ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Mucosal Immunity
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1571418
Exploring the Standardized Detection and Sampling Methods of Human Nasal SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgA
Provisionally accepted- 1National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (China), Beijing, China
- 2Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy (China), Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 3Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
- 4Changchun Institute of Biological Products Co. Ltd, Changchun, Hebei Province, China
- 5Shanghai Institute of Biological Products (SIBP), Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
- 6Beijing Minhai Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
- 7Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control And Prevention, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Vaccines capable of effectively inducing mucosal immunity, particularly specific IgA antibodies, represent an ideal strategy for preventing infections and the transmission of pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses that rapidly replicate in the upper respiratory tract and cause clinical symptoms. However, a lack of standardized nasal antibody detection and sampling methods has hindered cross-study comparability and vaccine development. To address this issue, this study uses SARS-CoV-2 as a model pathogen to standardize nasal antibody detection methods and sampling methods. Following the scientific guidelines (Q14 and Q2(R2)) for analytical procedure development and validation released by International Council for Harmonization (ICH), the first validated ELISA for SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgA detection in the nasal mucosa was established through analytical target profiling (ATP), risk assessment, and design of experiment optimization. Systematic validation demonstrated exclusive specificity for the target antigen, with intermediate precision of <17% and relative bias of <±4%, meeting ATP requirements. Analysis of 154 clinical samples demonstrated strong concordance between the novel assay and electrochemiluminescence assays, with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.87 for quantitative results and a kappa coefficient of 0.85 for results above and below the dilution-adjusted limit of quantification (LOQ). Applying this novel assay, a clinical comparison revealed that expanded sponge sampling achieved superior performance in terms of the single-day detection rate (above dilution-adjusted LOQ 95.5%), 5-day consecutive detection rate (above dilution-adjusted LOQ 88.9%), and median SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgA concentration (171.2 U/mL), significantly outperforming nasopharyngeal swabs (68.8%; 48.7%; 28.7 U/mL, p<0.0001) and nasal swabs (88.3%; 77.3%; 93.7 U/mL, p<0.05). The standardized detection system established in this study can be adapted with appropriate modifications for the clinical evaluation of other respiratory mucosal vaccines, thereby advancing the development of mucosal vaccines.
Keywords: nasal antibody, respiratory sample collection, Binding activity, Immune assay, SARS-CoV-2
Received: 05 Feb 2025; Accepted: 28 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Jia, Hu, Fu, Liu, Li, He, Gao, Li, Wang, Chu, Xu, Fu, Zhao, Liang, Li, Xu and Mao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jingxin Li, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control And Prevention, Nanjing, 210028, Jiangsu Province, China
Miao Xu, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (China), Beijing, China
Qunying Mao, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (China), Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.