Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1609340

This article is part of the Research TopicComparative Genomics and Functional Genomics Analyses in CancerView all 7 articles

Clonal Divergence and Genomic Meltdown in Prostatic Pleomorphic Giant Cell Adenocarcinoma

Provisionally accepted
Xiaoshi  MaXiaoshi Ma1Kun  ChenKun Chen2Jing  ZhangJing Zhang3Liming  LiuLiming Liu1Jiping  LuoJiping Luo1Kaipeng  HuangKaipeng Huang4Hongying  ZhangHongying Zhang1Danni  LiuDanni Liu3Jizhou  GouJizhou Gou1Changyin  FengChangyin Feng1Xia  ZhaoXia Zhao1Wanying  LiWanying Li1Lipeng  ChenLipeng Chen5Li  YinLi Yin2*Xianlin  MengXianlin Meng6*Zhiqiang  ChengZhiqiang Cheng1*
  • 1Shenzhen People's Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China
  • 2Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 3HaploX Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China
  • 4First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
  • 5Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • 6Binhai Hospital, Peking University, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Pleomorphic giant cell adenocarcinoma (PGCA) of the prostate is a rare, aggressive variant characterized by multinucleated giant cells, sarcomatoid features, and resistance to conventional therapies. Despite its recognition in the WHO 2016 guidelines, the molecular drivers and clinicopathological correlates of PGCA remain poorly characterized. This study presents the first integrative clinicogenomic profiling of PGCA, revealing a novel prognostic gene signature with direct implications for diagnosis and treatment.We conducted comprehensive clinicopathological and genomic analyses of a treatment-refractory PGCA case using histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), whole-exome sequencing (WES), clonal evolution modeling, and multi-cohort validation. IHC assessed key prostate cancer markers (AR, AMACR, KLK3, PTEN, NKX3-1, VIM), while WES compared somatic alterations in PGCA, adjacent adenocarcinoma, and stromal tissue. Public datasets (prostate_dkfz_2018, prad_tcga, prad_mcspc_mskcc_2020) were used for external validation.Results: PGCA displayed profound pleomorphism, necrosis, and complete loss of luminal markers (AR/AMACR/KLK3), along with strong vimentin (VIM) expression, consistent with epithelial-mesenchymal transition. WES revealed PGCA-specific mutations enriched in cell cycle and inflammatory response pathways, distinct from metabolic alterations in the adjacent adenocarcinoma. Clonal evolution analysis showed divergent progression from a shared ancestral clone. Importantly, mutations in ADAMTS7, CDH1, DRD5, MGAT5, and TP53 emerged as a robust 5-gene signature predictive of biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and poor survival, validated across multiple independent cohorts.Our study provides the first molecular roadmap of prostatic PGCA to date, 5 establishing a novel 5-gene prognostic signature and revealing fundamental insights into its pathogenesis through divergent evolution from conventional adenocarcinoma.These insights offer new opportunities for precise diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and targeted therapeutic strategies for this lethal prostate cancer variant.

Keywords: Prostate Cancer genomics, Pleomorphic Giant Cell Adenocarcinoma, Divergent tumor evolution, Cell Cycle, Apoptosis, Therapeutic resistance biomarkers

Received: 10 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ma, Chen, Zhang, Liu, Luo, Huang, Zhang, Liu, Gou, Feng, Zhao, Li, Chen, Yin, Meng and Cheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Li Yin, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
Xianlin Meng, Binhai Hospital, Peking University, Tianjin, 300450, China
Zhiqiang Cheng, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.