Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Microbial Immunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1638298

This article is part of the Research TopicCommunity Series in Gut Feelings: Investigating the Link Between Microbiota and Kidney Disease Progression: Volume 2View all articles

Clinical and Diagnostic Insights into Brucella Spondylitis: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study

Provisionally accepted
qiangsheng  fengqiangsheng feng1Xiaoqin  HaXiaoqin Ha1Xing  YuanXing Yuan1Xiaoming  QiuXiaoming Qiu2Jing  FangJing Fang1yuejuan  songyuejuan song1*
  • 1People's Liberation Army Joint Logistics Support Force 940th Hospital, Lanzhou, China
  • 2Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background This study evaluates the diagnostic value of etiological and serological testing and the clinical characteristics of spine brucellosis. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 200 cases of spine brucellosis diagnosed between 2012 and 2025, alongside 200 non-infected controls. Bacterial cultures, clinical features, serological results (Standard Agglutination Test [SAT] and Rose Bengal Test [RBT]), and imaging findings were analyzed. Results Among 200 patients with spinal involvement, Brucella melitensis was confirmed via bacterial culture in 29 cases (14.5%), with spinal tissue culture demonstrating the highest diagnostic yield (58.6%, 17/29) and a median detection time of 3 days. Spinal brucellosis constituted 25% of all brucellosis cases, exhibiting a male predominance (76.5%) and a mean patient age of 52.2 ± 10.1 years. The median hospital stay was 14.7 ± 7.8 days, while the median duration of chronic spinal brucellosis was 4.4 months (IQR: 1.5–11.5). The lumbar spine was the most frequently involved site (78.3%), followed by the cervical (8.6%) and thoracic (5.1%) regions. CT imaging revealed characteristic lesions, including bone destruction (53.0%), intervertebral space stenosis (38.5%), disc herniation (22.0%), degenerative changes (4.5%), and osteomyelitis (1.0%). Diagnostic sensitivity varied significantly across methods: blood culture (48.0%, 12/25), lumbar tissue culture (65.4%, 17/26), SAT(91.3%, 157/172), and RBT(95.9%, 165/172). Notably, all 15 serologically false-negative cases (7 by RBT and 15 by SAT) occurred in male patients. ROC curve analysis identified C-reactive protein (CRP) as a robust biomarker, with a cutoff of 1.21 mg/L yielding 85.2% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity (Z = 6.167, p < 0.001). Multivariable regression identified female sex (OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.20–4.96) and lumbar involvement (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.75–3.46) as independent predictors of chronicity (p < 0.05). All patients received standard 3-month combination therapy with doxycycline and rifampicin, with surgical intervention required in 45.5% (91/200) of cases. Clinical outcomes were favorable across the cohort, with rare reports of severe complications. Conclusions Brucella Spondylitis, typically chronic and lumbar-predominant, presents with bone destruction, gap stenosis, and disc herniation on imaging. Diagnosis relies on lumbar tissue culture, SAT, RBT, and CT. Early diagnosis and combined medical-surgical management improve outcomes.

Keywords: Brucella spondylitis, Brucella melitensis, Lumbar tissue culture, Clinical Characteristics, CT manifestations

Received: 30 May 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 feng, Ha, Yuan, Qiu, Fang and song. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: yuejuan song, fqs328@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.