Commentary: APOE e4 Genotype Predicts Severe COVID-19 in the UK Biobank Community Cohort

On March 11th, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. This respiratory disease results from infection by the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, and commonly presents with flu-like symptoms, including cough, fever, and fatigue. More severe cases, generally defined by hospitalization, intubation, and/or mortality, can also exhibit dyspnea, lymphopenia, and hypoalbuminemia with concomitant increases in the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß) (1, 2). In addition, common COVID-19 comorbidities include dementia, heart disease, and hypertension (3–5). Clinical observations notwithstanding, surprisingly little is known about the molecular determinants that underlie this disease. Interestingly, the multiallelic apolipoprotein E gene (APOE), an important regulator of cholesterol homeostasis, has been similarly linked to Alzheimer's disease and cardiovascular disease (6–8).

Three common APOE alleles exist in the population, ε2, ε3, and ε4. To investigate the relative contribution of APOE genotype to the risk for developing severe COVID-19, Kuo et al. analyzed case data from the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort (9), a study of 322,948 subjects of European ancestry, with a mean age of 68 years. Subjects were sorted by APOE genotype, and the number of positive COVID-19 tests between March 16th and April 26th, 2020 was recorded for each group. The authors found that individuals homozygous for APOE ε4 were more likely to test positive for COVID-19, and thus severe disease, compared the group homozygous for APOE ε3 (9). Given the urgency for genetic determinants associated with COVID-19 severity, Kuo et al. continued their investigation with the addition of more test results and mortality data (10). The study confirmed their initial findings, additionally reaching genome-wide significance for the association of APOE ε4ε4 genotype with COVID-19 test positivity. The initial analysis characterized positive cases as severe COVID-19 cases given positive tests were registered from March 16th to April 26th, 2020, a window of time in which testing was largely restricted to hospitalized patients. Importantly, however, the less restrictive temporal parameters established in the follow-up study significantly undermine this premise. Nevertheless, the mortality data presented (calculated by quantifying deaths after confirmed positive) suggests increased disease severity in these subjects (10). Moreover, they reported that APOE ε4ε4 genotype was associated with a 4-fold increase in mortality after testing positive relative to APOE ε3ε3 individuals. These data suggest that the APOE ε4ε4 genotype represents a significant risk for the development of severe COVID-19, as well as death following infection. Interestingly, APOE ε3ε4 COVID-19 positive subjects did not exhibit a significant difference in mortality compared to APOE ε3ε3 positive subjects, and only a slight increase in positivity. This observation implies the absence of any gene dosage effects, underscoring the required inheritance of two ε4 copies to acquire this genetic risk. Although these analyses identify APOE ε4ε4 genotype as a potentially valuable genetic determinant for development of severe COVID-19, gaps remain in our current understanding of how specific mechanisms drive this association.

In addition to its critical function in lipid transport, APOE has also been shown to modulate important innate immune responses key to inflammation. For example, human subjects harboring APOE ε4 exhibit significantly higher plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL 6 and TNFα) following IV challenge with the bacterial endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (11). A hallmark of COVID-19 infection is aberrant inflammation resulting from a dysfunctional immune response. Given the data from Kuo et al. illustrating a strong association between severe COVID-19 cases and APOE ε4ε4 genotype independent of the comorbidities, it is plausible that APOE modulates COVID-19 disease severity by regulating pro-inflammatory pathways in a genotype dependent manner.

Recently, there has been increased concern regarding the potential for chronic neurodegenerative effects following COVID-19 infection (12–14). APOE ε4 has also been shown to exacerbate inflammation in the CNS following stressors that mimic infection in the periphery. Peripheral administration of LPS resulted in increased expression of the proinflammatory chemokine CCL3 in the brains of APOE TR mice in a genotype dependent manner (ε4 >ε3) (15). Furthermore, individuals carrying the APOE ε4 allele exhibited accelerated breakdown of the blood brain barrier (16, 17). Thus, this not only creates concern for exacerbated inflammation in the periphery contributing to a cytokine storm during infection, yet also the potential for increased risk of long-term neurodegeneration in APOE ε4 infected patients.

The present studies come at a time when the identification of genetic factors influencing the development of COVID-19 are essential. Kuo and colleagues help to shed light on the association between APOE ε4 and severe COVID-19 infection, and establish a starting point from which to initiate empirical and replicable studies aimed at investigating the molecular nature of such genetic risks. Indeed, these findings encourage comprehensive interpretations of population-specific susceptibilities to COVID-19 like those observed among African Americans (18), and the role that variation in APOE allele frequency may play (19). Their work also provides an important foundation from which to explore the biological mechanisms that underlie these associations. Given the compelling evidence linking aberrant inflammation to severe COVID-19 (20), and the association of APOE ε4 with exacerbated inflammation, future studies should aim to determine if APOE ε4 is associated with increased inflammatory responses in the periphery following COVID-19 infection. This could easily be demonstrated by investigating plasma cytokine levels, as well as other immunological markers. Additionally, COVID-19 infection poses as a threat to the CNS given neuroinflammation is a universal characteristic across an array of neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, longitudinal effects of COVID-19 infection in APOE ε4 carriers, which exhibit exacerbated neuroinflammatory responses (21), may lead to exacerbated risk for developing these aliments. Taken together, future studies are necessary to elucidate an association between APOE ε4, inflammation, and COVID-19 infection, and characterize the biological mechanisms underlying this link. These studies should be strongly considered by the research community, because if an association exists, then millions of APOE ε4 carriers worldwide must take additional precautions to prevent developing a devastating and life-threatening disease.

Statements

Summary

Keywords

COVID-19, APOE and inflammation, APOE and COVID-19, APOE, APOE and SARS-CoV-2, APOE e4, APOE e4 and COVID-19, APOE e4 and inflammation

Citation

Kasparian K, Graykowski D and Cudaback E (2020) Commentary: APOE e4 Genotype Predicts Severe COVID-19 in the UK Biobank Community Cohort. Front. Immunol. 11:1939. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01939

Received

24 June 2020

Accepted

17 July 2020

Published

15 September 2020

Volume

11 - 2020

Edited by

Stefano Caserta, University of Hull, United Kingdom

Reviewed by

Mark R. Goldstein, NCH Baker Hospital Downtown (NCHMD), United States; David Melzer, University of Exeter, United Kingdom

Updates

Check for updates

Copyright

© 2020 Kasparian, Graykowski and Cudaback.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Eiron Cudaback ecudabac@depaul.edu

This article was submitted to Inflammation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.