Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1577920

This article is part of the Research TopicImmune Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Immuno-Oncology: Refining the Immunological Landscape of CancerView all 34 articles

Immune Intrinsic Escape Signature Stratifies Prognosis, Characterizes the Tumor Immune Microenvironment, and Identifies Tumorigenic PPP1R8 in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
  • 2Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with poor prognosis and limited response to immunotherapy. Immune escape-related genes (IERGs) are increasingly recognized as critical regulators of tumor progression and immune evasion. However, their prognostic value in GBM remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the clinical relevance of IERGs and develop a predictive gene signature to guide prognosis and characterize the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Methods: We performed a comprehensive analysis of IERGs using the TCGA GBM dataset. Prognostic IERGs were identified through univariate Cox regression, and a multivariate Cox model was used to develop a prognostic signature. Risk scores (IEScore) were calculated to classify patients into high- and low-risk groups. The signature was validated in two independent GBM cohorts. Its prognostic independence was assessed after adjusting for clinicopathological features. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed the signature's reliability. TIME analysis was carried out using multiple deconvolution algorithms. Additionally, functional assays including CCK8, cell cycle, and apoptosis assays were conducted on PPP1R8-silenced U251 cells using CRISPR/Cas9 technology Results: Thirty-six IERGs were associated with GBM outcomes, with 20 linked to poor survival and 16 to better outcomes. Key genes, including STAT2, IFNGR2, and PPP1R8, formed a robust prognostic signature. High-risk patients had significantly poorer overall survival (OS) compared to low-risk patients. The signature showed strong predictive power with AUC values of 0.68, 0.73, and 0.76 for 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival, respectively. Validation in two independent cohorts confirmed its robustness. Immune cell infiltration analysis revealed distinct patterns in high- and low-risk groups, with the high-risk group showing a more aggressive and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. The signature also effectively stratified low-grade glioma patients across four independent datasets. Knockout of PPP1R8 in GBM cells using CRISPR/Cas9 inhibited cell proliferation and increased apoptosis. Conclusion: The IERGs-based signature offers reliable prognostication for GBM, validated across multiple datasets. It can guide patient stratification and inform therapeutic decisions for GBM and potentially low-grade gliomas (LGG). Furthermore, we identify PPP1R8 as a key regulator of GBM cell proliferation and growth, providing insights into the immune microenvironment's role in GBM progression.

Keywords: Glioblastoma Multiforme, Immune escape related genes, Outcome, immune microenvironment, PPP1R8

Received: 16 Feb 2025; Accepted: 22 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Du, Lijun and Fu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Denggang Fu, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 29425, South Carolina, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.