Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Immunol., 15 July 2025

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1660831

This article is part of the Research TopicSingle-Cell Sequencing of the Immune Microenvironment in CancerView all 5 articles

Editorial: Single-cell sequencing of the immune microenvironment in cancer

  • Division of Myeloma, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States

Cancer progression and treatment response are deeply influenced by the complex interplay between malignant cells and the immune microenvironment. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomics have emerged as transformative technologies for dissecting this complexity, offering unprecedented resolution into cellular heterogeneity and functional diversity within tumors. This Research Topic features three original research papers examining the tumor microenvironment (TME) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and one comprehensive review addressing scRNA-seq studies in endometrial cancer, offering relevant insights that extend across the broader field of cancer immunology.

HCC, the most prevalent form of primary liver cancer and a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, has seen significant advances with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies (1). However, their benefit is limited to a subset of patients. A key determinant of therapeutic response is the TME, which profoundly shapes immune function and tumor evolution. Within the TME, CD8+ T cells often enter a state of exhaustion due to chronic antigen exposure and immunosuppressive signaling. This dysfunctional state, characterized by impaired effector activity and sustained expression of inhibitory receptors, presents a significant barrier to achieving durable immunotherapy responses (2). Understanding and reversing T cell exhaustion is therefore critical to improving immunotherapeutic outcomes in HCC. The three studies in this Research Topic illuminate novel mechanisms of immune exhaustion in HCC, leveraging single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing alongside spatial transcriptomics.

Jin et al. identified secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) expressing macrophages as key mediators of immune suppression. By using scRNA-seq data from HCC samples to deconvolute bulk RNA-seq profiles from a larger cohort, they quantified immune cell type abundance and demonstrated that SPP1+ macrophages are associated with poor prognosis due to their ability to suppress CD8+ T cell proliferation. Importantly, they showed that inhibition of SPP1 can reprogram macrophages toward a less suppressive phenotype, suggesting a viable therapeutic strategy for modulating macrophage function in HCC.

Expanding on the immunosuppressive mechanisms in HCC, Chen et al. explored the role of high-mobility group box 2 (HMGB2), a member of the HMGB protein family involved in transcriptional regulation, DNA repair, and chromatin remodeling. Elevated HMGB2 expression has been previously linked to a poor prognosis in HCC. Through a multi-omics approach, integrating scRNA-seq, bulk RNA-seq, spatial transcriptomics, and multiplex immunohistochemistry, they demonstrated that HMGB2 fosters immune evasion by promoting T cell exhaustion. Their findings highlight HMGB2’s potential as both a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target in HCC.

Huang et al. turned their focus to microvascular invasion (MVI), an established risk factor for recurrence and poor outcomes in HCC. MVI is defined by the infiltration of malignant cells into the microvasculature surrounding the tumor. By integrating scRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics, they identified a malignant cell subtype enriched for MYC signaling and strongly associated with MVI and adverse prognosis. These cells exhibited prominent crosstalk via macrophage migration inhibitory factor signaling. Using these features, the authors developed a machine-learning-based prognostic model, illustrating the clinical potential of combining high-resolution transcriptomic data with computational analytics.

The final contribution, a review by González-Martínez et al., surveyed the current landscape of scRNA-seq studies in endometrial cancer. They emphasized the cellular complexity of the TME across histological subtypes, drawing attention to the roles of tumor-associated macrophages, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. The authors also underscored several persistent challenges in the application of scRNA-seq, many of which extend to the broader field of tumor immunology. These include inconsistencies in tissue dissociation protocols, sequencing platforms, and parameter settings across studies. Computational variability further exacerbates the issue, with divergent approaches to quality control, data normalization, and cell annotation methods, particularly those used to distinguish between malignant and non-malignant cells. In addition, the limited number of cases analyzed, particularly among rare or aggressive histological subtypes, constrains the generalizability of findings. The authors advocate for standardization of both experimental and computational pipelines to improve reproducibility across studies and emphasize the need for larger, more diverse cohorts to capture the full spectrum of tumor heterogeneity.

Together, these studies demonstrate the unique power of single-cell and spatial transcriptomic technologies to elucidate the nuanced cellular and molecular dynamics of the immune microenvironment in cancer. By uncovering new mechanisms, identifying actionable targets, and informing clinical risk models, this work highlights how these cutting-edge approaches are poised to reshape cancer biology and drive more personalized and effective oncology care.

Author contributions

DC: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. ChatGPT 4o was used to enhance the clarity and quality of the writing.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Akbulut Z, Aru B, Aydın F, and Demirel GY. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1379622. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1379622

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Barsch M, Salié H, Schlaak AE, Zhang Z, Hess M, Mayer LS, et al. T-cell exhaustion and residency dynamics inform clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. (2022) 77:397–409. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.02.032

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: single cell RNA (scRNA), hepatocellar carcinoma (HCC), endometrial cancer, spatial transcriptomics, T cell exhaustion

Citation: Coffey DG (2025) Editorial: Single-cell sequencing of the immune microenvironment in cancer. Front. Immunol. 16:1660831. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1660831

Received: 07 July 2025; Accepted: 07 July 2025;
Published: 15 July 2025.

Edited and reviewed by:

Peter Brossart, University of Bonn, Germany

Copyright © 2025 Coffey. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: David G. Coffey, ZGF2aWRjb2ZmZXlAbWlhbWkuZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.