ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 17 October 2016

Sec. Molecular Innate Immunity

Volume 7 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00420

The High Prevalence of Functional Complement Defects Induced by Chemotherapy

  • 1. Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory AMC, Department of Immunopathology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • 2. Academic Medical Center (AMC), Emma Children’s Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • 3. Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory AMC, Department of Blood Cell Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

Introduction:

To date, oncology patients are more dependent on non-cellular host defense against pathogens due to intensive (chemo)therapy-related bone marrow suppression. Since data on complement functionality in oncology patients are limited, we aimed to investigate the innate complement function in relation to the type of malignancy and therapy in a longitudinal cohort of patients.

Methods:

A large single-center, prospective non-intervention study was conducted, in which blood samples were taken from patients before, during, and after treatment with chemotherapy and/or subsequent admittance for (febrile) neutropenia.

Results/findings:

Analysis of 48 patients showed a high percentage of defects in complement activity of the alternative pathway (19.1%), the classical pathway (4.3%), or both (42.6%). Post hoc analysis of six different treatment protocols with more than three patients each showed distinct effects of specific therapies. Whereas patients treated according to the Ewing, EpSSG-rhabdomyosarcoma, or SIOP CNS germ cell tumor protocol showed no defects, patients treated according to the ALL-11 (leukemia), the EURAMOS I (osteosarcoma), or the ACNS (medulloblastoma) protocols showed an almost universal reduction in complement function. Although we could not explain the reduced complement functionality under all conditions, a strong effect was observed following high-dose methotrexate or ifosfamide.

Conclusion:

Acquired complement defects were commonly observed in more than 50% of oncology patients, some of which associated with certain chemotherapeutic drugs. Additional studies are needed to determine the clinical and therapeutic context of complement defects and their possible effect on treatment outcome or the increased risk of infection.

Introduction

Infection is the most important cause of treatment-related deaths in oncology and the second most common reason for hospitalization during therapy (, ). The risk of infection and inflammation is increased in oncology patients due to treatment-induced neutropenia (), making them more dependent on their innate, non-cellular immunity. This dependence on innate host defense mechanisms might be more prominent in children because of the relative immaturity of the immune system (). Both the intactness of the barriers of skin, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal surface membranes as well as a functional innate immunity provide the most relevant defense against bacterial and fungal pathogens in oncology patients. To a large extent, this depends on complement proteins recognizing conserved so-called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) on the microbes on these surfaces upon invasion when these barriers are breached, for instance, by chemotherapy or radiation effects.

Although complement components are synthesized early in gestation, neonates show an immature innate immune response at birth, which poses an increased risk for infection. Concentrations of complement components are lower early during infancy compared to adults but rapidly normalize within weeks after birth (, ). Complement activation leads to opsonization of pathogens for phagocytosis, induces an inflammatory response, and eventually lyses pathogens via the membrane attack complex. Activation is induced via three distinctive pathways, the classical pathway (CP), the lectin pathway (LP), and the alternative pathway (AP) (). Binding of antibody to antigen can activate the C1 complex (composed of C1q, C1r, and C1s), which will lead to the activation of C4 and C2, resulting in the generation of a C3-convertase C4b2a to activate the terminal pathway (). In the LP, the binding of mannan-binding lectin (MBL), or one of the different ficolins (FCN), to their specific ligands will activate the MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs), hereby generating a C3-convertase via a similar mechanism to the CP (). Activation of the AP can occur via the spontaneous activation of C3 to C3(H2O), which, if not inhibited, generates a C3-convertase [C3(H2O)Bb], or via activation on apoptotic cells (), or via amplification of the initial response of the CP or LP (). The formation of a C3-convertase activates the terminal pathway, resulting in the formation of the membrane attack complex and lysis of the target cell (, ).

Although a role for complement factors has been described for the host immunosurveillance against cancer (), recent papers have instead confirmed a potentially harmful role of complement via the active C3a and C5a fragments that may contribute to the initiation of malignant cells (, ). Limited data have been published regarding the effect of cancer therapeutics on complement components, and either way, both the effect of therapy on the protein levels of complement components () or the effect of therapy on the functionality of the complement pathways have not been well studied to date (, ).

Our previous report on a small cohort of oncology patients during MBL-substitution therapy suggested preexisting defects in complement activation (). To confirm these previously observed reductions in complement activation in oncology patients and to correlate the effect of chemotherapy on the complement system in greater detail, a longitudinal observational study was conducted in patients being treated for diverse malignancies, including hematological malignancies and various solid tumors.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Protocol

Between 1 September, 2012 and 1 September, 2014, all pediatric oncology patients who were admitted to the oncology department of the Emma Children’s Hospital, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, were eligible for inclusion in the complement study (C2012). After inclusion, patients were anonymized after written informed consent from parents and children (>12 years) was obtained. The study was conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (CCMO registered NL39747.018.12).

Patient Selection

Eligibility criteria included pediatric oncology patients, irrespective of the treatment of the tumor (e.g., chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, or combinations hereof), who were admitted to the hospital for oncological treatment or admitted to the oncological ward for any other reason, such as, but not limited to, suspected or proven infection (Figure 1). Blood was drawn at specific time points (T), when possible, on the day of diagnosis (T = IC), before the start of therapy (T = B), during therapy (T = D), and after therapy (T = A), and thereafter, during episodes of febrile neutropenia (FN; neutropenia <500 cells/μL) or periods of suspected infection, continuing during admission with blood serial sampling every other day (T = 1, T = 2, etc.), only at moments of routine blood sampling for any clinical indication. The next time point was when the patient was recovered from FN (T = Q, recovery of FN) or proven infection.

Figure 1

End-Points

The primary end-points of the study were (1) the presence and prevalence of transient reduced complement functionality, (2) determining the effect of therapy and malignancy to reduced functionality of complement activation, i.e., the association of reduced complement functionality with specific therapeutic regimes or specific malignancies, if possible, and (3) determining the association of neutropenia and reduced complement functionality. Data on the occurrence and duration of fever, (proven) infection, and medication were obtained from the patient files. To determine a possible effect of therapy, only the largest groups of patients with similar treatment were selected for further post hoc analysis. Observational periods were defined as the period of days between admittance to the hospital, often related to oncological treatment or FN, and time of discharge. Because characteristics related to therapy and course of disease could change over time, different observation periods per patient could be defined. Diagnostic results (neutropenia, cell counts, organ failure) and different clinical parameters (mucositis, general well-being) were analyzed in relation to complement function. Total levels of complement component C3 (gram per Liter) and the complement C3 activation-dependent split product C3d [compared to fully activated normal serum aged (NSA) for 1 week at room temperature] were both obtained from the diagnostic department.

Power Analysis

Transient reduction of functionality of the AP of complement was first observed during an MBL-substitution study in MBL-deficient patients. The number of patients required to determine a transient reduction of complement functionality was calculated at 24 patients. Although the activation of the AP is independent of the activation of the LP or CP, this clinical observational study was corrected for the distribution of MBL-deficiency within the normal population.

Blood Samples

Blood samples from the patients were obtained during routine sampling. All blood samples were processed within 1 h, and serum, plasma, and buffy coat were isolated, according to the previously described protocols (, ), and stored at −80°C until use.

Assays

Functionality of the three complement activation pathways was performed at Sanquin Research and the Landsteiner laboratory, AMC, Amsterdam, using the well-described commercially available Wielisa® Complement system Screen COMPL 300 (Wieslab, Lund, Sweden) (, ). The ELISA was developed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, specific pre-coated plates for the different complement activation pathways were incubated with a fixed dilution of serum, depending on the pathway of interest, and compared to a positive control (%PC), which is given the value 100%.

Due to the strong influence of MBL levels on the functionality of the LP (), both MBL serum levels and MBL genotype were determined to confirm the results of the Wielisa®. MBL genotyping was performed by Taqman assay, as previously described (). By random selection of five samples per patient (if a series of more was available), MBL serum levels were measured as described before (). Briefly, after incubation of serum to mannan-coated plates, mannan-bound MBL was detected using biotinylated mouse-anti MBL (αMBL-1) () and compared to a serum pool (with a known concentration of 1.3 μg/mL).

The AP functionality was also measured by AP50 (i.e., the amount of serum needed for 50% hemolysis of rabbit erythrocytes by AP activation) (). By incubating lower dilutions of serum with rabbit erythrocytes in the presence of calcium chelators to prevent CP and LP activation, the functionality of the AP can be selectively assessed. Activation of the AP will result in lysis of the rabbit erythrocytes, and the increase in absorbance of released hemoglobin can be measured in the cell-free supernatant as compared to a 100% lysis control obtained by incubation of the erythrocytes with saponin [reference values: 75–125% ()].

Statistical Analysis

The association between MBL levels and functionality was calculated using a one-phase association with ordinary fit (no restriction). To determine a temporal effect of therapy on the functionality of the complement system, patient samples were paired within the different chemotherapy sessions. Significance was calculated with a paired, two-sided T-test. Data are expressed as mean ± SD in case of normal distributed data, unless otherwise mentioned, and as median (range) for not normally distributed data. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Patient characteristics are described in Table 1. The total number of patients included in C2012 was 48. Patients were coded CA-001 to CA-048. The median age of the patients [27 males (56.3%), 21 females (43.7%)] was 8.0 years (range: 0.3–17.6). The median follow-up was 488.5 days (range: 49–727), for a total number of 794 time points. Each patient received a unique identification number and was followed during different admittances to the hospital. One patient (CA-017) was included but was never admitted to the hospital and therefore excluded from further analysis. The larger diagnostic groups analyzed were acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n = 5; 10.4%), osteosarcoma (n = 7; 14.6%), Ewing sarcoma (n = 5; 10.4%), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 3; 6.3%), germ cell tumors (n = 3; 6.3%), and medulloblastoma (n = 3; 6.3%). Detailed description of functionality of the complement system of the specific diagnostic groups is described in Table 2. The remainder of the patients (n = 21; 43.8%) was not analyzed for specific associations with therapy or malignancy, due to the low number of similar therapies or lack of shared diagnoses within the study population.

Table 1

PatientSexaAge (years)Tumor
Therapy protocol
Follow-up (days)TeMBL genotype
SbGcRd
CA-001M3.2Ewing sarcomaSVIIIcEuroEwing1974LXPA/LXPAf
CA-002M1.9AMLHIbDB AML 017278HYPA/HYPA
CA-003M3.3NeuroblastomaSIVaHR chemo71319HYPA/LXPA
CA-004F3.4Pre B ALLHIaALL-1168477HYPA/HYPAf
CA-005M17.6BNHLHIIbLMB 2001 C68414HYPA/LXPA
CA-006F11.7GCTSXMAKEI 961503LYPA/LYQA
CA-007F6.2Pre B ALLHIaALL-1167643HYPA/LYQAf
CA-008M17.0GCTSXSIOP CNS GCT 20096695LYQA/LYQCf
CA-009F2.5Pleuropulmonal blastomaSXIIaChemotherapy65617HYPD/LXPA
CA-010M9.9GCTSXSIOP CNS GCT 20096553LXPA/LYQAf
CA-011M15.6Ewing sarcomaSVIIIcEwing 200864329LYPB/LYQAf
CA-012F15.8OsteosarcomaSVIIIaEURAMOS I64128LYPB/LYQAf
CA-013M14.9Burkitt lymphomaHIIcCOP COPADM16307HYPA/LYPB
CA-014M12.0HodgkinHIIaEuronet PHL CL16169HYPA/LYPB
CA-015F14.7OsteosarcomaSVIIIaEURAMOS I59928HYPA/LYPAf
CA-016M3.9Alveolar RMSSIXaEpSSG-RMS 200559824HYPA/LYPAf
CA-017M1.5NeuroblastomaSIVaChemotherapy5880n/a
CA-018M10.8Burkitt lymphomaHIIcLMB 200158823HYPA/HYPA
CA-019F1.6EpendymomaSIIIaChemotherapy58742LXPA/LXPA
CA-020M16.3ALLHIaALL-1157432HYPA/LXPAf
CA-021M14.4Ewing sarcomaSVIIIcEwing 200856712LXPA/LYQAf
CA-022M12.8OsteosarcomaSVIIIaEURAMOS I32917LYPB/LXPAf
CA-023M6.5T-ALLHIaALL-1154927HYPD/HYPAf
CA-024F0.3Infant ALLHIaInterfant 06 HR498LXPA/LYQC
CA-025M12.7GCTSXSIOP CNS GCT 9653212LYPB/LYQCf
CA-026M2.9Melanotic neuroectodermal tumorSVIIIcChemotherapy5229LYPA/LYQA
CA-027M1.7Opticus gliomaSIIIcSIOP-LGG 200450714HYPA/LXPA
CA-028F14.9Anaplastic large-cell lymphomaHIIALCL-9949014HYPA/HYPD
CA-029M14.5Hodgkin lymphomaHIIaEuronet PHL-C1 TG348710HYPA/LYPB
CA-030M14.5OsteosarcomaSVIIIaEURAMOS I42333LYPB/LYQAf
CA-031F4.3Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumorSIIIcEuro rhabdoid CNS 201040519LXPA/LYQA
CA-032M2.9RMS DSIXaEpSSG-RMS 2005 SR2896HYPD/LYQAf
CA-033F7.7OsteosarcomaSVIIIaEURAMOS I37525LYQA/LXPAf
CA-034F7.5Ewing sarcomaSVIIIcEwing 200837113LYQC/LYPAf
CA-035F2.4PNETSIIIcHEADSTART III37112HYPD/HYPA
CA-036F14.7OsteosarcomaSVIIIaEURAMOS I36713HYPA/LYQAf
CA-037M13.8OsteosarcomaSVIIIaEURAMOS I33333HYPA/LXPAf
CA-038F12.5MedulloblastomaSIIIcACNS03313448HYPD/HYPAf
CA-039M6.9MedulloblastomaSIIIcACNS03323139HYPA/LYPBf
CA-040F8.2MedulloblastomaSIIIcACNS033230714LXPA/LYQAf
CA-041M13.2CNS germinomaSXaCNS GCT 20092932n/af
CA-042F16.4B-NHLHIIbB-NHL Skion25812LYPB/LYQA
CA-043F1.8ALLHIaALL-1121322LXPA/LYQAf
CA-044F13.2OsteosarcomaSVIIIaEURAMOS I6012HYPA/LYPBf
CA-045M0.7Embryonal RMSSIXaEPSSG subgroup c1885HYPA/LXPAf
CA-046F1.8Ewing sarcomaSVIIIcEWING 20081604LXPA/LXPAf
CA-047M2.9HepatoblastomaSVIISIOPEL 3 SR1076LXPA/LXPA
CA-048F5.3Wilms tumorSVIaSIOP 2001978HYPA/HYPA

Patient characteristics.

aF(emale) or M(ale).

bS(olid) or H(ematological) malignancy.

cClassification of diagnostic group of malignancy according to Steliarova-Foucher et al. ().

dR(esection).

eT(imepoints).

fSelected for further analysis.

Table 2

Patient (n = 5)Age (years)TumorTherapyFollow-up (days)Time points (n = 201)CP
AP
Median% PC (range)Median% PC (range)
CA-0043.4Pre B ALLALL-1168476a85.20–123.238.70–113.5
CA-0076.2Pre B ALLALL-11676439111.1–109.8770–112
CA-02016.3ALLALL-115743286.51–12049.50–118
CA-0236.5T-ALLALL-115492780.52–124170–135
CA-0431.8ALLALL-1121322103.886.4–106.281.479.9–100
Median (range)574 (213–684)32 (22–77)87.3(0–124)48.7(0–135)

Patients (n = 7)Age (years)TumorTherapyFollow-up (days)Time points (n = 189)CP
AP
Median% PC (range)Median% PC (range)

CA-01215.8OsteosarcomaEURAMOS I6412810084.7–117.310068.6–113.5
CA-01514.7OsteosarcomaEURAMOS I599289614.4–116.470.52.1–100
CA-02212.8OsteosarcomaEURAMOS I3291797.267–11094.22–116
CA-03014.5OsteosarcomaEURAMOS I423339153–121.2814.9–115.4
CA-0337.7OsteosarcomaEURAMOS I37525a10659.9–133.687.711.5–120.4
CA-03614.7OsteosarcomaEURAMOS I36713a101.533.3–134.779.832–105
CA-03713.8OsteosarcomaEURAMOS I33333a103.30–139.595.90–217.3
Median (range)375 (60–641)25 (12–33)100.0(0–139.5)87.60(0–217.3)

Patients (n = 5)Age (years)TumorTherapyFollow-up (days)Time points (n = 62)CP
AP
Median% PC (range)Median% PC (range)

CA-0013.2Ewing sarcomaEuroEwing1974100100–1009883–100
CA-01115.6Ewing sarcomaEwing 2008643299123.9–100.184.44.1–108
CA-02114.4Ewing sarcomaEwing 20085671295.2567.1–106.810072.78–131.3
CA-0347.5Ewing sarcomaEwing 20083711310062.8–117.798.340.5–120.8
CA-0461.8Ewing sarcomaEwing 2008107499.592–128.6101.392.3–105
Median (range)371 (107–643)13 (4–29)97.0523.90–128.696.904.1–131.3

Patients (n = 3)Age (years)TumorTherapyFollow-up (days)Time points (n = 35)CP
AP
Median% PC (range)Median% PC (range)

CA-0163.9Alveolar RMSEpSSG-RMS 055982497.6575.4–111.478.37.6–102
CA-0322.9RMSEpSSG-RMS 05289693.0532–112.7621–86.2
CA-0450.7Embryonal RMSEpSSG sgc1885113.894.24–130.146.6222.5–128.4
Median (range)289 (188–598)6 (5–24)99.1032–130.166.831–128.4

Patients (n = 3)Age (years)TumorTherapyFollow-up (days)Time points (n = 20)CP
AP
Median% PC (range)Median% PC (range)

CA-00817.0GCTSIOP CNS GCT 2009669510095.2–103.410062.3–100
CA-0109.9GCTSIOP CNS GCT 2009655310098.3–10096.373–100
CA-02512.7GCTSIOP CNS GCT 19965321297.474–110.4956.0–100
Median (range)655 (532–669)5 (3–12)99.674–110.497.16.0–100

Patients (n = 5)Age (years)TumorTherapyFollow-up (days)Time points (n = 31)CP
AP
(%PC) (range)(%PC) (range)

CA-03812.5MedulloblastomaACNS03313448100.280.5–124.940.256.8–56.50
CA-0396.9MedulloblastomaACNS0332313995.4075.5–123.129.004.0–100.0
CA-0408.2MedulloblastomaACNS033230714112.578.44–13761.2912.10–164.7
Median (range)307 (307–344)9 (8–14)106.175.5–13744.504.0–164.7

Complement activation functionality of patients within six different therapy protocols.

aDue the experimental and logistical error, not all samples could be measured.

The Lectin Pathway of Complement

One single complete MBL-deficiency was observed in a patient with MBL protein levels below the detection limit (CA-025). This deficiency was confirmed by genotyping. No other complete genetic complement deficiencies were found within the included patients, since all patients showed normal functionality of the different activating pathways of complement during the observational period at several independent time points.

Activation of the LP of complement was directly related to MBL serum levels (r2 = 0.9071) (Figure 2A) and genotype (Figure 2B). Since MBL is a highly variable plasma protein based on genotype and acute phase response reactivity () (Appendix B in Supplementary Material), we focused in our subsequent analyses solely on the functionality of the CP and AP cascade of complement activation.

Figure 2

The Classical and Alternative Pathway of Complement

The cutoff for abnormal functionality of the CP was measured by Wielisa® COMPL 300 set at <75% and for the functionality of the AP at <40% of the positive control levels (%PC) (). We observed a wide range of complement activities in our patients for the CP, from being completely inactive to normal [median 96% (range 0–137.0%)]. This was also true for the AP activity [median 79% (range 0–164.7%)] (Figure 3A).

Figure 3

) for CP functionality (abnormal <75%) and AP functionality (<40%) in the WIELISA assay. Functionality is depicted as percentage of a positive control (%PC).

No reduced functionality at any point was observed in 34.0% patients, whereas a reduced functionality was observed in both pathways in 42.6%, or in a single pathway in 23.4% (i.e., 4.3% in the CP and 19.1% in the AP).

In total, 24.8% (n = 166/669) of the time points analyzed showed a reduced functionality of the complement system in either the CP or the AP, or both (Figure 3A): specific CP defects were observed in 18.7% (n = 31/166) of all defects, whereas a reduction of the AP was seen in 45.2% (n = 75/166) of the time points (Figure 3B; Appendix C in Supplementary Material). A reduction of CP functionality coincided with a reduction of the functionality of the AP in 36.1% (n = 60/166) of time points with reduced functionality (Figure 3B). Since there was not a complete overlap, our findings indicated that selective CP or AP defects in oncology patients may occur. The number of patients in which these specific defects in CP (4.6% of all time points) and or AP (11.2% of all time points) do not coincide is suggestive for the presence of some as yet unknown factors, which have a selective deleterious impact on these complement pathways.

Correlation of Complement Functionality to Specific Protocols

To determine potential drug-induced inhibition on the complement system, the patients were analyzed in specific treatment-related groups, and functionality was analyzed in relation to the harmonized therapy protocols used to treat these patients. Due to the heterogeneity of the patient population, the top six therapy groups were selected for further analysis of some of these oncological patient subgroups (Table 2). All patients with ALL, patients with osteosarcoma (n = 6/7), and all patients with medulloblastoma showed reduced CP and/or AP functionality at several time points following chemotherapy, whereas patients with Ewing sarcoma or germ cell tumors had no significant reduction in complement activation upon treatment for their solid tumor (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Of the patients with clear abnormalities in the complement activation routes, we analyzed the six largest treatment regimens. Analysis of the different time points (n = 200) of the included ALL patients [n = 5, all treated according to the ALL-11 protocol ()] showed a clear negative effect of chemotherapy on the complement pathway activity. We observed only few reductions in complement activity of the CP (n = 5/77; 6.5%), compared to the AP (n = 27/77; 35.1%), whereas the majority of samples showed simultaneous reductions in both CP and AP activity (n = 45/77; 58.4%) (Figure 5A).

Figure 5

Because of the high prevalence of the more common presence of combined defects in both the CP and AP in 60% of the ALL-11 samples, a shared factor was suspected. Temporal analysis of the complement functionality in the individual patients was unable to distinguish a direct correlation to a therapeutic compound (Figure 5B). Upon analysis of total C3 levels to determine possible reductions in protein synthesis or increases in complement consumption, we found neither any correlation with the detected defects in complement functionality (Figure 5C) nor with the levels of C3d, which can be used as a marker for complement activation and consumption (Figure 5D). The ratio between C3d and C3 can be used as a measure of C3 activation (). No correlation was observed between the ratio of C3d and total C3 and functionality of the CP or the functionality of the AP (data not shown).

In the subgroup of osteosarcoma patients (n = 7) treated according to the EURAMOS I protocol (), a total of 189 time points were available for measuring the CP and AP. No correlation explaining the specific reduction in complement functionality of the CP or the reduced functionality of the CP and AP was detected (Figure 6A). On the other hand, patients receiving high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX, 12 g/m2) (Table 3) showed less AP functionality directly following MTX infusion [most clearly by combining the different time points (n = 21)] (Figure 6B), before and after HD-MTX of all osteosarcoma patients, which showed a significant and immediate decrease (p < 0.001) (Figure 6C). To confirm these effects in a different method, AP activity was also tested in a hemolytic assay (AP50), demonstrating a similar decrease in AP functionality after infusion of MTX (p < 0.01) (Figure 6D). One pair of plasma samples was excluded (open symbol) because the patient received rescue-therapy (Rescuvolin™) for toxic MTX levels above the upper cutoff used (i.e., 10 μg/L after 24 h; blood levels were closely monitored as part of the protocol). This latter patient showed rapid recovery of AP functionality following rescue-therapy, supporting the direct effect of HD-MTX on the functionality of the AP.

Figure 6

Table 3

Malignancy
ALL
Osteosarcoma
Ewing sarcoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Germ cell tumor
Medullablastoma
Therapy protocolALL-11 ()EURAMOS I ()Ewing 1999 ()Ewing 2008 ()EpSSG–RMS ()SIOP CNS GCT ()ACNS 0331 ()ACNS 0332 ()
Actinomycin D+++
Adriamycin++
Asparaginase+
Busulfan/melphalan++
Carboplatin++
Cisplatin+++++
Cyclophosphamide+
Cytosine arabinoside+
Daunorubicin+
Doxorubicin+++
Etoposide+++++
Fludarabine+
Ifosfamide+++++
Lomustine+
6-Mercaptopurine+
Methotrexate++
Treosulfan/melphalan+
Vincristine++++++
Vinorelbine+
Zoledronate+

Overview of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic compounds in the different treatment protocols.

Patients with Ewing sarcoma (n = 5) received a therapeutic drug regimen of which several compounds were shared with the other treatment subgroups with exception of the alkylating antineoplastic agents busulfan, melphalan, or treosulfan (, ) (Table 3). We observed a reduction in the functionality of the CP (n = 7/62; 11.3%), whereas a reduction in the AP activity or a combination of the AP and CP activities was negligible and only present once (n = 1/62; 1.6%). The treatment protocol for Ewing sarcoma is the only chemotherapeutic treatment protocol, which appeared to be associated with a specific reduction in the CP. Despite all efforts, we were unable to find a direct correlation between these shared or unique drugs and the complement activity measured in the functional assays.

Although patients with rhabdomyosarcoma received similar forms of chemotherapy as the patients with Ewing sarcoma (, ), only some time points showed a clear reduction in the AP complement activity (Figure 7A). Further analysis indicated that these reductions in AP activity were associated with ifosfamide (Figure 7B). Ifosfamide is also given to patients with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, or germ cell tumors, but the drug-related effect on the AP activity as observed in rhabdomyosarcoma was not seen in these latter two groups. On the other hand, post hoc analysis of time points of the osteosarcoma patients receiving ifosfamide confirmed this drug-related association (Appendix D in Supplementary Material). No correlation of a complement defect with the dosage or other clinical parameters was found. Patients with a germ cell tumor were treated according to the SIOP CNS GCT protocol, which combines radiotherapy and chemotherapy (, ), but no specific relation with complement functionality was identified. The small number of patients and/or the limited longitudinal time series that were available in some of the patient subgroups make it difficult to establish a common cause for these transient reductions in complement functionality.

Figure 7

Patients with medulloblastoma (n = 3) were treated according to the ACNS-protocol (, ), and all patients showed reduced AP activity at certain time points, while they kept an intact functionality of the CP (Figure 4F). In our post hoc analysis, we were unable to determine a possible correlation to therapy, neither chemotherapy nor radiotherapy, or other clinical parameters.

Discussion

Significant reductions in the activating pathways of the complement system were observed in oncology patients. We reproduced our previous observation, showing the reductions of complement activity following chemotherapy were transient of nature (). In this clinical prospective study, some of oncological treatment regimens were found to specifically affect one or more of the three different activating pathways of the complement system.

In 66% of the patients included, a defect in the CP and/or AP route was observed. A reduced functionality in both pathways was observed in 42.6% of the patients (n = 20/47) and in 23.4% of the patients (i.e., 4.3% in the CP and 19.1% in the AP) in a single pathway. Because of the variability of MBL levels in the blood samples (and only one completely MBL-deficient patient), the current analysis focused on the CP and AP pathways of complement.

In these 28 affected patients within the 6 different therapeutic groups, a total of 25% of the time points analyzed showed a reduced function of 1 or more of the activation pathways of the complement system. A reduced CP and AP activity was observed in 14 and 20% of all time points measured. Although there was considerable overlap between CP and AP defects, we identified a number of specific defects, suggesting the presence of as yet unidentified highly selective factors that may impact on these functional complement pathways.

In subsequent post hoc analysis, specific chemotherapeutic drugs could be implicated in the inhibitory effect on the complement activity in different patient subgroups, as suggested for leukemia, osteosarcoma, or CNS tumors. The effect of chemotherapy complement components has been previously tested in patients with breast cancer receiving epirubicin–docetaxel combination therapy ().

As observed in our study, reduced functionality of the complement system could occur by inhibition, reduced production, or by increased turnover and depletion of complement proteins. There are few studies pointing to a selective activation of the classical, lectin, and AP of complement in the presence of different malignancies (, ). Cancer cells are known to develop strategies to inhibit and evade complement activation on the membrane by the overexpression of regulatory proteins (, ). Systemic inhibition of the complement system has not been described to date. However, if any of the malignant processes per se were directly responsible for the systemic complement defects observed, the reduced functionality of the complement system would have been already more prominently present before the start of chemotherapy. Subsequent effective therapeutic sessions would reduce the tumor burden and hereby reduce the inhibitory capacity of the cancer. Similarly, an increased and prolonged consumption, because of tumor cell death as induced by the chemotherapy, would have resulted in a more prominent inhibitory effect on the complement system in earlier therapeutic sessions. Reduction of the tumor load would reduce the amount of consumption of complement components. If an increased consumption could result in a reduced capacity to activate the activation pathway, this would not directly explain a selective inhibitory activation of different pathways depending on the therapeutic regimens. The direct effect of cancer therapeutics on complement components could only be demonstrated for the therapeutic compounds MTX and ifosfamide.

The strong correlation with specific treatment regimens suggests either a direct effect of the drugs as part of the chemotherapeutic regimens on the functionality of (specific) complement proteins or an indirect effect, either via the increased cell death of (malignant) cells and depletion of complement components as a consequence, or via the reduced production of complement proteins. We were unable to show an increase in consumption of C3 by increased levels of the split product C3d or a decreased protein level of C3 due to increased complement turnover or breakdown. This was also shown by the lack of correlation of the ratio of C3d and C3 and the functionality of the CP or the functionality of the AP. This underlines that the observed transient complement defects are neither related to increased consumption due to cell death nor to an inhibitory effect of the treatment on complement protein synthesis. These findings suggest that, downstream of C3, other late complement components of the common so-called late terminal complement pathway are involved in the observed combined CP and AP defects.

This study was sufficiently powered to determine the presence of transient reductions in complement activity in oncology patients. However, the study was not specifically designed to determine a direct effect of specific therapies or the many combination of chemotherapeutic compounds on the complement system. Nonetheless, we were able to show a correlation between MTX and ifosfamide and their direct negative effect on the complement system.

Due to chemotherapy-related neutropenia, the oncology patients are more dependent on their innate non-cellular immunity for the defense against pathogens. Reduction of complement activity could increase the rate of infection. Oncologic treatment is associated with a higher incidence of infection (, ), and this has been previously correlated to levels of complement proteins of different activation pathways (). Due to the relative small number of patients included in the study and the heterogeneous composition of the patient population, a possible clinical association between infection and reduced complement functionality was not feasible. In this study, the number of patients studied and the low number of proven microbial infections were too small to draw any conclusion but having demonstrated the high prevalence of acquired complement defects, prospective studies designed to investigate the potential link between complement and infection-risk has become a feasible next step. However, although reduced functionality of the complement system could be a risk factor for infection, it has been suggested that low-grade inflammation by deposition of sub-lytic amounts could be beneficial, by inducing specific signaling pathways for tumor survival and growth (), and inhibition of complement could therefore be of therapeutic value for overall survival of the patient.

In summary, oncology patients frequently show transient complement activation defects. Certain chemotherapeutic drugs appear to be directly related to the reduction of the activity of one or more complement pathways. Now that we have established highly significant complement defects in some of the oncology treatment regimens, additional studies should be designed to determine the positive or negative effects of the complement system (antitumor and/or increased risk of infection), which may be more relevant in children being more dependent on the innate immune system than in adults, which may have preexisting specific antibodies being largely absent in young oncology patients.

Statements

Author contributions

MK was involved in work conception, clinical study design, clinical data retrieval, clinical data analysis, experimental design, experimental work, experimental data analysis, manuscript writing and revision, and final manuscript approval. AK, CA, and JG were involved in experimental design, experimental work, experimental data analysis, manuscript revision, and final manuscript approval. HC was involved in clinical study design, clinical data retrieval, manuscript revision, and final manuscript approval. MW, DW, and TK were involved in work conception, clinical study design, clinical data retrieval and analysis, experimental design, experimental data analysis, manuscript writing and revision, and final manuscript approval. All authors agree for work accountability.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from KiKa (stichting Kinderen Kankervrij) (project 41).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all patients for their participation. Furthermore, we would like to thank the doctors and nurses of the department of pediatric oncology of the Emma Children’s Hospital at the AMC for their help in recruiting patients and clinical data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00420

References

Summary

Keywords

complement system, transient defects, oncology, therapeutic effect, methotrexate

Citation

Keizer MP, Kamp AM, Aarts C, Geisler J, Caron HN, van de Wetering MD, Wouters D and Kuijpers TW (2016) The High Prevalence of Functional Complement Defects Induced by Chemotherapy. Front. Immunol. 7:420. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00420

Received

06 July 2016

Accepted

27 September 2016

Published

17 October 2016

Volume

7 - 2016

Edited by

Cordula M. Stover, University of Leicester, UK

Reviewed by

Mariya Hristova, University College London, UK; Wen Yuan Chung, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Mischa P. Keizer,

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Molecular Innate Immunity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics