ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1559278
This article is part of the Research TopicImmune Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Immuno-Oncology: Refining the Immunological Landscape of CancerView all 30 articles
Prognostic Significance and Immune Infiltration Analysis of HMGA2 in Endometrial Cancer
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- 2Women and Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: HMGA2, as a transcription factor, facilitates oncogenesis and malignant progression by coordinating cell cycle dysregulation, compromising DNA repair machinery, and suppressing cancer cell apoptosis. However, its roles in prognostication and tumor immune microenvironment modulation in endometrial cancer (EC) remain incompletely defined.We systematically analyzed HMGA2 expression patterns and clinical prognostic value in EC using bioinformatics strategies, including TCGA and GTEX data mining, as well as single gene expression analysis. Functional enrichment analysis (GSEA and KEGG) identified HMGA2-associated pathways. The correlation between HMGA2 and immune infiltration was assessed via TIMER and TISIDB. Subsequent in vitro (proliferation, migration, colony formation) and in vivo (xenograft models) experimental were used to validate HMGA2's role in promoting EC progression. The correlation between HMGA2 and macrophage markers (CD86 and CD206) was validated through clinical tissue samples by IHC. Finally, a recurrence-predictive nomogram incorporating HMGA2 with clinicopathological parameters was established. Results: HMGA2 exhibited significant upregulation in endometrial cancer (EC) tissues and correlated with poor patient prognosis. Immunoassay showed that high expression of HMGA2 was negatively correlated with infiltration of various immune cells, especially M1 macrophages. Cytological experiments showed that knocking down HMGA2 significantly inhibited EC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and drug resistance, while overexpression of HMGA2 promoted the above phenotype; Animal experiments showed that knocking down HMGA2 significantly inhibited the growth of EC tumors and the expression of M1 macrophage marker CD86. The combination of HMGA2 inhibitors and targeted macrophage immunotherapy (CD47 monoclonal antibody) had the better tumor suppression effect. Clinical sample 3 / 30 analysis found that high expression of HMGA2 was significantly negatively correlated with CD86 and positively correlated with CD206 expression. Patients with low HMGA2 expression showed enhanced immune therapy responsiveness. The nomogram model based on HMGA2 and clinical pathological parameters showed better predictive performance (AUC=0.855, sensitivity=79.0%, specificity=76.8%). Conclusion: HMGA2 is a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for the EC. HMGA2 may drive the occurrence and development of EC by inhibiting the infiltration of immune cells, especially M1 macrophages. Therapeutic targeting of HMGA2 is a novel strategy for EC intervention.
Keywords: endometrial cancer, HMGA2, immune, Prognostic value, macropha ge polarization
Received: 12 Jan 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Yu, Zheng, Tian, Tu, Gong, Yu, Luo and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zhuoying Hu, Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.