ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1588663

This article is part of the Research TopicHarnessing Molecular Insights for Enhanced Drug Sensitivity and Immunotherapy in CancerView all 35 articles

Exploring and validating a guanylate-binding protein signature to predict the prognostic features of patients with lung adenocarcinoma

Provisionally accepted
Yue  LiYue Li1Wei  TianWei Tian2Chen  ChenChen Chen1Hailin  LiuHailin Liu1Zhenfa  ZhangZhenfa Zhang1Changli  WangChangli Wang1*
  • 1National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin, China
  • 2Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) exhibits rapid growth and high infiltration. Guanylatebinding proteins (GBPs) induced by interferons play a crucial role in inflammatory signaling. This study aimed to investigate their anti-cancer roles in LUAD.The TCGA-LUAD and GSE31210 datasets were sourced from the TCGA and GEO databases, and seven GBP genes were obtained. The GBP score was computed using ssGSEA for each patient, followed by performing weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) using the WGCNA package. Using the Limma package, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and then candidate genes were selected by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The Survimer and timeROC packages were respectively employed to conduct Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Immune infiltration was assessed by calculating immune cell score with ESTIMATE and ssGSEA, and drug sensitivity was predicted applying pRRophetic package. The GSEA package was used to perform pathway enrichment analysis. Finally, wound healing and Transwell assays were carried out for functional validation.The GBP score was significantly higher in para-carcinoma tissues. The green-yellow module (β=7), which contained 422 genes, was closely associated with the GBP score. We identified 92 overlapping genes from the DEGs between the normal and tumor samples. A 4-gene risk model derived from Cox regression demonstrated high predictive accuracy for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival.Patients were assigned by the median risk score into low-and high-risk groups. Notably, low-risk patients showed better prognostic outcomes and higher immune infiltration scores, particularly for 2 CD4+ T cells and activated B cells. CD19 influenced tumor cell migration and invasion. A nomogram combining multiple clinical factors displayed robust prognostic performance. We also predicted potential drugs for treating different risk groups of LUAD. Pathways such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and Myc target V2 were enriched in the high-risk groups, indicating potential targets for immunotherapy. Inhibiting CD19 in A549 cells suppressed the cells' abilities to migrate and invade.We analyzed the GBP phenotype associated with LUAD progression and developed a useful risk score model for patient prognosis.

Keywords: lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), WGCNA, Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs), risk score, immune infiltration analysis, Enrichment analysis

Received: 06 Mar 2025; Accepted: 12 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Tian, Chen, Liu, Zhang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Changli Wang, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.