ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Nutritional Immunology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1633500
Examining Intraindividual Variability of Urinary Gluten Immunogenic Peptides Compared to the Lactulose-Mannitol Ratio in Healthy Volunteers: Implications for Clinical Assessment of Intestinal Permeability
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- 2Research and Development Departmen, Biomedal S.L., Seville, Spain
- 3Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The intestinal barrier plays a crucial role in preventing the translocation of harmful substances. Intestinal permeability is commonly assessed using the lactulose-mannitol ratio (LMR) test, which measures absorption of non-metabolizable sugars. However, it does not reflect permeability to larger, potentially antigenic molecules such as proteins. Urinary gluten immunogenic peptides (u-GIP), derived from gluten, have emerged as promising biomarkers, showing sensitivity to mucosal disruption. This study compared the intraindividual variability of u-GIP and LMR under fasting conditions in healthy volunteers to assess the consistency and reproducibility of both methods for evaluating intestinal barrier function.Methods: Twelve healthy adult volunteers underwent a controlled dietary protocol and repeated intestinal permeability testing on three separate days. After a fasting period, each participant ingested gluten, lactulose, and and mannitol. Urine samples were collected at 0-6 and 0-15-hour intervals. GIP levels were assessed using a lateral flow immunoassay, while lactulose and mannitol were quantified via ion chromatography. Intraindividual variability was evaluated using coefficients of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the results were compared with reference ranges.Results: Excretion patterns for u-GIP, lactulose, and and mannitol were generally similar, with detection within the first 3 hours and peaks around 4-5 hours. u-GIP consistently exhibited lower intraindividual variability than the traditional LMR. The CV for u-GIP excretion remained within an acceptable range (~20%), and and its ICC reached 0.750 in the 0-15-hour interval, indicating excellent reproducibility. In contrast, the LMR showed higher CVs and poor ICC values, which only improved modestly after outlier exclusion. GIP measurements consistently fell within established reference ranges across test repetitions, further supporting their stability. Discussion: u-GIP demonstrated lower intraindividual variability and higher consistency than LMR, indicating its potential as a robust and reliable marker for assessing intestinal permeability. Unlike LMR, GIP showed better reproducibility across days and minimal influence from dietary fluctuations. Its advantages include direct clinical relevance as an immunogenic dietary protein marker, reduced physiological variability, and and non-invasive methods. These features highlight u-GIP promising potential for future clinical and research applications. However, further studies are needed to validate its effectiveness specifically in patients with altered intestinal permeability.
Keywords: intestinal permeability, Urine, Gluten immunogenic peptides, Lactulose, Mannitol
Received: 22 May 2025; Accepted: 12 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rodríguez Ramírez, Fernández Peralbo, Sousa and Cebolla. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Carolina Sousa, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.