Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

OPINION article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1647502

Letter to Editor: Complementary Perspectives on B Cell Regulatory Phenotypes in Cancer

Provisionally accepted
Akshay  PatelAkshay Patel1,2*Gary  W MiddletonGary W Middleton1,2
  • 1University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • 2University of Birmingham Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Birmingham, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

B cells are increasingly recognised as key regulators of immune responses in cancer, yet their suppressive roles and defining features remain poorly understood. Regulatory B cells (Bregs), which secrete cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β, may modulate the tumour microenvironment and influence outcomes of immunotherapy. In a recent study, Lo Tartaro et al. identified a novel subset of intratumoral Bregs expressing the immune checkpoint molecule VISTA, with distinct transcriptional and metabolic features in early-stage NSCLC. However, functional comparisons to previously reported Breg phenotypes were not explored.Our earlier work has characterised Breg developmental pathways and cytokine polyfunctionality in lung cancer patients, with clear links to immunotherapy-related toxicity. In this commentary, we provide complementary insights to support and extend the findings reported by Lo Tartaro et al.In recent years, the immunoregulatory functions of B cells within the TME have garnered increasing attention, particularly in the context of their contribution to immune evasion and therapeutic resistance. Bregs, a phenotypically and functionally heterogeneous subset, have emerged as pivotal mediators of immune suppression, primarily through IL-10 (their primary hallmark), TGF-β and IL-35 secretion (1-3) and modulation of T cell responses. However, the specific molecular features that define immunosuppressive Bregs in human cancers remain poorly understood.We read with great interest the recent publication by Lo Tartaro et al. investigating the role of VISTA+ regulatory B cells (Bregs) within the tumour microenvironment (TME) (4). Their study provides a comprehensive transcriptomic and spatial characterisation of this B cell subset in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), revealing a population of CD27+CD38 hi CD24-plasmablast-like cells enriched for the immune checkpoint molecule VISTA. Through integrative single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomic approaches, the authors identify a VISTA+ B cell population with an immunoregulatory gene signature and enrichment for suppressive cytokines and checkpoint markers, suggesting a novel immunosuppressive role within the tumor niche.The diffusion map trajectory analysis (Figure 1G) suggests that VISTA⁺ B cells occupy a transcriptionally distinct continuum suggestive of a regulatory trajectory, diverging from naïve and memory B cell subsets. These cells are enriched for gene signatures associated with immune regulation and suppression and are proposed to exert their function via soluble factor secretion rather than antigenspecific interactions. Our earlier work (1) has demonstrated the same distinct developmental trajectories that Bregs can take (Figure 3B), showing clear separation between the plasmablast phenotype (Ki67 hi CD38 hi CD27 hi CD95 hi IL-10 int ) and the PD1 hi and PD-L1 hi TGFβ+ populations. The clear lack of phenotypic surrogacy is nicely shown by this group (4) between blood and tumour tissue compartments, evident by the contrasting diffusion maps between the two regions. Further work from our group (5) has again corroborated these findings; Figure 1E shows a notable difference in B and Plasma cell trajectory between tumour and blood. The significantly higher presence of CD19 lo CD38 hi CD24-CD27 lo IgD-antibody secreting plasma cells in the tumour compared to blood, and the contrasting abundance of naïve, memory and plasmablast cells in circulation was a key finding from our work. Despite these insights, the study does not experimentally validate the functional capacity of VISTA⁺ Bregs, nor does it directly explore their impact on T cell effector function or clinical outcomes following checkpoint blockade. Hence, whether VISTA blockade abrogates polyfunctional cytokine expression ex vivo remains to be seen. Nevertheless, the work adds to the growing body of literature identifying immunosuppressive B cell subsets in human cancers and proposes VISTA as a novel surface marker that may aid in the delineation of regulatory B cell states.From Lo Tartaro Paper: are defined as median (centre), with the bounds of the box representing the interquartile range (upper and lower bounds) and the whiskers representing upper and lower extremes. Statistical analysis was conducted using Kruskal-Wallis (to generally test for overall differences between all three groups). All analyses were conducted using a Benjamini-Hochberg multiple comparisons correction, comparing all conditions as indicated. A significance level of <0.05 was adopted.From Patel AJ Frontiers Immunol Paper: Figure 1E: Diffusion map stratified according to condition, "blood" and "tumour". All samples are randomly downsampled to account for equally representative populations across samples.

Keywords: Breg, lung cancer, Non-small cel lung carcinoma, Vista, Immunother apy

Received: 15 Jun 2025; Accepted: 04 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Patel and Middleton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Akshay Patel, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.