ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Nutritional Immunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1601596

Exploring the Influence of Probiotic Administration Routes on Immune Responses in Atopic March

Provisionally accepted
Fang-Yu  ZhangFang-Yu Zhang1Chi-Yu  YangChi-Yu Yang1Chien-Hsun  HuangChien-Hsun Huang2I-Jen  WangI-Jen Wang3,4,5,6*
  • 1Animal Technology Research Center, Agriculture Technology Research Institute, Miaoli, Taiwan
  • 2Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Food Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei City, Taiwan
  • 4School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 5College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 6National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a higher likelihood of developing asthma, the so-called atopic march. Previous studies have suggested that probiotics can modulate development of the immune system and atopic disorders.However, the exact mechanisms and whether the route of administration of probiotics has a clinical effect are unknown. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate whether different routes of administration of probiotics may have different effects.Method: Probiotics Bacteroides plebeius, B. ovatus, 74-B and YCFA-33 were administered to mice via oral and nasal routes for 4 weeks, followed by the induction of AD using ovalbumin (OVA). The condition of the stimulated skin and histology of skin tissues were evaluated. In addition, 3 days of consecutive exposure to OVA (3%) aerosol was used to induce asthma at the end of the AD experiment. Serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), IgG, IL-4, IFN-γ, and TNF-α levels and histological evaluations of lung tissues were assessed after the experiments. Result: The oral administration of probiotics B. plebeius and B. ovatus may have improved the inflammatory response of OVA-induced asthma. The nasal administration of the probiotics 74-B and YCFA-33 may have alleviated the symptoms of skin redness and itching of OVA-induced atopic dermatitis. These effects may have been due to reduced infiltration of white blood cells in the stimulated skin area and dampened inflammatory responses. In the later asthma model, YCFA-33 administration significantly increased total IgG and IgG1 in serum, reduced OVA-IgE levels and IL-4 levels, decreased neutrophil content and TNF-α expression, and increased IFN-γ levels in lung lavage fluid (p<0.05). These effects may have blocked the progression from AD to asthma pulmonary inflammation. Conclusion: B. ovatus had better effects via oral administration while 74-B and YCFA-33 had better effects via nasal administration. Oral administration is not always the best route. Probiotics may mitigate allergic reactions and pulmonary inflammation. These findings could contribute to the development of innovative biomarkers and early interventions for managing asthma and atopic disorders.

Keywords: atopic dermatitis, Asthma, Probiotics, Nasal administration, Atopic march

Received: 28 Mar 2025; Accepted: 01 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Yang, Huang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: I-Jen Wang, Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei City, Taiwan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.