ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1664684
This article is part of the Research TopicColorectal Cancer Immunotherapy and Immune MechanismsView all 17 articles
Immunotherapy versus Chemotherapy as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected MSI-H/dMMR Colorectal Cancer: Real-World Evidence Informing Precision Strategies
Provisionally accepted- 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- 2Henan Cancer Hospital Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Background Immunotherapy has demonstrated unique advantages in MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) for its later-line, first-line in metastatic status, and neoadjuvant therapy. However, evidence regarding its value in postoperative adjuvant therapy remains limited. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 261 stage II/III MSI-H/dMMR CRC patients who underwent radical resection with over 2 years of follow-up. Disease-free survival (DFS) curves were used to compare prognoses under different postoperative strategies, and factors associated with recurrence were investigated. Results The patients cohort (mean age 55.3, range 19-86 years and male for 56.3%) had a median follow-up of 30 (range 24-45) months. Recurrence occurred in 18 patients (6.9%), with an overall DFS rate of 93.1% during follow-up period. Overall, postoperative immunotherapy showed non-significant DFS advantage over watchful waiting (WW) (HR=0.19, 95%CI: 0.03-1.39, P=0.101), but it demonstrated statistically superior DFS compared to chemotherapy (HR=0.26, 95%CI: 0.08-0.89, P=0.033). Subgroup analyses revealed: 1) For patients achieving pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative WW and immunotherapy were equivalent (both DFS 100%); 2) For Stage II, WW and immunotherapy showed comparable DFS (HR=0.21, 95%CI: 0.003-13.04, P=0.463). 3) For Stage III, immunotherapy showed a trend toward superior DFS versus chemotherapy, though statistical significance was not reached (HR=0.28, 95%CI: 0.04-1.96, P=0.204), and both outperformed WW (HR=0.05, 95%CI: 0.004-0.54, P=0.014 and HR=0.34, 95%CI: 0.05-2.17, P=0.113, respectively). Factors significantly associated with recurrence included Lynch-negative (P=0.02) and perineural invasion (P=0.014). Conclusions MSI-H/dMMR CRC exhibits excellent prognosis after radical surgery. Postoperative WW remains the preferred strategy for Stage II patients, While patients with stage III requires intensive adjuvant therapy, and immunotherapy may surpass conventional chemotherapy recommended by the current guidelines.
Keywords: colorectal cancer, Microsatellite instability high, Mismatch repair deficient, Immunotherapy, adjuvant therapy
Received: 12 Jul 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sun, Lyu, Yang, Wang, Zhai, Zhao, Yuan and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Mengfei Zhao, zhaomfnju@163.com
Weitang Yuan, yuanweitang@zzu.edu.cn
Quanbo Zhou, fcczhouqb@zzu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.