ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1627680
This article is part of the Research TopicCheckpoint Immunotherapy: Reshaping the Landscape of Gastrointestinal Cancer Treatment - Volume IIView all articles
Preexisting Ulcerative Colitis Increases the Risk of Immune-Related Colitis and Predicts Divergent Survival Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Provisionally accepted- 1Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- 2Cangzhou People's Hospital, Cangzhou, China
- 3The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- 4Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The risk of immune-related colitis (IRC) and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with gastrointestinal cancers and preexisting ulcerative colitis (UC) has not been well described. Patients and methods: We divided the patients with gastrointestinal cancers and preexisting UC who received ICIs between January 2021 and May 2024 into two groups as IRC group and non-IRC group. The electronic medical records were reviewed to compare the risk of IRC between two groups. Survival analysis and COX regression was conducted to assess clinical efficacy. Results: Of the 138 patients in study, 31 patients had a history of UC prior to initiation of immunotherapy. IRC occurred in 22 patients (71.0%) and over half experienced severe IRC (54.5%), a rate higher than that among similar patients without underlying UC (17.4%, p = 0.013). Compared with patients without UC who did not experience IRC, PFS and OS of patients with UC who had mild IRC were longer (PFS: 170 vs 96 days, p < 0.001; OS: 261 vs 172 days, p = 0.021) and those with severe IRC demonstrated merely a marginal advantage in terms of PFS (147 vs 96 days, p = 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in OS (171 vs 172 days, p = 0.851). The Multivariate analysis affirmed that mild IRC were correlated with a favorable prognosis (HR = 0.286, 95%CI: 0.106-0.769, p = 0.013), whereas severe IRC was not sufficient to be recognized as independent risk factors affecting survival outcomes. (HR = 1.149, 95%CI: 0.502-2.633, p = 0.742). The result of serum cytokines showed that the levels of IL-6 and IL-17A in patients with IRC were significantly elevated. Conclusion: For preexisting UC patients treated with ICIs, the risk of IRC is increased. Mild IRC may suggest a favorable prognosis, and being vigilant and effectively managing the occurrence of severe IRC is crucial for maximizing clinical benefits. Targeting the IL-6 pathway may be a potential new strategy for treating IRC in the future.
Keywords: immune checkpoint inhibitors, ulcerative colitis, immune-related colitis, Gastrointestinal cancers, Survival outcomes
Received: 13 May 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xu, Chen, Liu, Tao, Ji, Wu, Zhao, Zhou, Li, Zhu, Wang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hanlong Zhu, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Yunzhe Wang, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
Fangyu Wang, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.