EDITORIAL article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1625920
This article is part of the Research TopicHarnessing Single-Cell Insights: Pioneering Predictive Markers for Immunotherapy Efficacy in Solid TumorsView all 10 articles
Editorial: Harnessing Single-Cell Insights: Pioneering Predictive Markers for Immunotherapy Efficacy in Solid Tumors
Provisionally accepted- Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The area of tumor immunotherapy has made great advances, owing principally to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which constituted a breakthrough (1). However, developing predictive biomarkers capable of accurately forecasting individual response to immunotherapy remained a substantial issue. Despite improvements, we still don't fully understand why some patients respond well while others don't. The latest developments in single-cell analysis have transformed the area of immunotherapy. The technology's ability to examine single immune cells inside the tumor microenvironment and immune system has enabled researchers to dive into hitherto unknown complexities (2). This research topic aims to tackle the issues of predictive biomarkers by harnessing the novel potential of single-cell research and technology. With investigating the actions and interactions of single immune cell, this topic hope to acquire vital insights into the causes for diverse patients' reactions to immunotherapy. These advances in single-cell analysis not only enrich the comprehension of immunotherapy, but they also have a chance to provide the door to tailored therapy, hence enhancing the results of immunotherapy treatments. The purpose of this project is to employ single-cell analysis to investigate prognostic variables for immunotherapy achievement throughout many types of solid tumors, offering knowledge regarding the challenges and possibilities given by each cancer type.Impressively, we have carefully selected nine publications from many papers for this topic. Seven of these studies revealed the role of single cell technology in recognizing molecular markers in different tumors, while the other two reviews summarized the role of single cell technology in melanoma and pancreatic cancer. We have summarized these studies below: Antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) immunotherapy is thought to be the new engine for precision therapy (3). Zhang et al. aimed to create an ADCP-based liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) risk stratification system and identify potential targets. They used a mix of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) (GSE149614) and bulk RNA-seq data to screen for ADCP modifying factors in LIHC and identified GYPA, CLDN18, and IRX5 as potential major target genes for ADCP regulation in LIHC. Validation using tissue and cell samples revealed that GYPA and CLDN18 were elevated in liver cancer tissues and cells. Additionally, in vitro suppression of CLDN18 reduced the malignant capability of liver cancer cells, indicating CLDN18 as an important ADCP regulatory receptor in LIHC.Y-box-binding proteins (YBX) have a multifunctional role in tumor growth, metastasis, drug resistance via regulating transcription and translation pathways (4).mutations, and methylation patterns of three genes from the YBX family (YBX1, YBX2, and YBX3) in 28 different kinds of cancer, and used the ssGSEA method to establish a novel YBXs score. The YBXs score has proven to be an effective predictor for the efficacy of a variety of cancer therapies, including immunotherapy. Furthermore, YBX2 was identified as a possible therapeutic target, which has considerably improved hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnostic and therapy options.Glycosylation is critical for cell communication, immunological response, and protein stability (5). Jiang et al. obtained scRNA-seq data and transcriptome data from GSE197177 and GSE224411, respectively, to investigate the role of glycosylation mechanisms in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) development. They discovered that MGAT1 plays a crucial role in PDAC by controlling glycosylation levels in macrophages, which influences tumor growth and improves prognosis.Hyaluronan mediated motility receptor (HMMR) is a protein-coding gene on chromosome that is expressed during cell cycle, peaking between the late G2 phase and early mitosis (6). However, its significance in HCC is unknown. Su et al.discovered that HMMR had good diagnostic performance, and HMMR knockdown inhibited the proliferation and migration of HCC cells in vitro using single-cell data analysis (GSE149614) and experimental verification. Additionally, HMMR was related with a bad prognosis in HCC patients, and re-staging using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) provided an excellent prognosis predictive value, which might guide chemotherapy and targeted treatment.The relationship between glycosylation and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is not well understood. Ma et al. identified key genes controlling glycosylation using scRNA-seq analysis, created a three-gene signature (SMS, HEG1 and MYO1B) that may accurately predict the prognosis of HNSCC and their response to immunotherapeutic therapies.
Keywords: single-cell RNA sequencing, biomarkers, Immunotherapy, solid tumors, prognosis
Received: 09 May 2025; Accepted: 12 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zhongbao Zhou, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.