Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1628979

This article is part of the Research TopicImmunological Aspects and Immunotherapy in Gynecologic CancersView all 20 articles

Evaluation of Microsatellite Instability Patterns in Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Retrospective Analysis of 285 Endometrial Cancers

Provisionally accepted
Cheng  WangCheng WangMin  FengMin FengYuling  KouYuling KouWei  KuangWei KuangWei  WangWei WangDongni  LiangDongni Liang*
  • Department of Pathology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: In this study, we systematically compared the microsatellite shift patterns detected by PCR-based microsatellite instability analysis (PCR-MSI) in mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient ECs and analyzed the clinicopathological features associated with minimal versus major shifts. Method: We evaluated the microsatellite shift patterns using five NCI-recommended loci in 285 MMR-deficient ECs identified through immunohistochemistry (IHC). A minimal shift was defined as a one-to-three nucleotide repeat shift observed at least at one locus. Then, clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed for two distinct groups: the minimal shift group and the major shift group. Finally, further analysis of MMR/MSI discordant cases was performed through MLH1 promoter methylation detection and MMR gene germline mutation detection. Result: Of the 285 MMR-deficiency ECs, 169 (59.3%) had combined loss of MLH1 and PMS2, 54 (18.9%) had combined loss of MSH2 and MSH6, 39 (13.7%) had isolated loss of MSH6 and 23 (8.1%) had isolated loss of PMS2 by IHC. The rate of inconsistency between MMR-IHC and PCR-MSI was 12.3%. However, based on the minimal shifting criteria, 13 cases with MSI-L were reassessed as MSI-H because of the occurrence of minimal microsatellite shifts, and the inconsistency rate between MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR decreased to 7.7% . Additionally, discordant cases showed a higher frequency (91%, 20/22 cases) of minimal shift involving the mononucleotide locus. Among the 7 MLH1/PMS2-deficient cases, 3 were successfully detected and showed MLH1 promoter methylation. A total of 13 of 22 patients were successfully completed MMR gene germline testing, 11 cases had germline mutations in MSH6 and 3 cases harbored p.F1088Lfs*. Overall, the frequency of minimal shift was 100% (39/39) at isolated loss of MSH6, 85.8% (145/169) at the loss of MLH1 and PMS2, 66.7% (36/54) at the loss of MSH2 and MSH6, and 47.9% (11/23) at the isolated loss of PMS2, respectively. There is no correlation between minimal shift group or major shift group and clinicopathological features. Conclusion: MMR-deficient ECs exhibit a high frequency of minimal microsatellite shifts, particularly in cases with isolated loss of MSH6. The combination of MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR assays could enhance the accuracy of MSI detection, thereby facilitating more precise treatment strategies of ECs.

Keywords: Minimal microsatellite shift, mismatch repair (MMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), endometrialcancer (EC), immunohistochemistry (IHC), Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Received: 15 May 2025; Accepted: 03 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Feng, Kou, Kuang, Wang and Liang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dongni Liang, Department of Pathology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.