ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Cost and Resource Allocation
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1621018
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Value-Based Medicine: Lessons from China's Healthcare EvolutionView all 8 articles
Evaluating and Enhancing the Service Capacity of Secondary Public Hospitals in Urban China: A Multi-Method Empirical Analysis Based on Guangzhou (2019-2023)
Provisionally accepted
- 1The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 2School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 3School of Public Health,Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Secondary public hospitals play a pivotal role in China's hierarchical medical system, serving as a critical intermediary tier. However, in rapidly urbanizing cities such as Guangzhou, these hospitals face mounting challenges including widening efficiency disparities, imbalanced resource allocation, and weak governance structures. This study aims to systematically evaluate the evolution and spatial dynamics of service capacity among secondary general public hospitals in Guangzhou, offering empirical evidence to support capacity improvement and policy optimization.Methods: A composite evaluation framework was constructed across three dimensions: medical quality, operational efficiency, and sustainability. Based on panel data from 12 secondary general public hospitals in Guangzhou between 2019 and 2023, we applied a combination of Entropy-TOPSIS model, Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), and the Dagum Gini Coefficient to assess overall service capacity levels, temporal trends, and spatial inequalities.The findings indicate a general upward trend in service capacity; however, disparities among hospitals have intensified. While indicators of medical safety (e.g., mortality and complication rates) have steadily improved, there remains significant divergence in surgical ratios and pharmaceutical service coverage-particularly in peripheral areas. KDE analysis reveals a transition from unimodal to bimodal distribution, indicating stratification of service capacity. Decomposition of the Dagum Gini Coefficient shows that transvariation (inter-group overlaps) is the main source of inequality, underscoring increasing cross-regional capacity divergence.Conclusions: Although Guangzhou's secondary public hospitals have shown overall improvement, challenges remain in terms of regional coordination and internal structural disparities. This study recommends differentiated interventions such as specialty alliances, performance-based resource allocation, and workforce optimization to enhance system resilience and equity. The proposed evaluation model demonstrates strong applicability and scalability, offering theoretical and empirical insights for healthcare system governance in other rapidly urbanizing regions.
Keywords: Secondary public hospitals, Healthcare service capacity evaluation, Entropy-topsis, Kernel Density Estimation, Dagum Gini coefficient
Received: 06 May 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 WU, Wu, Huang, Zhenni and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Weizhang Huang, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.