SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Health Policy and Management
This article is part of the Research TopicIncreasing Importance of Patients-generated Real World Data for Healthcare Policy Decisions about Medicinal Products: Volume IIIView all 16 articles
Understanding the Factors that Shape Patient Choices in Bringing a Claim for Clinical Negligence Against the NHS in England: A Scoping Review
Provisionally accepted
- 1Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
- 2University of Birmingham Birmingham Law School, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Improving patient experience is a prominent theme of the NHS 10-Year Health Plan for England including the need to improve patient experience of clinical negligence claims. Understanding the factors that shape patient choices in bringing a claim for clinical negligence is an important aspect of patient experience that has the potential to provide crucial insight that could inform the future reform of the clinical negligence process in England. This scoping review aimed to identify the key concepts within the limited research exploring the factors that shape patient choices in bringing a claim for clinical negligence against the NHS in England and identify where gaps in the research may exist. Methods: To address this knowledge gap, a methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews was applied. Search strategies were developed using selected key words and index terms. Relevant published literature was identified by applying the search strategy to the peer-reviewed databases MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Westlaw. Reference lists of relevant publications were searched to identify relevant research and academic policy. All studies identified were charted and the results presented as a narrative synthesis. Results: Two main themes were identified from the 17 included records. These themes were 'Experience of harm' and 'Accessibility of compensation for clinical negligence'. Conclusion: How an NHS organisation responds to harm can shape patient choices in bringing a claim for clinical negligence. However, this scoping review identified the limited consideration given to how current law and policy, organisational cultures, social determinants of health and health inequalities may shape patient choices in bringing a claim for clinical negligence. Furthermore, this scoping review has identified that empirical research has given no consideration to the role of social media or Artificial Intelligence (AI) in shaping patient choices in bringing a claim for clinical negligence. Research considering these factors is vital to improve patient experience of clinical negligence process in England and has the potential to play an important role in informing the future reform of the clinical negligence process in England.
Keywords: claim, Clinical negligence, England, NHS, Patient choice
Received: 01 Sep 2025; Accepted: 08 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Assame, Yeowell, Greenhalgh and Tingle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Naomi Assame
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.