Abstract
Microglia are the essential responders to alimentary, pharmacological, and nanotechnological immunomodulators. These neural cells play multiple roles as surveyors, sculptors, and guardians of essential parts of complex neural circuitries. Microglia can play dual roles in the central nervous system; they can be deleterious and/or protective. The immunomodulatory effects of alimentary components, gut microbiota, and nanotechnological products have been investigated in microglia at the single-cell level and in vivo using intravital imaging approaches, and different biochemical assays. This review highlights some of the emerging questions and topics from studies involving alimentation, microbiota, nanotechnological products, and associated problems in this area of research. Some of the advantages and limitations of in vitro and in vivo models used to study the neuromodulatory effects of these factors, as well as the merits and pitfalls of intravital imaging modalities employed are presented.
Introduction
Neuroinflammation has been considered a detrimental factor in many neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and multiple sclerosis) (1–4). As the resident immune cells of the brain, microglia play a central role in neuroinflammatory processes. Traditionally, microglia were considered seminal contributors to neurodegeneration associated with neuroinflammation (5, 6). However, this view is gradually changing (7). Under normal conditions, microglia survey the brain and perform essential housekeeping functions, ranging from the scavenging of cellular debris to synaptic remodeling, but they switch from “surveyors” to “attackers” or “protectors” when challenged by pathogens, injurious stimuli, or nanoparticulates (8–10). If excessively and chronically activated, microglia exert deleterious effects in the central nervous system (CNS) by secreting proinflammatory cytokines and interfering with synaptic integrity and functions (11, 12). Microglia exhibit at least four different functions: surveillance, phagocytosis, cytotoxicity, and neuroprotection. Depending on the nature and structure of the challenger, as well as the intensity, duration, and location of the challenge, activated microglia can take on a protective or destructive role (13). Signals from healthy and damaged neurons, astrocytes, and factors from the periphery also modulate the phenotype of activated microglia (14–16). Neuroprotection is achieved through different modes of their action, e.g., (i) synaptic stripping in development and motoneuron regeneration (5), (ii) promotion of neurogenesis in the injured CNS (17, 18), (iii) phagocytosis of misfolded proteins and damaged organelles (19, 20), and (iv) production of anti-inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin-4, interleukin-10, and transforming growth factor beta (15, 21–24). Cytokines, chemokines, neurotrophins, reactive oxygen species, and glutamate are endogenous signal molecules exchanged between neurons and glia cells (25–28) that can be modulated by pharmacological agents, but the access of these agents to the CNS may be limited by the blood–brain barrier (29, 30). More recently, it was shown that the microbiome can affect the integrity and function of the blood–brain barrier, as well as the maturation and phenotype of microglia (31–34). The emergence of drug nanocarriers and nanotechnological probes has facilitated the entry of therapeutics into the brain, but some of them exerted immunogenicity. The present review will focus on key neural factors and pharmacological targets in neuroinflammation, and discuss the potential of alimentary and nanotechnological agents in modulating immune processes in the brain. The merits and pitfalls of in vitro and in vivo models of neuroinflammation will be summarized, and the use of intravital imaging modalities to investigate neuroinflammation will be reviewed.
Modulators of Neuroinflammation
Alimentary and Environmental Neuroimmunomodulators
Numerous genetic, environmental, and alimentary components can modulate neuroinflammation (35–37). For example, polluted urban air contains toxins, droplets, and particulates that are inhaled and travel though the blood stream, olfactory, and lymphatic systems to the brain, where they have been implicated in diseases of the CNS (37). Our daily diet can also affect neural cells, thereby altering their functions (38, 39). Rats fed high-fat diets were shown to have increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), in the hypothalamus, compared to controls fed regular chow (40). The arcuate nucleus in the mediobasal hypothalamus is particularly sensitive to metabolic factors from the periphery, as it is located near the median eminence, a circumventricular organ unprotected by the blood–brain barrier (41). The activation of microglia in the arcuate nucleus of animals on high-fat diets, thus, demonstrates the direct impact of nutrition on neuroinflammation. Dietary components have also been used for therapeutic purposes as neuroprotective agents. For instance, vitamins E, C, and B have been shown to reduce oxidative stress in the brain (42, 43). The ketogenic diet is an established treatment for childhood epilepsy (44–46). It is thought that the increase in circulating polyunsaturated fatty acids can modulate ion channels, and that inflammation is altered by increasing circulating beta-hydroxybutyrate and activating hydroxy-carboxylic acid receptor 2 in immune cells (47–49). Ketogenic diets have since been proposed in neurological conditions, such as Alzheimer’s disease and brain malignancies, but further clinical studies are required to confirm these findings and explain the beneficial effects at the molecular level (50–53). The polyunsaturated fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is a major component of neuronal cell membranes that is metabolized into resolvins and protectins, two families of neuroprotective lipid-derived mediators (54–56). Dietary DHA was shown to attenuate ischemic brain injury and pro-inflammatory markers in animal models (57–59). We have investigated the direct effects of DHA on synaptic integrity and indirect effects via microglia in the hippocampal CA1 region. Our studies have shown that DHA exerts neuroprotective effects in organotypic hippocampal tissue slices by preventing post synaptic spine deterioration (59). We also showed that DHA in microglia attenuates LPS-induced inflammation through the remodeling of lipid bodies and associated organelles (60). Furthermore, Bailey et al. provided evidence for the antioxidant role of lipid bodies in glia cells and neural stem cells (61, 62).
In addition to polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as DHA, numerous endogenous and exogenous fatty acids with different degree of saturation and chain lengths have been investigated in models of physiological and pathological conditions. The gut microbiota is an important source of small chain fatty acids (SCFA). Its population is heavily influenced by diet, and in turn, it modulates both the intestinal environment and overall human health (63–65). Once absorbed, SCFA directly impact on energy homeostasis in the liver, muscles, and adipose tissues, thereby affecting obesity and insulin resistance (66). SCFA can also affect the CNS by modulating neuroendocrine and cognitive responses, particularly when changes in the gut microbiome lead to increased intestinal permeability (34, 67, 68). Emerging research on the gut–brain axis has shown that there is a tight link between the gut microbiota and the function of neural cells. The gut microbiota are necessary for the early and normal development of the brain, and contribute in programing the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (69). In germ-free mice, microglia were found to have an immature phenotype, resulting in altered immune responses (31). Chronic enteric infections and antibiotics can also drastically modify the gut microbiome, resulting in neuropsychological symptoms (34, 70). The term “psychobiotics” has since been coined, referring to probiotics benefiting psychiatric illness, but further clinical studies are required to demonstrate the therapeutic benefits (71). While the composition and function of the gut microbiota can be affected by alimentary components, they can also be influenced by food contaminants, including nanoparticulate matter.
Nanotechnological Immunomodulators
Mammals have been exposed to airborne, waterborne, foodborne, and other nanomaterials in the environment for millennia and have developed mechanisms to deal with them (72, 73). Nevertheless, the explosion of nanoparticles in electronics, medical devices, paints, clothing, and cosmetics raised the awareness of the nanostructured materials in everyday life, requiring careful monitoring and analysis of the level and type of nanoparticles in soil, water, and air (74). In recent years, many nanomaterials have been designed for the development of diagnostics, delivery of therapeutic agents, and implants for the replacement of missing or impaired organ parts (e.g., joints, heart) (75–78). Some of these materials are well tolerated and efficiently eliminated, but others induce immune reactions and are toxic. Nanostructured materials are mainly recognized by cells of the immune system, primarily the mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS) (79). For example, internalized carbon nanotubes can be partly degraded in macrophages and the extent of biodegradation may be a major determinant in the severity of the associated inflammatory responses (80). Nanomaterial accumulation in macrophages within clearance organs (e.g., liver, kidneys, and spleen) can initiate both acute and chronic inflammation (81, 82). Although nanomaterials can cause toxic responses in these organs, technological manipulations of their morphologies, surfaces, sizes, charges, and porosities can minimize adverse effects (83–85). The structure–activity relationship of several classes of nanoparticles and outcome measures in immune and non-immune cells has been previously discussed (86, 87).
Our laboratory is particularly interested in investigating the effects of nanomaterials on microglia because of increasing evidence that (1) microglia are the major “consumers” of nanoparticles in the CNS (10, 88, 89), (2) microglia and macrophages contribute to the maintenance and progression of glioblastoma, one of the most complex and deadly brain tumors (90), and (3) there is a structural and functional link between the CNS and lymphatic vessels (91). The discovery that lymphatic vessels lining dural sinuses are gateways between the systemic lymphatic system and the brain has recently re-defined our understanding of the immune system of the brain and is seminal in investigating neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders associated with impairments of the immune system. The majority of the studies showing either positive or negative effects of nanomaterials on the immune system focused on peripheral macrophages. This is understandable considering that most foreign materials are taken up by these cells. However, brain cancers, such as gliomas, are infiltrated mainly by the brain macrophages, the microglia. In fact, the proportion of microglia in low-grade gliomas can exceed (>35%) the normal microglia contribution (10–15%) in non-neoplastic brains. The majority of non-neoplastic cells in gliomas are tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) either originating from the periphery or intrinsic to the brain (90, 92). These cells form the microenvironment of the brain tumor and play a major role in the maintenance and progression of the cancer cells. They can contribute to cancer survival, invasiveness, and proliferation. Although the mechanisms underlying microglia stimulation of low- and high-grade gliomas are not fully understood, the existence of a unique tumor microenvironment resulting from the infiltration of central and peripheral macrophages provides an opportunity to establish more effective chemotherapeutic interventions (93). Achieving this goal is not simple because of the considerable diversity and plasticity of macrophages and microglia. The common classification of M1 polarization, deemed pro-inflammatory, and M2, designating alternatively activated macrophages (with subclasses M2a, M2b, and M2c), seems inadequate for TAM. RNA microarray analyses indicated that about 1000 transcripts were found to be differently expressed in glioblastoma-associated microglia and macrophages relative to control microglia. The expression patterns only partially (<50%) overlapped with reported gene signatures for M1 and M2 macrophages (94). Therapeutic interventions targeting glioblastoma cells alone usually failed because of the contribution of the complex environment made of surrounding cells and brain tumor stem cells (95, 96). The problem is that macrophages and microglia secrete growth- and invasion-promoting factors, whereas brain tumor stem cells residing in perivascular niches often give raise to the resistance to radiation and chemotherapy (97–100). By contrast, some data suggest that the ketogenic diet combined with standard cancer treatment could increase the sensitivity of cancer cells toward therapies due to their reliance on glycolytic metabolism (101). Such a diet could also decrease inflammation caused by infiltrating macrophages and microglia. Although the results are encouraging, additional clinical trials are required to confirm the previous findings, suggesting the beneficial effects of the ketogenic diet (102). Immunomodulation of the glioma microenvironment by nanoparticles is also an attractive therapeutic avenue to reduce tumor invasiveness and growth. Data from preclinical and clinical studies are encouraging despite limitations and hurdles, which need to be overcome before this strategy becomes more widely applied (103–105).
In inflammation, immunomodulation using nanoparticles could provide suitable alternatives to standard treatment strategies because of the versatility of particle surface modifications, compositions, and charges. Particles with a negative surface charge can bind to monocytes, marking them for sequestration by the spleen and preventing their migration and participation at the inflammation site (65). Interesting examples of polyanions with anti-inflammatory effects are dendritic polyglycerol sulfates (dPGS) (106–108). Studies with dPGS suggest that they are effective anti-inflammatory agents per se with strong inhibitory effects on inflammation-induced degenerative changes in microglia and the ability to rescue dendritic spine morphology (108). Their L-selectin binding in the low nanomolar range, limited impact on blood coagulation, and minor activation of the complement system render them attractive anti-inflammatory agents (106). A simplified molecular mechanism of dPGS binding to selectins and their intracellular location in microglia is illustrated (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Mechanisms for nanoparticle-induced tolerance and reduction of inflammation severity have been previously reviewed in Ref. (109). Although there are still numerous unanswered questions related to the mechanisms of nanoparticle–immune system interactions, it is anticipated that in the next decade, clinical studies will show if negatively charged biodegradable nanoparticles (e.g., polylactic–polyglycolic acid) will reduce severe inflammations in myocardial infarction and acute encephalitis syndrome. If these and similar studies show a positive outcome, nanoparticle-based therapies could become a valuable addition to existing therapies targeting the immune system (110). However, a series of safety testing and validation has to be performed in preclinical and clinical investigations. A tiered approach for assessing nanoparticle compatibility with the immune system in vitro during the early phase of preclinical development, strategies for designing early phase preclinical immunotoxicity screening, and challenges associated with these investigations have been reviewed in Ref. (86). Despite disappointments due to the lack of standards and standardized procedures, limited understanding of underlying mechanisms involved in nanoparticle–immune cell interactions, inadequate nanoparticle characterization and incomplete knowledge about plasma proteins and their interactions with nanoparticle surfaces under physiological and pathological conditions, results obtained so far have provided a baseline for investigations to harness biocompatible and safe nanomaterials for immunomodulation.
Models of Neuroinflammation
In Vitro Models
Neuroinflammation involves complex intercellular communication between different neural cell types organized into intricate networks. Thus, suitable primary neural cells in 3D cultures (prepared either from dissociated cells or organotypic slices) are preferable to cell line models grown in 2D (Figure 2). However, both types of in vitro models have important limitations (Table 1). Phenotypic traits of primary cells are often lost following in vitro culture, particularly in monolayer and monocultures. Microglia are ramified in the healthy brain and in astrocyte co-cultures, but in the absence of astrocytic support, they take on various morphologies (e.g., amoeboid, spindle, and rod like) (111). Astrocyte-conditioned media are only partly effective in maintaining the ramified morphology of microglia, because astrocytes provide not only soluble (e.g., granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and colony-stimulating factor 1) but also non-diffusible factors. An astrocyte feeder layer is commonly used to support microglia and neuronal cultures alike (112, 113). This can be achieved using a two-chamber culture system comprising an enriched microglia culture separated from an enriched astrocyte culture by an inset with a porous membrane.
Figure 2
Table 1
| Inflammatory stimuli | Endpoints | Advantages (+) and limitations (−) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In vitro models (2D) | ||||
|
|
|
| (114–116) |
| ||||
| In vitro models (3D) | ||||
|
|
|
| (117–119) |
| (120–123) | |||
| (124–126) | |||
| In vivo models | ||||
| Wild-type animals |
|
|
| (1, 127–130) |
Transgenic animals
|
|
| ||
Models of immunomodulation: from in vitro to in vivo models.
Immortalized microglia cell lines were initially established from rodents in the 1980s, and the first human cell line was reported in 1995 (114). N9 and BV2 are among the oldest and best-described murine microglia cell lines, while CHME and HMO6 are the main human microglia cell lines. Recently, another immortalized microglia cell line was generated from the adult murine brain (131). Beside the practical advantages of an established cell line, immortalized microglia provide a relatively homogeneous cell population that retains the phagocytic and secretory abilities of their primary counterparts. However, surface markers vary from cell line to cell line, and as with any continuous cell culture, phenotypic traits may change as cells differentiate over time (114). The systematic analysis of primary mouse and human microglia genes and microRNAs identified a unique molecular signature that was distinct from peripheral immune cells and immortalized microglia cell lines. This striking difference between primary and immortalized cells indicates that continuous cell lines are not always suitable to answer some questions, such as the role of surface markers highly expressed in human or mouse microglia [e.g., purinergic receptor P2Y, G-protein coupled, 12 (P2ry12) in human, and Fc receptor-like S (FCRLS) in mouse microglia] (132, 133).
Brain slices are 3D, ex vivo models with partial brain architecture and synaptic circuitries. These models are used to investigate intercellular communication between neural cells under “physiological” and pathological conditions. Organotypic brain cultures are usually prepared from postnatal animals (days 3–9), and slices are maintained in culture until the maturation of the synaptic networks. Although the structural development of organotypic brain slices has been found to be largely comparable to that of age-matched animals, it has been reported that these ex vivo cultures had increased dendrite numbers and glutamatergic synaptic currents resulting from the rewiring of axons damaged during the initial slice preparation (120). Nevertheless, the preservation of tissue structure and the presence of microglia in organotypic brain slices are major advantages in the study of neuroinflammation. Acute brain slices are similar to organotypic brain cultures. They can be harvested from animals of any age, and experiments are typically completed within hours. However, the biomechanical stress caused by tissue slicing, presence of damaged cells, and release of soluble factors from these cells must be considered when interpreting results from such preparations (134).
Inflammation in neural cells can be induced using pathogen-derived ligands, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and injurious stimuli. Among the most common pro-inflammatory stimuli is lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an endotoxin from Gram-negative bacteria, which binds to toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on microglia, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and neurons (14, 135). The production of cytokines (e.g., interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, interleukin-18, interleukin-33) by microglia in response to LPS is mediated by the inflammasome, a multiprotein complex typically composed of pro-caspase-1, the adaptor molecule apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat-containing receptor (NLR) family proteins (Figure 3) (136). Different types of inflammasomes can assemble depending on the nature and intensity of the stimulus, and many members of the NLR family can facilitate the assembly (e.g., NLRP1, NLRP7, and NLRP12). In particular, the NLR family, pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is common in neuroinflammation-associated disorders, and can be regulated by a wide variety of factors, such as pathogen-associated molecular patterns, damage-associated molecular patterns, COX-2 activity, and damaged mitochondria (137–139). In Alzheimer’s disease, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), and MS, the NLRP3 inflammasome was found to exacerbate inflammatory responses and damage mediated by microglia (140–143). Notably, hyperactivation of microglia characterized by inflammasome activation and cytokine release can lead to the programed cell death pyroptosis in neural cells (144–146). Pro-inflammatory cytokines are major inducers of immune activation, both in the peripheral and central immune systems. These include, among others, TNF-α, IFNγ, IL-1β, and IL-6 (26, 147, 148). Modulation of IL-6 classical and trans-signaling has been exploited for therapeutic interventions in several preclinical and clinical trials (149, 150). The evolutionary conserved glycoprotein 130 (gp130) system inspired the development of sgp130Fc, an effective pharmacological tool to distinguish classical from trans-signaling. The results from phase III studies with sgp130Fc are awaited – it is anticipated that blockade of trans-signaling will prove to be superior to the global blockade of IL-6 signaling by the neutralizing antibody tocilizumab. Recent studies showed that the small molecule LMT-28 can also block trans-signaling of IL-6 (151). LMT-28 is stable, simple to synthesize, and functions by binding directly to gp130. Clinical data for its effectiveness in neurological disorders are not yet available. Anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-4 and -10, can dampen the effects of pro-inflammatory stimuli. The production of these secreted factors can be monitored using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Inflammation induced by ischemic and TBI is difficult to replicate in vitro, but some morphological and biochemical changes can be assessed in simplified models. For instance, oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) is often used to mimic brain ischemia and induce the activation of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in primary cortical neurons (135). Transection, compression, hydrostatic pressure, and stretch injuries are other examples of brain “injuries in the dish” (134).
Figure 3
In Vivo Models
A great number of animal models of neuroinflammation are available today, many of which are disease specific (see examples in Table 1). Although transgenic animals are popular to examine the effects of gene knock-in and knock-out, wild-type animals remain necessary to understand the fundamental pathophysiology of neuroinflammation. LPS can be injected either systemically or intracranially. Circulating LPS rapidly causes an inflammatory response in the brain, first at the circumventricular organs, then across the CNS (152). Although the choice of LPS serotype has little impact on TLR4 stimulation, it can significantly affect in vivo studies involving the adaptive immune system. The degree of purity of the LPS is also an important factor, as products of lesser quality can contain other pathogen-associated molecules that will alter the potency of the LPS and the magnitude of the inflammatory response. Systemic injection is often administered intraperitoneally, intravenously, or by stereotaxic administration directly into the brain parenchyma. The stereotaxic apparatus holds the head of the animal in place and a stereotaxic atlas is used to determine the coordinates for the site at which a small hole in the skull should be drilled to access a specific site in the brain (153). Until recently, innate recognition of LPS was limited to its membrane receptor TLR4/MD-2-stimulated cytokine transcription. Therapeutic intervention by Eritoran has achieved very moderate success in sepsis (154). This could be in part because of the existence of non-canonical LPS signaling induced by cytosolic LPS. This non-canonical signaling via intracellular LPS activates pro-inflammatory caspases – caspase-11 in mice and caspase-4/5 in humans – and does not depend on TLR4 (155–157). LPS binding to caspases induces their oligomerization, which is a prerequisite for caspase activation. A simplified model of canonical and non-canonical signaling by LPS is illustrated (Figure 4). Resulting CNS complications, such as encephalopathy, are mainly mediated by neuroinflammation and oxidative stress (158). Aside from LPS administration, inflammation can be induced more globally by bacterial infections. A standard method to induce polymicrobial sepsis is cecal ligation (159). It is easily performed, and the severity of the disease can be controlled to a certain extent (160). However, there is a high mortality rate, and variable outcomes have been observed between animals and laboratories (161).
Figure 4
Inflammatory processes in transgenic models of neuroinflammation often result indirectly from the expression of a disease-specific mutant gene, and most models were developed for the study of neurodegenerative diseases. The APP/PS1 mouse model, for instance, is used in the study of Alzheimer’s disease. These mice express a chimeric amyloid precursor protein and a mutant human presenilin-1, causing the accumulation of amyloid-beta plaques by the age of 6 months, extensive neuroinflammation and, later on, memory impairment (162). By contrast, it was recently suggested that the amyloid beta peptide can protect against microbial infection in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (163). This is an intriguing proposition, raising the possibility that amyloid beta may play a protective role in innate immunity through its binding to microbial cell walls via heparin-binding domains. In the adeno-associated virus-alpha-synuclein mouse model of Parkinson’s disease, the animal expresses alpha-synuclein under the control of a viral promoter. This results in the loss of dopaminergic neurons, as well as the activation of microglia (164). For the study of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, transgenic mice expressing a mutant superoxide dismutase 1 gene were observed to show astrocyte and microglia activation, leading to motoneuron degeneration and muscle atrophy (165, 166). Transgenic mouse models used to investigate neuroinflammation can provide valuable information on morphological, biochemical, and functional changes in neural cells, but they have limitations that must be considered in the context of human pathology (1). Other knock-out and knock-in animals have also been employed to study the role of key mediators of neuroinflammation. Caspase-1 knock-out mice, for example, seemed more resistant to ischemia-induced neural cell death than wild-type animals (167). More recently, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein-9 (Cas9) gene editing technique has generated considerable excitement, as it was successful in targeting single or multiple genes in the mouse brain (168). The technique allows the generation of mutant animals with ease and efficiency compared to the traditional transfection of mouse embryonic stem cells. However, emerging problems include off-site effects and mosaicism (169).
Intravital Imaging of Neuroinflammation
A great variety of reporters and probes are currently available to investigate neuroinflammation at the cellular level (170–173). Cellular events of interest include the migration and phagocytic activity of microglia, the infiltration of peripheral immune cells, as well as the production of secreted factors, metabolism, and viability of neural cells. Intravital imaging is useful to study the pathophysiology of neuroinflammation in a non-invasive manner, but an important limitation is the scattering and absorbance of light entering biological tissues. The availability of strong reporters and powerful imaging modalities have allowed for better detection and facilitated the generation of quantitative data from investigated signals while minimizing autofluorescence. The natural fluorescence of different tissues can mask signals from fluorescent probes. Lipofuscin, which can be excited anywhere in the range of 360–647 nm, is commonly found in neurons and glia cells, and increases with animal age. The imaging of green fluorescent protein, one of the most common and popular fluorescent labels, can also be hindered by a subset of green autofluorescent cells in the rat cortex and hippocampus (174). In tissue sections, the risk of false positives can be reduced by using autofluorescence quenchers, such as copper sulfate (175). The choice of fluorophores emitting in the near-infrared spectrum can be made to avoid this issue. Imaging of structural and functional changes in the living brain can be performed using open-skull preparations, where a small window in the skull is protected by a glass coverslip. Following the implantation of the cranial window, a recovery time is necessary to avoid inflammation caused by the surgery (176, 177). However, long-term imaging using the open-skull technique can be obscured by bone re-growth and the thickening of the meninges (178). Imaging of the cortex using the thinned-skull cranial window technique is useful when longer intervals are needed in between imaging sessions. However, repeated imaging requires the re-thinning of the skull, which has to be carefully monitored to avoid cortical trauma and inflammation (179, 180). For both imaging techniques, two-photon microscopy in the near infrared region is suitable to avoid photobleaching and photodamage.
Transgenic animals expressing luciferase in glia cells have been employed to track and image processes in neuroinflammation at the cellular level (181–183). Our studies have shown marked activation of microglia, pro-inflammatory caspases, and astrocytes by nanocrystals (184–186). Data from these studies showed that stable nanocrystals injected directly into the parenchyma of mice induced transient astrocyte activation, suggesting that only nanocrystals adequately coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) are suitable nanotechnological tools. Glia cells were also activated by gold nanoparticles, depending on the nanoparticles’ morphology (10). Activation of glia cells is often accompanied by the activation of inflammatory caspases and caspases implicated in apoptosis (187). Nanosensors for caspases have been developed, and examples of constructs for these sensors are illustrated in Figure 5 (170, 188).
Figure 5
A whole palette of fluorescent proteins, mostly mutant derivatives of the jellyfish’s green fluorescent protein, have also been employed to “illuminate” the brain. The use of cell-type-specific fluorescent labels allowed to map brain structures and to distinguish different cell populations with greater accuracy. High-resolution pictures have been recorded in recent years, and unprecedented 3D images and videos have been produced from fluorescently labeled brain tissues (189, 190). Although the quality of these imaging techniques remains variable and is dependent on the success of the genetic probes and the available imaging modalities, these techniques have been instrumental in understanding structural and functional aspects of the CNS – including glia–neuron interactions. Optogenetics have also been used to study light-responsive channels and other proteins in neural cells (191–193). For instance, the selective expression of channelrhodopsin-2, a light-responsive membrane channel, has been employed to study calcium signaling in astrocytes in vitro and in vivo (194). Optogenetic tools could, thus, be used to reveal the contribution of microglia in neuroinflammatory processes (195). Although optogenetics has generated valuable information on macromolecules in cells, this approach cannot be applied to investigate small molecules, such as phospholipids. More recently, the approach of optolipidomics was used to study the processing of mitochondria-specific cardiolipins in apoptosis (196). Mitochondrial functions are often impaired in inflammatory processes, and the combination of optogenetics and optolipidomics could provide complementary information on underlying intricacies in neuroinflammation.
Conclusion
Neuroinflammation is considered a significant contributor in many neurodegenerative diseases. Microglia are the immune cells of the CNS, and are modulated by numerous factors, including alimentary products and the gut microbiome. Nanoparticulates have emerged as a new group of “xenobiotics” that must be thoroughly characterized prior to investigating their immunomodulatory effects in the CNS and elsewhere. Nanotechnology offers a wide selection of shape- and size-tunable probes, ranging from quantum dots to fluorescently labeled polymeric constructs (163). Nanoprobes can be brighter and more stable than genetic probes, and designed to “activate” in response to a particular stimuli, such as light or acidic pH. However, nanotechnological probes are often large and cannot reach desirable intracellular locations. In addition, these probes are complex and relatively little is known about their stability in vivo, as well as their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (186, 187). It is well established that the biological identity of a nanoparticle is distinct from its well-defined chemical identity. Serum protein binding, sensitivity to pH, and clearance rates are all factors affecting the immunogenicity and fate of a nanoparticle in vivo (146, 147). On the other hand, nanoparticle-induced immune responses can be exploited for improving vaccine efficiency and boost the immune system in pathologies with weakened immune responsiveness (197–199). Diverse fluorescent nanostructures can provide tools for the tracking and imaging of complex networks in different cell types in a spatio-temporal manner. The combined use of nanotechnological tools and advanced intravital imaging techniques can, thus, provide unprecedented insight into the mechanisms of neuroinflammation. Exciting data related to brain abnormalities implicating glial cells come from gene editing techniques, such as CRISPR/Cas9 (168). Animal studies exploiting these approaches in mice models of neurodegenerative diseases will help to reveal intricacies in neural circuitries under physiological conditions and mechanisms involved in multifactorial diseases associated with neuroinflammation.
Statements
Author contributions
DM outlined, co-wrote, and revised the manuscript. IZ drafted and finalized the figures and table, and co-authored the text. Both authors read and approved of the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr. Jeff Ji for reading the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (RGPIN-2015-04994) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (119425).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
HenekaMTKummerMPLatzE. Innate immune activation in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Immunol (2014) 14:463–77.10.1038/nri3705
2
HunotSHirschEC. Neuroinflammatory processes in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol (2003) 53(Suppl 3):S49–58.10.1002/ana.10481
3
NolanYMSullivanAMToulouseA. Parkinson’s disease in the nuclear age of neuroinflammation. Trends Mol Med (2013) 19:187–96.10.1016/j.molmed.2012.12.003
4
WhalleyK. Neuroinflammation: transport disruption in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurosci (2015) 16:2–2.10.1038/nrn3892
5
KettenmannHKirchhoffFVerkhratskyA. Microglia: new roles for the synaptic stripper. Neuron (2013) 77:10–8.10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.023
6
PerryVHNicollJARHolmesC. Microglia in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol (2010) 6:193–201.10.1038/nrneurol.2010.17
7
ChenZTrappBD. Microglia and neuroprotection. J Neurochem (2016) 136(Suppl 1):10–7.10.1111/jnc.13062
8
SierraABeccariSDiaz-AparicioIEncinasJMComeauSTremblayM-È. Surveillance, phagocytosis, and inflammation: how never-resting microglia influence adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Neural Plast (2014) 2014:610343.10.1155/2014/610343
9
KreutzbergGW. Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci (1996) 19:312–8.10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7
10
HutterEBoridySLabrecqueSLalancette-HébertMKrizJWinnikFMet alMicroglial response to gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano (2010) 4:2595–606.10.1021/nn901869f
11
BlockMLZeccaLHongJ-S. Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci (2007) 8:57–69.10.1038/nrn2038
12
HanischU-K. Microglia as a source and target of cytokines. Glia (2002) 40:140–55.10.1002/glia.10161
13
HanischU-KKettenmannH. Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat Neurosci (2007) 10:1387–94.10.1038/nn1997
14
LehnardtS. Innate immunity and neuroinflammation in the CNS: the role of microglia in Toll-like receptor-mediated neuronal injury. Glia (2010) 58:253–63.10.1002/glia.20928
15
CherryJDOlschowkaJAO’BanionMK. Neuroinflammation and M2 microglia: the good, the bad, and the inflamed. J Neuroinflammation (2014) 11:98.10.1186/1742-2094-11-98
16
SavarinCHintonDRValentin-TorresAChenZTrappBDBergmannCCet alAstrocyte response to IFN-γ limits IL-6-mediated microglia activation and progressive autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroinflammation (2015) 12:79.10.1186/s12974-015-0293-9
17
ErnstAAlkassKBernardSSalehpourMPerlSTisdaleJet alNeurogenesis in the striatum of the adult human brain. Cell (2014) 156:1072–83.10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.044
18
NikolakopoulouAMDuttaRChenZMillerRHTrappBD. Activated microglia enhance neurogenesis via trypsinogen secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2013) 110:8714–9.10.1073/pnas.1218856110
19
SierraAAbiegaOShahrazANeumannH. Janus-faced microglia: beneficial and detrimental consequences of microglial phagocytosis. Front Cell Neurosci (2013) 7:6.10.3389/fncel.2013.00006
20
BrownGCNeherJJ. Microglial phagocytosis of live neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci (2014) 15:209–16.10.1038/nrn3710
21
LindholmDCastrénEKieferRZafraFThoenenH. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 in the rat brain: increase after injury and inhibition of astrocyte proliferation. J Cell Biol (1992) 117:395–400.10.1083/jcb.117.2.395
22
LiuXLiuJZhaoSZhangHCaiWCaiMet alInterleukin-4 is essential for microglia/macrophage M2 polarization and long-term recovery after cerebral ischemia. Stroke (2016) 47:498–504.10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012079
23
ParkKWLeeHGJinBKLeeYB. Interleukin-10 endogenously expressed in microglia prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced neurodegeneration in the rat cerebral cortex in vivo. Exp Mol Med (2007) 39:812–9.10.1038/emm.2007.88
24
LedeboerABrevéJJPooleSTildersFJVan DamAM. Interleukin-10, interleukin-4, and transforming growth factor-beta differentially regulate lipopolysaccharide-induced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide in co-cultures of rat astroglial and microglial cells. Glia (2000) 30:134–42.10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(200004)30:2<134::AID-GLIA3>3.0.CO;2-3
25
FieldsRDStevens-GrahamB. New insights into neuron-glia communication. Science (2002) 298:556–62.10.1126/science.298.5593.556
26
ChoiSSLeeHJLimISatohJKimSU. Human astrocytes: secretome profiles of cytokines and chemokines. PLoS One (2014) 9:e92325.10.1371/journal.pone.0092325
27
ElkabesSDiCicco-BloomEMBlackIB. Brain microglia/macrophages express neurotrophins that selectively regulate microglial proliferation and function. J Neurosci (1996) 16:2508–21.
28
DomercqMVazquezNMatuteC. Neurotransmitter signaling in the pathophysiology of microglia. Front Cell Neurosci (2013) 7:49.10.3389/fncel.2013.00049
29
PalmerAM. Multiple sclerosis and the blood-central nervous system barrier. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol (2013) 2013:530356.10.1155/2013/530356
30
EricksonMADohiKBanksWA. Neuroinflammation: a common pathway in CNS diseases as mediated at the blood-brain barrier. Neuroimmunomodulation (2012) 19:121–30.10.1159/000330247
31
ErnyDHrabě de AngelisALJaitinDWieghoferPStaszewskiODavidEet alHost microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci (2015) 18:965–77.10.1038/nn.4030
32
SherwinEReaKDinanTGCryanJF. A gut (microbiome) feeling about the brain. Curr Opin Gastroenterol (2016) 32:96–102.10.1097/MOG.0000000000000244
33
BurokasAMoloneyRDDinanTGCryanJF. Microbiota regulation of the mammalian gut-brain axis. Adv Appl Microbiol (2015) 91:1–62.10.1016/bs.aambs.2015.02.001
34
KellyJRKennedyPJCryanJFDinanTGClarkeGHylandNP. Breaking down the barriers: the gut microbiome, intestinal permeability and stress-related psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Neurosci (2015) 9:392.10.3389/fncel.2015.00392
35
MalikMParikhIVasquezJBSmithCTaiLBuGet alGenetics ignite focus on microglial inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener (2015) 10:52.10.1186/s13024-015-0048-1
36
CaiD. Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in overnutrition-induced diseases. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2013) 24:40–7.10.1016/j.tem.2012.11.003
37
BlockMLCalderón-GarcidueñasL. Air pollution: mechanisms of neuroinflammation and CNS disease. Trends Neurosci (2009) 32:506–16.10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.009
38
TimmermansSBogieJFJVanmierloTLütjohannDStinissenPHellingsNet alHigh fat diet exacerbates neuroinflammation in an animal model of multiple sclerosis by activation of the renin angiotensin system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol (2014) 9:209–17.10.1007/s11481-013-9502-4
39
CastanonNLuheshiGLayéS. Role of neuroinflammation in the emotional and cognitive alterations displayed by animal models of obesity. Front Neurosci (2015) 9:229.10.3389/fnins.2015.00229
40
De SouzaCTAraujoEPBordinSAshimineRZollnerRLBoscheroACet alConsumption of a fat-rich diet activates a proinflammatory response and induces insulin resistance in the hypothalamus. Endocrinology (2005) 146:4192–9.10.1210/en.2004-1520
41
ValdearcosMXuAWKoliwadSK. Hypothalamic inflammation in the control of metabolic function. Annu Rev Physiol (2015) 77:131–60.10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071656
42
MorrisMC. Nutrition and risk of dementia: overview and methodological issues. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2016) 1367:31–7.10.1111/nyas.13047
43
RiffelAPKde SouzaJASantos MdoCQHorstAScheidTKolbergCet alSystemic administration of vitamins C and E attenuates nociception induced by chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve in rats. Brain Res Bull (2016) 121:169–77.10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.02.004
44
BarañanoKWHartmanAL. The ketogenic diet: uses in epilepsy and other neurologic illnesses. Curr Treat Options Neurol (2008) 10:410–9.10.1007/s11940-008-0043-8
45
LutasAYellenG. The ketogenic diet: metabolic influences on brain excitability and epilepsy. Trends Neurosci (2013) 36:32–40.10.1016/j.tins.2012.11.005
46
DupuisNCuratoloNBenoistJ-FAuvinS. Ketogenic diet exhibits anti-inflammatory properties. Epilepsia (2015) 56:e95–8.10.1111/epi.13038
47
RahmanMMuhammadSKhanMAChenHRidderDAMüller-FielitzHet alThe β-hydroxybutyrate receptor HCA2 activates a neuroprotective subset of macrophages. Nat Commun (2014) 5:3944.10.1038/ncomms4944
48
OffermannsSSchwaningerM. Nutritional or pharmacological activation of HCA2 ameliorates neuroinflammation. Trends Mol Med (2015) 21:245–55.10.1016/j.molmed.2015.02.002
49
YoumY-HNguyenKYGrantRWGoldbergELBodogaiMKimDet alThe ketone metabolite β-hydroxybutyrate blocks NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated inflammatory disease. Nat Med (2015) 21:263–9.10.1038/nm.3804
50
SeyfriedTNFloresRPoffAMD’AgostinoDPMukherjeeP. Metabolic therapy: a new paradigm for managing malignant brain cancer. Cancer Lett (2015) 356:289–300.10.1016/j.canlet.2014.07.015
51
HertzLChenYWaagepetersenHS. Effects of ketone bodies in Alzheimer’s disease in relation to neural hypometabolism, β-amyloid toxicity, and astrocyte function. J Neurochem (2015) 134:7–20.10.1111/jnc.13107
52
WoolfECScheckAC. The ketogenic diet for the treatment of malignant glioma. J Lipid Res (2015) 56:5–10.10.1194/jlr.R046797
53
WrightCSimoneNL. Obesity and tumor growth: inflammation, immunity, and the role of a ketogenic diet. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care (2016) 19(4):294–9.10.1097/MCO.0000000000000286
54
KohliPLevyBD. Resolvins and protectins: mediating solutions to inflammation. Br J Pharmacol (2009) 158:960–71.10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00290.x
55
LiLWuYWangYWuJSongLXianWet alResolvin D1 promotes the interleukin-4-induced alternative activation in BV-2 microglial cells. J Neuroinflammation (2014) 11:72.10.1186/1742-2094-11-72
56
OrrSKPalumboSBosettiFMountHTKangJXGreenwoodCEet alUnesterified docosahexaenoic acid is protective in neuroinflammation. J Neurochem (2013) 127:378–93.10.1111/jnc.12392
57
ChangC-YKuanY-HLiJ-RChenW-YOuY-CPanH-Cet alDocosahexaenoic acid reduces cellular inflammatory response following permanent focal cerebral ischemia in rats. J Nutr Biochem (2013) 24:2127–37.10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.08.004
58
OrrSKTrépanierM-OBazinetRP. n-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids in animal models with neuroinflammation. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids (2013) 88:97–103.10.1016/j.plefa.2012.05.008
59
ChangPK-YKhatchadourianAMcKinneyRAMaysingerD. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA): a modulator of microglia activity and dendritic spine morphology. J Neuroinflammation (2015) 12:34.10.1186/s12974-015-0244-5
60
TremblayM-EZhangIBishtKSavageJCLecoursCParentMet alRemodeling of lipid bodies by docosahexaenoic acid in activated microglial cells. J Neuroinflammation (2016) 13:116.10.1186/s12974-016-0580-0
61
WelteMA. How brain fat conquers stress. Cell (2015) 163:269–70.10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.046
62
BaileyAPKosterGGuillermierCHirstEMAMacRaeJILecheneCPet alAntioxidant role for lipid droplets in a stem cell niche of Drosophila. Cell (2015) 163:340–53.10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.020
63
Ríos-CoviánDRuas-MadiedoPMargollesAGueimondeMde los Reyes-GavilánCGSalazarN. Intestinal short chain fatty acids and their link with diet and human health. Front Microbiol (2016) 7:185.10.3389/fmicb.2016.00185
64
TilgHAdolphTE. Influence of the human intestinal microbiome on obesity and metabolic dysfunction. Curr Opin Pediatr (2015) 27:496–501.10.1097/MOP.0000000000000234
65
ChuHMazmanianSK. Winning the microbial battle, but not the war. Cell (2015) 163:271–2.10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.050
66
CanforaEEJockenJWBlaakEE. Short-chain fatty acids in control of body weight and insulin sensitivity. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2015) 11:577–91.10.1038/nrendo.2015.128
67
BranisteVAl-AsmakhMKowalCAnuarFAbbaspourATóthMet alThe gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Sci Transl Med (2014) 6:263ra158.10.1126/scitranslmed.3009759
68
FrostGSleethMLSahuri-ArisoyluMLizarbeBCerdanSBrodyLet alThe short-chain fatty acid acetate reduces appetite via a central homeostatic mechanism. Nat Commun (2014) 5:3611.10.1038/ncomms4611
69
SudoNChidaYAibaYSonodaJOyamaNYuX-Net alPostnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol (2004) 558:263–75.10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388
70
BercikPCollinsSM. The effects of inflammation, infection and antibiotics on the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Adv Exp Med Biol (2014) 817:279–89.10.1007/978-1-4939-0897-4_13
71
DinanTGStantonCCryanJF. Psychobiotics: a novel class of psychotropic. Biol Psychiatry (2013) 74:720–6.10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.001
72
DobrovolskaiaMAMcNeilSE. Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Nanotechnol (2007) 2:469–78.10.1038/nnano.2007.223
73
ColvinVL. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol (2003) 21:1166–70.10.1038/nbt875
74
FramptonMWBrauerMKleemanMKreylingWGNtziachristosLSarnatSEet alUnderstanding the Health Effects of Ambient Ultrafine Particles. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute (2013).
75
ZhangLWebsterTJ. Nanotechnology and nanomaterials: promises for improved tissue regeneration. Nano Today (2009) 4:66–80.10.1016/j.nantod.2008.10.014
76
LiuHWebsterTJ. Nanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials (2007) 28:354–69.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.049
77
GhanbariHde MelASeifalianAM. Cardiovascular application of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanomaterials: a glimpse into prospective horizons. Int J Nanomedicine (2011) 6:775–86.10.2147/IJN.S14881
78
ShevachMFleischerSShapiraADvirT. Gold nanoparticle-decellularized matrix hybrids for cardiac tissue engineering. Nano Lett (2014) 14:5792–6.10.1021/nl502673m
79
GustafsonHHHolt-CasperDGraingerDWGhandehariH. Nanoparticle uptake: the phagocyte problem. Nano Today (2015) 10:487–510.10.1016/j.nantod.2015.06.006
80
KaganVEKonduruNVFengWAllenBLConroyJVolkovYet alCarbon nanotubes degraded by neutrophil myeloperoxidase induce less pulmonary inflammation. Nat Nanotechnol (2010) 5:354–9.10.1038/nnano.2010.44
81
ParkMVDZNeighAMVermeulenJPde la FonteyneLJJVerharenHWBriedéJJet alThe effect of particle size on the cytotoxicity, inflammation, developmental toxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials (2011) 32:9810–7.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.085
82
ParkE-JYoonJChoiKYiJParkK. Induction of chronic inflammation in mice treated with titanium dioxide nanoparticles by intratracheal instillation. Toxicology (2009) 260:37–46.10.1016/j.tox.2009.03.005
83
IlinskayaANDobrovolskaiaMA. Understanding the immunogenicity and antigenicity of nanomaterials: past, present and future. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol (2016) 299:70–7.10.1016/j.taap.2016.01.005
84
LongmireMChoykePLKobayashiH. Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats. Nanomedicine (Lond) (2008) 3:703–17.10.2217/17435889.3.5.703
85
ParkHJSohnJ-HKimY-JParkYHHanHParkKHet alAcute exposure to silica nanoparticles aggravate airway inflammation: different effects according to surface characteristics. Exp Mol Med (2015) 47:e173.10.1038/emm.2015.50
86
DobrovolskaiaMA. Pre-clinical immunotoxicity studies of nanotechnology-formulated drugs: challenges, considerations and strategy. J Control Release (2015) 220:571–83.10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.056
87
YanamalaNKaganVEShvedovaAA. Molecular modeling in structural nano-toxicology: interactions of nano-particles with nano-machinery of cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2013) 65:2070–7.10.1016/j.addr.2013.05.005
88
PapaSFerrariRDe PaolaMRossiFMarianiACaronIet alPolymeric nanoparticle system to target activated microglia/macrophages in spinal cord injury. J Control Release (2014) 174:15–26.10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.11.001
89
CerqueiraSROliveiraJMSilvaNALeite-AlmeidaHRibeiro-SamySAlmeidaAet alMicroglia response and in vivo therapeutic potential of methylprednisolone-loaded dendrimer nanoparticles in spinal cord injury. Small (2013) 9:738–49.10.1002/smll.201201888
90
HambardzumyanDGutmannDHKettenmannH. The role of microglia and macrophages in glioma maintenance and progression. Nat Neurosci (2016) 19:20–7.10.1038/nn.4185
91
LouveauASmirnovIKeyesTJEcclesJDRouhaniSJPeskeJDet alStructural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature (2015) 523:337–41.10.1038/nature14432
92
YiLXiaoHXuMYeXHuJLiFet alGlioma-initiating cells: a predominant role in microglia/macrophages tropism to glioma. J Neuroimmunol (2011) 232:75–82.10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.10.011
93
LapaCLinsenmannTLückerathKSamnickSHerrmannKStofferCet alTumor-associated macrophages in glioblastoma multiforme – a suitable target for somatostatin receptor-based imaging and therapy?PLoS One (2015) 10:e0122269.10.1371/journal.pone.0122269
94
SzulzewskyFPelzAFengXSynowitzMMarkovicDLangmannTet alGlioma-associated microglia/macrophages display an expression profile different from M1 and M2 polarization and highly express Gpnmb and Spp1. PLoS One (2015) 10:e0116644.10.1371/journal.pone.0116644
95
ZhouB-BSZhangHDamelinMGelesKGGrindleyJCDirksPB. Tumour-initiating cells: challenges and opportunities for anticancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2009) 8:806–23.10.1038/nrd2137
96
ChenKHuangYChenJ. Understanding and targeting cancer stem cells: therapeutic implications and challenges. Acta Pharmacol Sin (2013) 34:732–40.10.1038/aps.2013.27
97
BaoSWuQMcLendonREHaoYShiQHjelmelandABet alGlioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature (2006) 444:756–60.10.1038/nature05236
98
HambardzumyanDSquatritoMHollandEC. Radiation resistance and stem-like cells in brain tumors. Cancer Cell (2007) 11:97.10.1016/j.ccr.2006.12.011
99
TokudomeTSasakiATsujiMUdakaYOyamadaHTsuchiyaHet alReduced PTEN expression and overexpression of miR-17-5p, -19a-3p, -19b-3p, -21-5p, -130b-3p, -221-3p and -222-3p by glioblastoma stem-like cells following irradiation. Oncol Lett (2015) 10:2269–72.10.3892/ol.2015.3594
100
CombsSESchmidTEVaupelPMulthoffG. Stress response leading to resistance in glioblastoma – the need for innovative radiotherapy (iRT) concepts. Cancers (Basel) (2016) 8:15.10.3390/cancers8010015
101
AllenBGBhatiaSKAndersonCMEichenberger-GilmoreJMSibenallerZAMapuskarKAet alKetogenic diets as an adjuvant cancer therapy: history and potential mechanism. Redox Biol (2014) 2:963–70.10.1016/j.redox.2014.08.002
102
StaedtkeVBaiR-YLaterraJ. Investigational new drugs for brain cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs (2016) 1–20.10.1080/13543784.2016.1182497
103
GettsDRSheaLDMillerSDKingNJC. Harnessing nanoparticles for immune modulation. Trends Immunol (2015) 36:419–27.10.1016/j.it.2015.05.007
104
NiuMNaguibYWAldayelAMShiYHurstingSDHershMAet alBiodistribution and in vivo activities of tumor-associated macrophage-targeting nanoparticles incorporated with doxorubicin. Mol Pharm (2014) 11:4425–36.10.1021/mp500565q
105
ZhuSNiuMO’MaryHCuiZ. Targeting of tumor-associated macrophages made possible by PEG-sheddable, mannose-modified nanoparticles. Mol Pharm (2013) 10:3525–30.10.1021/mp400216r
106
HeekTKühneCDepnerHAchaziKDerneddeJHaagR. Synthesis, photophysical, and biological evaluation of sulfated polyglycerol dendronized perylenebisimides (PBIs)-a promising platform for anti-inflammatory theranostic agents?Bioconjug Chem (2016) 27(3):727–36.10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00683
107
ReimannSGrögerDKühneCRieseSBDerneddeJHaagR. Shell cleavable dendritic polyglycerol sulfates show high anti-inflammatory properties by inhibiting L-selectin binding and complement activation. Adv Healthc Mater (2015) 4(14):2154–62.10.1002/adhm.201500503
108
MaysingerDGrögerDLakeALichaKWeinhartMChangPK-Yet alDendritic polyglycerol sulfate inhibits microglial activation and reduces hippocampal CA1 dendritic spine morphology deficits. Biomacromolecules (2015) 16:3073–82.10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00999
109
GettsDRTerryRLGettsMTDeffrasnesCMüllerMvan VredenCet alTherapeutic inflammatory monocyte modulation using immune-modifying microparticles. Sci Transl Med (2014) 6:219ra7.10.1126/scitranslmed.3007563
110
SmithMJBrownJMZamboniWCWalkerNJ. From immunotoxicity to nanotherapy: the effects of nanomaterials on the immune system. Toxicol Sci (2014) 138:249–55.10.1093/toxsci/kfu005
111
KettenmannHHanischU-KNodaMVerkhratskyA. Physiology of microglia. Physiol Rev (2011) 91:461–553.10.1152/physrev.00011.2010
112
TambuyzerBRPonsaertsPNouwenEJ. Microglia: gatekeepers of central nervous system immunology. J Leukoc Biol (2009) 85:352–70.10.1189/jlb.0608385
113
JonesEVCookDMuraiKK. A neuron-astrocyte co-culture system to investigate astrocyte-secreted factors in mouse neuronal development. Methods Mol Biol (2012) 814:341–52.10.1007/978-1-61779-452-0_22
114
RodheJ. Cell culturing of human and murine microglia cell lines. In: JosephBVeneroJL, editors. Microglia Methods in Molecular Biology. New York: Humana Press (2013). p. 11–6.
115
Gresa-ArribasNViéitezCDentesanoGSerratosaJSauraJSolàC. Modelling neuroinflammation in vitro: a tool to test the potential neuroprotective effect of anti-inflammatory agents. PLoS One (2012) 7:e45227.10.1371/journal.pone.0045227
116
SauraJ. Microglial cells in astroglial cultures: a cautionary note. J Neuroinflammation (2007) 4:26.10.1186/1742-2094-4-26
117
PluchinoSZanottiLRossiBBrambillaEOttoboniLSalaniGet alNeurosphere-derived multipotent precursors promote neuroprotection by an immunomodulatory mechanism. Nature (2005) 436:266–71.10.1038/nature03889
118
PluchinoSMuzioLImitolaJDeleidiMAlfaro-CervelloCSalaniGet alPersistent inflammation alters the function of the endogenous brain stem cell compartment. Brain (2008) 131:2564–78.10.1093/brain/awn198
119
LiLWalkerTLZhangYMackayEWBartlettPF. Endogenous interferon γ directly regulates neural precursors in the non-inflammatory brain. J Neurosci (2010) 30:9038–50.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5691-09.2010
120
ChoSWoodABowlbyMR. Brain slices as models for neurodegenerative disease and screening platforms to identify novel therapeutics. Curr Neuropharmacol (2007) 5:19–33.10.2174/157015907780077105
121
HuuskonenJSuuronenTMiettinenRvan GroenTSalminenA. A refined in vitro model to study inflammatory responses in organotypic membrane culture of postnatal rat hippocampal slices. J Neuroinflammation (2005) 2:25.10.1186/1742-2094-2-25
122
HumpelC. Organotypic brain slice cultures: a review. Neuroscience (2015) 305:86–98.10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.086
123
De SimoniAYuL. Preparation of organotypic hippocampal slice cultures: interface method. Nat Protoc (2006) 1:1439–45.10.1038/nprot.2006.228
124
TingJTDaigleTLChenQFengG. Acute brain slice methods for adult and aging animals: application of targeted patch clampanalysis and optogenetics. Methods Mol Biol (2014) 1183:221–42.10.1007/978-1-4939-1096-0_14
125
MishraAO’FarrellFMReynellCHamiltonNBHallCNAttwellD. Imaging pericytes and capillary diameter in brain slices and isolated retinae. Nat Protoc (2014) 9:323–36.10.1038/nprot.2014.019
126
BuskilaYBreenPPTapsonJvan SchaikABartonMMorleyJW. Extending the viability of acute brain slices. Sci Rep (2014) 4:5309.10.1038/srep05309
127
OosterhofNBoddekeEvan HamTJ. Immune cell dynamics in the CNS: learning from the zebrafish. Glia (2015) 63:719–35.10.1002/glia.22780
128
BuckwalterMSWyss-CorayT. Modelling neuroinflammatory phenotypes in vivo. J Neuroinflammation (2004) 1:10.10.1186/1742-2094-1-10
129
NazemASankowskiRBacherMAl-AbedY. Rodent models of neuroinflammation for Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation (2015) 12:74.10.1186/s12974-015-0291-y
130
CazarethJGuyonAHeurteauxCChabryJPetit-PaitelA. Molecular and cellular neuroinflammatory status of mouse brain after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge: importance of CCR2/CCL2 signaling. J Neuroinflammation (2014) 11:132.10.1186/1742-2094-11-132
131
McCarthyRCLuD-YAlkhateebAGardeckAMLeeC-HWessling-ResnickM. Characterization of a novel adult murine immortalized microglial cell line and its activation by amyloid-beta. J Neuroinflammation (2016) 13:21.10.1186/s12974-016-0484-z
132
ButovskyOJedrychowskiMPMooreCSCialicRLanserAJGabrielyGet alIdentification of a unique TGF-β-dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia. Nat Neurosci (2014) 17:131–43.10.1038/nn.3599
133
GreterMLeliosICroxfordAL. Microglia versus myeloid cell nomenclature during brain inflammation. Front Immunol (2015) 6:249.10.3389/fimmu.2015.00249
134
MorrisonBIIIElkinBSDolléJ-PYarmushML. In vitro models of traumatic brain injury. Annu Rev Biomed Eng (2011) 13:91–126.10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124706
135
TangS-CArumugamTVXuXChengAMughalMRJoDGet alPivotal role for neuronal toll-like receptors in ischemic brain injury and functional deficits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2007) 104:13798–803.10.1073/pnas.0702553104
136
LatzEXiaoTSStutzA. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13:397–411.10.1038/nri3452
137
GurungPLukensJRKannegantiT-D. Mitochondria: diversity in the regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Trends Mol Med (2015) 21:193–201.10.1016/j.molmed.2014.11.008
138
HuaK-FChouJ-CKaS-MTasiY-LChenAWuS-Het alCyclooxygenase-2 regulates NLRP3 inflammasome-derived IL-1β production. J Cell Physiol (2015) 230:863–74.10.1002/jcp.24815
139
SavageCDLopez-CastejonGDenesABroughD. NLRP3-inflammasome activating DAMPs stimulate an inflammatory response in glia in the absence of priming which contributes to brain inflammation after injury. Inflammation (2012) 3:288.10.3389/fimmu.2012.00288
140
GoldmannTTayTLPrinzM. Love and death: microglia, NLRP3 and the Alzheimer’s brain. Cell Res (2013) 23:595–6.10.1038/cr.2013.24
141
GustinAKirchmeyerMKoncinaEFeltenPLosciutoSHeurtauxTet alNLRP3 inflammasome is expressed and functional in mouse brain microglia but not in astrocytes. PLoS One (2015) 10:e0130624.10.1371/journal.pone.0130624
142
LiuH-DLiWChenZ-RHuY-CZhangD-DShenWet alExpression of the NLRP3 inflammasome in cerebral cortex after traumatic brain injury in a rat model. Neurochem Res (2013) 38:2072–83.10.1007/s11064-013-1115-z
143
JhaSSrivastavaSYBrickeyWJIoccaHToewsAMorrisonJPet alThe inflammasome sensor, NLRP3, regulates CNS inflammation and demyelination via caspase-1 and interleukin-18. J Neurosci (2010) 30:15811–20.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4088-10.2010
144
Tovar-Y-RomoLBPenagos-PuigARamírez-JarquínJO. Endogenous recovery after brain damage: molecular mechanisms that balance neuronal life/death fate. J Neurochem (2016) 136:13–27.10.1111/jnc.13362
145
TanM-STanLJiangTZhuX-CWangH-FJiaC-Det alAmyloid-β induces NLRP1-dependent neuronal pyroptosis in models of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Death Dis (2014) 5:e1382.10.1038/cddis.2014.348
146
SagulenkoVThygesenSJSesterDPIdrisACridlandJAVajjhalaPRet alAIM2 and NLRP3 inflammasomes activate both apoptotic and pyroptotic death pathways via ASC. Cell Death Differ (2013) 20:1149–60.10.1038/cdd.2013.37
147
SchellerJChalarisASchmidt-ArrasDRose-JohnS. The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6. Biochim Biophys Acta (2011) 1813:878–88.10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.034
148
SmithJADasARaySKBanikNL. Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines released from microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res Bull (2012) 87:10–20.10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.10.004
149
SchellerJGarbersCRose-JohnS. Interleukin-6: from basic biology to selective blockade of pro-inflammatory activities. Semin Immunol (2014) 26:2–12.10.1016/j.smim.2013.11.002
150
SchaperFRose-JohnS. Interleukin-6: biology, signaling and strategies of blockade. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev (2015) 26:475–87.10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.07.004
151
HongS-SChoiJHLeeSYParkY-HParkK-YLeeJYet alA novel small-molecule inhibitor targeting the IL-6 receptor β subunit, glycoprotein 130. J Immunol (2015) 195:237–45.10.4049/jimmunol.1402908
152
RivestS. Molecular insights on the cerebral innate immune system. Brain Behav Immun (2003) 17:13–9.10.1016/S0889-1591(02)00055-7
153
Espinosa-OlivaAMde PablosRMHerreraAJ. Intracranial injection of LPS in rat as animal model of neuroinflammation. Methods Mol Biol (2013) 1041:295–305.10.1007/978-1-62703-520-0_26
154
OpalSMLaterreP-FFrancoisBLaRosaSPAngusDCMiraJ-Pet alEffect of eritoran, an antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on mortality in patients with severe sepsis: the ACCESS randomized trial. JAMA (2013) 309:1154–62.10.1001/jama.2013.2194
155
SmithCWangXYinH. Caspases come together over LPS. Trends Immunol (2015) 36:59–61.10.1016/j.it.2014.12.007
156
GalluzziLLópez-SotoAKumarSKroemerG. Caspases connect cell-death signaling to organismal homeostasis. Immunity (2016) 44:221–31.10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.020
157
ShiJZhaoYWangYGaoWDingJLiPet alInflammatory caspases are innate immune receptors for intracellular LPS. Nature (2014) 514:187–92.10.1038/nature13683
158
YokooHChibaSTomitaKTakashinaMSagaraHYagisitaSet alNeurodegenerative evidence in mice brains with cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis: preventive effect of the free radical scavenger edaravone. PLoS One (2012) 7:e51539.10.1371/journal.pone.0051539
159
DejagerLPinheiroIDejonckheereELibertC. Cecal ligation and puncture: the gold standard model for polymicrobial sepsis?Trends Microbiol (2011) 19:198–208.10.1016/j.tim.2011.01.001
160
RittirschDHuber-LangMSFlierlMAWardPA. Immunodesign of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nat Protoc (2009) 4:31–6.10.1038/nprot.2008.214
161
SawyerRG. Surgical Infections, An Issue of Surgical Clinics. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences (2015).
162
JankowskyJLSluntHHRatovitskiTJenkinsNACopelandNGBorcheltDR. Co-expression of multiple transgenes in mouse CNS: a comparison of strategies. Biomol Eng (2001) 17:157–65.10.1016/S1389-0344(01)00067-3
163
KumarDKVChoiSHWashicoskyKJEimerWATuckerSGhofraniJet alAmyloid-β peptide protects against microbial infection in mouse and worm models of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med (2016) 8:340ra72.10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf1059
164
St MartinJLKluckenJOuteiroTFNguyenPKeller-McGandyCCantuti-CastelvetriIet alDopaminergic neuron loss and up-regulation of chaperone protein mRNA induced by targeted over-expression of alpha-synuclein in mouse substantia nigra. J Neurochem (2007) 100:1449–57.10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04310.x
165
GurneyMEPuHChiuAYDal CantoMCPolchowCYAlexanderDDet alMotor neuron degeneration in mice that express a human Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase mutation. Science (1994) 264:1772–5.10.1126/science.8209258
166
WongPCPardoCABorcheltDRLeeMKCopelandNGJenkinsNAet alAn adverse property of a familial ALS-linked SOD1 mutation causes motor neuron disease characterized by vacuolar degeneration of mitochondria. Neuron (1995) 14:1105–16.10.1016/0896-6273(95)90259-7
167
KozaiTDYLiXBodilyLMCaparosaEMZenonosGACarlisleDLet alEffects of caspase-1 knockout on chronic neural recording quality and longevity: insight into cellular and molecular mechanisms of the reactive tissue response. Biomaterials (2014) 35:9620–34.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.006
168
SwiechLHeidenreichMBanerjeeAHabibNLiYTrombettaJet alIn vivo interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol (2015) 33:102–6.10.1038/nbt.3055
169
YenS-TZhangMDengJMUsmanSJSmithCNParker-ThornburgJet alSomatic mosaicism and allele complexity induced by CRISPR/Cas9 RNA injections in mouse zygotes. Dev Biol (2014) 393:3–9.10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.06.017
170
MaysingerDJiJHutterECooperE. Nanoparticle-based and bioengineered probes and sensors to detect physiological and pathological biomarkers in neural cells. Front Neurosci (2015) 9:480.10.3389/fnins.2015.00480
171
MossakowskiAAPohlanJBremerDLindquistRMillwardJMBockMet alTracking CNS and systemic sources of oxidative stress during the course of chronic neuroinflammation. Acta Neuropathol (2015) 130:799–814.10.1007/s00401-015-1497-x
172
RadbruchHBremerDMothesRGüntherRRinnenthalJLPohlanJet alIntravital FRET: probing cellular and tissue function in vivo. Int J Mol Sci (2015) 16:11713–27.10.3390/ijms160511713
173
ZhangFMastorakosPMishraMKMangravitiAHwangLZhouJet alUniform brain tumor distribution and tumor associated macrophage targeting of systemically administered dendrimers. Biomaterials (2015) 52:507–16.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.053
174
SpitzerNSammonsGSPriceEM. Autofluorescent cells in rat brain can be convincing impostors in green fluorescent reporter studies. J Neurosci Methods (2011) 197:48–55.10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.029
175
NeumannMGabelD. Simple method for reduction of autofluorescence in fluorescence microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem (2002) 50:437–9.10.1177/002215540205000315
176
GoldeyGJRoumisDKGlickfeldLLKerlinAMReidRCBoninVet alRemovable cranial windows for long-term imaging in awake mice. Nat Protoc (2014) 9:2515–38.10.1038/nprot.2014.165
177
HoltmaatABonhoefferTChowDKChuckowreeJDe PaolaVHoferSBet alLong-term, high-resolution imaging in the mouse neocortex through a chronic cranial window. Nat Protoc (2009) 4:1128–44.10.1038/nprot.2009.89
178
DorandRDBarkauskasDSEvansTAPetrosiuteAHuangAY. Comparison of intravital thinned skull and cranial window approaches to study CNS immunobiology in the mouse cortex. Intravital (2014) 3:e29728.10.4161/intv.29728
179
YangGPanFParkhurstCNGrutzendlerJGanW-B. Thinned-skull cranial window technique for long-term imaging of the cortex in live mice. Nat Protoc (2010) 5:201–8.10.1038/nprot.2009.222
180
YuXZuoY. Two-photon in vivo imaging of dendritic spines in the mouse cortex using a thinned-skull preparation. J Vis Exp (2014) (87):e51520.10.3791/51520
181
AswendtMAdamczakJCouillard-DespresSHoehnM. Boosting bioluminescence neuroimaging: an optimized protocol for brain studies. PLoS One (2013) 8:e55662.10.1371/journal.pone.0055662
182
CordeauPLalancette-HébertMWengYCKrizJ. Estrogen receptors alpha mediates postischemic inflammation in chronically estrogen-deprived mice. Neurobiol Aging (2016) 40:50–60.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.01.002
183
Dany ArsenaultJD-O. A novel combinational approach of microstimulation and bioluminescence imaging to study the mechanisms of action of cerebral electrical stimulation in mice: stimulation device for small animals. J Physiol (2015) 593(Pt 10):2257–78.10.1113/jphysiol.2014.287243
184
Lalancette-HébertMMoquinAChoiAOKrizJMaysingerD. Lipopolysaccharide-QD micelles induce marked induction of TLR2 and lipid droplet accumulation in olfactory bulb microglia. Mol Pharm (2010) 7:1183–94.10.1021/mp1000372
185
MoquinAHutterEChoiAOKhatchadourianACastonguayAWinnikFMet alCaspase-1 activity in microglia stimulated by pro-inflammagen nanocrystals. ACS Nano (2013) 7:9585–98.10.1021/nn404473g
186
MaysingerDBehrendtMLalancette-HébertMKrizJ. Real-time imaging of astrocyte response to quantum dots: in vivo screening model system for biocompatibility of nanoparticles. Nano Lett (2007) 7:2513–20.10.1021/nl071611t
187
MaysingerDHutterE. Nanoparticle-based caspase sensors. Nanomedicine (Lond) (2015) 10:483–501.10.2217/nnm.14.158
188
DingYLiJEnterinaJRShenYZhangITewsonPHet alRatiometric biosensors based on dimerization-dependent fluorescent protein exchange. Nat Methods (2015) 12:195–8.10.1038/nmeth.3261
189
KongLTangJLittleJPYuYLämmermannTLinCPet alContinuous volumetric imaging via an optical phase-locked ultrasound lens. Nat Methods (2015) 12:759–62.10.1038/nmeth.3476
190
ParkJ-HSunWCuiM. High-resolution in vivo imaging of mouse brain through the intact skull. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2015) 112:9236–41.10.1073/pnas.1505939112
191
GovorunovaEGSineshchekovOAJanzRLiuXSpudichJL. Natural light-gated anion channels: a family of microbial rhodopsins for advanced optogenetics. Science (2015) 349:647–50.10.1126/science.aaa7484
192
DeisserothK. Optogenetics: 10 years of microbial opsins in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci (2015) 18:1213–25.10.1038/nn.4091
193
BerndtALeeSYWietekJRamakrishnanCSteinbergEERashidAJet alStructural foundations of optogenetics: determinants of channelrhodopsin ion selectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2016) 113:822–9.10.1073/pnas.1523341113
194
FigueiredoMLaneSTangFLiuBHHewinsonJMarinaNet alOptogenetic experimentation on astrocytes. Exp Physiol (2011) 96:40–50.10.1113/expphysiol.2010.052597
195
VazeyEMAston-JonesG. New tricks for old dogmas: optogenetic and designer receptor insights for Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res (2013) 1511:153–63.10.1016/j.brainres.2013.01.021
196
MaoGQuFSt. CroixCMTyurinaYYPlanas-IglesiasJJiangJet alMitochondrial redox opto-lipidomics reveals mono-oxygenated cardiolipins as pro-apoptotic death signals. ACS Chem Biol (2016) 11:530–40.10.1021/acschembio.5b00737
197
GregoryAETitballRWilliamsonD. Vaccine delivery using nanoparticles. Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2013) 3:13.10.3389/fcimb.2013.00013
198
DunkleABlanchetteCBooneTCorzettMFischerNHoeprichPet alCo-delivery of adjuvant and subunit antigens via a nanoparticle platform induces tissue-associated and systemic adaptive immune responses (P4409). J Immunol (2013) 190:205.14.
199
ZhaoLSethAWibowoNZhaoC-XMitterNYuCet alNanoparticle vaccines. Vaccine (2014) 32:327–37.10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.069
Summary
Keywords
neuroinflammation, microglia, immunomodulation, nutrition, microbiota–gut–brain axis, intravital imaging, nanodelivery systems, nanomedicine
Citation
Maysinger D and Zhang I (2016) Nutritional and Nanotechnological Modulators of Microglia. Front. Immunol. 7:270. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00270
Received
17 March 2016
Accepted
27 June 2016
Published
15 July 2016
Volume
7 - 2016
Edited by
Saparna Pai, Centenary Institute, Australia
Reviewed by
Ihsan Gursel, Bilkent University, Turkey; Pavan Bhargava, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA
Updates
Copyright
© 2016 Maysinger and Zhang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dusica Maysinger, dusica.maysinger@mcgill.ca
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.