BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1623920
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Molecular Strategies for Allergy ManagementView all articles
Pre-clinical allergenicity assessment of IgE epitope-targeted Der p 2 mutants demonstrate potential as hypoallergenic AIT candidates
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- 2Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
- 3InBio, Charlottesville, VA, United States
- 4Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 5Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 6Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
- 7Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 8Human Microbiome (HUMI) Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Advancements in hybridoma technology have enabled the production of human IgE monoclonal antibodies (hIgE-mAb) for successful IgE-epitope mapping of major allergens. Here, we assessed the hypoallergenicity of three IgE-epitope mutants (single 4C8 or 2F10, and double 4C8+2F10 epitope mutants) of house dust mite allergen (HDM) Der p 2. Methods: Humanized rat basophilic leukemia (huRBL) cells, passively sensitized overnight with either pairs of Der p 2 specific hIgE-mAb (2F10, 4C8 or 2G1) or HDM-allergic serum (n=8), were stimulated with either wildtype (WT) Der p 2 or an IgE-epitope mutant and mediator release was measured. Results: No degranulation was induced upon stimulation with all mutants, when cells were sensitized with pairs of hIgE-mAb specific for at least one mutated epitope. HIgE-mAb specific for non-mutated epitopes led to mediator release comparable to WT Der p 2, indicating that epitopes recognized by the three different hIgE-mAb are not overlapping and that the 3D-structure of the mutants is conserved. The double 4C8+2F10 epitope mutant had a significantly reduced maximal mediator release (48.3%) compared to WT, in cells sensitized with allergic donor serum. Overall, the area-under-the-curve of mediator release curves induced by the mutants was significantly lower (31-65%) compared to WT. When comparing the EC20, the double 4C8+2F10 epitope mutant required a 158-fold higher antigen concentration to induce the same extent of mediator release as WT Der p 2. Conclusion: Der p 2 epitope mutants display significantly reduced allergenicity. Particularly, the double 4C8+2F10 epitope mutant demonstrated a strong potential as a novel AIT vaccine candidate.
Keywords: allergen-specific immunotherapy, House dust mite, Der p 2, Hypoallergenic, human IgE monoclonal antibodies
Received: 06 May 2025; Accepted: 10 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pena-Amelunxen, Asghari, Khatri, Glesner, Versteeg, van Ree, Chapman, Smith, Chruszcz, Pomés and Aglas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lorenz Aglas, Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.