ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Microbial Immunology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1607619
This article is part of the Research TopicHost Response to Spirochete InfectionsView all 3 articles
Aberrant T-cell Phenotypes in a Cohort of Patients with Post-Treatment Lyme Disease
Provisionally accepted- 1Lyme Disease Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
- 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
- 3Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
- 4Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Post-treatment Lyme Disease (PTLD) is a poorly understood complication of Borrelia burgdorferi infection with significant patient morbidity. Characterized by fatigue, generalized myalgias, and cognitive impairment, PTLD symptomatology closely resembles long COVID and other post-acute infection syndromes. While prior studies suggest immune dysregulation as a factor in PTLD pathogenesis, the mechanisms underlying its heterogeneous presentation and severity remain unclear. To associate symptom burden with discrete immune phenotypes, we applied factor analysis to self-reported symptom data from 272 PTLD patients to generate patient subgroups. We then immunophenotyped peripheral blood cells of these individuals and 28 healthy controls through 19-parameter flow cytometry and cytokine profiling to associate PTLD status and the newly defined subgroups with specific immune states. Our PTLD cohort had fewer circulating CXCR5+ CD4+ naïve T cells relative to healthy controls (5.2% vs. 8.3%, Padj < 0.001). These cells were positively associated with musculoskeletal pain in PTLD participants, but not healthy controls. This and additional immunophenotypic alterations, including an increased prevalence of CXCR3+ CCR4- CCR6- CD8 T cells (43.1% vs. 25.7%, Padj < 0.01), permitted the creation of an elastic net classifier which identified PTLD with moderate efficacy (AUC 0.83). Measurement of cytokines did not reveal associations with PTLD and did not improve the performance of the model. While we could not identify immune features which distinguished all patient subgroups, we did observe a female-specific increase in central memory CD8 T cells restricted to one high-fatigue patient subgroup. Additionally, factor analysis revealed multiple associations between immune cell frequency and the severity of specific symptoms. Collectively, our findings add to growing evidence of immune dysfunction as a prominent feature of PTLD.
Keywords: Post-Treatment Lyme Disease (PTLD), Flow Cytometry, Immune phenotyping, post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS), Cytokine profiling, T cells
Received: 07 Apr 2025; Accepted: 18 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Girgis, Cimbro, Yang, Rebman, Sewell, Villegas de Flores, Vadalia, Robinson, Cox, Darrah, Soloski and Aucott. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: John N. Aucott, Lyme Disease Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.