ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1608077
This article is part of the Research TopicImmunotherapeutic Advances in Brain TumorsView all 6 articles
Prognostic Value of Metal-based Ferroptosis and Cuproptosis Genes (MBFCG) and Score in Lower Grade Gliomas
Provisionally accepted- 1Institute of Translational Medicine, Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- 2Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 3Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- 4Key Laboratory of Alzheimer's Disease of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Aging, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- 5School of Basic Medical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan Province, China
- 6Department of Oncology, Haian Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Ferroptosis and Cuproptosis are newly defined forms of cell death. Despite distinct mechanisms, both involve metabolic processes in the TCA cycle and downstream pathways, crucial for anticancer immunity. Methods: We evaluated Iron (Fe) and Copper-induced cell death in lower-grade gliomas (LGG) using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data by developing a metal-based ferroptosis and cuproptosis genes score (MBFCGs) risk model. Lasso regression and survival analyses assessed MBFCGs' significance. An MBFCGs-based nomogram was created and its predictive performance verified. Signaling pathways, immune checkpoints, chemokines, and therapeutic response indicators were quantified using R/oncoPredict and Tidepay. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) examined candidate gene expression.The MBFCGs risk model, based on BACH1, CDCA3, and TIMP1, predicts LGG prognosis. High MBFCGs were associated with poor clinical outcomes. Functional enrichment analysis showed upregulation in neurotransmitter receptor regulation, KRAS signaling, and hedgehog signaling pathways in the high-risk group. High-risk LGG patients exhibited higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) and lower IDH1 mutation incidence. These patients also had increased stromal and immune scores, with elevated levels of T helper cells, B cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and NK cells. Immune checkpoint analysis indicated higher expression of CD274, PDCD1, and other inhibitory molecules, suggesting potential for targeted cancer immunotherapy.The MBFCGs risk model is a promising prognostic tool for LGG, offering insights into underlying mechanisms and new directions for immunotherapy strategies. Assessment of MBFCGs for individual LGG patients may provide clues for developing new immunotherapy strategies.
Keywords: ferroptosis, cuproptosis, Cell Death, Immunotherapy, low-grade glioma, Tumor Microenvironment, Immune checkpoint blockade LGG: Lower-grade gliomas TCGA: The cancer genome atlas TMB: Tumor mutation burden IHC: Immunohistochemistry TCA: Tricarboxylic acid MBFCGs: Metal-based ferroptosis and cuproptosis genes score
Received: 08 Apr 2025; Accepted: 05 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Saddozai, Dong, Dong, Khawar, Fan, Guo, Akbar, Khattak, Wang and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Haibo Sun, Institute of Translational Medicine, Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.