- 1Fischell Department of Bioengineering, A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
- 2The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- 3The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Leishmaniasis and immunity: challenges, advances and future perspective
Leishmaniasis is still one of the most prevalent parasitic diseases in tropical and subtropical regions of the world (1). Despite sustained global efforts and collaborative initiatives over the past two decades, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) continues to account for hundreds of thousands of new cases annually (2). Meanwhile, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) persists as the second most fatal disease among parasitic diseases after malaria in these regions. Although over a century has passed since the discovery of pentavalent antimonials, the emergence of drug resistance in several endemic areas has significantly reduced its efficacy (3). Currently, most therapeutic options in use or under clinical evaluation for leishmaniasis are repurposed drugs, underscoring the need for new treatment strategies. Molecular tools have considerably improved the detection of Leishmania species and identification of asymptomatic infections, facilitated by point-of-care diagnostics in resource-limited field settings. However, the development of an effective and accessible vaccine remains elusive (4).
The biology of Leishmania infection is inherently complex, with different species causing distinct clinical manifestations influenced by multiple factors, most notably host-parasite interactions, which ultimately determine disease outcome (5). To survive within the hostile environment of host macrophages, the parasite has evolved various immune evasion strategies (6). Therefore, a deeper understanding of the dynamic interplay between parasite virulence mechanisms and host immune defenses, particularly in an epigenetic framework, is essential for developing effective interventions against the disease. Recent studies have emphasized the key role of host immunity in disease progression, treatment response, and potential vaccine development. Identifying these immunological determinants is crucial to advance our knowledge on Leishmania infection. This Research Topic brings together cutting-edge research addressing the multifaceted challenges of leishmaniasis, explores advances in immunological research and provides future perspectives. We hope the contributions compiled here not only update current knowledge on the topic but also inspire novel strategies to combat this enduring global health burden.
The Research Topic begins with a perspective article by Kumar et al., which offers a comprehensive overview of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL), a cutaneous sequel of VL. The review highlights recent advances in diagnosis, treatment, and immunological understanding of PKDL. Importantly, the authors discuss the implications of PKDL in VL elimination programs, outlining key challenges and proposing strategic approaches to address them. Ihedioha et al. explored the host–pathogen interactions during L. major infection, focusing on how these dynamics influence disease progression. Their study examined the role of lipophosphoglycan (LPG), a key surface virulence glycoconjugate in platelet activation and the induction of Dickkopf-1 (DKK1), a modulator of proinflammatory responses. Utilizing L. major mutant strains lacking LPG synthesis, the authors demonstrated that LPG mediates platelet activation through TLR1/2 signaling and promotes the formation of leukocyte–platelet aggregates. Their findings suggest LPG-activated platelets contribute to Th2 immune polarization, shaping the host’s immune response against Leishmania infection.
Advances in leishmaniasis research have also pointed out the role of various factors, particularly the host’s genetic background, on disease susceptibility and protection. In this context, Junior et al. conducted a haplotype-based analysis using single nucleotide variants (SNVs) across a chromosomal region to identify genetic markers associated with clinical outcomes. Their results revealed that three human IL-13 gene haplotypes conferred protection against L. guyanensis-induced CL, whereas three others were associated with increased susceptibility to the disease. It is well established that many pathogens enhance their intracellular survival by manipulating host RNA interference (RNAi) pathways and their associated components. In a study, Moradimotlagh et al. explored the involvement of Argonaute (Ago) protein complexes in the pathogenesis of L. donovani. Their findings revealed that infection with Leishmania selectively upregulates Ago1 in host macrophages and that silencing Ago1 significantly reduced parasite survival. Furthermore, proteomic profiling identified several Leishmania-associated pathogenic proteins whose expression correlated with Ago1 levels in infected macrophages, suggesting a potential role in modulating host responses and promoting disease progression.
Bernardo et al. investigated how immunosuppressive therapies, including anti-TNF agents and methotrexate (MTX), affect the host immune response and the efficacy of anti-leishmanial therapy during L. infantum infection. Their study demonstrated that immunosuppressed mice exhibited impaired parasite clearance and a reduction in proinflammatory cytokine production following treatment. This diminished response was likely due to the host’s inability to mount a specific cellular immune defense against the parasite under immunosuppressive conditions. In an in vivo study, Devender et al. evaluated the immunogenic potential of the tuzin protein as a vaccine candidate against L. donovani infection. Mice immunized with tuzin showed a significant reduction in parasite burden and elevated levels of Th1-associated immune markers. Following parasite challenge, tuzin-immunized mice exhibited an increased IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio, indicating a protective Th1-biased immune response against L. donovani.
de Araujo et al. investigated the immune response of healthy volunteers exposed to the saliva of uninfected Phlebotomus duboscqi, a known vector of L. major. The study reported significant antigen-specific IgG responses and identified several salivary proteins with high plasma reactivity that triggered a Th1-skewed cellular immune response, suggesting their potential role in host defense and vaccine development. At last, Borges-Fernandes et al. examined the impact of blocking MHC class I-related protein 1 (MR1) on the internalization of L. infantum by host phagocytic cells. Their findings indicated that MR1 blockade led to increased TNF-α and IL-10 production in VL patients, whereas asymptomatic individuals exhibited a comparatively lower cytokine response. Additionally, MR1 blockade reduced IFN-γ levels and elevated Th2-associated cytokines, underscoring a potential protective role of MR1 in modulating immune responses during VL. Finally, this Research Topic also received two submissions that, although ultimately not endorsed during peer review, nonetheless reflected the relevance of the subject matter.
Author contributions
SE: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AS: Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NS: Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the authors and reviewers for their help and for making this research topic possible.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Ejazi SA and Ali N. Developments in diagnosis and treatment of visceral leishmaniasis during the last decade and future prospects. Expert Rev anti-infective Ther. (2013) 11:79–98. doi: 10.1586/eri.12.148
2. Kim J, Zieneldien T, Ma S, and Cohen BA. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the context of global travel, migration, refugee populations, and humanitarian crises. Clinics Pract. (2025) 15:77. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15040077
3. Sundar S, Madhukar P, and Kumar R. Anti-leishmanial therapies: overcoming current challenges with emerging therapies. Expert Rev anti-infective Ther. (2025) 23:159–80. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2438627
4. Gupta J, Menon Y, Kumar S, and Jain CK. Vaccine designing technology against leishmaniasis: current challenges and implication. Curr Drug Discov Technol. (2025) 22:e240524230315. doi: 10.2174/0115701638291767240513113400
5. Gupta AK, Das S, Kamran M, Ejazi SA, and Ali N. The pathogenicity and virulence of Leishmania - interplay of virulence factors with host defenses. Virulence. (2022) 13:903–35. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2022.2074130
Keywords: leishmaniasis, host-parasite interactions, immune response, parasite survival, visceral leishmaniasis, cutaneous leishmaniasis
Citation: Ejazi SA, Satoskar A and Singh N (2025) Editorial: Leishmaniasis and immunity: challenges, advances and future perspective. Front. Immunol. 16:1666020. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1666020
Received: 15 July 2025; Accepted: 24 July 2025;
Published: 06 August 2025.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Dario S. Zamboni, University of São Paulo, BrazilCopyright © 2025 Ejazi, Satoskar and Singh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sarfaraz Ahmad Ejazi, c2FyZmFyYXouZWphemlAaG90bWFpbC5jb20=