Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1656108

Biomarkers for Predicting CAR-T Cell Therapy Outcomes in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Hematology and Oncology, Wuhan Children’s Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
  • 2Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), yet challenges such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity (ICANS), and variable long-term efficacy persist. This systematic review evaluates the role of biomarkers in predicting CAR-T therapy outcomes, toxicity risks, and guiding personalized strategies. Following PRISMA guidelines, 33 studies (n=2,095 patients) published between 2018–2024 were analyzed through PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Key findings identified tumor burden and minimal residual disease (MRD) as dual-predictive biomarkers. High tumor burden (≥40% blasts) correlated with reduced complete remission (87% vs. 100%) and increased CRS/ICANS risks, while MRD negativity (NGS threshold <10-⁶) predicted superior 2-year event-free survival (68% vs. 23%). CAR-T functional parameters, including PD-1/LAG-3 expression (>5.2% in CD4+ cells) and peak expansion kinetics, linked efficacy to toxicity trade-offs. Genetic biomarkers (IKZF1 mutations, complex karyotypes) and biochemical indicators (m-EASIX >6.2, ferritin ≥10,000 ng/mL) further stratified risks. Unidirectional efficacy biomarkers included T-cell subsets (e.g., CD8+ naive T cells) and B-cell aplasia, while IL-6 dynamics specifically predicted CRS severity. Despite promising insights, heterogeneity in toxicity grading systems, inconsistent biomarker thresholds, and retrospective study designs limit clinical standardization. Future directions emphasize cytoreductive bridging therapies, biomarker-guided combinatorial approaches (e.g., MDM2 inhibitors for TP53 mutations), and multicenter validation of integrated predictive models.

Keywords: CAR-T cell therapy, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, biomarkers, Cytokinerelease syndrome, Minimal Residual Disease, Tumor Burden, Systematic review

Received: 29 Jun 2025; Accepted: 02 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 柯 and 周. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: 芬 周, daisy_may@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.