ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1560750

This article is part of the Research TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma: From Bench to BedsideView all 7 articles

Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Lenvatinib and PD-1 Inhibitor in Intermediate-Stage HCC exceeding the up-7 Criteria: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Provisionally accepted
Miao  XueMiao Xue1*Yanqin  WuYanqin Wu1Yiyang  TangYiyang Tang1Kun  HuangKun Huang2Haikuan  LiuHaikuan Liu1Bowen  ZhuBowen Zhu1Jie  WenJie Wen1Yue  ZhaoYue Zhao1Guixiong  ZhangGuixiong Zhang1Hang  LiuHang Liu1Wenzhe  FanWenzhe Fan1*Jiaping  LiJiaping Li1*
  • 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients exceeding the up-to-7 criteria.Materials and Methods: Data from 115 patients with intermediate-stage HCC exceeding the up-to-7 criteria, treated between January 2015 and December 2023, were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Key clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response rates based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and adverse events (AEs), were evaluated and compared between the two treatment groups.Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors affecting OS and PFS.Results: Among the patients, 35 received TACE+LEN+PD-1, and 80 underwent TACE+LEN. The TACE+LEN+PD-1 group achieved a longer median PFS (10.0 months vs. 5.7 months; P=0.002) and a median OS of 21.0 months, compared to 16.2 months in the TACE+LEN group, though the OS difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). Progression to macrovascular invasion (MVI) or extrahepatic spread (EHS) was delayed in the TACE+LEN+PD-1 group compared to the TACE+LEN group (12.0 months vs. 7.5 months; P=0.007). Multivariate analysis identified treatment modality and tumor burden score (TBS) as independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Subgroup analyses showed that patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or HBV positivity derived greater benefits from TACE+LEN+PD-1, while those with high TBS or a Child-Pugh score of 7 did not show similar advantages. The rates and severity of AEs were comparable between groups (any grade: 88.6% vs. 91.3%, P=0.733; grade 3 or 4: 48.6% vs. 42.5%, P=0.546).TACE+LEN+PD-1 significantly improved PFS, particularly by delaying progression to MVI or EHS after the first TACE session in intermediate-stage HCC patients exceeding the up-to-7 criteria, compared to TACE+LEN. Subgroup analysis indicated superior survival benefits for patients with a PS of 0 or HBV positivity,but not in those with high TBS or a Child-Pugh score of 7. The safety profile of TACE+LEN+PD-1 was comparable to TACE+LEN. However, the OS benefit between the two groups was not statistically significant. Keywords:hepatocellular carcinoma, up-7 criteria, transarterial chemoembolization, lenvatinib, PD-1 inhibitor, combined therapy, tumor response.

Keywords: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, up-7 criteria, Transarterial chemoembolization, Lenvatinib, PD-1 inhibitor, combined therapy, tumor response

Received: 14 Jan 2025; Accepted: 16 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xue, Wu, Tang, Huang, Liu, Zhu, Wen, Zhao, Zhang, Liu, Fan and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Miao Xue, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Wenzhe Fan, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Jiaping Li, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.