Hemopexin and HO-1 induction during acute colitis in mice is dependent on interleukin-22

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that frequently requires long-term immunosuppressive therapy, which increases the risk of infections and other complications. During active disease, intestinal bleeding is common and leads to the release of free luminal heme, a pro-inflammatory molecule that can disrupt mucosal integrity, fuel microbial dysbiosis, and amplify inflammation. Interleukin-22 (IL-22) plays a protective role in the gut by promoting epithelial barrier integrity and wound healing. More recently, IL-22 has been shown to induce hemopexin, a heme scavenger protein that limits heme availability and suppresses bacterial growth during systemic infections.

Methods: Here we investigate the protective role of IL-22 and hemopexin in the context of colitis using the dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) acute colitis model in mice. Wild-type (Wt) and Il22ra1^-/- mice were used to evaluate the effects of exogenous hemopexin and hemin treatments on colitis severity.

Results: IL-22 signaling was crucial for the induction of hemopexin in the colon, as Il22ra1^-/- mice exhibited limited hemopexin induction and more severe colitis, which could be reversed by recombinant hemopexin administration. Additionally, hemin treatment, known to upregulate heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), failed to show full protective effects in Il22ra1^-/- mice, suggesting that IL-22 signaling contributes to the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of hemin by inducing hemopexin and HO-1.

Discussion: These findings reveal a critical protective role for IL-22 by increasing the amount of hemopexin and HO-1 production in the colon, which could be part of a protective mechanism that mitigates DSS-induced colonic inflammation. Given its epithelial-specific and immunomodulatory activity, IL-22 represents a promising therapeutic approach for IBD. Furthermore, hemopexin itself may serve as an adjunct therapy during active disease.

1 Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, is characterized by chronic relapsing intestinal inflammation. Cytokine responses play a crucial role in driving intestinal inflammation in IBD and have been successfully used as targets for therapeutic interventions (1, 2). Interleukin-22 (IL-22) is a member of the IL-10 family that has emerged as an important cytokine in the intestinal environment (3). Its importance is related to its ability to connect immune functions with metabolic functions (4, 5) and with the intestinal environment, as IL-22 levels can be modulated by the gut microbiota (6).

IL-22 is produced in response to inflammatory signals by various innate and adaptive immune cells, primarily innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and T-helper cells (Th17 and Th22) (7). Unlike many other cytokines that elicit widespread immune activation, IL-22 exerts selective effects on non-hematopoietic cells that express the IL-22 receptor, such as colonic epithelial cells (8). Protective effects of IL-22 in the colon include limiting tissue damage, promoting tissue repair, preventing excessive inflammation (9), and fostering beneficial bacterial communities while limiting the growth of potentially pathogenic or pro-inflammatory organisms (4, 10–12).

Recent studies have revealed the additional protective role of IL-22 during systemic infections through mediation of hemopexin (13), a plasma glycoprotein primarily responsible for binding free heme and mitigating oxidative stress during inflammation (14, 15). Though generally recognized for its systemic effects, hemopexin also has a potential, unexplored role within the colonic microenvironment during acute colitis. This is because the binding of hemopexin to heme both limits heme toxicity to colonic cells and reduces heme availability to microorganisms. Given the role of IL-22 in epithelial protection and tissue homeostasis, along with the growing recognition of the influence of the gut microbiota in IBD (16), we hypothesize that IL-22 signaling may drive hemopexin upregulation as a protective mechanism in colitis.

In this study, we explore the role of IL-22 and IL-22-induced hemopexin in the context of experimental ulcerative colitis using the dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) mouse model of acute colitis.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Animal experiments

Animal studies were conducted under the approval of the Institutional Animal Protection Committee (CIPA) at the Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM). Il22ra1^-/- mice and their wild-type (Wt) littermates, of C57BL/6N background, were rederived originally as previously described (Dr Naglaa Shoukry, CRCHUM) (17) and were bred under specific pathogen-free conditions. All mice used for these experiments were females between 8 and 10 weeks old, and they were maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle with unlimited access to food (Inotiv Teklad Diets, TD2018, IN, USA) and water.

2.2 DSS administration

Acute colitis was induced in mice by subjecting Il22ra1^-/- and Wt to 12 days of 2.5% DSS (DB001; TdB Labs, Upsala, Sweden) treatment in sterile water while the control groups received sterile water. In some experiments, Wt mice received 2.5% DSS in water for 9 days, followed by 3 days of recovery with normal drinking water. The weight of the mice was monitored daily throughout the experiments and the disease activity index (DAI) was evaluated daily by scoring based on stool consistency and rectal bleeding, using the following scale: Stool consistency (Normal =0; Loose =2; Diarrhea =4); Rectal bleeding (Normal =0; Occult blood =2; Rectal bleeding =4) (18, 19). The difference between initial and testing weights was used to determine weight loss, and the presence of persistent watery fecal material in the colon and the lack of fecal pellet development were used to characterize diarrhea. Hemoccult sensa (Beckman Coulter inc, Brea, CA 92821 USA) was used to evaluate bleeding. At day 12, mice were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital, followed by cervical dislocation. The feces, liver, and colon were collected in 1.5 ml tubes and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen before being transferred to -80°C for further assays.

2.3 Treatments

For IL-22 treatment, mice received intraperitoneal injection of recombinant murine IL-22 (rIL-22) (Peprotech, USA) at a dosage of 1 µg/mouse on days 3, 6 and 9 of DSS treatment. Intraperitoneal injections were used to treat mice with hemopexin (Athens Research & Technology, Athens, USA) at a dosage of 5 mg/kg body weight on day 7 of DSS administration, while control mice received an injection of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). For hemin treatment, hemin was dissolved in 0.2 mol/l NaOH and adjusted to pH 7.4 using HCl before being diluted with PBS (Wisent Inc., St-Bruno, QC, Canada). Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 75 µmol/kg of hemin (Sigma-AldrichCo, St Louis, MO, USA) or the vehicle, PBS, on day 5, 8 and 10 of DSS administration.

2.4 Heme quantification

The colorimetric method as described by (20) was used with little modification. The assay is based on the chemical conversion of non-fluorescing heme to intensely fluorescent porphyrins (21) and is specific for fecal heme (22). Firstly, colonic contents from mice were promptly snap-frozen and maintained at -80°C until diluted in water 1:1 (w/w). After homogenization, samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1500 × g. 10 µl of the supernatant was then added to 200 μL of glacial acetic acid (ACP Chemicals, Montreal, QC, Canada). Afterwards, 10 μL of fresh aqueous solution of FeSO4.7H₂O (Sigma-Aldrich, (0.12 mol/l)) and HC1 (Fisherscientific, (4.5 mol/l)) was added. Following an instant 30 minute incubation period at 60°C, 50 μl of the sample was added to 100 μl of a 1:1 2-propanol/water (v/v) mixture. Finally, fluorescence was measured at 360 nm excitation and 594 nm emission.

2.5 Protein quantification and ELISA

Fecal and colon samples were first digested by adding 20–30 g to 200 µL radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing NaCl (150 mM), NP-40 (1%), deoxycholic acid (0.50%), SDS (0.10%), Tris pH 8.0 (50 mM) and protease inhibitors (cOmplete^™, Mini, EDTA free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Roche) and vortexed for 5 minutes to yield a homogenous suspension. This process is followed by centrifugation (12,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C). An aliquot of the supernatant was prepared in a new tube and stored at -20°C until analysis. Protein concentrations were quantified using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA). For ELISA, adequate dilutions of homogenates and serum were prepared with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (reagent diluent) or as directed by the manufacturers of the kit. The mouse lipocalin (Lcn)-2/NGAL ELISA kit, (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and the ELISA Max™ standard set mouse IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α kits (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA; Cerdalane^® distributor) were used. Hemopexin concentration was quantified using a mouse hemopexin ELISA kit (Novus Biologicals Bio-Techne, Canada), and heme-oxygenase (HO) using a mouse heme-oxygenase ELISA kit (Abcam inc, Toronto ON, Canada). A multimode microplate reader (Tecan Spark, Morrisville USA) was used to read the absorbance of the plates.

2.6 Histology

Sections of the proximal and distal colon were fixed in 10% formalin (ChapTec, Montreal, QC, Canada). The samples were then embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 4 µm-thickness. To assess the severity of colitis, the sections were stained using hematoxylin (RICCA, VWR International, Mississauga, ON) and eosin (H&E; Leica Biosystems Richmond Inc. Richmond, IL).

2.7 Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was isolated with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON). A second clean-up using the Qiagen mRNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was employed to further purify the mRNA in order to prevent DSS from inhibiting downstream reactions. Reverse transcription was performed with Thermoscript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen). Hemopexin (Hpx) mRNA levels were measured by real-time PCR in a Rotor Gene 3000 Real Time DNA Detection System (Montreal Biotech, Kirkland, QC) with PowerUp^TM SYBR^TM Green Master Mix for qPCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described (23). Expression levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene β-actin. The following primers were used: hemopexin Forward CAGCAGTGGCGCTAAATATCC and hemopexin Reverse ACTCTCCCGTTGGCAGTAGG; β-actin Forward TGTTACCAACTGGGACGACA and β-actin Reverse GGTGTTGAAGGTCTCAAA.

2.8 Statistics

Graphpad Prism (Version 10.4.1), Graphpad software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to analyze all data. Shapiro-Wilk was used for data normality check, while F test (two variances) and Barlett’s test (multiple variances) were used to check for homogeneity of variance. When the data did not pass the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, log(Y) transformation was applied to the data. Statistical significance was determined at P values less than 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Recombinant IL-22 treatment during the acute phase of colitis induces hemopexin in the colon

Bleeding in the colonic mucosa is commonly seen in both patients and mice with ulcerative colitis, resulting in heme accumulation in the intestine (24). As a defense mechanism against reactive heme, hemopexin is induced (14). To understand the role of IL-22 in hemopexin induction in acute colitis, mice receiving DSS in water were treated with recombinant IL-22 (rIL-22), Figure 1A). As shown in Figure 1B, no significant differences in body weights were observed between the groups. However, compared with the vehicle-treated control mice, rIL-22 significantly decreased DAI scores during DSS treatment (Figure 1C).

Figure 1

Figure 1. IL-22 treatment lowers inflammation in the DSS-induced mouse model of acute colitis. (A) Study design; (B) Body weight variation; (C) Disease activity index; and (D) Colon length. Fecal levels of (E) Lcn-2; (F) TNF-α; (G) IL-6; (H) Hemopexin; and (I) Heme. Each dot represents one mouse, and means are represented by horizontal bars ± SEM; n=6 mice per group. *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns: not significant. Student’s t-test. DSS, dextran sulfate sodium.

During DSS treatment, the epithelium becomes injured, causing increased cell death, thereby leading to the shortening of the colon (18). rIL-22 treatment significantly reduced this effect, with these mice presenting longer colons than PBS-treated mice (Figure 1D). In addition, mice treated with rIL-22 had decreased levels of inflammatory cytokines, namely Lcn-2 (Figure 1E), one of the most sensitive markers of inflammation in IBD patients (25), as well as TNF-α and IL-6 (Figures 1F, G). Most importantly, rIL-22 treatment enhanced hemopexin levels in fecal samples, resulting in reduced heme levels (Figures 1H, I).

These results indicate that hemopexin is induced by IL-22, and that it has a protective effect in acute colitis, limiting DSS-induced damage of colonic epithelial cells and lessening inflammation.

3.2 The absence of IL-22ra1 signaling blunts hemopexin induction and aggravates acute colitis in mice

To further understand the role of hemopexin induced through IL-22 signaling, we next performed experiments in Il22ra1^-/- mice (Figure 2A). Following DSS treatment, Il22ra1^-/- mice showed significantly more weight loss (Figure 2B) and higher DAI scores at the endpoint than Wt mice (Figure 2C). In addition, DSS-treated Il22ra1^-/- mice had significantly shorter colon lengths compared to the Wt mice (Figure 2D). Furthermore, DSS-treated Il22ra1^-/- mice showed significantly higher levels of fecal Lcn-2, TNF-α, and IL-6 (Figures 2E–G). Conversely, compared to the DSS-treated Wt mice, DSS-treated Il22ra1^-/- mice had a significantly reduced ability to induce hemopexin mRNA in the liver, thus resulting in lower hemopexin levels in the serum (Supplementary Figures S1A, B) and, critically, in feces (Figure 2H). The reduction of hemopexin in Il22ra1^-/- mice was accompanied by an increase in fecal heme levels (Figure 2I).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Increased colitis severity in DSS-treated IL-22ra1 knockout mice. (A) Study design; (B) Body weight variation; (C) Disease activity index; (D) Colon length; Fecal levels of (E) Lcn-2; (F) TNF-α; (G) IL-6; (H) Hemopexin; and (I) Heme. Each dot represents one mouse, and means are represented by horizontal bars ± SEM; n=8–9 mice per group. ANOVA *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001, ns: not significant). DSS, dextran sulfate sodium.

Taken together, these results underscore the importance of IL-22ra1 signaling in mediating systemic and colonic hemopexin levels and reducing colitis severity in response to DSS.

3.3 Hemopexin administration reverses colitis aggravation in the absence of IL-22ra1 signaling

To further evaluate the importance of IL-22-dependent hemopexin induction on the severity of DSS-induced acute colitis, we treated Il22ra1^-/- mice with exogenous hemopexin (Figure 3A). Despite similar body weights between PBS-treated (control) and hemopexin-treated Il22ra1^-/- mice during the experiment (Figure 3B), colitis severity was significantly attenuated by exogenous hemopexin treatment as indicated by lower DAI scores (Figure 3C) and improved colonic lengths when compared to PBS treatment (Figure 3D). DSS-treatment caused visible changes in pathological parameters including crypt distortion, epithelial damage, ulceration, and inflammatory cell infiltration. The overall histological damage was more severe in Il22ra1^-/- compared to Wt mice, and was attenuated by hemopexin treatment (Supplementary Figure S2). Consistently, hemopexin administration significantly reduced fecal Lcn-2, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels in hemopexin-treated Il22ra1^-/- mice, which showed similar levels to DSS-treated Wt mice (Figures 3E–G). Finally, levels of fecal hemopexin were increased after exogenous hemopexin treatment, and concordantly, fecal heme levels significantly decreased (Figures 3H, I).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Hemopexin treatment decreases inflammation in the absence of IL-22ra1 signaling in mice. (A) Study design; (B) Body weight variation (C) Disease activity index; (D) Colon length. Fecal levels of (E) Lcn-2; (F) TNF-α; (G) IL-6; (H) Hemopexin; and (I) Heme. Each dot represents one mouse, and means are represented by horizontal bars ± SEM; n=8–10 mice per group. ANOVA, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns: not significant. DSS, dextran sulfate sodium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; Hpx, hemopexin.

Together, these results show that exogenous hemopexin has a protective effect in acute colitis and further indicate that hemopexin induction during colitis is dependent on IL-22ra1 signaling.

3.4 Full anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects of hemin require functional IL-22ra1 signaling

Next, we investigated the role of IL-22 in hemopexin induction (14) by treating mice with hemin, the ferric form of heme with a chloride ligand, during experimental acute colitis (Figure 4A). Hemin is the substrate and primary inducer of heme-oxygenase (HO-1), the rate limiting enzyme that catalyzes the breakdown of heme to carbon monoxide (CO), biliverdin and free iron (26, 27). As such, hemin has both anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties (28, 29). As seen in Figure 4B, body weights remained similar among all mouse groups. However, colitis severity was significantly reduced in Wt mice that received hemin compared to Wt mice that received the vehicle, as indicated by reduced DAI scores and increased colon lengths (Figures 4C, D). In marked contrast, hemin treatment in Il22ra1^-/- mice failed to attenuate colitis severity (Figures 4C, D). In addition, while hemin caused a significant reduction in fecal Lcn-2 and IL-6 levels in both Wt and Il22ra1^-/- mice (Figures 4E–G), levels in hemin-treated Il22ra1^-/- mice were significantly higher than those in hemin-treated Wt mice. Consistent with these effects, HO-1 production was significantly enhanced in the colon of Wt mice, but not in IL22ra1^-/- mice (Figure 4H). While hemopexin levels were enhanced in both the Wt and Il22ra1^-/- mice that received hemin, this elevation was much more modest in Il22ra1^-/- mice (Figure 4I).

Figure 4

Figure 4. The effect of hemin treatment is attenuated in Il22ra1^-/- mice. (A) Study design; (B) Body-weight variation; (C) Disease activity index; (D) Colon length. Fecal levels of (E) Lcn-2; (F) TNF-α; (G) IL-6; (H) Colon HO-1. (I) Fecal hemopexin. Each dot represents one mouse, and means are represented by horizontal bars ± SEM; n=9-11 mice per group. ANOVA, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001). ns, not significant between the groups; DSS, dextran sulfate sodium.

These results suggest that the attenuation of acute colitis by hemin treatment depends on intact IL-22ra1 signaling, involving hemopexin induction and downstream antioxidant effects through HO-1 production.

4 Discussion

The protective role of IL-22 in IBD is due to the promotion of epithelial barrier integrity, enhancement of tissue repair, and regulation of immune responses. Here we report that IL-22 is additionally protective against heme toxicity through the modulation of colonic hemopexin and HO-1 levels in the DSS-induced mouse model of acute colitis.

We show that recombinant IL-22 administration significantly alleviated inflammation in DSS-treated mice while conversely, IL-22ra1 deficiency exacerbated colitis severity in DSS-treated mice. These findings are in line with previous reports that IL-22 deficiency results in exacerbated DSS-mediated colitis due to alterations to the colonic microbiota (4) and compromised colonic epithelial integrity during gastrointestinal infections (30). Most importantly, we provide evidence that, in addition to the reported role of IL-22 in promoting epithelial regeneration and wound healing (31), IL-22 is also essential for the appropriate modulation of hemopexin levels in the colon. This was evidenced by the limited hemopexin induction in the liver and its reduced presence in the serum and feces of Il-22ra1^-/- mice and by the consequent severity of DSS-induced colitis, which could be reversed by recombinant hemopexin treatment. In addition, the protective effects of hemin treatment, including the upregulation of HO-1 (32), were significantly reduced in Il-22ra1^-/- mice. HO-1 has been shown to play a protective role in DSS-induced intestinal inflammation (33), with previous research showing that IL-22 can directly stimulate HO-1 in keratinocytes (34) and in the liver (35). In this study, we demonstrate that HO-1 is additionally induced in an IL-22-dependent manner in the colon. HO-1 expression can be triggered by various stimuli in gut epithelial cells (36) as well as in gut resident macrophages (37). More precisely, administration of cobalt protoporphyrin IX was shown to activate HO-1 in gut macrophages in the azoxymethane/DSS mouse model of tumorigenesis, thus decreasing tumor burden (37). Likewise, in a DSS model of acute colitis, HO-1 activation by cobalt protoporphyrin limited colonic inflammation (38). Furthermore, in peritoneal macrophages, the heme-hemopexin complex has been shown to activate HO-1 (39). Therefore, in addition to the direct effect of IL-22 in inducing HO-1, IL-22 signaling may also contribute to the anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects of hemin (40) by activating the heme-hemopexin-HO-1 axis.

In the context of IBD, the presence of heme in the luminal space of the colon due to either the diet (red meat consumption) or intestinal bleeding has a direct cytotoxic effect on the colonic epithelium (41), further aggravating acute colitis (42). Heme injures the colon surface epithelium by generating cytotoxic and oxidative stress resulting in mucosal hyperproliferation (43). In addition, luminal heme levels may further exacerbate colitis indirectly through the modulation of the gut microbiota composition and function (44).

Cytokines are central to the pathology of IBD, making them attractive therapeutic targets (45). A key advantage of targeting IL-22 in IBD is that IL-22 receptors are primarily expressed on epithelial cells rather than immune cells, meaning that IL-22-based therapies can enhance tissue repair without directly suppressing systemic immune responses. This selective action reduces the risk of systemic immunosuppression-associated complications, a major concern with many current IBD treatments that broadly target inflammation (46), such as anti-TNF-α therapy (47).

In conclusion, our findings highlight the important role of IL-22-dependent hemopexin and HO-1 induction in the context of acute colitis in mice (Figure 5). Our current study design does not allow for a clear separation of the individual contributions of HO-1 and hemopexin in the IL-22-mediated protective response. Future research using, for example, hemopexin knockout mice (49) and HO-1 inhibitors (50) should examine further the distinct roles of IL-22-induced hemopexin and IL-22-induced HO-1. In addition to its well-known role in heme scavenging and oxidative stress reduction, hemopexin may also influence gut microbiota dynamics by limiting heme availability to potential pathobionts and pathogens. Given the increasing recognition of microbial dysbiosis in IBD pathogenesis, targeting heme metabolism through hemopexin offers an intriguing therapeutic strategy. The integration of IL-22 and hemopexin-based therapies could represent a novel and complementary therapeutic avenue for IBD treatment, balancing tissue repair with controlled inflammation.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Graphical abstract summarizing the major findings of this study and the proposed mechanism. DSS administration triggers epithelial damage, bleeding, and the release of free heme. IL-22 enhances the levels of hemopexin, a heme-binding protein that sequesters free heme, reducing inflammation and tissue damage. The heme-hemopexin complex facilitates detoxification of heme and promotes the induction of HO-1, an antioxidant enzyme, reducing oxidative stress. In addition, IL-22 can directly induce HO-1. Previously described roles for IL-22 in the gut includes cell proliferation, tissue remodeling, wound healing, and antimicrobial defense (dashed green box). Previous reports show that hemopexin can inhibit reactive oxygen species (ROS), inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β), and cell death (dashed red box), which can be induced by free heme (48). Blunt arrows (┴) indicate inhibition while sharp arrows (→) indicate stimulation. Created with Biorender.com.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Institutional Animal Protection Committee (CIPA) at the Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

AA: Data curation, Visualization, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Methodology. CG: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology. GF: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. AC: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. MS: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Validation, Project administration, Conceptualization, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR - grant PJT 196002) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC - grant RGPIN-2024-05660) to MS. AA and CG are recipients of the Canderel Scholarship from the Institut du cancer de Montréal.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Naglaa Shoukry for her help with the IL-22ra1 knockout mice to start our mouse colony. We also want to sincerely appreciate the staff of the animal facility for their help. The authors thank Feryel Azzi, Liliane Meunier, and Véronique Barrès from the Molecular Pathology core facility of the CRCHUM.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1614466/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | (A) Liver hemopexin mRNA levels. (B); Serum hemopexin levels. Each dot represents one mouse, and means are represented by horizontal bars ± SEM; n=8–10 mice per group. ANOVA, *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001, ns: not significant. DSS = dextran sulfate sodium, Hpx, hemopexin.

Supplementary Figure 2 | Histological assessment of DSS-induced colitis. Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained colon sections. Magnification: 200x, DSS, dextran sulfate sodium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; Hpx, hemopexin.

References

1. Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2014) 14:329–42. doi: 10.1038/nri3661

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Maloy KJ and Powrie F. Intestinal homeostasis and its breakdown in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. (2011) 474:298–306. doi: 10.1038/nature10208

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Aujla SJ and Kolls JK. IL-22: A critical mediator in mucosal host defense. J Mol Med. (2009) 87:451–4. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0448-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zenewicz LA, Yin X, Wang G, Elinav E, Hao L, Zhao L, et al. IL-22 deficiency alters colonic microbiota to be transmissible and colitogenic. J Immunol. (2013) 190:5306–12. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Keir M, Yi Y, Lu T, and Ghilardi N. The role of IL-22 in intestinal health and disease. J Exp Med. (2020) 217:e20192195. doi: 10.1084/jem.20192195

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Sabihi M, Böttcher M, Pelczar P, and Huber S. Microbiota-Dependent Effects of IL-22. Cells. (2020) 9:2205. doi: 10.3390/cells9102205

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Rutz S, Eidenschenk C, and Ouyang W. IL-22, not simply a Th17 cytokine. Immunol Rev. (2013) 252:116–32. doi: 10.1111/imr.12027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Sonnenberg GF, Fouser LA, and Artis D. Border patrol: regulation of immunity, inflammation and tissue homeostasis at barrier surfaces by IL-22. Nat Immunol. (2011) 12:383–90. doi: 10.1038/ni.2025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Shohan M, Dehghani R, Khodadadi A, Dehnavi S, Ahmadi R, Joudaki N, et al. Interleukin-22 and intestinal homeostasis: Protective or destructive? IUBMB Life. (2020) 72:1585–602. doi: 10.1002/iub.2295

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Aden K, Rehman A, Falk-Paulsen M, Secher T, Kuiper J, Tran F, et al. Epithelial IL-23R Signaling Licenses Protective IL-22 Responses in Intestinal Inflammation. Cell Rep. (2016) 16:2208–18. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Shih VF-S, Cox J, Kljavin NM, Dengler HS, Reichelt M, Kumar P, et al. Homeostatic IL-23 receptor signaling limits Th17 response through IL-22–mediated containment of commensal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2014) 111:13942–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323852111

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Fatkhullina AR, Peshkova IO, Dzutsev A, Aghayev T, McCulloch JA, Thovarai V, et al. An Interleukin-23-Interleukin-22 Axis Regulates Intestinal Microbial Homeostasis to Protect from Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis. Immunity. (2018) 49:943–57.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.09.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Sakamoto K, Kim YG, Hara H, Kamada N, Caballero-Flores G, Tolosano E, et al. IL-22 Controls Iron-Dependent Nutritional Immunity Against Systemic Bacterial Infections. Sci Immunol. (2017) 2:eaai8371. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aai8371

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Tolosano E and Altruda F. Hemopexin: structure, function, and regulation. DNA Cell Biol. (2002) 21:297–306. doi: 10.1089/104454902753759717

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Dutra FF and Bozza MT. Heme on innate immunity and inflammation. Front Pharmacol. (2014) 5:115. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00115

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lloyd-Price J, Arze C, Ananthakrishnan AN, Schirmer M, Avila-Pacheco J, Poon TW, et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature. (2019) 569:655–62. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1237-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Abdelnabi MN, Flores Molina M, Soucy G, Quoc-Huy Trinh V, Bédard N, Mazouz S, et al. Sex-Dependent Hepatoprotective Role of IL-22 Receptor Signaling in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease-Related Fibrosis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatology. (2022) 14:1269–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.08.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chassaing B, Aitken JD, Malleshappa M, and Vijay-Kumar M. Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Curr Protoc Immunol. (2014) 104:15.25.1–15.14. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1525s104

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kim JJ, Shajib MS, Manocha MM, and Khan WI. Investigating intestinal inflammation in DSS-induced model of IBD. J Vis Exp. (2012) 60:3678. doi: 10.3791/3678-v

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. van den Berg JW, Koole-Lesuis R, Edixhoven-Bosdijk A, and Brouwers N. Automating the quantification of heme in feces. Clin Chem. (1988) 34:2125–6. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/34.10.2125

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ahlquist DA, McGill DB, Schwartz S, Taylor WF, Ellefson M, and Owen RA. HemoQuant, A New Quantitative Assay for Fecal Hemoglobin. Ann Internal Med. (1984) 101:297–302. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-3-297

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Schwartz S, Dahl J, Ellefson M, and Ahlquist D. The ‘HemoQuant’ test: A specific and quantitative determination of heme (hemoglobin) in feces and other materials. Clin Chem. (1984) 29:2061–7. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/29.12.2061

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Samba-Mondonga M, Constante M, Fragoso G, Calvé A, and Santos MM. Curcumin induces mild anemia in a DSS-induced colitis mouse model maintained on an iron-sufficient diet. PloS One. (2019) 14:e0208677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208677

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Paine ER. Colonoscopic evaluation in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). (2014) 2:161–8. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zollner A, Schmiderer A, Reider SJ, Oberhuber G, Pfister A, Texler B, et al. Faecal Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Calprotectin Versus Lipocalin-2-a Comparative Study. J Crohns Colitis. (2021) 15:43–54. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa124

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Silva I, Correia R, Pinto R, and Mateus V. Hemin Ameliorates the Inflammatory Activity in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Non-Clinical Study in Rodents. Biomedicines. (2022) 10:2025. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10082025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Naito Y, Takagi T, Uchiyama K, and Yoshikawa T. Heme oxygenase-1: a novel therapeutic target for gastrointestinal diseases. J Clin Biochem Nutr. (2011) 48:126–33. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.10-61

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Estarreja J, Caldeira G, Silva I, Mendes P, and Mateus V. The Pharmacological Effect of Hemin in Inflammatory-Related Diseases: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines. (2024) 12:898. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040898

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. El-Ashmawy NE, Al-Ashmawy GM, Farag AA, and Ibrahim AO. Hemin versus erythropoietin: Possible role in Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway in rats with nephrotoxicity. Biomedicine Pharmacotherapy. (2022) 156:113971. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113971

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Zheng Y, Valdez PA, Danilenko DM, Hu Y, Sa SM, Gong Q, et al. Interleukin-22 mediates early host defense against attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Nat Med. (2008) 14:282–9. doi: 10.1038/nm1720

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Klotskova HB, Kidess E, Nadal AL, and Brugman S. The role of interleukin-22 in mammalian intestinal homeostasis: Friend and foe. Immun Inflammation Dis. (2024) 12:e1144. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1144

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Soares MP and Weiss G. The Iron age of host-microbe interactions. EMBO Rep. (2015) 16:1482–500. doi: 10.15252/embr.201540558

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Takagi T, Naito Y, Mizushima K, Hirai Y, Harusato A, Okayama T, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 prevents murine intestinal inflammation. J Clin Biochem Nutr. (2018) 63:169–74. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.17-133

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Numata I, Okuyama R, Memezawa A, Ito Y, Takeda K, Furuyama K, et al. Functional Expression of Heme Oxygenase-1 in Human Differentiated Epidermis and Its Regulation by Cytokines. J Invest Dermatol. (2009) 129:2594–603. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Xing W-w, Zou M-j, Liu S, Xu T, Gao J, Wang J-x, et al. Hepatoprotective effects of IL-22 on fulminant hepatic failure induced by d-galactosamine and lipopolysaccharide in mice. Cytokine. (2011) 56:174–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.07.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Akagi R. Role of Heme Oxygenase in Gastrointestinal Epithelial Cells. Antioxidants (Basel). (2022) 11:1323. doi: 10.3390/antiox11071323

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Marelli G, Erreni M, Anselmo A, Taverniti V, Guglielmetti S, Mantovani A, et al. Heme-oxygenase-1 Production by Intestinal CX3CR1+ Macrophages Helps to Resolve Inflammation and Prevents Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. (2017) 77:4472–85. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2501

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Paul G, Bataille F, Obermeier F, Bock J, Klebl F, Strauch U, et al. Analysis of intestinal haem-oxygenase-1 (HO-1) in clinical and experimental colitis. Clin Exp Immunol. (2005) 140:547–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02775.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Liang X, Lin T, Sun G, Beasley-Topliffe L, Cavaillon JM, and Warren HS. Hemopexin down-regulates LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokines from macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. (2009) 86:229–35. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1208742

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Zhong W, Xia Z, Hinrichs D, Rosenbaum JT, Wegmann KW, Meyrowitz J, et al. Hemin exerts multiple protective mechanisms and attenuates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2010) 50:132–9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181c61591

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Schepens MA, Vink C, Schonewille AJ, Dijkstra G, van der Meer R, and Bovee-Oudenhoven IM. Dietary heme adversely affects experimental colitis in rats, despite heat-shock protein induction. Nutrition. (2011) 27:590–7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.05.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. van der Logt EM, Blokzijl T, van der Meer R, Faber KN, and Dijkstra G. Westernized high-fat diet accelerates weight loss in dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice, which is further aggravated by supplementation of heme. J Nutr Biochem. (2013) 24:1159–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.09.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Ijssennagger N, Rijnierse A, de Wit NJ, Boekschoten MV, Dekker J, Schonewille A, et al. Dietary heme induces acute oxidative stress, but delayed cytotoxicity and compensatory hyperproliferation in mouse colon. Carcinogenesis. (2013) 34:1628–35. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt084

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Constante M, Fragoso G, Calvé A, Samba-Mondonga M, and Santos MM. Dietary heme induces gut dysbiosis, aggravates colitis, and potentiates the development of adenomas in mice. Front Microbiol. (2017) 8:1809. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01809

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Danese S. New therapies for inflammatory bowel disease: from the bench to the bedside. Gut. (2012) 61:918–32. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300904

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kofla-Dłubacz A, Akutko K, Krzesiek E, Jamer T, Braksator J, Grębska P, et al. Selective Forms of Therapy in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:994. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040994

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Shivaji UN, Sharratt CL, Thomas T, Smith SCL, Iacucci M, Moran GW, et al. Review article: managing the adverse events caused by anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2019) 49:664–80. doi: 10.1111/apt.15097

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Silva RCMC, Tan LB, Gama A, De Cicco NNT, Merle NS, Roumenina LT, et al. Hemopexin and albumin inhibit heme-induced macrophage activation while also enabling heme-LPS synergistic promotion of TNF production. Adv Redox Res. (2023) 8:100069. doi: 10.1016/j.arres.2023.100069

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Tolosano E, Hirsch E, Patrucco E, Camaschella C, Navone R, Silengo L, et al. Defective Recovery and Severe Renal Damage After Acute Hemolysis in Hemopexin-Deficient Mice. Blood. (1999) 94:3906–14. doi: 10.1182/blood.V94.11.3906

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Pittalà V, Salerno L, Romeo G, Modica MN, and Siracusa MA. A Focus on Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1) Inhibitors. Curr Medicinal Chem. (2013) 20:3711–32. doi: 10.2174/0929867311320300003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar