Abstract
Introduction:
Chronic hyperglycemia can contribute to metabolic disorders, disrupting cellular homeostasis and potentially leading to immunological disturbances. As highly adaptable innate immune cells, macrophages can effectively utilize glucose for energy and adjust their activities in response to environmental changes. We hypothesized that hyperglycemia induces distinct effects on M1 and M2 macrophages, thereby promoting their divergent roles in the inflammatory response.
Methods:
For this, we applied an in vitro hyperglycemia model to investigate its impact on M1- and M2-like macrophages differentiated from primary monocytes.
Results:
M1-like macrophages exhibited diminished capacity to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), IL-6, TNF-α, as well as reduced antigen presentation and co-stimulatory abilities under long exposure to high glucose. In contrast, M2-like macrophages showed a shift toward M1 polarization, characterized by increased production of ROS and IL-6, upregulation of CD86 and HLA-DR expression, and reduced reparative abilities. We also observed disturbance of endotoxin tolerance evidenced by increased production of TNF-α and diminished phagocytic ability.
Discussion:
The results suggest that hyperglycemia disrupts the typical functional dichotomy of M1 and M2 macrophages, which may explain mixed polarization of tissue macrophages in individuals with metabolic syndromes associated with chronic hyperglycemia.
Introduction
Hyperglycemia has been reported to be associated with metabolic diseases and may induce several physiological and pathophysiological changes (). It is the main reason for the development of complications in both types of diabetics. The progression of tissue damage in diabetes can be attributed, in part, to hyperglycemia-induced disturbance between immune activation and inflammation resolution, where macrophages are capable of participating given their plasticity in response to different stimuli (). Prolonged hyperglycemic condition results in the development of diabetes mellitus by damaging the pancreatic β-cell and inducing insulin resistance (). The major cause of comorbidities related to diabetes was proposed to be a release of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 predominantly produced by macrophages (). Macrophages have an integral role in preserving or damaging pancreatic β-cells with their impact largely determined by their activation state. Given their plastic nature, macrophages can exert multiple roles in the immunity, including activation of the acquired immune response, antigen presentation, wound healing, cytokine/chemokine production thus maintaining immune homeostasis. By simplified classification, macrophages are divided into two major differentiation phenotypes, classically activated macrophages (M1) and alternatively activated macrophages (M2). M1 macrophages secrete IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β and display functional characteristics that are pro-inflammatory and antimicrobial in nature, whereas anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages secrete IL-10 and other anti-inflammatory factors and performs tissue repair function (–).
Hyperglycemia is one of the important factors driving the development of complications linked to diabetes. Notably, even transient episodes of hyperglycemia increase the risk for diabetes-associated complications, termed “hyperglycemic memory”. There is an association between hyperglycemia and the recruitment of monocytes, their infiltration into arterial plaques which contributes to the development of atherosclerosis in animal models (). Hyperglycemia has already been identified as a direct driver of macrophage dysfunctions (–). High glucose levels have been demonstrated to induce reprogramming of macrophages, resulting in reduced inflammatory response, phagocytosis, and nitric oxide production in mouse macrophages (, ). In another mouse study, the authors have shown a significantly reduced production of TNF-α and IL-6, low expression of CD86 and CD54, and enhanced nitric oxide secretion by peritoneal exudate macrophages ().
In the current study, we have applied an in vitro model of macrophage differentiation from monocytes in the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF). Macrophages developed in the presence of GM-CSF exhibit a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype with enhanced antigen presentation and cytokines production, while M-CSF-induced macrophages exhibit immunosuppressive phenotype associated with tissue repair, immune modulation, and production of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and a CCL2/MCP-1 (, –). In this current study, we tested our hypothesis that distinct subsets of macrophages respond differently to hyperglycemia. To test this, we employed an in vitro model of human-derived peripheral blood monocytes differentiated into M1- and M2-like macrophage cells. We explored the effects of short- and long-term glucose exposures on the morphology, phenotype and functions, including their reparative and atherogenic abilities, as well as their response to LPS. We also sought to determine how endotoxemia, particularly in the context of hyperglycemia, affects the functionality of M1 and M2 macrophages.
Methods
In vitro differentiation of primary monocytes in normal and high glucose conditions
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from healthy individuals (age range 25–50 years) without family history of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Before enrollment in study, informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethnic approval was obtained from the ethical committee of Institute of Molecular Biology NAS RA (IRB00004079, IORG0003427). Whitten informed consent was obtained from each participant. Monocytes were purified from the buffy coat using negative selection EasySep™ Direct Human Monocyte Isolation Kit (Stemcell Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Isolated monocytes were seeded (0.5x106) in 24-well plate in RPMI-1640 containing normal (10mM) glucose (n-Glu), high (25mM) glucose (h-Glu) or high mannitol (25 mM) as osmotic pressure control, and supplemented with 10% of heat inactivated FBS, 2mM L-glutamine, penicillin (100U/mL), and streptomycin (100 µg/mL) (all from Sigma-Aldrich). To induce macrophage differentiation, monocytes were stimulated with 30ng/mL of GM-CSF or 30ng/mL of M-CSF (BioLegend). On the day of 3 of cell cultivation, the growth medium was replaced with fresh RPMI containing the same glucose concentration and corresponding growth factor. Thereafter, medium replacements were performed every 2nd day. Supernatants from 3, 5 and 7-day cultivations were harvested and stored at -80°C. Macrophages were detached with use of Trypsin and EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich), washed and used for further evaluations.
Cell viability assay
Apoptotic rate of differentiated macrophages was assessed via Annexin V-FITC (BioLegend) and propidium iodide (PI, BioLegend) double staining by flow cytometry. Annexin V-/PI- cells were considered as viable, annexin V+/PI- cells as early apoptotic, and Annexin V+/PI+ cells as dead cells.
Oxidative burst assay
To determine oxidative burst capacity of GM-CSF or M-CSF differentiated macrophages, dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR-123, Sigma-Aldrich) conversion into the fluorophore rhodamine was evaluated. Detached cells were treated with DHR-123 at a final concentration of 10 μM for 1 hour at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by placing the tubes on ice for 10 min. Fluorescence of oxidized DHR123 was measured by flow cytometry.
Phagocytosis assay
The phagocytic capacity of GM-CSF or M-SCF differentiated macrophages was assessed by using pHrodo™ Green Zymosan BioParticles (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA). Briefly, 25 ug/ml pHrodo BioParticles were added to the macrophage culture for 3 hours at 37°C. Following the incubation, the cells were detached with trypsin-EDTA and washed with PBS. The cells then were placed on ice for 15 min and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry analysis
To access surface markers expression of GM-CSF or M-CSF-treated monocytes, the cells after detachment were stained with monoclonal antibodies against CD36-FITC (#986302), CD86-PE (#305406), CD206-APC-Cy7 (#321120), CD284-APC (TLR4, #312816) (BioLegend), CD14-APC-Cy7 (#333948), HLA-DR-PE (#568230) (BD Biosciences). For intracellular staining of CD68-PerCP/Cy5.5 (#333813), the cells were fixed with a fixation buffer (BioLegend), washed in PBS and permeabilized using a permeabilization buffer (BioLegend). Isotype controls and/or fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls were employed to ascertain the positivity and negativity of marker expression. The acquisition was done with the LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with BD FACSDiva™ v.8.0.1 software. Obtained data were analyzed using FlowJo V10 software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA). The results are presented as the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) or the percentage of positive events for each marker. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism v.5.01 software (GraphPad Software, USA).
Production of cytokines
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure the concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα, and IL-10 in supernatants of GM-CSF or M-CSF-treated monocytes.
RT-PCR
To detect mRNA expression of human NOX2, Arginase 1, and NF-kB, total RNA was extracted from cultured cells with TRIzol™ Reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA). One step probe-based real-time RT-PCR kit qPCRBIO Probe 1-Step Go (PCR Biosystems, USA) was used to analyze relative quantities of target genes expression. The expression level of each target gene was normalized to their Actin level using the 2-ΔCt method. Primer sequences used in rRT-PCR experiments were as following: β-actin forward 5′-CGCGAGAGAAGATGACCCAGATC-3′ and reverse 5′-GCCAGAGGCGTACAGGGATA-3′; Arginase-1 forward 5′-ATCAACACTCCCCTGACAACC-3′ and reverse 5′-CGCAAGCCAATGTACACGAT-3′;NF-κB p65, forward 5′-CTGTCCTTTCTCATCCCATCTT-3′ and reverse 5′-ACACCTCAATGTCCTCTTTCTG-3′; NOX2 forward 5′-ACACCCTTCGCATCCATTCTC-3′ and reverse 5′-GCAAACCACTCAAAGGCATGT-3′.
Fluorescence imaging
GM-CSF or M-CSF-treated monocytes were fixed with Fixation Buffer for 20 min, washed with PBS, then permeabilized for another 20 min. Non-specific binding was blocked with 10% normal donkey serum in PBS for 45 min. This was followed by staining with primary mouse anti-human CD68 antibodies (BioLegend, #333802) overnight at +4°C. Cells were then washed and stained with secondary donkey anti-mouse IgG antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor 647 (Abcam, #ab150107) and for cytoskeleton staining of F-actin with Alexa Fluor® 488 Phalloidin (Cell Signaling Technology, #8878) for 45 min. Alternatively, fixed and permeabilized cells were incubated overnight at +4°C with primary rabbit anti-human NOS2 antibodies (MyBiosource, #MBS7122224), followed by staining with donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (Abcam, #ab150073) and Alexa Fluor® 647 Phalloidin (Cell Signaling Technology, #8940). After that cells were washed and stained with Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Scientific) for 5 min and imaged using Cytation C10, Agilent equipped with Gen5 v. 3.14 software.
Scratch wound healing assay
To evaluate the wound healing capacity of GM-CSF or M-CSF-treated cells, freshly isolated monocytes were differentiated for 5 days as described above. In order to conduct a scratch wound healing model, human epithelial HeLa cells (cervix carcinoma) were grown in a 24-well plate in complete RPMI-1640, until they reached 85-90% confluence. Following this period, the cell monolayer was delicately scratched using a 200μL pipette tip, and supernatants with detached cells were immediately replaced with conditioned media taken from GM-CSF or M-CSF-treated monocytes. Throughout the following incubation period, the progress of wound closure was recorded by imaging reader (Cytation C10, Agilent) at different time points (each 6 hours), and 48h point was chosen as a final time-point. Images were analyzed using Gen5 v.3.14 software. The distance between wound edges was calculated from the multiple measurements. The percentage of wound healing was calculated using a formula:
Three independent experiments were performed.
In vitro LDL uptake
Briefly, primary monocytes were differentiated for 5 days as described above and seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well plates. On the 5th day of differentiation, oxLDL (25μg/ml, Invitrogen) was added to the cells for the next 24 hours. Afterward, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and washed again. Cultures were then incubated in 100% propylene glycol for 7 min and stained with 0,5% Oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich). Unbound dye was removed by rinses with PBS. Cells were mounted with an aqueous mounting medium with DAPI and evaluated by confocal microscopy using Cytation C10 (Agilent) on Cy5 channel. Three independent experiments were performed.
Induction GM-CSF or M-CSF-treated cells by LPS
Primary monocytes were differentiated into M1- and M2-like macrophages over a period of 5 days, as previously described. After removing the growth factors, 100 ng/ml of LPS was added for the indicated times and the cells were subjected to cytometric and RT-PCR analyses.
Endotoxin tolerance model
Freshly isolated PBMCs from healthy individuals were cultured in RPMI-1640 and treated with 30 ng/mL GM-CSF and incubated 2 days in 24 well plates, at 37°C with 5% CO2. Then medium was replaced and 10ng/mL of LPS was added to corresponding wells and incubated for 20 hours. Following the incubation period, indicated cells were supplemented with 100 ng/mL of LPS and cultivated for an additional 4 hours, to assess LPS tolerance. Detailed sequence of LPS stimulation steps is represented in the experimental scheme. All supernatants were collected and stored at -80°C till cytokine levels measurement. The cells were detached with Trypsin-EDTA solution for further cytometric and functional analyses.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of obtained data was performed using Graph Pad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Data is presented as the mean +/- the standard deviation (SD). First, normality of variables was calculated using Kolmogorov-Smirnov D’Agostino test. Data comparison was performed by using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey’s or Brown-Forsithe multiple comparison post hoc test. Analysis between independent data was done with unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney test, based on data distribution. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results
GM-CSF- and M-CSF-treated monocytes exhibit characteristics reminiscent of M1 and M2 macrophage polarization, respectively
The GM-CSF and M-CSF-derived macrophage model was employed to investigate the impact of short-term and long-term hyperglycemia. Primary monocytes were exposed to n-Glu and h-Glu conditions in the presence of GM-CSF or M-CSF for a duration of 7 days. Over the 5th day cultivation period, monocytes treated with GM-CSF and M-CSF differentiated into M1-like and M2-like macrophages, respectively. Comparison of cell surface molecule expression and cytokine production by GM-CSF and M-CSF-treated monocytes confirmed a shift of GM-CSF-treated cells towards M1-like macrophages and M-CSF-treated cells towards M2-like macrophages. For the phenotypical characterization of differentiated macrophages, the expression of M1 (HLA-DR, CD86) and M2 (CD206, CD36) antigens were evaluated. CD86 (1.9-fold), CD206 (1.6-fold), and HLA-DR (1.8-fold) were differentially expressed between GM-CSF- and M-CSF-treated cells (Figure 1A). Cytokine levels in supernatants obtained from differentiated cells after 5 days of cultivation demonstrated that GM-CSF-treated cells produced significantly higher amounts of the IL-1β (8-fold) and IL-6 (2.8-fold), and lower concentrations of IL-10 (1.9-fold) (Figure 1A). Additionally, mRNA levels of genes typical for M1 (NF-kB, NOS2) and M2 (Arginase-1) macrophages were corresponding to the GM- and M-differentiated monocytes, correspondingly (Figure 1B). Particularly, analysis of basal mRNA expression signatures of M1- and M2-like macrophages revealed higher levels of NF-kB (p=0.055) and NOX2 (p<0.01) in GM-CSF-treated cells compared with M-CSF-treated ones, while expression of Arginase 1 was in opposite higher in M-CSF-treated cells (p<0.01) (Figure 1B). Thus, the scheme using GM-CSF and M-CSF as differential factors for the polarization of monocytes to M1-like and M2-like cells provided a reliable model to study macrophage responses under hyperglycemic conditions. This polarization model allowed us to examine the distinct effects of LPS stimulation and endotoxin tolerance on these two macrophage subsets.
Figure 1
In order to visualize the morphology of naïve GM-CSF or M-CSF-treated cells, we stained the cells for nuclei, actin, and CD68. Following cell differentiation with growth factors, the two resulting cell populations showed distinct morphological features (Figures 1C, D). Particularly, we observed that GM-CSF or M-CSF-differentiated macrophages displayed different cell morphologies, as has also been reported by other groups (, ). Both GM-CSF or M-CSF- cells appeared as heterogeneous cell populations with a mixture of 3 different morphologies: i) small cells with spherical shape; ii) small-middle size cells with high granularity; iii) large elongated (differentiated) cells. The difference between GM-CSF or M-CSF- cells is in the relative number/percentage of differentiated cells, as well as their lengths and area. Particularly, the percentage of differentiated cells in GM-CSF macrophages was lower (16%) than in M-CSF macrophages (24%). Conversely, GM-CSF macrophages have a higher number of highly granular cells compared to M-CSF macrophages (8.8% vs. 4.7%, correspondingly). In M-CSF-differentiated cells length and area were higher in comparison with GM-CSF macrophages (length 54 ± 24.2 μm vs. 39 ± 8.4 μm, area 427 ± 109.6 μm2vs. 375.5 ± 136.3 μm2, respectively). The length and area sizes in small spherical GM-CSF and M-CSF-treated cells were not different. This data was confirmed by measuring forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) using flow cytometry (Figure 1E).
Based on the phenotypic, molecular, and morphological characterization, GM-CSF and M-CSF-treated cells were validated as representative models of M1-like and M2-like macrophage subsets, respectively. Accordingly, we refer to these populations as M1-like and M2-like macrophages throughout the remainder of the manuscript.
Long hyperglycemia results in distinct morphological changes in M1- and M2-like macrophages
As shown in Figure 1D, elongated/differentiated cells (white arrows) are present in both the M1- and M2-like macrophages under n-Glu conditions, while under h-Glu conditions, the number of differentiated M1-like cells was reduced by 2-fold and M2-like cells by 3.5-fold. Both M1-like and M2-like cells in h-Glu conditions exhibited a large number of heterogeneously shaped, highly granulated cells (green arrows, 17% vs. 18%). In contrast, the cells under n-Glu conditions displayed fewer numbers of cells with less granulation (8.8% vs. 4.7%). Additionally, a difference in size between cell types was observed: under both n-Glu and h-Glu conditions, differentiated M2-like cells are significantly larger in terms of area and length compared to M1-like cells. To verify macrophage identity in the differentiated cell cultures, we used CD68, a lysosomal-associated membrane glycoprotein from the LAMP family and a well-established pan-macrophage marker. To our knowledge, there is no clear evidence in the literature regarding differential CD68 expression between M1 and M2 macrophages. However, our results showed a slightly higher expression in GM-CSF-treated cells compared to M-CSF-treated cells. CD68 expression varied between cells depending on their differentiation status. Specifically, in differentiated cells, CD68 was distributed throughout the cytoplasm, with low expression levels observed (Figure 1C). In contrast, non-differentiated round-shaped cells exhibited higher levels of CD68, which was more compactly localized (Figure 1D).
High glucose induces opposite changes in the functionality and phenotype of M1- and M2-like cells
Both short-term and long-term glycaemia had different effects on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in M1- and M2-like macrophages. M1 cells showed a significant reduction in ROS activity when exposed to h-Glu throughout the entire cultivation period, whereas M2 cells exhibited increased ROS activity under h-Glu conditions (Figure 2A). Notably, under n-Glu conditions, M1 cells initially generated more ROS than M2 cells, which aligns with findings in the literature (, ).
Figure 2
Macrophages are renowned for their role as professional phagocytes and antigen presenting cells. We studied the phagocytic capacity of the cells using pHrodo particles. M2-like cells demonstrated a more pronounced phagocytic activity which was increasing over the cultivation period. Under h-Glu conditions, the phagocytic ability of M1-like macrophage was suppressed on days 3 and 5. M2-like cells retained their phagocytic function regardless of glucose conditions (Figure 2B).
Apoptotic rates in the studied cells also demonstrated opposing effects in the presence of high glucose. Specifically, there was an acceleration of apoptotic rates in M1-like cells, whereas M2-like cells displayed reduced apoptotic rates during the whole cultivation period (Figure 2C).
To assess whether high-glucose conditions influence NOS2 expression in a polarization-dependent manner, we examined the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS2), a hallmark of classically activated (M1-like) macrophages, using fluorescence microscopy. NOS2 is typically upregulated in response to pro-inflammatory stimuli and plays a central role in nitric oxide (NO) production, contributing to the inflammatory capacity of M1 macrophages. As shown in Figure 2D, the highest NOS2 expression was observed in M1-like macrophages under n-Glu conditions. However, h-Glu exposure markedly reduced NOS2 expression in M1-like cells, while the number of NOS2-expressing cells increased within the M2-like population.
We also studied the ability of the cells to engulf OxLDL. Our results supporting the pro-atherogenic properties of macrophages indicated an enhanced uptake of oxLDL by M2-like macrophages both in n-Glu and h-Glu conditions (Figure 2E). M1-like cells exhibited lower uptake of the lipids. Enhanced uptake of M2-like cells was associated with the basal increased expression levels of surface CD36 (albeit not significant) (Figure 2F). CD36 is a well-established scavenger receptor involved in the uptake of fatty acids and oxidized OxLDL (). Its up-regulation, along with increased lipid uptake, suggests a certain role for CD36 in the process of lipid uptake.
Subsequently, we investigated the abilities of macrophages to repair tissue in the presence of high glucose using scratch wound healing assay. Given that cytokines are the main factors influencing reparation processes, we evaluated the impact of conditioned media from M1-like and M2-like macrophages on wound healing. The microscopic examination revealed that HeLa cell migration was significantly inhibited in the wells with conditioned media from M2-like cells at h-Glu levels, resulting in prolonged wound closure (54.5%) (Figure 2G). The best reparative rates were observed in the wells with conditioned media from M2-like cells in n-Glu. Conditioned media from these cells recovered monolayer of HeLa cells faster (73.3%) than other studied groups. The mean percentage of tissue recovery in M1-conditioned media under both n-Glu and h-Glu conditions was 66.3% and 69.7%, respectively.
In line with the functional tests, immunophenotype of the cells revealed a different dynamic of cell activation between M1 and M2-like macrophages during both short-term and long-term glycemia. Upon long exposure to h-Glu, M1-like macrophages showed a diminished capacity for antigen presentation, as evidenced by reduced expression of HLA-DR on days 5 and 7. The decline in antigen presentation was accompanied by a reduction in co-stimulatory abilities, indicated by decreased CD86 expression on day 7. During extended exposure to h-Glu, M1-like macrophages also down-regulated expression of CD14 and CD206. M2-like macrophages reacted to prolonged hyperglycemia only on day 7 by increasing expression of HLA-DR and CD86 (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Long-term exposure to high glucose suppressed the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by M1 macrophages and increased their production by M2 macrophages
Next, we investigated the dynamic of cytokine production (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10) by M1- and M2-like macrophages cultured under n-Glu and h-Glu conditions on days 3, 5, and 7. It’s important to note that the media was replaced on the 3rd day of cell cultivation and then every 2nd day thereafter. As a result, cytokines present in the supernatants collected on days 5 and 7 were representative of a 2-day cultivation period. As seen in Figure 4, M1-like cells cultured under n-Glu conditions displayed a classical cytokine profile characterized by higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and lower levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines compared to M2-like macrophages. A notable observation was the trend of lower production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by M1-like cells during the cultivation process in h-Glu conditions compared to n-Glu. This trend was particularly evident on day 5 and 7, with significant reduction observed for TNF-α and on day 7 for IL-6. Although IL-1β levels showed a similar trend, statistical significance was not achieved. In contrast to M1-like cells, M2-like macrophages showed an increase in the production of IL-6 throughout all the studied days of cell cultivation. Additionally, M2-like cells produced low amounts of IL-1β and not detectable levels of TNF-α (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Altered response to LPS by M1- and M2-like macrophages
Next, we investigated the response of the studied cells to LPS. Our results so far indicated that the M1-like and M2-like cells responded to long-term hyperglycemia differently. Macrophage polarization is regulated through the activation of transcription factors and signaling pathways downstream of receptors for various inducers (). First, we aimed to analyze transcriptional activity of M1- and M2-related factors at basal level and after stimulation with LPS.
Despite being suppressed by hyperglycemia (described above), M1-cells retained pro-inflammatory activity as evidenced by the mRNA levels of NF-kB and NOX2. M2-like cells also up-regulated NF-kB and NOX2, but to a lesser extent, and these changes were not significant (Figure 5A). As expected, M2 cell marker Arginase 1 was up-regulated by M2-like macrophages. Its expression was up-regulated by LPS under h-Glu conditions albeit not significant. While under n-Glu, in M2-like cells expression Arginase 1 was down-regulated by LPS (Figure 5A).
Figure 5
IL-1β is a cytokine that potently promotes inflammation through activation of the transcription factor NF-κB. We aimed to analyze its production in the cells exposed to LPS. As appeared, the production of IL-1β was induced by LPS in both studied groups in n-Glu, while its increase in h-Glu was not significant (Figure 5B). As seen in Figure 5C, M2-like cells, in comparison to M1-like cells, exhibited slightly stronger phagocytic activity. However, a significant difference was observed only for LPS-treated cells under h-Glu conditions. M1-like cells showed slight decrease in the rates of phagocytosis in the presence of LPS at h-Glu conditions, while M2-like cells displayed an increase in the phagocytic activity (Figure 5C). TLR4 is a known sensor of Gram-negative bacterial infections through recognition of the LPS. Its surface expression was found to be down-regulated in M2-like cells at h-Glu conditions (Figure 5D), which was well associated with increased phagocytic abilities of the cells.
High glucose affects endotoxin tolerance in M1-like macrophages
Next, we investigated whether macrophages responded differently to repeated exposures to LPS under n-Glu and h-Glu conditions. Repeated LPS stimulation was required to induce cell tolerance, a crucial regulatory mechanism in controlling inflammatory responses. “LPS tolerance” or “endotoxin tolerance” are well-known processes which are defined as a reduced capacity of the host to respond to a second or repeated LPS stimulation (). Given that the suppression of LPS-induced cytokine production, particularly of TNF-α, is commonly acknowledged as a mechanism underlying the protective effect of endotoxin tolerance (, ), we exclusively used GM-CSF-treated cells to investigate endotoxin tolerance (Figure 6A). Our results revealed that TNF-α secretion from LPS-restimulated (tolerant) macrophages was significantly reduced compared to LPS-activated cells, suggesting successful establishment of the endotoxin tolerance model (, ). In h-Glu conditions, the cells showed re-programming of the processes involved in LPS tolerance, as evidenced by suppressed phagocytic activity and increased production of TNF-α (Figure 6B). It is worth mentioning that a single dose of LPS increased the production of TNF-α and expression of TLR4 under short-term n-Glu conditions, and didn’t induce significant changes under short-term h-Glu conditions.
Figure 6
Discussion
The therapeutic potential of modulating metabolic reprogramming in immune cells is increasingly evident. Depending on the specific context, the ability to enhance or suppress M2 activation could offer therapeutic advantages. Exploring the mechanisms underlying macrophages reprogramming under high glucose conditions represents a crucial stride towards achieving this objective. Our study, for the first time, provides evidence that long-term hyperglycemia exerts divergent effects on the morphology, activation, and functionality of M1- and M2-like macrophages.
The results presented in this study indicate that hyperglycemia causes macrophage activation in a strikingly different fashion compared with the normoglycemic conditions. Long hyperglycemia reduced ROS activity in M1 macrophages, while M2 macrophages exhibited a gradual increase in ROS production over time, adopting characteristics reminiscent of M1 macrophages. In norm, M1 macrophages are characterized by glycolytic metabolism, the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Elevated levels of glycolytic intermediates support nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NOX2) generation for nucleotide biosynthesis, ROS and lactate production (, ). M2 macrophages are characterized by increased mitochondrial respiration, production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and high arginase-1 expression. The efficient microbicidal activity of macrophages relies on the sustained production of ROS and subsequent maturation of phagosomes. However, long hyperglycemia in our in vitro model reduced the effectiveness of bactericidal activity by M1 cells. In diabetes, the inflammatory response becomes prolonged over time where macrophages in the wound exhibit a failure to switch from a pro-inflammatory to a pro-healing phenotype suggesting that the pro-inflammatory state of macrophages may result in wide-ranging effects on the immune system. Recent studies showed that reduced ROS production improved wound healing in a model of diabetic mice (, ). Of note, M2 macrophages also express NOX2 oxidase, endowing them with the ability to generate ROS (). Significantly increased ROS activity and reduced wound healing by M2 macrophages at h-Glu shown in our model further reinforcing abovementioned. Although initially beneficial, the wound healing process may turn detrimental when it persists long, resulting in the alteration of the extracellular matrix within the vessel wall. This is associated with an enhanced collagen deposition (). ROS have been proposed as a mediator of the remodeling actions exhibited by M2 macrophages in fibrotic conditions, including lung fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, and the aortic stiffening linked to hypertension (). Thus an increased pro-inflammatory activity of M2 macrophages caused by hyperglycemia might become a contributing factor for the ROS increase and reinforced pro-fibrotic functions of the cells.
ROS acts as an agonist of NF-κB signaling pathway initiating downstream inflammatory signaling pathways and leading to the release of inflammatory factors (). Consistently, we observed up-regulated expression of NF-κB in M2-like cells in h-Glu which was associated with the increased expression of costimulatory CD86 and enhanced antigen-presentation by the cells. Chronic triggering of oxidative stress can cause aberrant responses to bacterial stimuli such as LPS. Despite being suppressed in hyperglycemia, M1 cells retain their ability to respond to a single dose LPS stimuli. Despite this, our results suggest that the reprogramming of M1 macrophages in response to metabolic changes involves complex regulatory mechanisms that affect their ability to respond to secondary stimuli. Secondary responses in innate immune cells can modify their capacity to react with either a stronger or weaker response compared to the primary one. As an example, repeated or persistent exposure of macrophages to a high dose of LPS ensures tolerance, preventing the expression of inflammatory genes (). TLR4 signaling stimulated by LPS, drives macrophages to a preferentially M1 phenotype. Chronic signaling through the TLR4 pathway has been shown to induce various negative regulation which switch from an MyD88-dependent to a TRIF-dependent TLR4 pathway and switch macrophages to an immunosuppressive, endotoxin-tolerant phenotype. In our model, h-Glu appears to disrupt the establishment of endotoxin tolerance and potentially prime the induction of TNF-α in cells challenged with an additional dose of LPS. We previously showed that hypomethylation of the IL1RN and NFKB1 gene promoters is associated with dysregulation of the IL-1β/IL-1Ra axis in type 2 diabetes (). We hypothesized that hyperglycemia may act as an epigenetic modulator driving inflammatory priming of innate immune cells. These findings underscore the adaptation of the cells to ensure physiological adjustments to the increased levels of glucose, aiming to restore the cellular systems back to homeostatic states. However, side effects of these adjustments often occur that can lead to chronic inflammatory diseases (, ). Thus, the observed disruption of endotoxin tolerance and the priming of pro-inflammatory responses in hyperglycemic conditions highlight the adaptive but potentially harmful adjustments of macrophages to sustained high glucose levels.
Islet-resident macrophages may serve as initial detectors of systemic metabolic alterations and adapt their function and/or undergo local expansion in response. Tissues may contain mixed macrophage populations exhibiting a spectrum of functional and activation states. The transitions between the M1 and M2 phenotypes of macrophages are influenced by multiple factors, inflammation scenarios or disease progression (). The inflammatory polarization of islet-associated macrophages is exacerbated during T2DM, shifting mainly towards M1-like phenotype (, ). The inflammatory polarization is further strengthened by the recruitment of circulating monocytes. This recruitment is observed to a much lesser extent compared to what is observed during T1DM. The results summarized so far indicate M1/M2 mixed polarization of T1DM macrophages (, ). Long-term hyperglycemia has the potential to essentially alter the paradigm of M1/M2 macrophage classification. Our study clearly shows that hyperglycemia suppresses proinflammatory program of M1 macrophages and increases pro-inflammatory potential of M2 macrophages. Macrophage populations often express mixed phenotypes in the course of various disease settings including neurodegenerative disorders, atherosclerotic plaques, and some tumors (, ). We suggest that characterization of tissue macrophages from the patients with metabolic deviations might represent a challenging task, complicating interpretation of their function. As an example, the novel M4, Mhem and M(Hb) macrophage subtypes described in atherosclerotic plaque formation and stability, which are polarized by CXCL4, heme and hemoglobin, respectively ().
The mechanisms for macrophage reprogramming under hyperglycemia are currently largely unknown and may include multiple signaling molecules and pathways. Recent studies point to a key TRIM29-PERK axis in regulating macrophage function. TRIM29 suppresses macrophage inflammation by promoting NEMO degradation, inhibiting NF-κB and type I interferon signaling (), and stabilizes PERK via SUMOylation to enhance ER stress and immunosuppressive programs (). PERK itself supports M2 polarization by reprogramming mitochondrial metabolism (). Thus, TRIM29 may coordinate both anti-inflammatory signaling and metabolic programming. Further investigation into this axis may reveal how metabolic stress promotes inflammation and tissue remodeling in metabolic disorders.
Re-polarization of macrophages is known phenomena, it was shown that M2 macrophages can be re-polarized into M1 macrophages following exposure to TLR ligands or IFNγ (), whereas M1 macrophages can be reprogrammed to the macrophages with M2 phenotype with the agents that increase IL-10 level (). Targeting colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) and CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) for M2 macrophage reprogramming has been widely implemented in clinical trials for cancer therapy (, ). To ensure a comprehensive understanding of macrophage reprogramming under hyperglycemic conditions, future research should focus on elucidating the specific signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved. This could reveal potential therapeutic targets for modulating macrophage function in metabolic disorders and conditions characterized by chronic inflammation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, long-term hyperglycemia exerts multifaceted effects on the functionality and polarization of macrophages, challenging the accepted paradigm of macrophage polarization in the context of metabolic disorders. Therapies aimed at modulating the inflammatory state of macrophages are increasingly recognized as valuable strategies to mitigate their detrimental effects. Our findings underscore the importance of carefully targeting macrophages in the management of metabolic disorders.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the ethical committee of the Institute of Molecular Biology NAS RA (IRB00004079, IORG0003427). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
SM: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. DP: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. SG: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. LH: Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. AM: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. GM: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by a State Committee Science MES RA, in the frame of the research project no. SCS 21AG-1F072.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
GiriBDeySDasTSarkarMBanerjeeJDashSK. Chronic hyperglycemia mediated physiological alteration and metabolic distortion leads to organ dysfunction, infection, cancer progression and other pathophysiological consequences: An update on glucose toxicity. BioMed Pharmacother. (2018) 107:306–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.157
2
YingWFuWLeeYSOlefskyJM. The role of macrophages in obesity-associated islet inflammation and β-cell abnormalities. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2020) 16:81–90. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0286-3
3
RohmTVMeierDTOlefskyJMDonathMY. Inflammation in obesity, diabetes, and related disorders. Immunity. (2022) 55:31–55. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.12.013
4
PortaCRiboldiEIppolitoASicaA. Molecular and epigenetic basis of macrophage polarized activation. Semin Immunol. (2015) 27:237–48. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2015.10.003
5
WculekSKDunphyGHeras-MurilloIMastrangeloASanchoD. Metabolism of tissue macrophages in homeostasis and pathology. Cell Mol Immunol. (2022) 19:384–408. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00791-9
6
StrizovaZBenesovaIBartoliniRNovysedlakRCecrdlovaEFoleyLKet al. M1/M2 macrophages and their overlaps - myth or reality? Clin Sci (Lond). (2023) 137:1067–93. doi: 10.1042/CS20220531
7
ChenSSaeedAFUHLiuQJiangQXuHXiaoGGet al. Macrophages in immunoregulation and therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2023) 8:207. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1
8
ThiemKKeatingSTNeteaMGRiksenNPTackCJvan DiepenJet al. Hyperglycemic memory of innate immune cells promotes in vitro proinflammatory responses of human monocytes and murine macrophages. J Immunol. (2021) 206:807–13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1901348
9
SunCSunLMaHPengJZhenYDuanKet al. The phenotype and functional alterations of macrophages in mice with hyperglycemia for long term. J Cell Physiol. (2012) 227:1670–9. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22891
10
MogantiKLiFSchmuttermaierCRiemannSKlüterHGratchevAet al. Hyperglycemia induces mixed M1/M2 cytokine profile in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages. Immunobiology. (2017) 222:952–9. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.07.006
11
PavlouSLindsayJIngramRXuHChenM. Sustained high glucose exposure sensitizes macrophage responses to cytokine stimuli but reduces their phagocytic activity. BMC Immunol. (2018) 19:24. doi: 10.1186/s12865-018-0261-0
12
SousaESAQueirozLADGuimarãesJPTPantojaKCBarrosRSEpiphanioSet al. The influence of high glucose conditions on macrophages and its effect on the autophagy pathway. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1130662. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1130662
13
XiuFDiaoLQiPCatapanoMJeschkeMG. Palmitate differentially regulates the polarization of differentiating and differentiated macrophages. Immunology. (2016) 147:82–96. doi: 10.1111/imm.12543
14
VerreckFAde BoerTLangenbergDMHoeveMAKramerMVaisbergEet al. Human IL-23-producing type 1 macrophages promote but IL-10-producing type 2 macrophages subvert immunity to (myco)bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2004) 101:4560–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400983101
15
JoshiSSinghARZulcicMBaoLMesserKIdekerTet al. Rac2 controls tumor growth, metastasis and M1-M2 macrophage differentiation in vivo. PloS One. (2014) 9:e95893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095893
16
LukicALarssenPFaulandASamuelssonBWheelockCEGabrielssonSet al. GM-CSF- and M-CSF-primed macrophages present similar resolving but distinct inflammatory lipid mediator signatures. FASEB J. (2017) 31:4370–81. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700319R
17
HeinrichFLehmbeckerARaddatzBBKeglerKTipoldASteinVMet al. Morphologic, phenotypic, and transcriptomic characterization of classically and alternatively activated canine blood-derived macrophages in vitro. PloS One. (2017) 12:e0183572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183572
18
RostamHMReynoldsPMAlexanderMRGadegaardNGhaemmaghamiAM. Image based Machine Learning for identification of macrophage subsets. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:3521. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03780-z
19
XuQChoksiSQuJJangJChoeMBanfiBet al. NADPH oxidases are essential for macrophage differentiation. J Biol Chem. (2016) 291:20030–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.731216
20
YangYWangYGuoLGaoWTangTLYanM. Interaction between macrophages and ferroptosis. Cell Death Dis. (2022) 13:355. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04775-z
21
ParkYM. CD36, a scavenger receptor implicated in atherosclerosis. Exp Mol Med. (2014) 46:e99. doi: 10.1038/emm.2014.38
22
SeeleyJJGhoshS. Molecular mechanisms of innate memory and tolerance to LPS. J Leukoc Biol. (2017) 101:107–19. doi: 10.1189/jlb.3MR0316-118RR
23
LehnerMDMorathSMichelsenKSSchumannRRHartungT. Induction of cross-tolerance by lipopolysaccharide and highly purified lipoteichoic acid via different Toll-like receptors independent of paracrine mediators. J Immunol. (2001) 166:5161–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.8.5161
24
NahidMASatohMChanEK. MicroRNA in TLR signaling and endotoxin tolerance. Cell Mol Immunol. (2011) 8:388–403. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2011.26
25
del FresnoCGarcía-RioFGómez-PiñaVSoares-SchanoskiAFernández-RuízIJuradoTet al. Potent phagocytic activity with impaired antigen presentation identifying lipopolysaccharide-tolerant human monocytes: demonstration in isolated monocytes from cystic fibrosis patients. J Immunol. (2009) 182:6494–507. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803350
26
López-CollazoEdel FresnoC. Pathophysiology of endotoxin tolerance: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Crit Care. (2013) 17:242. doi: 10.1186/cc13110
27
HakamiNYDustingGJChanECShahMHPeshavariyaHM. Wound healing after alkali burn injury of the cornea involves nox4-type NADPH oxidase. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2020) 61:20. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.12.20
28
FengCYuBSongCWangJZhangLJiXet al. Static magnetic fields reduce oxidative stress to improve wound healing and alleviate diabetic complications. Cells. (2022) 11:443. doi: 10.3390/cells11030443
29
KraaijMDKoekkoekKMvan der KooijSWGeldermanKAvan KootenC. Subsets of human type 2 macrophages show differential capacity to produce reactive oxygen species. Cell Immunol. (2013) 284:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.07.006
30
MooreJPVinhATuckKLSakkalSKrishnanSMChanCTet al. M2 macrophage accumulation in the aortic wall during angiotensin II infusion in mice is associated with fibrosis, elastin loss, and elevated blood pressure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2015) 309:H906–17. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00821.2014
31
LewisCVVinhADiepHSamuelCSDrummondGRKemp-HarperBK. Distinct redox signalling following macrophage activation influences profibrotic activity. J Immunol Res. (2019) 2019:1278301. doi: 10.1155/2019/1278301
32
WuMYangZZhangCShiYHanWSongSet al. Inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome ameliorates podocyte damage by suppressing lipid accumulation in diabetic nephropathy. Metabolism. (2021) 118:154748. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154748
33
MinassianAMSattiIPoultonIDMeyerJHillAVMcShaneH. A human challenge model for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guerin. J Infect Dis. (2012) 205:1035–42. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis012
34
MargaryanSKriegovaEFillerovaRSmotkova KraiczovaVManukyanG. Hypomethylation of IL1RN and NFKB1 genes is linked to the dysbalance in IL1β/IL-1Ra axis in female patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PloS One. (2020) 15:e0233737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233737
35
MedvedevAELentschatAKuhnsDBBlancoJCSalkowskiCZhangSet al. Distinct mutations in IRAK-4 confer hyporesponsiveness to lipopolysaccharide and interleukin-1 in a patient with recurrent bacterial infections. J Exp Med. (2003) 198:521–31. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030701
36
DivangahiMAabyPKhaderSABarreiroLBBekkeringSChavakisTet al. Trained immunity, tolerance, priming and differentiation: distinct immunological processes. Nat Immunol. (2021) 22:2–6. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-00845-6
37
PorcherayFViaudSRimaniolACLéoneCSamahBDereuddre-BosquetNet al. Macrophage activation switching: an asset for the resolution of inflammation. Clin Exp Immunol. (2005) 142:481–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02934.x
38
CucakHGrunnetLGRosendahlA. Accumulation of M1-like macrophages in type 2 diabetic islets is followed by a systemic shift in macrophage polarization. J Leukoc Biol. (2014) 95:149–60. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0213075
39
CalderonBCarreroJAFerrisSTSojkaDKMooreLEpelmanSet al. The pancreas anatomy conditions the origin and properties of resident macrophages. J Exp Med. (2015) 212:1497–512. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150496
40
EguchiKNagaiR. Islet inflammation in type 2 diabetes and physiology. J Clin Invest. (2017) 127:14–23. doi: 10.1172/JCI88877
41
WangYJTraumDSchugJGaoLLiuCHPAP Consortiumet al. Multiplexed in situ imaging mass cytometry analysis of the human endocrine pancreas and immune system in type 1 diabetes. Cell Metab. (2019) 29:769–783.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.01.003
42
WangNLiangHZenK. Molecular mechanisms that influence the macrophage m1-m2 polarization balance. Front Immunol. (2014) 5:614. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00614
43
NagenborgJGoossensPBiessenEALDonnersMMPC. Heterogeneity of atherosclerotic plaque macrophage origin, phenotype and functions: Implications for treatment. Eur J Pharmacol. (2017) 816:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.10.005
44
XingJWengLYuanBWangZJiaLJinRet al. Identification of a role for TRIM29 in the control of innate immunity in the respiratory tract. Nat Immunol. (2016) 17:1373–80. doi: 10.1038/ni.3580
45
WangJLuWZhangJDuYFangMZhangAet al. Loss of TRIM29 mitigates viral myocarditis by attenuating PERK-driven ER stress response in male mice. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:3481. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44745-x
46
RainesLNZhaoHWangYChenHYGallart-AyalaHHsuehPCet al. PERK is a critical metabolic hub for immunosuppressive function in macrophages. Nat Immunol. (2022) 23:431–45. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01145-x
47
YeJXieCWangCHuangJYinZHengBCet al. Promoting musculoskeletal system soft tissue regeneration by biomaterial-mediated modulation of macrophage polarization. Bioact Mater. (2021) 6:4096–109. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.017
48
HyamSRLeeIAGuWKimKAJeongJJJangSEet al. Arctigenin ameliorates inflammation in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway and polarizing M1 macrophages to M2-like macrophages. Eur J Pharmacol. (2013) 708:21–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.01.014
49
AoJYZhuXDChaiZTCaiHZhangYYZhangKZet al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor blockade inhibits tumor growth by altering the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. (2017) 16:1544–54. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0866
50
BartVMTPickeringRJTaylorPRIpseizN. Macrophage reprogramming for therapy. Immunology. (2021) 163:128–44. doi: 10.1111/imm.13300
Summary
Keywords
hyperglycemia, GM-CSF and M-CSF-derived cells, M1 and M2 macrophages, phagocytosis, endotoxin tolerance, LPS
Citation
Margaryan S, Poghosyan D, Ghonyan S, Hakobyan L, Martirosyan A and Manukyan G (2025) Long-term hyperglycaemia exerts contrasting effects on M1- and M2-like macrophages. Front. Immunol. 16:1639650. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1639650
Received
03 June 2025
Accepted
15 July 2025
Published
31 July 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Junji Xing, Houston Methodist Research Institute, United States
Reviewed by
Gaurav Kumar Chaubey, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
Quan Liu, Heidelberg University, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Margaryan, Poghosyan, Ghonyan, Hakobyan, Martirosyan and Manukyan.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gayane Manukyan, gaya.manukyan@gmail.com; g_manukyan@mb.sci.am
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.