- 1Division of Moral and Legal Education, Institute of Marxism, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
- 2Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
- 3Ningde Municipal Hospital, Ningde Normal University, Ningde, Fujian, China
- 4Department of Orthopaedics, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- 5Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- 6Fudan University–Dr. Kong Joint Laboratory of Sports Medicine, Shanghai, China
- 7Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University (Sports Hospital of Jiaxing), Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
- 8Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Music therapy, an intersection of art and science, is gaining recognition as a complementary approach in cancer care. This review systematically explores its mechanisms, applications, and effectiveness, with a focus on its impact on the tumor microenvironment (TME), particularly immune signaling and inflammation at single-cell resolution. Evidence shows that music therapy alleviates psychological symptoms—such as anxiety and depression—and physical discomforts including pain, fatigue, and nausea. Beyond symptomatic relief, it also modulates immune responses, especially in immune cell populations that influence tumor-associated inflammation and cancer progression. Advances in single-cell technologies may begin to explain how music therapy modulates immune signaling pathways within the TME, potentially enhancing treatment efficacy.Despite its non-invasive, cost-effective nature and high patient acceptability, music therapy remains underutilized in oncology. Further large-scale studies are needed to elucidate its molecular mechanisms, refine intervention models, and validate its role in immune modulation. As research advances, music therapy holds promise as a valuable component of integrative oncology, supporting patient recovery and immune homeostasis.
1 Introduction
Cancer treatment often leads to significant physical and psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, pain, and fatigue, which greatly reduce quality of life (1). Since emerging in the mid-20th century, music therapy has become widely used in psychiatry, rehabilitation, palliative care, and oncology (2, 3). Facilitated by trained professionals, it includes both active music-making and passive listening to promote emotional and physiological well-being (4).
As a supportive therapy alongside standard cancer treatments, music therapy is increasingly recognized for its benefits. Many colorectal cancer patients, for example, seek complementary therapies, with music therapy ranking among the most preferred. Evidence from randomized controlled trials shows that music-based interventions can significantly reduce anxiety, depression, pain, and fatigue, leading to improved quality of life (5–7).
Emerging research also indicates that music therapy may influence immune function by reducing stress-related neuroendocrine activity, potentially enhancing treatment response. Despite some methodological limitations, consistent findings support its therapeutic value, with high patient acceptability and adherence. Recognizing these benefits, organizations like the International Society of Integrative Oncology recommend its use to manage cancer-related psychological distress (8). While most music therapy currently occurs in clinical settings, expanding access to home-based options may improve continuity of care, patient autonomy, and long-term outcomes.
2 Basic forms and mechanisms of music therapy
Music therapy is an evidence based clinical intervention that utilizes music experiences to achieve therapeutic goals (9). In cancer care, it serves both psychosocial and physiological functions, offering tailored support across different stages of diagnosis and treatment (10, 11). This section outlines the primary forms of music therapy and the underlying mechanisms through which it exerts its therapeutic effects.
2.1 Forms of music therapy
Music therapy includes two main forms: active and passive. Active Music Therapy involves creating music (e.g., singing or drumming), promoting self-expression and emotional connection—especially useful in group settings. Passive Music Therapy involves listening to music to reduce anxiety and stress, ideal for frail patients or those in medical procedures (12). Both forms can be tailored to patient needs. Sessions typically last 30–60 minutes, 2–3 times per week for 4–8 weeks for best results.
2.2 Mechanisms of action in music therapy
The effectiveness of music therapy in cancer care is supported by psychological, physiological, and neurological mechanisms (13). Music helps regulate emotions, lower stress, and support brain function. Pleasant and structured music reduces anxiety, fear, and emotional distress in cancer patients (14, 15). It encourages emotional expression, eases depression, and improves psychological well-being (16). Music also serves as a distraction from pain and negative thoughts, reducing discomfort (17). Group music therapy further improves hope, coping, and treatment outlook by encouraging sharing and emotional connection.
These psychological benefits support music therapy’s role in cancer treatment, where emotional well-being affects treatment success. Physiologically, music influences the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and hormone levels (18). Calm music increases parasympathetic activity, reducing heart rate, blood pressure, and muscle tension (19). Clinical trials show music can increase heart rate variability, indicating relaxation (20). In surgical settings, music can lower inflammation markers like IL-6 and HMGB-1, reducing stress responses (21).
Music also affects stress hormones. It lowers cortisol—often elevated during chemotherapy or surgery—and increases oxytocin, which helps with bonding, pain relief, and emotional comfort (22). Music activates brain reward systems, releasing endorphins and dopamine, which reduce pain and enhance tolerance (23). This matches the gate control theory of pain, where non-painful input like music blocks pain signals. Music therapy, therefore, helps reduce stress, control inflammation, and manage pain (24). Animal studies and tissue analysis have confirmed these effects (25, 26).
These hormonal and chemical effects support better hormone balance, less anxiety, and improved immune stability during cancer treatment. Music activates brain areas involved in emotion and motivation—such as the amygdala, nucleus accumbens, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex (27, 28). This affects mood, focus, and decision-making. Music also influences the HPA axis, controlling cortisol and enhancing immunity (29). Active participation in music (e.g., singing or rhythm exercises) stimulates the brain and supports neuroplasticity, which is important for long-term or palliative care (30). Advanced techniques like single-cell sequencing and multi-omics suggest music therapy can help modulate immune responses, aiding recovery in advanced cancer (31–34). Combining music therapy with nanotechnology and biomaterials could further improve immune regulation and tissue repair (35–38). The type of music and personal preferences also matter—patient-chosen or culturally familiar music often produces better immune and psychological outcomes (39). For example, it has been linked to lower cortisol and higher natural killer (NK) cell activity.
In summary, the neurobiological effects of music therapy support its growing use in cancer care by improving quality of life, emotional resilience, immune balance, and cognitive health in patients, especially those with advanced-stage cancer.
2.3 The modernization of oriental music therapy: five-element music therapy combined with artificial intelligence
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and wearable technology have helped modernize traditional music therapies like Five-Element Music Therapy, which is based on East Asian Five-Element Theory. AI can personalize music therapy by analyzing various sound elements and adjusting rhythm, pitch, and harmony to match a patient’s emotional and physical state, making treatment more tailored and effective (40). Wearable health devices combined with AI further enhance music therapy by continuously tracking indicators like heart rate, skin conductance, and movement. This real-time data helps adjust the therapy for better results. Studies show that these AI-integrated wearables are well-received by patients, especially those with chronic illnesses, as they support remote monitoring and proactive care (41). This is particularly useful when in-person visits are limited, allowing therapy to adapt as the patient’s condition changes. AI and wearable technology are also being used in other healthcare areas. For example, VR paired with wearables has shown success in reducing pain and improving satisfaction during post-surgery recovery (42). VR music therapy can improve emotional and physical health by creating immersive, calming environments. Patient responses vary based on age, culture, gender, and illness. Younger people may prefer fast rhythms, while older adults respond better to soothing music. Cultural familiarity enhances emotional impact, and different cancer stages require tailored support. AI can use these factors to personalize Five-Element Music Therapy. With AI and wearable tech, music therapy becomes more objective and adaptive, combining traditional methods with modern healthcare. As AI advances, it can make music therapy more personalized and effective, especially for chronic and long-term care.
2.4 Home-based music therapy for neurodegenerative disorders
Home-based music therapy has shown effectiveness in managing symptoms of neurodegenerative diseases like dementia and stroke. Recent pilot studies support its feasibility and therapeutic value. In one study, 18 dementia patients and their caregivers took part in weekly Neurologic Music Therapy (NMT) sessions for six weeks. Results showed reduced symptoms like agitation and apathy, with improvements lasting up to 12 weeks, also easing caregiver stress (43). Another pilot study with stroke patients experiencing arm weakness involved twice-weekly music therapy for six weeks. Participants responded well, and the therapy showed promise in aiding motor recovery (44). These findings suggest that home-based music therapy is a practical, patient-centered approach that can support long-term recovery, complement standard care, and improve overall well-being.
3 Application of music therapy in different stages of cancer treatment
Due to its flexibility and diverse modalities, music therapy can be integrated across all stages of cancer care to address patients’ evolving physical and psychological needs (45). From preoperative preparation and perioperative periods to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and palliative care, tailored music interventions have been shown to alleviate emotional distress, modulate physiological stress responses, and improve overall treatment experiences and outcomes (46).
3.1 Preoperative relief of anxiety and emotional tension
Prior to surgery, cancer patients often experience significant anxiety, which may exacerbate pain sensitivity and increase perioperative complications (47). Music therapy effectively addresses these concerns by promoting relaxation and emotional stability. Studies have shown that listening to soothing or self-selected music before surgery reduces anxiety levels and enhances psychological readiness(Figure 1) (48, 49). For example, randomized trials involving breast, head and neck cancer patients demonstrate that both live and recorded music significantly decrease preoperative anxiety compared to standard care (50). Music also influences physiological parameters. Patients exposed to calming music exhibit more stable heart rates and blood pressure, and in procedures using local or conscious sedation, music can enhance sedative effects, reducing the need for pharmacologic agents (51). Implementation is straight forward nursing staff may play music in waiting areas, or therapists can provide live sessions. Self-selected music consistently shows greater efficacy, emphasizing the importance of patient preference (52). In summary, preoperative music therapy supports both psychological and physiological stability, potentially improving intraoperative conditions and postoperative recovery.
3.2 Intraoperative sedation and decompression
Music therapy during surgery especially under local or regional anesthesia can promote calmness and reduce intraoperative stress (53). For conscious patients, music acts as a distraction from surgical stimuli, enhancing subjective well-being and stabilizing autonomic responses such as heart rate and blood pressure(Figure 1) (54, 55). Even under general anesthesia, music has been associated with reduced postoperative pain, anxiety, and analgesic use, suggesting that it modulates stress responses through unconscious pathways (56, 57). Biochemical evidence also supports music’s impact. A study involving breast cancer patients found that intraoperative music significantly reduced pro-inflammatory markers such as IL-6, particularly when combined with aromatherapy. These findings imply a potential role for music in mitigating surgical stress and improving recovery.
In practice, music interventions are non-invasive and do not interfere with surgical procedures (54). Music can be delivered through operating room sound systems or via therapists offering live, adaptive performances. Volume control is critical to maintain communication and patient comfort. For patients under general anesthesia, music contributes to a more serene environment, while for conscious patients, it serves as a vital sensory and psychological support (58).
3.3 Benefits in chemotherapy and radiotherapy
Cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiotherapy often cause distressing side effects (59). Music therapy can help by reducing symptoms, improving emotional well-being, and supporting treatment adherence (60). It has been shown to relieve pain, nausea, and fatigue (Figure 1) (3), enhance immune function, and reduce stress, making treatment more tolerable (61, 62). Music promotes relaxation, releases endorphins, and helps balance the immune system, potentially lowering infection risk. Cochrane reviews and bioinformatics studies support its role in symptom management (63). Music therapy also reduces anxiety and depression during prolonged treatment (64), offers emotional support, and may lower the need for medication. Compared to virtual reality, it remains an accessible tool for emotional care (65). By improving both physical and emotional health, music therapy enhances quality of life, increases treatment completion rates, and strengthens patient-provider relationships. In summary, music therapy offers comprehensive support in cancer care, improving outcomes and reducing treatment side effects.
3.4 Advantages in palliative and end of life care
In palliative care, the goal shifts to symptom control and quality of life enhancement. Music therapy provides meaningful support for managing physical discomfort and addressing emotional and spiritual needs during this sensitive phase (66).
Music therapy complements pharmacological approaches by promoting relaxation and alleviating symptoms such as pain, fatigue, dyspnea, and insomnia (67, 68). Studies have shown improvements in physiological markers of relaxation and reduced subjective distress in patients receiving music therapy (69). Although some effects, such as pain reduction, may not always reach statistical significance, benefits in fatigue relief and overall comfort are consistently observed.
As patients confront end of life realities, music serves as a medium for emotional expression and spiritual reflection (70). Familiar songs can evoke meaningful memories and foster a sense of peace and connection (71). Therapists often guide patients through life review processes or song composition, enabling expression of love, regrets, and closure (72). These experiences enhance existential well-being and are supported by both qualitative and quantitative research.
Music therapy also benefits families, creating a calm and supportive environment (Figure 1). Shared listening or singing can strengthen bonds and offer comfort during final moments. Therapists may facilitate farewell rituals that help patients and families express sentiments and process grief (73). Research shows that families involved in music therapy report lower bereavement distress and a more meaningful end of life experience (74).
In sum, music therapy in palliative and end of life care delivers holistic support—addressing physical symptoms, facilitating emotional peace, and offering spiritual enrichment. It exemplifies the essence of humanistic medicine, affirming dignity and compassion when curative treatments are no longer possible.
4 Effects of music therapy in specific types of cancer
4.1 Breast cancer and colorectal cancer
Breast cancer patients are a key focus in music therapy research, with benefits observed throughout treatment. During surgery, music therapy reduces anxiety and post-operative pain (75), and studies show it lowers inflammatory markers like IL-6 and HMGB-1, indicating reduced stress (76). Combined with aromatherapy, it has an even greater impact on pain, anxiety, and inflammation (77). During chemotherapy, music therapy continues to support mental and physical well-being (78). An Italian trial found both virtual reality and music therapy improved mood and reduced anxiety, with VR being slightly more effective for anxiety, depression, and fatigue (79). In colorectal cancer, where patients face pain, bowel issues, and emotional strain, music therapy has shown similar benefits. It eases symptoms during surgery, chemotherapy, and palliative care, potentially reducing pain medication use and improving comfort during stoma care (80). These findings reflect wider oncology research supporting music therapy’s role in symptom management and emotional support.
4.2 Other types of cancer
Beyond breast and colorectal cancers, music therapy has shown promise in various oncological subgroups (81). In patients with hematologic malignancies undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(HSCT), music therapy has been associated with reduced emotional distress, including tension and depression, and enhanced coping and social interaction. It offers emotional expression and connection, mitigating the isolation commonly experienced during HSCT (82).
In pediatric and adolescent oncology, music therapy is integral due to its interactive nature (83). Studies report improved comfort, reduced procedural fear and pain, and enhanced calmness in hospitalized children. For instance, during lumbar punctures, children receiving music therapy exhibited significantly less pain and anxiety than controls (84). Similarly, live music therapy via closed circuit television during radiotherapy improved treatment compliance and reduced sedation needs (85). These findings highlight music therapy’s value in pediatric oncology care.
While direct research on music therapy in lung, prostate, and brain cancer remains limited, general oncology studies suggest it may alleviate common symptoms such as pain and anxiety (86). Future investigations should address potential differential effects across specific cancer types.
In conclusion, despite varying treatment pathways and clinical needs, music therapy consistently demonstrates positive effects across cancer types. Whether in solid tumors, hematologic malignancies, or pediatric populations, music therapy contributes to pain relief, emotional regulation, and holistic care, thereby supporting its integration into comprehensive oncology treatment frameworks.
5 Comparative analysis of music therapy vs. music medicine
Music-based interventions in clinical care include music therapy, delivered by certified therapists, and music medicine, which uses pre-recorded music administered by healthcare staff (87). Both aim to reduce symptoms like pain, anxiety, and stress, but differ in interactivity, personalization, and therapeutic depth. Music therapy is a structured, adaptive process involving active or receptive techniques such as guided listening, singing, or instrument playing (2). Therapists tailor interventions in real time to match patients’ emotional and physiological states, often integrating mindfulness practices and working alongside psychiatrists or psychologists to address complex psychosocial needs (88). This interactive approach can enhance both psychological and physiological outcomes. In contrast, music medicine is passive, simpler, and more scalable, making it useful in resource-limited settings, but less effective for deeper emotional support. Cochrane reviews and other studies show music therapy yields superior outcomes in fatigue, depression, and quality of life due to its relational nature (89). Additionally, music therapy has shown stronger immune-modulating effects, increasing biomarkers like immunoglobulin A (IgA) and NK cell activity, while music medicine mainly reduces cortisol and anxiety. A tiered approach is recommended: music medicine can serve as a broad, accessible option, while music therapy is reserved for patients needing personalized, multidimensional support. Intelligent algorithms and data analysis now support tailored music therapy strategies (90, 91). Furthermore, active participation (e.g., singing or rhythmic activity) often results in greater benefits than passive listening, even within music medicine (92). Both models can be implemented in wards or dedicated therapy rooms. Wards allow flexibility but may require volume controls to avoid disturbing others. Treatment rooms offer controlled settings for advanced sessions, though scheduling may be a limitation. Appointment systems can help manage access. Multidisciplinary collaboration in either setting enhances holistic care. Ultimately, the choice of setting should be based on infrastructure and patient needs to ensure effective, patient-centered delivery.
6 Cost effectiveness analysis and practical feasibility
Amid rising healthcare constraints, the widespread adoption of music therapy must consider cost-effectiveness and practicality. Compared to pharmacological or high-tech treatments, music therapy is low-cost, mainly involving therapist salaries and basic equipment (93, 94). Passive music medicine, using playback devices and pre-recorded music, is even more economical (95). Beyond direct costs, it can reduce symptom severity, hospital stays, and medication use, generating indirect economic benefits (96). For example, it lowers postoperative analgesic use and related opioid side effects (97), and reduces the need for sedatives and sleep aids by easing anxiety and depression (98). Music therapy may also modulate immune function, potentially decreasing pharmaceutical reliance (99, 100). It is safe, non-invasive, and well tolerated, with minimal risks compared to drugs. Mild discomfort from unsuitable music can be managed through proper selection. High patient satisfaction and low dropout rates, especially among terminal patients, indicate strong compliance (101, 102). Operational feasibility depends on integration into clinical workflows. While passive music can be delivered by regular staff, formal therapy requires trained professionals (103). Despite current shortages, the number of therapists is growing, and hospitals can employ them or partner with community programs. Successful implementation in some cancer centers demonstrates institutional feasibility. Flexible delivery formats—including bedside sessions, group workshops, concerts, and tele-music therapy—expand access (104). Digital health tools and bioinformatics may enhance treatment strategies (105). A pilot study on virtual mindfulness-based music therapy showed 73% completion without major technical issues (106). Emerging evidence, including single-cell RNA sequencing, suggests music therapy may influence immune signaling pathways, supporting its role in reducing healthcare costs (99). Personalized music based on culture or preference further improves acceptance across diverse populations (107).
In summary, music therapy is a cost-effective, safe, and widely accepted adjunct to cancer care. By integrating professional and passive formats, leveraging digital tools, and considering cultural factors, it can be scaled for broader clinical use.
7 Conclusion
Music therapy offers multidimensional benefits across all stages of cancer care, improving psychological symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression), physical discomfort (e.g., pain, fatigue, nausea), and overall quality of life (Figure 2). Despite its high patient acceptability, low cost, and minimal side effects, its integration into oncology is limited by a shortage of trained therapists, inconsistent protocols, and insufficient large-scale evidence. Still, music therapy supports holistic, patient-centered care, reduces pharmacological reliance, enhances treatment adherence, and provides emotional support from diagnosis through end-of-life care. Future research should focus on large-scale RCTs, standardization, exploration of neurobiological mechanisms, and integration with technologies like virtual reality (108). Establishing dedicated services and including training in oncology education will be key to broader implementation.

Figure 2. The figure illustrates the therapeutic benefits of music therapy in cancer care, demonstrating its effectiveness in alleviating symptoms like anxiety, depression, pain, and fatigue, thus improving patients’ psychological well-being and overall quality of life. Music therapy promotes emotional expression, reduces anxiety, strengthens patient-provider relationships, and induces relaxation. It also lowers blood pressure, reduces inflammation (e.g., IL-6), and mitigates treatment side effects. Neurologically, music activates brain regions linked to reward and resilience, while enhancing immune surveillance. Music therapy is cost-effective, well-accepted by patients, and can reduce medication use. However, challenges remain, such as the lack of standardized protocols and limited understanding of its biological mechanisms. Future research should focus on large-scale trials and personalized approaches.
Author contributions
YF: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KW: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YC: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LJ: Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Software, Supervision. ZL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RS: Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Visualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. We utilized ChatGPT-4.0 solely for language editing to enhance the clarity and fluency of the manuscript. The tool was used exclusively for grammatical correction and stylistic improvement, without contributing to the selection, interpretation, or synthesis of the literature. Its use complies with academic ethical standards and does not affect the scholarly independence or intellectual integrity of the review.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Brem S and Kumar NB. Management of treatment-related symptoms in patients with breast cancer: current strategies and future directions. Clin J Oncol Nurs. (2011) 15:63–71. doi: 10.1188/11.CJON.63-71
2. Marwick C. Leaving concert hall for clinic, therapists now test music’s “charms. JAMA. (1996) 275:267. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03530280017006
3. Mahon EM and Mahon SM. Music therapy: a valuable adjunct in the oncology setting. Clin J Oncol Nurs. (2011) 15:353–6. doi: 10.1188/11.CJON.353-356
4. Universitatea Transilvania Brasov, Dragulin S, and Constantin FA. The science of healing through music. active versus receptive music therapy. ARA J. (2019) 2. doi: 10.14510/ARAJ.2019.4220
5. Tsai HF, Chen YR, Chung MH, Liao YM, Chi MJ, Chang CC, et al. Effectiveness of music intervention in ameliorating cancer patients’ anxiety, depression, pain, and fatigue: a meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs. (2014) 37:E35–50. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000116
6. Clara MI, Canavarro MC, Severina A, Ramos S, Rafael C, and Gomes AA. Assessment of cancer-related fatigue expression: comparing the expression of fatigue in patients with a history of cancer, patients with other chronic diseases, and healthy individualsevaluation de l’expression de la fatigue liée au cancer: comparant l’expression de la fatigue chez les patients atteints de cancer, chez les patients touchés par d’autres maladies chroniques et chez les individus en bonne santé. PO. (2024) 18:49–57. doi: 10.32604/po.2023.044320
7. Zhou Y, Li X, Chen Y, Ng L, Varma SN, Liu C-Z, et al. The role of autophagy in the treatment of osteoporosis by Chinese medicines (natural). Tradit Med Res. (2023) 8:58. doi: 10.53388/TMR20230503002
8. Carlson LE, Ismaila N, Addington EL, Asher GN, Atreya C, Balneaves LG, et al. Integrative oncology care of symptoms of anxiety and depression in adults with cancer: society for integrative oncology–ASCO guideline. JCO. (2023) 41:4562–91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00857
9. Bunt L and Warner C. Music therapy. In: Oxford Music Online. Oxford University Press (2020). doi: 10.1093/omo/9781561592630.013.90000361441
10. Stanczyk MM. Music therapy in supportive cancer care. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. (2011) 16:170–2. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2011.04.005
11. Zhu W. The impact of social support on the mental health of cancer patients: evidence from China. PO. (2024) 18:69–77. doi: 10.32604/po.2023.046593
12. Watkins GR. Music therapy: proposed physiological mechanisms and clinical implications. Clin Nurse Special. (1997) 11:43–50. doi: 10.1097/00002800-199703000-00003
13. Archie P, Bruera E, and Cohen L. Music-based interventions in palliative cancer care: a review of quantitative studies and neurobiological literature. Support Care Cancer. (2013) 21:2609–24. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1841-4
14. Rossetti A, Chadha M, Torres BN, Lee JK, Hylton D, Loewy JV, et al. The impact of music therapy on anxiety in cancer patients undergoing simulation for radiation therapy. Int J Radiat OncologyBiologyPhys. (2017) 99:103–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.003
15. Wu P, Gao J, Lan G, and Wang Y. The role of RNA m5C modification in central nervous system diseases. Discov Med. (2024) 36:1555. doi: 10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.143
16. Hou X. The application of music therapy in autism spectrum disorder, depression, and anxiety: effects on symptom relief, social skill enhancement, and emotional regulation. AHR. (2024) 10:23–7. doi: 10.54254/2753-7080/2024.18280
17. Mitchell LA, MacDonald RAR, and Brodie EE. A comparison of the effects of preferred music, arithmetic and humour on cold pressor pain. Eur J Pain. (2006) 10:343–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.03.005
18. Ellis RJ, Koenig J, and Thayer JF. Getting to the heart: autonomic nervous system function in the context of evidence-based music therapy. Music Med. (2012) 4:90–9. doi: 10.1177/1943862112437766
19. Archana R. Beneficial effect of preferential music on exercise induced changes in heart rate variability. JCDR. (2016) 10(5):CC09–11. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18320.7740
20. Mojtabavi H, Saghazadeh A, Valenti VE, and Rezaei N. Can music influence cardiac autonomic system? A systematic review and narrative synthesis to evaluate its impact on heart rate variability. Complement Therapies Clin Pract. (2020) 39:101162. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101162
21. Fu VX, Oomens P, Sneiders D, Van Den Berg SAA, Feelders RA, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. The effect of perioperative music on the stress response to surgery: A meta-analysis. J Surg Res. (2019) 244:444–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.052
22. Nieuwenhuys A and Oudejans RR. Anxiety and performance: perceptual-motor behavior in high-pressure contexts. Curr Opin Psychol. (2017) 16:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.019
23. Dobek CE, Beynon ME, Bosma RL, and Stroman PW. Music modulation of pain perception and pain-related activity in the brain, brain stem, and spinal cord: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Pain. (2014) 15:1057–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.07.006
24. Avers L, Mathur A, and Kamat D. Music therapy in pediatrics. Clin Pediatr (Phila). (2007) 46:575–9. doi: 10.1177/0009922806294846
25. Latini E, Nusca SM, Curci ER, Boaretto D, Santoboni F, Trischitta D, et al. Intramuscular paravertebral oxygen-ozone therapy for chronic neck pain and low back pain: evaluation of 6-month clinical outcomes. Med Gas Res. (2024) 14:6–11. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.374388
26. Tanaka Y, Imaizumi T, Kobori Y, Tachizaki M, Shiratori T, Dobashi M, et al. Expression of ISG60 is induced by TLR3 signaling in BEAS−2B bronchial epithelial cells: Possible involvement in CXCL10 expression. Mol Med Rep. (2024) 30:151. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13276
27. Koelsch S. A coordinate-based meta-analysis of music-evoked emotions. NeuroImage. (2020) 223:117350. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117350
28. Li S, Yao J, Zhang S, Zhou X, Zhao X, Di N, et al. Prognostic value of tumor-microenvironment-associated genes in ovarian cancer. BIOI. (2023) 4(3):84–96. doi: 10.15212/bioi-2022-0008
29. Fancourt D, Ockelford A, and Belai A. The psychoneuroimmunological effects of music: A systematic review and a new model. Brain Behavior Immun. (2014) 36:15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.10.014
30. Thaut C and Stephan KM. Neurologic music therapy in sensorimotor rehabilitation. In: Thaut MH and Hodges DA, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Music and the Brain. Oxford University Press (2019). p. 693–714. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198804123.013.27
31. McClean S, Bunt L, and Daykin N. The healing and spiritual properties of music therapy at a cancer care center. J Altern Complement Med. (2012) 18:402–7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0715
32. Wu J-F, Chen Y-S, and Xie Y-C. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling reveals ZEB1-mediated regulation in microglial subtypes and the impact of exercise on neuroinflammatory responses. Tradit Med Res. (2025) 10:11. doi: 10.53388/TMR20240423002
33. Liang Y, Zhang R, Biswas S, Bu Q, Xu Z, Qiao L, et al. Integrated single-cell transcriptomics reveals the hypoxia-induced inflammation-cancer transformation in NASH-derived hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Proliferation. (2024) 57:e13576. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13576
34. Long X, Yan B, and Mo Z. Uncovering the heterogeneity and cell fate decisions of endothelial cells after myocardial infarction by single-cell sequencing. Med Adv. (2023) 1:234–45. doi: 10.1002/med4.34
35. Chen Y, Huang L, Luo Z, Han D, Luo W, Wan R, et al. Pantothenate-encapsulated liposomes combined with exercise for effective inhibition of CRM1-mediated PKM2 translocation in Alzheimer’s therapy. J Controlled Release. (2024) 373:336–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.07.010
36. Liu J, Gao D, Hu D, Lan S, Liu Y, Zheng H, et al. Delivery of biomimetic liposomes via meningeal lymphatic vessels route for targeted therapy of parkinson’s disease. Research. (2023) 6:30. doi: 10.34133/research.0030
37. Wang L, Gao H, Sun H, Ji Y, Song L, Jia L, et al. Reconfigurable vortex-like paramagnetic nanoparticle swarm with upstream motility and high body-length ratio velocity. Research. (2023) 6:88. doi: 10.34133/research.0088
38. Kalayil N, Budar AA, and Dave RK. Nanofibers for drug delivery: design and fabrication strategies. BIOI. (2024) 5:1–18. doi: 10.15212/bioi-2024-0023
39. Ziv G and Lidor R. Music, exercise performance, and adherence in clinical populations and in the elderly: A review. J Clin Sport Psychol. (2011) 5:1–23. doi: 10.1123/jcsp.5.1.1
40. Kwon C-Y, Kim H, and Kim S-H. The modernization of oriental music therapy: five-element music therapy combined with artificial intelligence. Healthcare. (2024) 12:411. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030411
41. Alzghaibi H. Adoption barriers and facilitators of wearable health devices with AI integration: a patient-centred perspective. Front Med. (2025) 12:1557054. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1557054
42. Pandrangi VC, Araujo AV, Buncke M, Olson B, Jorizzo M, Said-Al-Naief N, et al. Postoperative implementation of virtual reality and wearable devices: opportunities and challenges. Laryngoscope. (2025) 135:2044–50. doi: 10.1002/lary.31989
43. Holden SK, Sheffler J, Stewart R, Thompson S, Persson J, Finseth T, et al. Feasibility of home-based neurologic music therapy for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: A pilot study. J Music Ther. (2019) 56:265–86. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thz009
44. Street AJ, Magee WL, Bateman A, Parker M, Odell-Miller H, and Fachner J. Home-based neurologic music therapy for arm hemiparesis following stroke: results from a pilot, feasibility randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. (2018) 32:18–28. doi: 10.1177/0269215517717060
45. Magill L. Role of music therapy in integrative oncology. J Soc Integr Oncol. (2006) 04:79. doi: 10.2310/7200.2006.009
46. Bradt J, Dileo C, Grocke D, and Magill L. Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, editor. Cochrane database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK (2011). CD006911.pub2. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub2
47. Stamenkovic DM, Rancic NK, Latas MB, Neskovic V, Rondovic GM, Wu JD, et al. Preoperative anxiety and implications on postoperative recovery: what can we do to change our history. Minerva Anestesiol. (2018) 84(11):1307–17. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12520-X
48. Wang S-M, Kulkarni L, Dolev J, and Kain ZN. Music and preoperative anxiety: A randomized, controlled study. Anesth Analgesia. (2002) 94:1489–94. doi: 10.1213/00000539-200206000-00021
49. Zhang C, Tan H, Xu H, and Ding J. The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. (2024) 110:6282–96. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001380
50. Bradley Palmer J, Lane D, Mayo D, Schluchter M, and Leeming R. Effects of music therapy on anesthesia requirements and anxiety in women undergoing ambulatory breast surgery for cancer diagnosis and treatment: A randomized controlled trial. JCO. (2015) 33:3162–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.6049
51. Koch ME, Kain ZN, Ayoub C, and Rosenbaum SH. The sedative and analgesic sparing effect of music. Anesthesiology. (1998) 89:300–6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199808000-00005
52. Garza-Villarreal EA, Pando V, Vuust P, and Parsons C. Music-induced analgesia in chronic pain conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Physician. (2017). 20(7):597–610. doi: 10.1101/105148
53. Bae I, Lim HM, Hur M-H, and Lee M. Intra-operative music listening for anxiety, the BIS index, and the vital signs of patients undergoing regional anesthesia. Complement Therapies Med. (2014) 22:251–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.02.002
54. Kemper KJ and Danhauer SC. Music as therapy. South Med J. (2005) 98:282–8. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000154773.11986.39
55. Moore AR, Hutchinson JC, Winter C, Dalton PC, Bolgla LA, and Paolone VJ. Music alters heart rate and psychological responses but not muscle activation during light-intensity isometric exercise. Sports Med Health Sci. (2024) 6:394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.008
56. Matsota P, Christodoulopoulou T, Smyrnioti ME, Pandazi A, Kanellopoulos I, Koursoumi E, et al. Music’s use for anesthesia and analgesia. J Altern Complement Med. (2013) 19:298–307. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0235
57. Xu M, Tu J, Huang Y, Wang B, Zhao Z, Lin T, et al. Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes in Lower-limb osteosarcoma pediatric patients: a large single-center retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. (2024) 110:4208–20. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001340
58. Reilly M. Incorporating music into the surgical environment. Plast Surg Nurs. (1999) 19:35–8. doi: 10.1097/00006527-199901910-00007
59. Thong MSY, Doege D, Frick J, and Arndt V. Langzeit-Organtoxizität von onkologischen Therapien. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. (2025) 150:29–36. doi: 10.1055/a-2258-1737
60. Önsüz Ü and Can G. Music therapy in various physical and mental conditions and its effects on cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar. (2025) 17:225–43. doi: 10.18863/pgy.1439639
61. Bilgiç Ş and Acaroğlu R. Effects of listening to music on the comfort of chemotherapy patients. West J Nurs Res. (2017) 39:745–62. doi: 10.1177/0193945916660527
62. Lu X, Yi F, and Hu L. Music-induced analgesia: An adjunct to pain management. Psychol Music. (2021) 49:1165–78. doi: 10.1177/0305735620928585
63. Sun C, Ma S, Chen Y, Kim NH, Kailas S, Wang Y, et al. Diagnostic value, prognostic value, and immune infiltration of LOX family members in liver cancer: bioinformatic analysis. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:843880. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.843880
64. Dileo C. Effects of music and music therapy on medical patients: A meta-analysis of the research and implications for the future. J Soc Integr Oncol. (2006) 04:67. doi: 10.2310/7200.2006.002
65. Dakal TC, Bhushan R, Xu C, Gadi BR, Cameotra SS, Yadav V, et al. Intricate relationship between cancer stemness, metastasis, and drug resistance. MedComm. (2024) 5:e710. doi: 10.1002/mco2.710
66. Pawuk LG and Schumacher JE. Introducing music therapy in hospice and palliative care: an overview of one hospice’s experience. Home Healthcare Nurse. (2010) 28:37–44. doi: 10.1097/01.NHH.0000366796.79152.4a
67. Magill-Levreault L. Music therapy in pain and symptom management. J Palliat Care. (1993) 9:42–8. doi: 10.1177/082585979300900411
68. Luo C, Yao J, Man S, and Gao W. Rhizoma paridis saponins protected against liver injury in diethylnitrosamine-induced mice. Tradit Med Res. (2023) 8:8. doi: 10.53388/TMR20220419003
69. De Witte M, Pinho ADS, Stams G-J, Moonen X, Bos AER, and Van Hooren S. Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. (2022) 16:134–59. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1846580
70. Black BP and Penrose-Thompson P. Music as a therapeutic resource in end-of-life care. J Hospice Palliative Nurs. (2012) 14:118–25. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0b013e31824765a2
71. Götell E, Brown S, and Ekman S-L. Caregiver-assisted music events in psychogeriatric care. Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. (2000) 7:119–25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.2000.00271.x
72. Wlodarczyk N. The use of music and poetry in life review with hospice patients. J Poetry Ther. (2009) 22:133–9. doi: 10.1080/08893670903198409
73. Romanoff BD and Thompson BE. Meaning construction in palliative care: the use of narrative, ritual, and the expressive arts. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. (2006) 23:309–16. doi: 10.1177/1049909106290246
74. Krout RE. Music therapy with imminently dying hospice patients and their families: Facilitating release near the time of death. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. (2003) 20:129–34. doi: 10.1177/104990910302000211
75. Gooding L, Swezey S, and Zwischenberger JB. Using music interventions in perioperative care. South Med J. (2012) 105:486–90. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318264450c
76. Leardi S, Pietroletti R, Angeloni G, Necozione S, Ranalletta G, and Del Gusto B. Randomized clinical trial examining the effect of music therapy in stress response to day surgery. Br J Surg. (2007) 94:943–7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5914
77. Deng C, Xie Y, Liu Y, Li Y, and Xiao Y. Aromatherapy plus music therapy improve pain intensity and anxiety scores in patients with breast cancer during perioperative periods: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Breast Cancer. (2022) 22:115–20. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.05.006
78. Roberts J, Horn S, Aquino E, and Amer K. Music: A holistic approach to symptom management for patients undergoing cancer treatment. JNEP. (2022) 12:1. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v12n6p1
79. Ioannou A, Papastavrou E, Avraamides MN, and Charalambous A. Virtual reality and symptoms management of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain: A systematic review. SAGE Open Nurs. (2020) 6:2377960820936163. doi: 10.1177/2377960820936163
80. Borjeson S. Common symptoms and distress experienced among patients with colorectal cancer: A qualitative part of mixed method design. TONURSJ. (2012) 6:100–7. doi: 10.2174/1874434601206010100
81. Boyde C, Linden U, Boehm K, and Ostermann T. The use of music therapy during the treatment of cancer patients: A collection of evidence. Glob Adv Health Med. (2012) 1:24–9. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.5.009
82. Yao Z, Ma Z, Zhu Y, and Lv X. Music intervention in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Japan J Nurs Sci. (2024) 21:e12586. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12586
83. González-Martín-Moreno M, Garrido-Ardila EM, Jiménez-Palomares M, Gonzalez-Medina G, Oliva-Ruiz P, and Rodríguez-Mansilla J. Music-based interventions in paediatric and adolescents oncology patients: A systematic review. Children. (2021) 8:73. doi: 10.3390/children8020073
84. Vohra S and Nilsson S. Does music therapy reduce pain and anxiety in children with cancer undergoing lumbar puncture? Focus Alt Comp Ther. (2011) 16:66–7. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7166.2010.01070_15.x
85. Radke U, Reinold B, Schlaak L, Segatz-Thiele F, Wiedemann G, Boelling T, et al. The application of therapeutic music (TM) during the radiotherapy in order to improve the patient compliance and minimize incorrect positioning during the treatment. JCO. (2011) 29:e19585–5. doi: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e19585
86. Hanser S. Music therapy in adult oncology: research issues. J Soc Integr Oncol. (2006) 04:62. doi: 10.2310/7200.2006.003
87. Stegemann T, Geretsegger M, Phan Quoc E, Riedl H, and Smetana M. Music therapy and other music-based interventions in pediatric health care: an overview. Medicines. (2019) 6:25. doi: 10.3390/medicines6010025
88. Ansdell G, Davidson J, Magee WL, Meehan J, and Procter S. From “This F***ing life” to “that’s better” … in four minutes: an interdisciplinary study of music therapy’s “present moments” and their potential for affect modulation. Nordic J Music Ther. (2010) 19:3–28. doi: 10.1080/08098130903407774
89. Raglio A and Oasi O. Music and health: what interventions for what results? Front Psychol. (2015) 6:230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00230
90. Li W, Dong B, Wang H, Yuan J, Qian H, Zheng L, et al. Artificial intelligence promotes shared decision-making through recommending tests to febrile pediatric outpatients. World J Emergency Med. (2023) 14:106. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.033
91. Zhou J, You D, Bai J, Chen X, Wu Y, Wang Z, et al. Machine learning methods in real-world studies of cardiovascular disease. CVIA. (2023) 7(1). doi: 10.15212/CVIA.2023.0011
92. Thram D. Understanding music’s therapeutic efficacy: Implications for music education. TDSA. (2014) 10. doi: 10.4102/td.v10i2.110
93. Blackburn R and Bradshaw T. Music therapy for service users with dementia: a critical review of the literature. Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. (2014) 21:879–88. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12165
94. Qin M, Gao Y, Guo S, Lu X, Zhao Q, Ge Z, et al. Establishment and evaluation of animal models of sepsis-associated encephalopathy. World J Emergency Med. (2023) 14:349. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.088
95. Wright J, Adams D, and Vohra S. Complementary, holistic, and integrative medicine: music for procedural pain. Pediatr In Rev. (2013) 34:e42–6. doi: 10.1542/pir.34.11.e42
96. Undergraduate Student of Applied Psychology, Amity University, Noida UP, and Jk C. Music Therapy should be Integrated in Healthcare System: A Review. JoARPP. (2018) 01:16–20. doi: 10.24321/2581.5822.201802
97. Poulsen MJ, Coto J, and Cooney MF. Music as a postoperative pain management intervention. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. (2019) 34:662–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.01.003
98. Mofredj A, Alaya S, Tassaioust K, Bahloul H, and Mrabet A. Music therapy, a review of the potential therapeutic benefits for the critically ill. J Crit Care. (2016) 35:195–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.05.021
99. Franco PF, DeLuca DA, Cahill TF, and Cabell L. Why practitioners should care about music therapy: understanding its clinical relevance and practical implications through an evidence-based study. Altern Complement Therapies. (2018) 24:63–77. doi: 10.1089/act.2018.29156.pff
100. Wesa K, Gubili J, and Cassileth B. Integrative oncology: complementary therapies for cancer survivors. Hematol/Oncol Clinics North America. (2008) 22:343–53. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2008.02.002
101. Warth M, Keßler J, Hillecke TK, and Bardenheuer HJ. Music therapy in palliative care. Deutsches Ärzteblatt Int. (2015) 112(46):788–94. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0788
102. Paulo LP, Tourette-Turgis C, and Vannier M-P. Graduation of Patients at the University: An Innovative Program to Train Patients as Care Partners in OncologyLa diplomation de patient•es partenaires en oncologie: un dispositif soutenant l’engagement du patient•e en oncologie. PO. (2024) 18:9–15. doi: 10.32604/po.2023.042981
103. Barnes TB. Integrative music therapy: A healing intervention. J Christian Nurs. (2018) 35:100–5. doi: 10.1097/CNJ.0000000000000479
104. Cephas AS, Sofield S, and Millstein A. Embracing technological possibilities in the telehealth delivery of interactive music therapy. Nordic J Music Ther. (2022) 31:214–27. doi: 10.1080/08098131.2022.2040579
105. Adeniji T, Olagbegi OM, Nadasan T, and Dada O. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation-based exercises plus transcranial direct current stimulation for stroke rehabilitation among older adults: A scoping review. Brain Hemorrhages. (2023) 4:136–46. doi: 10.1016/j.hest.2022.11.002
106. Phillips CS, Bockhoff J, Berry DL, Buchbinder E, Frazier AL, LaCasce A, et al. Exploring young adults’ Perspectives of participation in a mindfulness-based music therapy intervention before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. (2023) 12:569–76. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0090
107. Rajendran T. Addressing the need for personalizing music therapy in integrative oncology. J Integr Med. (2022) 20:281–3. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2022.01.005
Keywords: music therapy, cancer, immune modulation, inflammation, integrative oncology, neuroimmune interaction, tumor microenvironment, single-cell resolution
Citation: Fu Y, Wu K, Zhuang J, Chen Y, Jia L, Luo Z and Sun R (2025) Music therapy in modulating immune responses and enhancing cancer treatment outcomes. Front. Immunol. 16:1639047. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1639047
Received: 01 June 2025; Accepted: 08 July 2025;
Published: 23 July 2025.
Edited by:
Jiaheng Xie, Central South University, ChinaReviewed by:
Li-Ping Tian, Beijing Wuzi University, ChinaChia-Yen Dai, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Copyright © 2025 Fu, Wu, Zhuang, Chen, Jia, Luo and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhiwen Luo, emhpd2VuLmx1b19mdWRhbkBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ==; Rong Sun, ZG9jdG9yc3Vucm9uZzgxOEAxNjMuY29t