeros and joining the path from IN-1 between Cerro Los Patos and Cerro Lila. The path to Salar del Hombre Muerto from PE-3 and PE-2 is exactly the same as the path to Ona-Las Cuevas; however, it diverges at the level of Volcán Colorados, heading north-east across the Salar de Antofalla, and then passing Laguna de Caro to reach the source of materials at Laguna del Hombre Muerto.
In the case of the paths from IN-1 and PE-2 to Ona-Las Cuevas, and from PE-3 and PE-2 to Salar del Hombre Muerto, we observe that they offer direct, safe connection along mobility circuits very well-supplied with water and local flora and fauna. The route from site PE-2 to Salar de Punta Negra might appear difficult, however the least-cost path climbs to the north along the edge of Pedernales to the lower part of Cerro Bolsón, where it joins the path from IN-1. From there it turns north, passing close by Salar de Aguilar, then Salar de Agua Amarga and finally Salar de Pajonales, which leads directly to Salar de Punta Negra. This path is quite interesting, since the accumulated cost analyses show that it has the highest cost per km. Nevertheless, it supports the thesis of interregional mobility in areas close to reliable fauna and plant resources. Finally, the longest and most improbable path is that connecting site IN-1 with the area of Hualfín, a distance of 293.33 km. The path leads south-east, bordering Infieles, though a number of ravines until it comes close to Lagunas Bravas. There it crosses into modern-day Argentina, where it connects with the system of streams and rivers fed by snow-melt, between Manantiales and Bayo mountains. This connects in turn with the area of high Andean and Puna lakes including Laguna del Peinado, Laguna Purolla and Mar de Olas, east of Robledo volcano. This route continues past the lakes at the foot of Cerro Pabellón to Río Belén, and finally reaches Hualfín.
6 Discussion
The results of our research take us in three directions. In first place, the arid event of the Middle Holocene had a significant impact on human mobility, which was manifested in a low to null archaeological signal between 7,600 and 4,000 cal. years BP. The second refers to the fact that the repopulation of the area during the Late Holocene coincides with an improvement in environmental conditions ~3,000 years ago. In the third place, during later agro-ceramic periods, a more significant and diverse occupation of the environments was experienced, consolidating niche construction. The drastic hiatus in occupation of the Puna de Copiapó between 7,600 and 4,000 cal. BP coincides with the so-called “Archaeological Silence” proposed for the Atacama puna (Núñez and Santoro,
Some authors have attributed this phenomenon to a demographic bottle-neck (Barberena et al.,
After 2,000 cal. years BP, the archaeological signal increases considerably, both in the density and number of occupations, as well as in the types of sites, reflecting a diversification in modalities of occupation and land-use. The best represented activities are camelid hunting and plant gathering. The hunting structures and landscapes also indicate that the capture of vicuña and guanacos was an important activity during the Late Holocene, suggesting intensification in the exploitation and construction of a specific niche (Zedeño et al., 2014; Lemke,
With the occupation of groups that manufactured pottery, other forms of land use in highlands areas start to appear. In various sectors of the marshes formed by the Juncalito river we have documented land and corrals used for animals, with deposits of fecal remains; these marshes would therefore have been used as foraging areas, probably as part of transhumantic grazing circuits. Moreover, sites like PE-38 and IN-1 were evidently used during visits to sources of rocks and minerals. Notable among the latter is a pigment, easily available in the vicinity, which was used profusely in rock paintings. Other sites, like MA-41 in the Maricunga basin, show local exploitation of black obsidian from the Ciénaga Redonda-Cerro Manchado source (Loyola et al.,
The analyses of least-cost paths between the various sites suggest an interconnected space between the mobility routes of the human groups. They establish clearly the possibility of north-south traffic from Salar de Punta Negra in the north to Salar de Maricunga in the far south, as well as east-west movement between the Pacific coast and NWA. It is interesting to note that all the optimum paths observed pass through areas of wetlands, bogs, salt flats and lakes, considered a crucial factor in extensive, large-scale mobility circuits. This is corroborated by various materials like the Felicioliva peruviana shells at sites PE-2 and PE-3, connected by the path with PE-38 where materials associated with the Huentelauquén Cultural Complex were recorded (López et al.,
7 Conclusions
In conclusion, the research carried out in the Southern Puna indicates an almost total absence of occupations between 3,200 and 7,500 cal. years BP, with the exception of a date of 4,146–3,909 cal. years BP in the Jorquera River. These results confirm that the arid event of the Middle Holocene did indeed have a significant impact on the low archaeological signal between 7,500 and 4,000 cal. years BP. As environmental conditions became more humid, the Puna de Atacama was re-occupied by hunter-gatherer groups, although with low-intensity occupations until the appearance of the first records of pottery makers. This may be attributable to the gradual rate of repopulation from 3,200 cal. years BP, due to the alternation of arid and humid phases (Maldonado et al.,
It is from the appearance of ceramic groups that a greater intensification in the occupation of space is observed, but also a greater diversification of the interests linked to the use of these high Andean environments. To date our excavations in sites from late periods are scarce, but surface finds associated with corrals, structures and rock-art denote that these spaces were occupied by herders. For now, we cannot confirm or dismiss that this process of domestication was local, as occurred in the Salar de Atacama (Núñez et al.,
Finally, the archaeological evidence does not fully fit the chronological and cultural sequences defined for the valleys and coast of the current Atacama Region. The Puna functioned as a series of nodes and internodes related mainly to high mountain basins and passes, and to a lesser extent to valleys and the Pacific coast. The construction of chrono-cultural sequences must therefore consider these cultural interactions, especially with NWA, given the presence of Condorhuasi Río Diablo ceramics, Punta del Pueblo rock art from Antofagasta de la Sierra and obsidian from the Ona-Las Cuevas and Salar del Hombre Muerto in Catamarca. The above goes hand in hand with the idea that important nodes can develop in hostile or scarcely productive areas such as the mountains, with strong contrasts in the density of activities and interactions (Nielsen,
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author
Ethics statement
The research with archaeological evidence was approved by the National Monuments Council of Chile (Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales, Chile). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
PL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RL: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. CC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization. EL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization. VM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was financed by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) through Fondecyt Projects 1190197 and 1240193.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the whole team who took part in the processes of excavation and analysis of the archaeological evidence: Luciana Quiroz, Pablo Díaz-Jarufe, Pablo Mariani, Ariel Sperling, Francisca Vera, Francisca Santana-Sagredo, Daniel Varas, Alethia Quirgas, Daniel Hernández, Angélica Soto, Valentina Flores-Aqueveque, Antonio Maldonado, Diego Mayorga, Josefina de la Barra, Vanessa Orrego, and Bárbara Neumann. Finally, we thank our colleague Daniel Pavlovic for his help in the assignation of some of the ceramic fragments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fearc.2024.1423960/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AldenderferM. (2011). Peopling the Tibetan plateau: insights from archaeology. High Alt. Med. Biol.12, 141–147. 10.1089/ham.2010.1094
2
AscheroC.HocsmanS. (2011). Arqueología de las ocupaciones cazadoras-recolectoras de fines del Holoceno Medio de Antofagasta de la Sierra (Puna Meridional Argentina). Chungara43, 393–411. 10.4067/S0717-73562011000300005
3
AscheroC.MartínezJ. (2001). Técnicas de caza en Antofagasta de la Sierra, Puna Meridional Argentina. Rel. Soc. Arg. Antrop. XXVI, 215–241.
4
BarberenaR.MéndezC.de PorrasM. E. (2017). Zooming out from archaeological discontinuities: the meaning of mid-Holocene temporal troughs in South American deserts. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 46, 68–81. 10.1016/j.jaa.2016.07.003
5
BartonL. (2016). The cultural context of biological adaptation to high elevation Tibet. Archaeol. Res. Asia5, 4–11. 10.1016/j.ara.2016.01.001
6
BorreroL. A.SantoroC. (2022). Metapopulation processes in the long-term colonization of the andean highlands in South America. J. World Prehist. 35, 135–162. 10.1007/s10963-022-09167-x
7
BrantinghamP. J.XingG.MadsenD. B.RhodeD.PerreaultC.h.van der WoerdJ.et al. (2013). Late occupation of the high-elevation northern Tibetan Plateau based on cosmogenic, luminescence, and radiocarbon ages. Geoarchaeology28, 413–431. 10.1002/gea.21448
8
BravoG. (2022). Redécouvrir le site de Bahía Maldonado (27°S): une première approche des chasseurs-cueilleurs archaïques du secteur septentrional de la région semi-aride du Chili. Antipodes Ann. Fond. Martine Aublet. 10.48728/antipodes.220117
9
CabelloG.GonzálezC.GarridoF. (2010). “Revisitando la secuencia cronológico cultural de la Región de Atacama” in Identidades en Diálogo: Articulando Actores y Construyendo Realidades. Estudio fortalecimiento de la identidad regional de Atacama, ed. M. Lorca (Santiago: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Árida), 31–49.
10
CaprilesJ.Albarracin-JordanJ.LombardoU.OsorioD.MaleyB.GoldsteinS.et al. (2016). High-altitude adaptation and late Pleistocene foraging in the Bolivian Andes. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 6, 463–474. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.03.006
11
CervellinoM. (1998). “El Período Arcaico en la Región de Atacama. Caza-Recolección y Pesca Marítima (9000 años a 100 años Antes de Cristo),” in Culturas Prehistóricas de Copiapó, eds. H. Niemeyer, M. Cervellino, and G. Castillo (Copiapó: Museo Regional de Atacama), 39–60.
12
CiriglianoiN. A.PalloiiM. C. (2016). Entre caminos y equinos: un modelo SIG para localizar sitios arqueológicos de momentos históricos ecuestres (Provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina). Rev. Chil. Antropol.32, 89–101. 10.5354/0719-1472.2015.42502
13
Corporación Nacional Forestal (2018). Catastro y actualización de los recursos vegetacionales y uso de la tierra de la Región de Atacama (III). CONAF. Available online at: https://ide.minagri.gob.cl/geoweb/2019/11/22/planificacion-catastral/ (accessed March 23, 2024).
14
Corporación Nacional Forestal (2019). Catastro y actualización de los recursos vegetacionales y uso de la tierra de la Región de Antofagasta (II). CONAF. Available online at: https://ide.minagri.gob.cl/geoweb/2019/11/22/planificacion-catastral/ (accessed March 23, 2024).
15
De PorrasM.MaldonadoA.De Pol-HolzR.LatorreC.BetancourtJ. (2017). Late Quaternary environmental dynamics in the Atacama Desert reconstructed from rodent midden pollen records. J. Quat. Sci. 32, 665–684. 10.1002/jqs.2980
16
De SouzaP. (2004). Cazadores recolectores del Arcaico Temprano y Medio en la cuenca superior del río Loa: sitios, conjuntos líticos y sistemas de asentamientos. Estud. Atacameños27, 7–42. 10.4067/S0718-10432004002700002
17
DijkstraE. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math. 1, 269–271. 10.1007/BF01386390
18
GaeteN. (1999). Evidencias de dominio incaico en la región de Atacama: Hacia una sistematización de la ocupación de la cuenca del río Jorquera. Estud. Atacameños18, 223–236. 10.22199/S07181043.1999.0018.00016
19
GarridoF. (2004). ¿Qué sucedió en Copiapó? Una aproximación a la cultura Copiapó a partir de la alfarería. Actas del V Congreso Chileno de Antropología, 35–79. Available online at: https://www.aacademica.org/v.congreso.chileno.de.antropologia/71 (accessed March 23, 2024).
20
GarridoF. (2010). El camélido sagrado y el hombre de los valles: una aproximación a la Cultura Copiapó y sus relaciones a partir de la alfarería (degree thesis). Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
21
GonzálezC.LópezP.CarracedoC.CarrascoC.LatorreE.LoyolaR.et al. (2023). Salar de Infieles (25°S-69°O): ocupaciones alfareras, arte rupestre e interrelaciones culturales de un asentamiento de las tierras altas, Región de Atacama, Chile. Rev. Mus. Antropol. 16, 67–86. 10.31048/1852.4826.v16.n2.40305
22
GonzálezC.WestfallC.CastellsC. (2017). Mina Las Turquesas: lapidaria, secuencia alfarera prehispánica e interrelaciones culturales en un espacio internodal del Desierto de Atacama, Chile. Estud. Atacameños56, 225–251. 10.4067/S0718-10432017005000007
23
Gooong. (2024). Least-Cost Path (1.1) [Software]. Github. Avaailable online at: https://github.com/Gooong/LeastCostPath (accessed March 23, 2024).
24
GordilloS. (2021). Caracoles marinos en contextos arqueológicos en el centro de Argentina (32° LS - 64° LO): materialidades simbólicas extendidas en el territorio. Chungara53, 379–398. 10.4067/S0717-73562021005001301
25
GrosjeanM.Valero-GarcésB.GeyhM.MesserliB.SchottererU.SchreierH.et al. (1997). Mid and Late Holocene limnogeology of Laguna del Negro Francisco, northern Chile and its paleoclimatic implications. Holocene7, 151–159. 10.1177/095968369700700203
26
HerzogI. (2010). “Theory and Practice of Cost Functions”, in CAA2010. Fusion of Cultures: Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, eds. F. Contreras, M. Farjas, and F.J. Melero (Granada: Bar International Series 2494), 375–382.
27
HerzogI. (2014). Least-cost paths-some methodological issues. Int. Archaeol. 36. 10.11141/ia.36.5
28
HerzogI. (2021). Issues in replication and stability of least-cost path calculations. Stud. Digit. Herit.5, 131–155. 10.14434/sdh.v5i2.33796
29
KimJ. H.SchneiderR. R.HebbelnD.MullerP. J.WeferG. (2002). Last deglacial sea-surface temperature evolution in the Southeast Pacific compared to climate changes on the South American continent. Quat. Sci. Rev. 21, 2085–2097. 10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00012-4
30
KockS. T.SchittekK.MächtleB.WisselH.MaldonadoA.LückeA. (2020). Late Holocene environmental changes reconstructed from stable isotope and geochemical records from a cushion-plant peatland in the Chilean Central Andes (27S). J. Quat. Sci. 34, 153–164. 10.1002/jqs.3088
31
KullC.GrosjeanM.VeitH. (2002). Modeling modern and Late Pleistocene glacio-climatological conditions in the North Chilean Andes (29°S-30°S). Clim. Change52, 359–381. 10.1023/A:1013746917257
32
LamyF.HebbelnD.WeferG. (1998). Late Quaternary precessional cycles of terrigenous sediment input of the Norte Chico, Chile (27.5° S) and palaeoclimatic implications. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 140, 233–244. 10.1016/S0031-0182(98)90052-9
33
LamyF.KlumpJ.HebbelnD.WeferG. (2000). Late quaternary rapid climate change in northern Chile. Terra Nova12, 8–13. 10.1046/j.1365-3121.2000.00265.x
34
LatorreC.BetancourtJ. L.ArroyoM. K. (2006). Late Quaternary vegetation and climate history of a perennial river canyon in the Río Salado basin (22°S) of Northern Chile. Quat. Res. 65, 450–466. 10.1016/j.yqres.2006.02.002
35
LemkeA. (2021). Literal niche construction: built environments of hunter-gatherers and hunting architecture. J. Anthropol. Archaeol.62:101276. 10.1016/j.jaa.2021.101276
36
LloberaM.SluckinT. J. (2007). Zigzagging: theoretical insights on climbing strategies. J. Theor. Biol. 249, 206–217. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.020
37
López RomeroR. (2005). Cálculo de rutas óptimas mediante SIG en el territorio de la ciudad celtibérica de Segeda. Propuesta Metodológica. Salduie5, 95–111. 10.26754/ojs_salduie/sald.200556505
38
LópezPLoyolaR.CarrascoC.RoaC.VarasD.Santana-SagredoF.et al. (2024). Pedernales-5: an enclave for flamingo (Phoenicopteridae) exploitation during the Early Holocene in the Chilean southern Puna (26°S-69°W). Holocene.10.1177/09596836241254481
39
LópezP.CarrascoC.LoyolaR.Flores-AquevequeV.MaldonadoA.Santana-SagredoF.et al. (2022). Huentelauquén coastal groups in the Andean highlands? An assessment of human occupations of the Earl y Holocene in Salar de Pedernales, Chile (26°S, 3356 masl). PaleoAmerica8, 253–263. 10.1080/20555563.2022.2057833
40
LópezP.CarrascoC.LoyolaR.Flores-AquevequeV.Santana-SagredoF.MartínezI. (2021a). Develando Terra Incognita. Una búsqueda arqueológica de las primeras ocupaciones humanas en los salares de Infieles y Pedernales (3000-4100 msnm, 25°-26°S), Región de Atacama, Chile. Intersecc. Antropol. 22, 11–24. 10.37176/iea.22.1.2021.558
41
LópezP.CarrascoC.LoyolaR.MéndezV.LatorreE.Díaz-JarufeP.et al. (2023b). Late Pleistocene human occupations in the Southern Puna, Chile (12,4-10,7 ka cal. BP): Primary results from the Salar de Infieles (25° S, 3529 m.a.s.l.). Quat. Sci. Rev. 313:108189. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108189
42
LópezP.CarrascoC.LoyolaR.MéndezV.VarasD.DíazP.et al. (2023a). Chronological sequence (early and late Holocene) and cultural trajectories in Quebrada Pedernales, Southern Puna, Chile (26°S-3,456-3,730 masl). Quat. Int. 646, 34–50. 10.1016/j.quaint.2022.11.001
43
LópezP.CarrascoC.LoyolaR.Santana-SagredoF.Flores-AquevequeV.MaldonadoA.et al. (2021b). Caza de vicuñas en un refugio de las Tierras Altas de la Puna meridional de Chile (26°s). Archaeofauna30, 55–73. 10.15366/archaeofauna2021.30.004
44
LoyolaR.LópezP.CarrascoC.GlascockM.Flores-AquevequeV.MéndezV.et al. (2023). Provenance and long-term circulation of archaeological obsidian in the Puna de Copiapó (25-27°S), South-Central Andes. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 51:104134. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.104134
45
LoyolaR.LópezP.CarrascoC.WalkerC.FaganJ.MéndezV.et al. (2024). Technological and protein residue analysis on ancient stemmed projectile points of the southern Andes highlands. Lithic Technol. 1–16. 10.1080/01977261.2024.2318526
46
LynchT. (1986). Un reconocimiento arqueológico en el Salar de Punta Negra, Segunda Región. Chungara 16–17, 75–88.
47
MaldonadoA.BetancourtJ.LatorreC.VillagránC. (2005). Pollen analyses from a 50,000-yr rodent midden series in the southern Atacam a Desert (25° 30' S). J. Quat. Sci.20, 493–507. 10.1002/jqs.936
48
MaldonadoA.De PorrasM. E.ZamoraA.RivadeneiraM.AbarzúaA. M. (2016). “El Escenario Geográfico y Paleoambiental de Chile”, in Prehistoria de Chile: desde sus Primeros Habitantes hasta los Incas, eds. F. Falabella, M. Uribe, L. Sanhueza, C. Aldunate, and J. Hidalgo (Santiago: Editorial Universitaria), 23–70.
49
MaldonadoA.RozasE. (2008). “Clima y Paleoambientes Durante el Cuaternario Tardío en la Región de Atacama”, in Libro Rojo de la Flora Nativa y de los Sitios Prioritarios para su Conservación: Región de Atacama, eds. F. Squeo, G. Arancio, and J. Gutiérrez (La Serena: Ediciones Universidad de La Serena), 293–304.
50
MaldonadoA.VillagránC. (2006). Variability of the Northern limit of the Southern Westerlies over the last 9900 cal yr BP from a swamp forest pollen record along the semiarid coast of Chile (32°05'S). Quat. Res. 66, 246–258. 10.1016/j.yqres.2006.04.003
51
MartelÁ.ZamoraD.LéporiM. (2017). Tráfico y movilidad caravanera en la Puna Catamarqueña. Una mirada internodal. Estud. Atacameños56, 197–223. 10.4067/S0718-10432017005000004
52
MéndezC.TroncosoA. D.JacksonD.PavlovicD. (2009). Movilidad y uso del espacio entre cazadores-recolectores tardíos en espacios cordilleranos del Norte Semiárido de Chile. Intersecc. Antropol. 10, 311–326.
53
MinettiA. E. (1995). Optimum gradient of mountain paths. J. Appl. Physiol. 79, 1698–1703. 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.5.1698
54
MorenoE. (2010). Arqueología de la caza de vicuñas en el área del Salar de Antofalla, Puna de Atacama. Una aproximación la Arqueología del Paisaje (doctoral thesis). La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
55
Moreno-MeynardP.MéndezC.IrarrázavalI.Nuevo-DelaunayA. (2022). Past human mobility corridors and least-cost path models south of General Carrera lake, central west Patagonia (46° S, South America). Land11:1351. 10.3390/land11081351
56
NASA (2013). NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) (Satellite Data OT.042013.4326.1). OpenTopography. 10.5069/G9445JDF
57
NemeG.OtaolaC.GiardinaM.GilA.FranchettiF. (2020). Consumo de faunas y funcionalidad de sitios: Testeando hipótesis en los Andes meridionales. Lat. Am. Antiq. 31, 163–179. 10.1017/laq.2019.100
58
NielsenA. (1997–1988). Tráfico de caravanas en el Sur de Bolivia: observaciones etnográficas e implicancias arqueológicas. Rel. Soc Arg. Antrop. XXII–XXIII, 139–178.
59
NielsenA. (2017). Actualidad y potencial de la arqueología Internodal surandina. Estud. Atacameños56, 299–317. 10.4067/S0718-10432017000300012
60
NúñezL. (1984). Tráfico de complementariedad de recursos entre las tierras altas y el Pacífico en el área centro sur andina (doctoral thesis). Tokio: University of Tokio.
61
NúñezL. (1992). “Ocupación Arcaica en la Puna de Atacama: Secuencia, Movilidad y Cambio,” in. Nuevas Perspectivas Prehistoria Sudamericana, ed. B. Meggers (Washington, DC: Taraxacum), 283–307.
62
NúñezL.CartajenaI.CarrascoC.LópezP.RiveraF.de SouzaP.et al. (2017). Nuevas excavaciones en Tulán-54: revelando la arquitectura ceremonial durante el Formativo Temprano de la Puna de Atacama. Rev. Chil. Antropol. 34, 65–79. Available online at: https://revistadeantropologia.uchile.cl/index.php/RCA/article/view/45149
63
NúñezL.GrosjeanM.CartajenaI. (1999). Un ecorrefugio oportunístico en la Puna de Atacama durante eventos áridos del Holoceno Medio. Estud. Atacameños17, 125–174. 10.22199/S07181043.1999.0017.00008
64
NúñezL.GrosjeanM.CartajenaI. (2002). Human occupations and climate change in the Puna de Atacama, Chile. Science298, 821–824. 10.1126/science.1076449
65
NúñezL.LoyolaR.CartajenaI.LópezP.SantanderB.MaldonadoA.et al. (2018). Miscanti-1: human occupation during the arid Mid-Holocene event in the high altitude lakes of the Atacama Desert, South America. Quat. Sci. Rev. 181, 109–122. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.12.010
66
NúñezL.SantoroC. (1988). Cazadores de la puna seca y salada del área centro sur andina (norte de Chile). Estud. Atacameños9, 13–65. 10.22199/S07181043.1988.0009.00003
67
OsorioC. (2002). Moluscos Marinos en Chile. Especies de Importancia Económica: Guía para su Identificación. Santiago: Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile.
68
PelegrinJ. (1995). Technologie lithique: le Châtelperronien de Roc-de-Combe (Lot) et de La Côte (Dordogne). Cahiers du Quaternaire XX, 1–295.
69
PelegrinJ. (2000). “Les techniques de débitage laminaire au Tardiglaciaire: critères de diagnose et quelques réflexions”, in L'Europe centrale et septentrionale au tardiglaciaire. Congrontation des modèles régionaux de peuplement, eds. B. Valentin, P. Bodu, and M. Christensen (París: Mémoires du Musée de Prehistoire d'Ile de France. A.P.R.A.I.F.), 73 86.
70
PintarE. (2009). Un “ecorrefugio” en la cuenca de la Laguna de Antofagasta (Puna Salada) hacia 7900 y 6200 años AP. Arqueología15, 85–108. Available online at: http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/Arqueologia/article/view/1699
71
PintarE. (2014). Continuidades e hiatos ocupacionales durante el Holoceno Medio en el borde oriental de la Puna Salada, Antofagasta de la Sierra, Argentina. Chungara46, 51–71. 10.4067/S.0717-73562014000100004
72
QGIS Association (2024). QGIS Geographic Information System (3.36) [Software]. QGIS Association. Available online at: http://www.qgis.org (accessed March 23, 2024).
73
QuadeJ.RechJ.BetancourtJ.LatorreC.QuadeB.TylanderK.et al. (2008). Paleowetlands and regional climate change in the central Atacama Desert, northern Chile. Quat. Res. 69, 343–360. 10.1016/j.yqres.2008.01.003
74
RademakerK.HodginsG.MooreK.ZarrilloS.MillerC.BromleyG.et al. (2014). Paleoindian settlement of the high-altitude Peruvian Andes. Science346, 466–469. 10.1126/science.1258260
75
ReinhardJ. (1991). Investigación arqueológica de las plataformas ceremoniales en los volcanes de Copiapó y Jotabeche (Región de Atacama). Contribución Arqueológica3, 29–89.
76
RiquelmeR.RojasC.AguilarG.FloresP. (2011). Late Pleistocene-early Holocene paraglacial and fluvial sediment history in the Turbio valley, semiarid Chilean Andes. Quat. Res.75, 166–175. 10.1016/j.yqres.2010.10.001
77
RodríguezM.AguirreM. (2019). Historia y desarrollo de las investigaciones arqueobotánicas en la Puna Sur Argentina. Rev. Antropol. Mus. Entre Ríos5, 68–87. Available online at: https://ramer.ar/revista/index.php/ramer/article/view/29
78
SáezA.GodfreyL.HerreraC.ChongG.PueyoJ. (2016). Timing of wet episodes in Atacama Desert over the last 15 ka. The ground water discharge deposits (GWD) from Domeyko range at 25°S. Quat. Sci. Rev. 145, 82–93. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.05.036
79
SotoC. (2009). Restos malacológicos en la fase Tilocalar, quebrada Tulan (3500-2500 AP) (degree thesis). Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
80
SotoC. (2019). “Objetos perforados”, asociaciones simbólicas y redes de circulación: reflexiones sobre la forma de intercambio en el periodo Formativo (1500 AC-500 DC) del Desierto de Atacama. Chungara51, 573–593. 10.4067/S0717-73562019005001301
81
TroncosoA.VergaraF.PavlovicD.GonzálezP.PinoM.LarachP.et al. (2016). Dinámica espacial y temporal de las ocupaciones prehispánicas en la cuenca hidrográfica del río Limarí (30° Lat. S.). Chungara48, 199–224. 10.4067/S0717-73562016005000016
82
TrueD. (1980). “Archaeological Investigations in Northern Chile: Caserones”, in Prehistoric Trails of Atacama: Archaeology of Northern Chile. Monumenta Archaeologica 7, eds. C. Meighan, and D. True (Los Ángeles, CA: Universidad de California), 139–178.
83
UribeM. (2004). Alfarería, arqueología y metodología. Aportes y proyecciones de los estudios cerámicos del norte grande de Chile (master's thesis). Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
84
ValenzuelaJ. (2010). El material malacológico y el Complejo Cultural Pica-Tarapacá: uso social y simbolismo de las conchas en la Prehistoria tardía del Norte de Chile (degree thesis). Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
85
VeitH. (1996). Sourthern Westerlies during the Holocene deduced from geomorphological and pedological studies in the Norte Chico, Northern Chile (27-33° S). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 123, 107–119. 10.1016/0031-0182(95)00118-2
86
VerhagenP.NuningerL.GroenhuijzenM. R. (2019). “Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches”, in Finding the Limits of the Limes: Modelling Demography, Economy and Transport on the Edge of the Roman Empire, eds. P. Verhagen, J. Joyce, and M. R. Groenhuijzen (Cham: Springer), 217–249.
87
VolanteJ.ColladoA.FerreyraE.LópezC.NavarroM.PezzolaA.et al. (2009). Monitoreo de la Cobertura y el Uso del Suelo a partir de sensores remotos. GEOPORTAL IDESA Infraestructura de datos espaciales de la Provincia de Salta. Available online at: http://geoportal.idesa.gob.ar/layers/geonode%3Alccs_n3_2007 (accessed March 23, 2024).
88
WhiteD. A.Surface-EvansS. L. (2014). Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes: Archaeological Case Studies. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
89
YacobaccioH. (2017). Peopling of the high Andes of northwestern Argentina. Quat. Int. 461, 34–40. 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.01.006
90
YacobaccioH.MoralesM. (2005). Mid-Holocene environment and human occupation of the Puna (Susques, Argentina). Quat. Int. 132, 5–14. 10.1016/j.quaint.2004.07.010
91
ZechR.KullC.VeitH. (2006). Late Quaternary glacial history in the Encierro Valley, northern Chile (29°S), deduced from 10Be surface exposure dating. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.34, 277–286. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.10.011
92
ZedeñoM.BallengerJ.MurrayJ. (2014). landscape engineering and organizational complexity among late prehistoric bison hunters of the Northwestern Plains. Curr. Anthropol. 55, 23–58. 10.1086/674535
93
ZhaoY.ObieM.StewartB. (2023). The archaeology of human permanency on the Tibetan plateau: a critical review and assessment of current models. Quat. Sci. Rev. 313:108211. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108211
Summary
Keywords
Chile, Southern Puna, Late Holocene, Andes highlands, vicuñas
Citation
López Mendoza P, Loyola R, Carrasco C, Latorre E and Méndez V (2024) Human dynamics in the Southern Puna of Chile (25°-27°s) during the Late Holocene: abandonment, re-occupation and diversification. Front. Environ. Archaeol. 3:1423960. doi: 10.3389/fearc.2024.1423960
Received
26 April 2024
Accepted
19 June 2024
Published
11 July 2024
Volume
3 - 2024
Edited by
Enrique Alejandro Moreno, Universidad Nacional de Catamarca, Argentina
Reviewed by
Daniel Alexander Contreras, University of Florida, United States
Noel Amano, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Germany
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2024 López Mendoza, Loyola, Carrasco, Latorre and Méndez.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Patricio López Mendoza patriciolopezmend@gmail.com
†ORCID: Patricio López Mendoza orcid.org/0000-0003-3431-7260
Rodrigo Loyola orcid.org/0000-0003-3828-9439
Elvira Latorre orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-2707
Víctor Méndez orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-3708
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.