STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1538032

This article is part of the Research TopicUnderstanding the Interplay Between Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Neoantigens for Improved ImmunotherapyView all 6 articles

A Phase II Randomized Trial of Individualized Neoantigen Peptide Vaccine Combined with Unusual Radiotherapy (iNATURE) in Advanced Solid Tumors

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Shenzhen Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • 2The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 3Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
  • 4Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • 5Radiation Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, MI, Hong Kong, SAR China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Neoantigen-based vaccines show promising therapeutic potential in solid tumors such as melanoma, GBM, NSCLC, and CRC. However, clinical responses remain suboptimal in stage IV patients, due to ineffective T-cell function and high tumor burdens. To overcome these limitations, our study investigates a combination strategy using neoantigen peptide vaccines and precision critical lesion radiotherapy (CLERT), which delivers immunomodulatory doses to key tumor regions synergistically enhance immune activation and inhibit progression in multifocal stage IV patients.This is an open-label, multicenter phase II randomized study. The main objective is to evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy of personalized tumor neoantigen peptide vaccines and assess how different radiation doses synergize with vaccination in treating patients with advanced malignant tumors who have progressed after systemic therapy. Patients are stratified by cancer type and randomized 1:1 to receive either placebo with conventional treatment (including high and low dose radiotherapy) or a personalized neoantigen peptide vaccine alongside conventional treatment (including high and low dose radiotherapy). A one-way crossover design is implemented, permitting patients in the placebo arm to transition to the experimental arm upon progression. Clinical outcomes including progressionfree survival and objective response rate are assessed both before and after crossover. Key inclusion criteria are as follows: 1) Patients with advanced or recurrent cancers detected by pathology and imaging, who failed first-line treatments; 2) Patients with projected survival ≥3 months and an ECOG score of 0-2; and 3) Patients with at least one predicted high-quality tumor neoantigen.This trial introduces an innovative combination strategy of precision radiotherapy and neoantigen vaccine. A notable feature of this study is the incorporation of a randomized control and intra-group crossover design, which is rarely utilized in neoantigen trials. The study is designed to provide critical insight into radiation-immune synergy and the clinical benefit of personalized immunization. Additionally, a basket-trial framework is employed, leveraging shared neoantigens across cancer types to improve efficiency and generalizability. This approach may reduce preparation time and cost, facilitating broader implementation of neoantigen-based immunotherapies. Altogether, this trial design represents a significant step toward translational application of tumor neoantigen vaccines and provides a platform for future combinational immunotherapy strategies.

Keywords: neoantigen vaccine, Radiotherapy, Immunotherapy, T cell response, Low-dose radiation, High-dose radiation, tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), systemic tumor immune environment (STIE)

Received: 02 Dec 2024; Accepted: 11 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Hu, Ma, Wu, Chao, Chen, Xu, Su, Dai, Huang, Fu and Kong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Feng-Ming (Spring) Kong, Radiation Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, 48109, MI, Hong Kong, SAR China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.