Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology

Prognostic Value of Kappa Free Light Chain Index in patients with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • 2Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
  • 3Medizinische Universitat Wien, Vienna, Austria
  • 4Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Neurologia 3, Turin, Italy
  • 5Universita degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
  • 6Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 7Fachhochschule Campus Wien, Vienna, Austria
  • 8Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark
  • 9Wiener Gesundheitsverbund Klinik Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
  • 10Goteborgs universitet, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 11Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 12Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita, Novara, Italy
  • 13Universita degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
  • 14Universitat Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Kappa free light chain (-FLC) index is a well-established biomarker in multiple sclerosis (MS). While the prognostic value of the -FLC index has been demonstrated in early relapsing-remitting MS, its prognostic value in primary progressive MS (PPMS) has not yet been investigated. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study patients diagnosed with PPMS with diagnostic lumbar puncture and clinical follow-up of at least 12 months were recruited through nine MS centers across five countries. At baseline, age, sex, disease duration, number of T2 hyperintense (T2L) and contrast-enhancing T1 lesions (CEL) on MRI were determined. -FLC were measured by nephelometry/turbidimetry, and -FLC index calculated as [CSF -FLC/serum -FLC]/albumin quotient. At follow-up, the occurrence of disability progression as well as the administration of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) were registered. The primary endpoint was time to disability progression. Results: A total of 121 PPMS patients were included with a median age of 53 years (25th-75th percentile: 46–59) and a balanced sex distribution (48.8% females). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed no significant association between the -FLC index and disability progression (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.0, p = 0.950). Prior use of DMT (HR 0.60, p = 0.023) and brain T2L >9 at baseline (HR 2.22, p = 0.026) were significantly associated with disability progression. The remaining covariates including age, sex, disease duration and CEL showed no significant associations. Conclusion: The -FLC index does not predict disability progression in PPMS, contrasting its growing role as a prognostic biomarker in relapsing MS. This highlights phenotypic differences in MS pathophysiology and underscores the need for prognostic biomarkers in PPMS.

Keywords: Cerebrospinal Fluid, Kappa free light chain, primary progressive, mul%ple sclerosis, prognos%c, biomarker

Received: 02 Jul 2025; Accepted: 24 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Schmidauer, Berek, Auer, Bsteh, Cavalla, Di Pauli, Di Filippo, Deisenhammer, Emersic, Foettinger, Gaetani, Hassler, Krajnc, Milosavljevic, Ponleitner, Petersen, Presslauer, Rosenstein, Rot, Winther Tørring, Vecchio, Vercellino, Zrzavy, Zinganell, Walde and Hegen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Harald Hegen, harald.hegen@i-med.ac.at

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.