ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1587567
Quantitative bead-based multiplex assay for simultaneous determination of IgG concentrations of Pertussis toxin, Filamentous hemagglutinin, Pertactin, Diphtheria, Tetanus, Haemophilus influenzae b and Hepatitis B in human serum samples
Provisionally accepted- 1Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, Maharashtra, India
- 2Science and Research, Medicines, and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, South Mimms, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Multiplex serological assays provide opportunities for seroprevalence studies and for evaluating antibodies post-vaccination. In this report, we describe the development and validation of a 7-plex bead-based assay for quantifying human immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (PRN), diphtheria toxoid (DT), tetanus toxoid (TT), Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib) and hepatitis B (Hep B) using international reference standards. Methods: Existing international human reference sera standards are tailored for monoplex assays and, therefore, require characterization for multiplex assays. The reference standards for pertussis (06/142), diphtheria (10/262), tetanus (13/240), Hib (09/222), and Hep B (07/164) were characterized for their suitability in the assay. The purified antigens (PT, FHA, PRN, DT, TT, Hib and Hep B) were coupled to spectrally unique magnetic carboxylated beads. The method was validated according to the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and International Council for Harmonization Multidisciplinary (ICH M10) guidelines. Validation parameters, such as precision, accuracy, dilution linearity, assay range, robustness, and solution stability, were assessed.Results: An equi-mix of an international reference standard for Hep B (07/164) and Hib (09/222) provided the best dynamic range for the 7-plex assay. Method validation was conducted using a panel of human serum samples that included samples from vaccinated healthy volunteers, non-vaccinated volunteers, negative controls, and international reference standards. Assay specificity using inhibition experiments demonstrated specificities of 98, 95, 93, 98, 97, 97 and 98 % for DT, TT, FHA, PRN, PT, Hib and Hep-B, respectively. Spike recoveries of 80-120 % were demonstrated in different matrices, including those of hemolytic and lipemic sera samples. The precision and accuracy were confirmed by evaluating a panel of human serum samples obtained from vaccinated individuals. The assay demonstrated coefficients of variation (CV) of ≤ 20 % across all assays, regardless of run, day, or analyst. This method demonstrated strong agreement with conventional commercially available assays, highlighting the advantages of multiplexing over traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).
Keywords: ELISA, Luminex, Multiplex immunoassay, Combination vaccines, Haemophilus influenzae b
Received: 04 Mar 2025; Accepted: 06 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rathod, Katke, Patil, Bhandare, Kadam, Gautam, Gumma, Kumar, Hassall, Asokanathan, Bardsley, Markey, Gupta, Rao, Parekh, Pujari, Sharma, Shaligram and Gairola. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sunil Gairola, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, Maharashtra, India
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.