Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1669856

This article is part of the Research TopicNew Strategies and Clinical Translation Progress in Immunotherapy for Liver CancerView all 3 articles

TACE-HAlC combined with Donafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors for BCLC stage C HCC patients (THEME study): A retrospective IPTW-adjusted cohort study

Provisionally accepted
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150081, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Treatment options for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain limited, with targeted therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) serving as the standard first-line treatment. This study investigates whether a combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), donafenib, and ICIs (quadruple therapy) provides superior survival benefits compared to the targeted therapy combined with ICIs (targeted-immunotherapy). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with BCLC stage C HCC who received quadruple therapy or targeted-immunotherapy at the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between September 2019 and October 2024The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR) and safety. To minimize baseline imbalances between the groups, we applied stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) methods. Results: A total of 195 patients were included in the study, of whom 125 were assigned to the quadruple therapy group and 70 to the targeted-immunotherapy Group. After applying sIPTW to balance the This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article baseline characteristics between the two groups, patients in the quadruple therapy group demonstrated a significantly higher median OS (mOS) compared with the targeted-immunotherapy group (29.4 months [95% CI: 23.9-NA] vs 18.0 months [14.7-31.8]; P = 0.041). Additionally, the median PFS(mPFS) assessed by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was longer in the quadruple therapy group(16.4 months [95% CI: 12.7-NA] vs 10.0 months [3.32-31.8]; P = 0.012). Under the mRECIST criteria, quadruple therapy group demonstrated superior)ORR (68.4% vs 28.%, P = 0.001) and DCR (92.3% vs 63.1%, P < 0.001). The incidence of any adverse events (AE) in the quadruple therapy group was 95.2%, compared with 97.1% in the targeted-immunotherapy group. Among these the incidence of grade ≥3 AE was 40.8% in the quadruple therapy group and 38.6% in the targeted-immunotherapy group. Conclusions: Compared with targeted-immunotherapy group, patients with BCLC stage C HCC treated with TACE-HAIC combined with donafenib and ICIs demonstrated superior efficacy and acceptable safety.

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma1, Donafenib2, transarterial chemoembolization3, Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy4, immune checkpoint inhibitors5

Received: 20 Jul 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Linan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yin Linan, yinlinan3010@hrbmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.