ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Primary Immunodeficiencies
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1598491
This article is part of the Research TopicMethods in Primary Immunodeficiencies: 2022View all 4 articles
Рrospective multicenter study of treatment efficacy, safety, and quality of life in a large cohort of patients with inborn errors of immunity receiving subcutaneous immunoglobulin
Provisionally accepted- Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) preparations are widely used in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI), with proven efficacy and good tolerance. We assessed treatment efficacy, safety, and quality of life in a large cohort of IEI patients who switched from intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to SCIG. Our observational study included 200 patients aged 1‒65 years with IEI. SCIG Cutaquig (16.5%) was administered every 7–10 days for at least 12 months via the rapid push method. We assessed the rate of infection, immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration, adverse events, and quality of life. A total of 8,787 SCIG doses were administered during the study. The rate of infections (per person/month) during SCIG treatment was 0.05, which was significantly lower compared to 0.19 during the IVIG period (p<0.001). The median trough IgG was 6.9 g/L on IVIG, compared to 9.0 g/L during the first six months, and 9.2 g/L during the next six months on SCIG. Systemic reactions occurred in 12.4% of the IVIG infusions and 1.9% of the SCIG infusions. The total scores on quality of life summary assessments of physical and mental health were higher on SCIG therapy compared with IVIG (p<0.001). At the end of the study, 85.6% of the patients chose to remain on SCIG. Our data suggest that SCIG infusion via the rapid push method is effective, well tolerated, and feasible in large groups of IEI patients, including those in large countries such as Russia.
Keywords: inborn errors of immunity, Subcutaneous immunoglobulin, Intravenous Immunoglobulin, efficacy, Safety, tolerability, Quality of Life, Rapid push
Received: 23 Mar 2025; Accepted: 02 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Avedova, Deripapa, Rodina, Mukhina, LATYSHEVA, Yukhacheva, Burlakov, Kan, Bogdanova, Moiseeva, Kuzmenko, Nesterenko, Deordieva, Zinovyeva, Sevostyanova, Kalmeteva, Barycheva, Селезнева, Shakhova, Laba, Vlasova, Gorenkova, Timofeeva, Trusova, Yudina, Bambaeva, Mashkovskaya, Isakova, Selina, Shilova, Mandzhieva, Starikova, Grachev and Shcherbina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Asmik Avedova, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.