ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Inflammation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1515993
The HL-60 clone 15 cell line as a model for leukocyte migrationpossibilities and limitations
Provisionally accepted- 1TUM University Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- 2Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- 3Section for Translational Surgical Oncology and Biobanking, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
- 4Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- 5Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
- 6Centre for Rhinology and Allergology (Germany), Wiesbaden, Germany
- 7Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
As a part of the innate immune system, eosinophils are recruited during infectious diseases, to release their characteristic cytotoxic granules and catch pathogens in extracellular traps. Moreover, eosinophils have a crucial role in autoimmune diseases, for example allergies. The isolation of these densest and lowest abundant leukocytes is cost-and labor intense. This sets restrictions on many aspects of eosinophilic research. In this study, we performed a thorough characterization and functional assessment of the HL-60 clone 15 (HC15) cell line, which can be differentiated into eosinophil-like cells, to investigate its potential in eosinophil research.HC15 cells were differentiated with sodium butyrate with or without IL-5 and cells were characterized and compared to primary eosinophils, neutrophils and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Cell features were analyzed using proteomics, morphologic assessment, RT-qPCR, immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry. Based on these results, functional tests were performed, including transwell migration assays, flow cytometry-based aggregate formation assays, immunofluorescent microscopy-based adherence assays to endothelial cells and flow cytometry- and ELISA-based activation assays.The proteomes of the cell line cells differed from those of primary eosinophils and neutrophils. Differentiation of HC15 cells enhanced the expression of GATA-1 and altered the expression of surface markers IL-5R, EMR1, and TREM-1. Differentiated HC15 cells overexpressed the granule protein EPX compared to primary eosinophils and induced a distinct inflammatory milieu by secreting CCL-5, EPX and IL-8. The addition of IL-5 during differentiation increased this effect. Cell line cells responded weaker to activation than primary eosinophils but showed a similar migration and adherence pattern in multiple assays. These features were mostly unaffected by differentiation. Differentiation of HC15 cells induces an eosinophil lineage-committed precursor state. Hence, the differentiated cell line cells lacked characteristic features of eosinophils such as morphologic attributes, surface marker expression and the capacity to be activated. However, the cells were able to migrate, form aggregates with platelets and similarly adhere to endothelial cells as primary eosinophils. It is, therefore, advisable to use the cell line as an eosinophilic model only in research questions related to chemotaxis and migration.
Keywords: Eosinophilic differentiation, Eosinophil Biology, Eosinophilic research, immunology, allergy, Migration, Chemotaxis, Proteomics
Received: 23 Oct 2024; Accepted: 28 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Griesbaum, Weusthof, Sauer, Gemoll, Weirich, Klimek, Petry, Bashiri Dezfouli, Shoykhet and Wollenberg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Barbara Wollenberg, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 80333, Bavaria, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.