Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 25 September 2025

Sec. Inflammation

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1671137

Lymphadenopathy and synovial hyperplasia are associated with sepsis risk in an experimental model of rheumatoid arthritis

Johann Aleith*Johann Aleith*Wendy Bergmann-EwertWendy Bergmann-EwertBrigitte Müller-HilkeBrigitte Müller-Hilke
  • Core Facility for Cell Sorting and Cell Analysis, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition arising from immune dysregulation, particularly in patients with underlying diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, experimental data on this phenomenon are lacking. Using flow cytometry, we investigated immune responses in mice with or without collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) following Streptococcus infection. Mice without CIA effectively cleared the infection, maintained hematopoiesis, and mobilized lymphocytes. In contrast, CIA mice exhibited impaired bacterial clearance, leukopenia, and sepsis. Emergency hematopoiesis in CIA mice led to depletion of lineage-committed progenitor cells, correlating with an accumulation of immature neutrophils that exhibited diminished cytokinogenesis. Notably, immune dysregulation in CIA mice appeared before sepsis onset. We detected an increase in neutrophils and monocytes in draining lymph nodes and joints. Importantly, lymphadenopathy and hyperactivated synovial fibroblasts, along with articular immune cell infiltration, drove excessive cytokine production, increasing sepsis risk. Our findings emphasize the importance of rigorous medical management of RA to mitigate infection-related complications.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
www.frontiersin.org

Graphical Abstract.

1 Introduction

Sepsis—defined as a dysregulated host response following infection that leads to organ dysfunction—is the leading cause of mortality in intensive care settings (1, 2). It is characterized by an inadequate release of pro-inflammatory cytokines upon activation of pattern recognition receptors (3). The hyperinflammatory phase transitions into systemic immunosuppression, driven by immune cell apoptosis, upregulation of anti-inflammatory effector functions, and maladaptive emergency hematopoiesis (4, 5). In sepsis, the maladaptive immune response fails to control bacterial dissemination and is often accompanied by immunosuppression, including leukocyte apoptosis and impaired recovery of immune cells due to exhausted emergency hematopoiesis (6, 7). Although the pathophysiology of sepsis has been extensively studied, mortality rates remain high, and progress in developing novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools has been limited (1, 810).

Sepsis predominantly occurs in patients with comorbidities and underlying conditions such as diabetes, malignancies, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which considerably increase the risk of fatal disease progression (1113). RA is a prevalent autoimmune disorder that primarily affects the joints and has long been recognized to heighten infection risk and related complications (1416). Notably, serious infections in RA patients carry an increased risk for sepsis, sepsis-related fatality, and long-term mortality following sepsis survival (1720).

It has been debated whether this increased risk is linked to immunosuppressive therapy (21, 22). We previously demonstrated in a model of intravenous Streptococcus infection that immunocompetent mice with underlying collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) had a considerably increased risk of developing sepsis and septic arthritis, with a ninefold increase in mortality rate compared to infected mice without CIA (23). Conversely, mice with non-inflammatory joint disease resembling osteoarthritis were not more susceptible to sepsis (24). Collectively, our preliminary results suggest that the amplified sepsis risk in chronic inflammation extends beyond immunosuppression and joint damage alone and may instead be linked to the immunopathophysiology of the pre-existing disease itself (14).

Understanding the interaction between underlying inflammatory joint disease and infection might unlock new avenues for more individualized sepsis diagnostics and therapy in patients suffering from RA. This perspective underscores the need to further explore immune responses and hematopoietic changes in the context of autoinflammation-associated infection. Thus, we here set out to further explore sepsis immunobiology in RA. Specifically, we aimed to identify immune cell populations and cytokine production patterns that might correlate with increased sepsis risk For this, mice with and without CIA were infected and cell-type specific cytokine productions were investigated. Mice were sacrificed at two stages of infection, and cells from blood, liver, spleen, draining lymph nodes, joints, and bone marrow were analyzed by flow cytometry. This approach allowed us to identify potential immunological correlates that may contribute to sepsis susceptibility in RA.

2 Results

2.1 Sub-clinical sepsis in autoimmune arthritis was associated with impaired bacterial clearance and leukopenia

To model rheumatoid arthritis, mice underwent prime-boost immunization with bovine type II collagen in adjuvant, while control mice were left untreated (Figure 1A). Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) led to paw joint swelling and erythema, peaking at three weeks and declining after eight weeks post-boost. Eleven weeks post-immunization, CIA mice were randomized into groups for 24- or 48-hour intravenous Group A Streptococcus infections. The severity of CIA was comparable between mice assigned to the different infection durations (Supplementary Figure S1A). Notably, CIA mice exhibited significantly lower body weight than controls immediately before infection (t0), indicating compromised overall health, though weight-adjusted bacterial inoculums were comparable across all groups (Supplementary Figure S1B).

Figure 1
Diagram of an experiment involving mice to study GAS infection and its impacts on sepsis. Panel A shows the study design, including immunization and GAS infection. Panel B displays a bar graph comparing sepsis scores for GAS and CIA+GAS groups at 24 and 48 hours. Panel C shows bacterial burden in blood, spleen, and liver at the same intervals. Panel D presents leukocyte cell counts in blood and bone marrow. Panel E illustrates scatter plots showing a negative correlation between sepsis scores and leukocyte counts in blood and bone marrow at 48 hours. Statistical significance is indicated with asterisks.

Figure 1. Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infection in an experimental model of rheumatoid arthritis. (A) Experimental study design scheme illustrating that first-generation (F1) offspring from DBA/1J × B10.Q crosses were subjected to prime-boost immunization using bovine collagen type 2 (bovCII) in adjuvant to elicit collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Healthy control (HC) mice were not immunized. Eleven weeks after the booster immunization, animals were infected with GAS. Mice received a weight-adapted dose of Brefeldin A (BFA) either 20 or 44 hours post-infection and were sacrificed at 24 or 48 hours post-infection, respectively. (B) Box plot showing sepsis scores for mice without underlying conditions infected for 24 hours (GAS, n = 5) or 48 hours (GAS, n = 17), and for mice with pre-existing CIA infected for 24 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 7) or 48 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 15). (C) Box plots showing counts of β-hemolytic bacteria in peripheral blood, spleen and liver. (D) Box plots showing cell counts in peripheral blood and bone marrow, determined by trypan blue staining using a hemocytometer. Box plots indicate the median, with the lower and upper hinges corresponding to the 25th and 75th percentiles. Whiskers extend to the smallest and lowest values within 1.5 × interquartile range. (E) Scatter plots showing peripheral blood and bone marrow cell counts in relation to sepsis scores 48 hours post-infection. Each dot represents one animal. The black regression line follows a linear model with locally estimated scatter plot smoothing (LOESS), and the gray area represents the 95% confidence interval. r: Pearson correlation coefficient. p-values were obtained using Dunn’s test (B–D) or Pearson correlation analysis (E). p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***).

We next monitored the course of infection and observed that significant clinical manifestations of sepsis—measured by a scoring system incorporating weight loss, altered appearance, and abnormal behavior—emerged in CIA mice only at 48 hours post-infection (Figure 1B). Interestingly, bacterial burdens in peripheral blood, spleen, and liver were already increased in CIA mice at 24 hours post-infection (Figure 1C), indicating a maladaptive antibacterial immune response associated with the pre-existing disease. Similarly, arthritic mice tended to have a higher proportion of knee joint cavities invaded by bacteria (Supplementary Table S1).

While mice without underlying CIA exhibited a modest increase in blood cell counts at 48 hours post-infection, CIA mice developed cytopenia at both 24 and 48 hours. Similarly, bone marrow cellularity remained stable in control mice, whereas medullary cell counts decreased significantly over the course of infection in CIA mice (Figure 1D). Liver cell numbers were similar between groups, but an increase of spleen leukocytes over the course of infection was observed only in mice without CIA (Supplementary Figure S1C). Focusing on 48 hours post-infection, when sepsis became distinctive for CIA mice, we found significant negative correlations between the sepsis score and cell counts in blood, bone marrow, and spleen (Figure 1E; Supplementary Figure S1D).

Taken together, CIA mice exhibited early bacterial dissemination and failed to maintain cellular homeostasis following Streptococcus infection, which preceded the onset of sepsis.

2.2 Sepsis in arthritic mice was paralleled by an enrichment of non-classical myeloid cells in peripheral organs

We next sought to define sepsis-induced immunopathology in greater depth. To do this, we performed single-cell analyses on peripheral blood, spleen, liver, and inguinal lymph nodes (iLN) using a flow cytometry panel of antibody conjugates that covered a variety of markers for both innate and adaptive immune lineages. Through hierarchical gating (Supplementary Figures S2A, B), we identified 15 immune cell populations (Figure 2A). To gain an overview of our data, we compared their distribution across different peripheral organs. Regardless of the underlying condition or infection-associated pathology, blood samples were primarily composed of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and monocytes (MO, Supplementary Figure S2C). The spleen was dominated by B cells, the liver contained a balanced mixture of lymphoid and myeloid cells, and iLN were enriched in B and T lymphocytes.

Figure 2
A multi-part scientific figure showing tSNE plots and box plots of immune cell populations. Panel A presents a tSNE map of 15 immune cell types like NKT, NK, and CD4+ T cells, among others. Panels B, C, and D show tSNE plots for Peripheral Blood, Spleen, and Inguinal Lymph Nodes at 24 and 48 hours, with blue representing GAS and red CIA+GAS, along with box plots detailing leukocyte percentages and counts. Panel E depicts a correlation matrix of immune cell presence in Blood, Spleen, Liver, and iLN, with color intensity and circle size indicating correlation strength and significance level.

Figure 2. The enrichment of non-classical myeloid cells in various organs from arthritic mice correlated with the sepsis score. (A) Topological maps generated using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) illustrate immune cells identified by flow cytometry and hierarchical gating. Immune cell populations are indicated by color coding and numbered annotations. (B−D) Superimposed tSNE maps showing the immune landscape in peripheral blood (B), spleen (C), and iLN (D), with black arrows indicating differences in immune cell compositions. Data include mice without underlying conditions infected for 24 hours (GAS, n = 5) or 48 hours (GAS, n = 14), and for mice with pre-existing CIA infected for 24 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 7) or 48 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 14). Box plots presenting frequencies and cell counts of CD4+ T lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN), and non-classical myeloid cells (ncMyC) for peripheral blood and spleen. For iLN, box plots show the frequencies and counts of PMN and monocytes (MO). Box plots indicate the median, with the lower and upper hinges corresponding to the 25th and 75th percentiles. Whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within 1.5 × interquartile range. (E) Bubble plot demonstrating for peripheral blood (PB), spleen (Sp), liver (Lvr), and iLN the correlation between immune cell frequencies and sepsis scores at 48 hours post-infection. r: Pearson correlation coefficient. p-values were obtained using Dunn’s test (B−D), or Pearson correlation analysis (E). p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***).

Stratifying the data by infection period and underlying condition, we identified distinct immune landscapes: one of them appeared indicative of a competent immune response leading to host resilience in mice without pre-existing CIA, and another one exhibited characteristic of immune dysregulation and sepsis in mice with CIA (Supplementary Table S2). Specifically, resilience was associated with an increase in lymphocytes—particularly CD4+ T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells—in blood, spleen, and liver (Figures 2B, C; Supplementary Figure S2D). In contrast, while PMN frequencies tended to increase in CIA mice 24 hours post-infection, they were depleted in both blood and spleen under sepsis conditions at 48 hours post-infection (Figures 2B, C). Notably, CD11b+Gr-1lo/−F4/80CD11cI-A/I-E non-classical myeloid cells (ncMyC, Supplementary Figure S2B) were significantly enriched in CIA mice 48 hours post-infection across all analyzed organs (Figures 2B, C; Supplementary Figure S2D, Supplementary Table S2).

Next, we focused on iLN, the secondary lymphoid compartment specifically draining the immunization site in CIA. Interestingly, the overall lymphocyte composition differed markedly between groups, potentially reflecting baseline differences between mice with and without CIA rather than infection alone (Supplementary Figure S2E). However, in CIA mice, PMN and MO frequencies and counts were higher at 24 hours post-infection (Figure 2D). We then conducted correlation analyses to examine whether alterations in the multiorgan immune landscape were associated with infection severity. Our data reveal throughout strong positive correlations between sepsis scores and the frequency of ncMyC in blood, spleen, liver, and iLN (Figure 2E).

In summary, an efficient immune response to bacterial infection was marked by lymphoid cell expansion, whereas sepsis in the context of arthritis was associated with the depletion of peripheral leukocytes that was paralled by an increase in non-classical myeloid cells across multiple organs.

2.3 Immature neutrophils exhibiting reduced cytokine expressions expanded during sepsis

Given the reported association between Gr-1 expression and neutrophil development (25), and the marked expansion of Gr-1lo/− ncMyC in CIA-associated sepsis in our study, we suspected that a significant portion of this population comprised immature neutrophils (IMN). Supporting this, Gr-1 expression among PMN was lower in septic mice (Figure 3A). Since this reduction limited our ability to identify neutrophils by Gr-1 expression alone, we recently developed a gating strategy based on the observation that nearly all neutrophils, regardless of developmental stage, exhibit high intracellular interferon (IFN)γ expression (26). This approach allowed us to distinguish Gr-1hi PMN from Gr-1lo/− IMN via flow cytometry (Figure 3B; Supplementary Figure S3A). Using this method, we confirmed an increase in IMN frequencies across peripheral organs in CIA mice 48 hours post-infection (Figures 3B, C), with levels positively correlating with the sepsis score (Supplementary Figure S3B).

Figure 3
A multi-part scientific figure analyzes immune responses in a sepsis study.   A: Four scatter plots show negative correlations between sepsis scores and natural logarithm of Gr1 mean fluorescence intensity among polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) in blood, spleen, liver, and inguinal lymph node (iLN).  B: Flow cytometry gating strategy with plots shows cell populations in response to sepsis scores, highlighting differences in immunomodulatory neutrophils (IMN) and PMN.  C: Bar graphs depict percentages of IMN among live leukocytes in blood, spleen, liver, and iLN, showing significant differences over 24 and 48 hours in GAS and CIA+GAS conditions.  D: Principal component analysis (PCA) plots with loadings depict immune cell variations and associated cytokine levels (TNFα and IL-6) among PMN and IMN, with violin plots indicating significant cytokine differences.

Figure 3. Sepsis in arthritic mice was paralleled by an enrichment of immature neutrophils featuring a decreased cytokine output. (A) Scatter plots depicting the relationship between Gr-1 expressions, based on the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) and sepsis scores in peripheral blood (PB), Spleen, Liver, and inguinal lymph nodes (iLN). Data include mice without underlying conditions infected for 24 hours (GAS, n = 5) or 48 hours (GAS, n = 14), and for mice with pre-existing CIA infected for 24 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 7) or 48 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 14). Each dot represents one animal. The black regression line follows a linear model with locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS), and the gray area represents the 95% confidence interval. (B) Top: Gating strategy for flow cytometry analyses of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and immature neutrophils (IMN) across different organs. Bottom: Representative contour plots showing IMN frequencies for mice exhibiting different sepsis scores. (C) Box plots showing IMN frequencies in peripheral organs. (D) Principal component (PC) analysis illustrating the variance between PMN (green) and IMN (yellow), based on the median fluorescence intensities of intracellularly labeled tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, interferon (IFN)γ, interleukin (IL-)6, IL - 17A, IL - 10, C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL)2, and CCL3 – 24 and 48 hours post-infection. Violin and superimposed box plots depicting for PMN and IMN the expression of TNFα and IL - 6 across different organs, based on z(MFI). Box plots indicate the median, with the lower and upper hinges corresponding to the 25th and 75th percentiles. Whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within 1.5 × interquartile range (IQR). r: Pearson correlation coefficient. p-values were obtained using Pearson correlation analysis (A), Dunn’s test (C) or the Mann-Whitney U test (D). p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****).

To assess the effector functions of PMN and IMN, we performed intracellular cytokine staining and found distinct expression patterns between these two cell populations (Figure 3D). Notably, IMN produced significantly lower levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, IFNγ, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL - 10 in blood, spleen, liver, and iLN, while CCL2 was elevated in spleen and liver (Supplementary Figure S3C; Supplementary Table S3). IL - 17A labeling was specifically increased in liver IMN (Supplementary Figure S3D). Importantly, while IMN were much less frequent in resilient mice (i.e., those without pre-existing CIA), their impaired effector function was independent of infection time and infection-associated immunopathology (Supplementary Figure S3E).

Taken together, our findings indicate that IMN expanded during sepsis in CIA mice and exhibited diminished cytokine production compared to their mature counterparts, suggesting impaired antibacterial effector functions.

2.4 Emergency hematopoiesis in sepsis stalled at the stage of myeloid- and lymphoid-biased progenitor cells

To link sepsis-associated alterations in the peripheral immune landscape to hematopoiesis, we performed single-cell analyses on medullary stem and progenitor cells. First, we identified immune lineage cells and observed a decrease in PMN frequencies alongside an increase in myeloid cells (MyC) in the bone marrow of CIA mice 48 hours post-infection (Supplementary Figure S4A). This shift coincided with a reduction in Gr-1 expression among PMN, which correlated with higher sepsis scores (Supplementary Figure S4B). We then analyzed the lineage-KITlo/+ population (Figure 4A), which contains the majority of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) (27). Interestingly, this population transiently expanded in CIA mice at 24 hours post-infection but returned to levels that were comparable to resilient control mice by 48 hours (Figure 4B).

Figure 4
Composite image showing various scientific diagrams and charts related to cell analysis. Panel A depicts flow cytometry plots identifying cell types and KIT expression. Panel B shows box plots comparing cell percentages and counts between conditions. Panel C presents a heatmap correlating marker expression with sepsis scores. Panel D contains box plots of cell population percentages across time points. Panel E is a FlowSOM map clustering different cell populations. Panel F displays scatter plots comparing conditions over time. Panel G features a correlation heatmap among different tissues and cells. Panel H is a schematic of cell differentiation pathways influenced by sepsis.

Figure 4. Characterizing the sepsis-specific medullary stem/progenitor cell compartment and its relationship with peripheral immune landscape restructuring. (A) Gating strategy for flow cytometry analyses of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the bone marrow. (B) Box plots showing frequencies and cell counts of KITlo/hi cells in mice without underlying conditions infected for 24 hours (GAS, n = 5) or 48 hours (GAS, n = 14), and in mice with pre-existing CIA infected for 24 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 7) or 48 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 13). (C) Heatmap illustrating standardized (z) expression values of cell surface markers, based on median fluorescence intensities (MFI) among medullary KITlo/hi cells, and their correlation with sepsis scores at 48 hours post-infection. (D) Box plots presenting frequencies of manually-gated short-term hematopoietic stem cells (ST-HSC), multipotent progenitor (MPP) cells biased towards the megakaryocyte/erythrocyte (MkE) or granulocyte/monocyte (GM) lineage, common myeloid progenitor (CMP) cells, and granulocyte/monocyte progenitor (GMP) cells in the bone marrow. Box plots indicate the median, with the lower and upper hinges corresponding to the 25th and 75th percentiles. Whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within 1.5 × interquartile range (IQR). (E) Topological map generated using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) illustrate KITlo/hi hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells identified by flow cytometry and flow self-organizing map (FlowSOM Cell populations are color-coded labeled with numbered annotations. (F) Superimposed tSNE maps showing the hematopoietic landscape stratified by infection time and pre-existing condition, with black arrows indicating differences in composition. (G) Heatmap representing the correlation matrix between frequencies of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in the bone marrow (purple) and peripheral immune cells in blood (dark red), spleen (gray), liver (pink), and inguinal lymph nodes (iLN, yellow). Red boxes highlight clusters of positively correlated cell populations, while the blue box marks populations negatively correlated with those labeled by the blue bar. (H) Flow chart illustrating the sepsis-induced alterations in medullary hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell frequencies. Arrowheads illustrate relative changes in frequencies among cell populations in septic CIA mice compare to infected control mice without CIA. MDSC, Myeloid-derived suppressor cells. r: Pearson correlation coefficient. p-values were obtained using Dunn’s test (B, D), or Pearson correlation analysis (C, G). p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**).

Conversely, the most striking alteration in hematopoiesis occurred in CIA mice at 48 hours post-infection, identified by the marked overexpression of stem cell markers such as Sca-1 and CD38, which correlated significantly with sepsis scores (Figure 4C). To determine whether these expression shifts translated into changes in specific HSPC subpopulations, we performed manual gating as previously described (7, 28, 29) (Supplementary Figure S4C). Notably, short-term hematopoietic stem cells (ST-HSCs) and multipotent progenitor cells biased toward megakaryocytes/erythrocytes (MPPMkE) and granulocytes/monocytes (MPPGM), respectively, were enriched in sepsis (Figure 4D). In contrast, common myeloid progenitors (CMP) and granulocyte-monocyte progenitors (GMP) were severely depleted in CIA mice at 48 hours post-infection.

Recognizing that manual gating only accounted for 30% of HSPC events (data not shown), we employed FlowSOM clustering on lineage-KITlo/+ cells to gain a more comprehensive view of sepsis-induced emergency hematopoiesis (Figure 4E). FlowSOM-generated cellular subsets (φHSPC) were phenotyped and annotated through hierarchical clustering. This allowed for the comparison of stem cell marker expression patterns among φHSPC with manually gated cells (Supplementary Figure S4D). Notably, sepsis led to an increase in φHPC subpopulations resembling MPP cells. While only CD127hi φCLPi cells were significantly increased, other lymphoid- and myeloid-biased progenitors were markedly depleted in CIA mice 48 hours post-infection (Figures 4E, F; Supplementary Figure S4D, E, Supplementary Table S4).

To integrate single-cell data from peripheral organs and bone marrow, we performed correlation analyses. This revealed that sepsis-induced alterations in the HSPC compartment were strongly linked to diminished lymphocyte frequencies and the increased mobilization of immature leukocytes (Figure 4G). Particularly, the depletion of myeloid- and lymphoid-biased progenitor cells in the bone marrow correlated significantly with increased frequencies of ncMyC/IMN across peripheral organs.

Collectively, our findings indicate that sepsis-induced hematopoietic dysfunction resulted in the depletion of immune cell progenitors, leading to a failure to replenish the peripheral leukocyte pool. The apparent bottleneck at the stage of myeloid- and lymphoid-biased progenitor cells suggests that emergency hematopoiesis in sepsis became progressively impaired, ultimately contributing to immune paralysis (Figure 4H).

2.5 Lymphadenopathy-driven cytokine overproduction was associated with sepsis risk in autoimmune arthritis

Systemic inflammation is a hallmark of sepsis, and we therefore investigated whether sepsis risk in autoimmune arthritis is related to aberrant cytokine production. To address this, we first identified cytokine-positive events among non-neutrophils using manual gating for TNFα, IFNγ, IL-6, IL-17A, IL-10, CCL2, or CCL3 and applied a Boolean OR operator to combine all cytokine-producing cells for subsequent analyses (Supplementary Figures S5A, B). Comparing cytokine expression across peripheral organs, we found that non-neutrophil leukocytes from the liver highly expressed various cytokines, including IL-6, IL-10, and CCL3 (Supplementary Figure S5C). In contrast, splenic cytokine production was less pronounced. Blood leukocytes primarily produced TNFα, IFNγ, and CCL2, while IL-17A was predominantly synthesized in the iLN (Supplementary Figure S5C).

To further characterize cytokine-producing immune subsets, we utilized FlowSOM clustering and annotated populations based on surface marker expression patterns (Supplementary Figure S5D). This analysis identified eight populations responsible for 94% of cytokine production across peripheral organs: NK cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, double-negative T cells (DNT)/non-classical monocytes (ncMO), B lymphocytes, classical monocytes (cMO), macrophages (MΦ), and ncMyC (Figure 5A). Notably, ncMyC, which highly expressed TNFα, IFNγ, and IL-10, constituted the largest proportion of cytokine producers in the blood and liver. B lymphocytes were the primary source of TNFα, IFNγ, and CCL3 in the spleen, whereas IL-17A, TNFα, and IFNγ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes were predominantly found in the iLN (Figure 5B; Supplementary Figure S5E).

Figure 5
A series of scientific data visualizations, including: A) a t-SNE plot showing clusters of cytokine-positive cells with labels like NK and CD4+ T; B) a heatmap illustrating mean fluorescence intensity of cytokines across cell types; C) stacked bar charts comparing cytokine presence in blood, spleen, liver, and inguinal lymph nodes (iLN) at 24 and 48 hours; D) box plots of cytokine-positive neutrophils in iLN; E) box plot of cell counts in iLN; F) box plots showing various cytokine-positive cells in iLN; G) a scatter plot correlating sepsis score with cell numbers in iLN.

Figure 5. Associating sepsis risk in autoimmune arthritis with inguinal lymph node (iLN) cytokinogenesis. (A) Topological map generated using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) illustrate cytokine-producing immune cells identified by flow cytometry and flow self-organizing map (FlowSOM). Cell populations expressing cytokines are indicated by color coding and numbered annotations. (B) Grayscale heatmap showing intracellular expressions of (TNF)α, interferon (IFN)γ, interleukin (IL-)6, IL-17A, IL-10, C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL)2, or CCL3 in FlowSOM-generated immune cell populations, based on median fluorescence intensities (MFI) normalized to a 0 – 1 range. (C) Stacked bar plots showing the composition of cytokine-producing cell types in different organs from mice without underlying conditions infected for 24 hours (GAS, n = 5) or 48 hours (GAS, n = 14), and for mice with pre-existing CIA infected for 24 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 7) or 48 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 14). (D) Box plots depicting cell counts of cytokine-producing neutrophils in iLN. (E) Box plot showing absolute cell numbers in iLN. (F) Box plots presenting counts of cytokine-expressing cells in iLN. Box plots indicate the median, with the lower and upper hinges corresponding to the 25th and 75th percentiles. Whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within 1.5 × interquartile range (IQR). (G) Scatter plot highlighting the relationship between iLN cell counts and sepsis scores in CIA mice 48 hours post-infection. r: Pearson correlation coefficient. p-values were obtained using Dunn’s test (C−E) or Pearson correlation analysis (F). p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****).

Next, we compared cytokine-producing leukocytes between infected mice with and without CIA. While the compositions in blood, liver, and spleen were largely comparable across groups (Figure 5C; Supplementary Table S5), CIA mice exhibited significantly increased frequencies of TNFα, IL-6, IL-17A, IL-10, and CCL2-producing cells in the blood 48 hours post-infection (Supplementary Figure S5F). Changes in the spleen and liver were less pronounced, primarily involving differential TNFα and IL-10 productions (Supplementary Figure S5G, H). Given the above-described increase in PMN frequencies in the iLN 24 hours post-infection, we suspected these cells might contribute to nodal cytokine production. Indeed, we found for early infection in CIA mice an enrichment of cytokine-positive PMN in the iLN (Figure 5D).

Since adjuvant-chaperoned immunization and subsequent CIA led to an accumulation of cells in the draining lymph nodes (i.e., iLN, Figure 5E), we investigated whether this resulted in enhanced cytokine production in this organ. We observed a marked enrichment of cytokine-producing cells in the iLN as early as 24 hours post-infection, persisting until clinical sepsis development (Figure 5F). Furthermore, sepsis scores strongly correlated with iLN cell counts in septic mice (Figure 5G), suggesting that CIA-associated lymphadenopathy and excessive cytokine production contributed to immune dysregulation.

Overall, while cytokine-producing immune cells in the blood were only enriched at the clinical stage of sepsis, iLN leukocytes in CIA mice exhibited sustained cytokine overproduction before sepsis onset.

2.6 CIA-associated joint immune cell infiltration and synovial fibroblast activation accompanied articular cytokine overexpression in sepsis

Synovial hyperplasia and immune cell infiltration are common features of joint pathology in autoimmune arthritis. To determine whether joint cells contribute to immune dysregulation before or during sepsis, we enzymatically digested paw tissue from infected mice, analyzed the extracted articular cells by flow cytometry, and identified immune and stromal cell populations via manual gating (Supplementary Figure S6A). Although the time interval between collagen immunization and GAS infection allowed joint swelling to subside (Supplementary Figure S1), leukocyte infiltration remained pronounced in mice with underlying CIA (Figure 6A; Supplementary Table S6). In contrast, fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS) counts were comparable between groups (Supplementary Figure S6B).

Figure 6
Panel A shows box plots comparing percentages and counts of CD45+ cells in GAS and CIA+GAS conditions at 24 and 48 hours. Panel B depicts a t-SNE plot highlighting various immune cell populations. Panel C offers UMAP plots contrasting GAS and CIA+GAS cell distributions over time. Panel D presents box plots for PMN cell percentages and counts. Panel E displays heatmaps for MFI of markers among FLSs and histogram overlays for CD54 and CD80. Panel F consists of box plots comparing cytokine-producing cell counts for TNFα, IL-6, IFNγ, IL-17A, IL-10, CCL2, and CCL3 at each time point.

Figure 6. Linking immune cell infiltration in the arthritic joint to fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS) activation and cytokine production in sepsis susceptibility. (A) Box plots showing frequencies and counts of leukocytes in paw joints from mice without underlying conditions infected for 24 hours (GAS, n = 5) or 48 hours (GAS, n = 14), and for mice with pre-existing CIA infected for 24 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 7) or 48 hours (CIA+GAS, n = 14). (B) Topological map generated using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) illustrate cell populations in paw joints identified by flow cytometry and hierarchical gating. Cell populations are indicated by color coding and numbered annotations. (C) Superimposed tSNE maps showing the cellular composition in paw joints stratified by infection time and pre-existing condition, with black arrows indicating differences between mice with and without CIA. (D) Box plots depicting frequencies and counts of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) in paw joints. (E) Heatmap (left) illustrating standardized (z) expression values of surface protein markers, based on median fluorescence intensities (MFI) among FLS. Representative histograms and box plots (right) show the expression of CD54 (top) and CD80 (bottom), based on MFI among FLS. (F) Box plots presenting the counts of paw joint cells producing (TNF)α, interferon (IFN)γ, interleukin (IL-)6, IL-17A, IL-10, C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL)2, or CCL3. Box plots indicate the median, with the lower and upper hinges corresponding to the 25th and 75th percentiles. Whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within 1.5 × interquartile range (IQR). p-values were obtained using Dunn’s test. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***).

Next, we examined joint cell composition and found a notable enrichment of PMNs in CIA mice 24 hours post-infection, which persisted—albeit at a lower level—until 48 hours post-infection (Figure 6B–D). Additionally, CIA joints exhibited a transient increase in monocytes at 24 hours post-infection, whereas CD4+ T cell enrichment was independent of infection time (Supplementary Figure S6C). Given that FLS constituted the majority of joint cells, we investigated their role in immune dysregulation. Indeed, FLS from CIA mice were hyperactivated, as indicated by increased expressions of cytokines, adhesion molecules such as CD54 (ICAM-1), and the co-stimulatory molecule CD80 (Figure 6E).

To further characterize cytokine-producing joint cells, we performed FlowSOM clustering on populations identified through Boolean gating. Lymphocytes, PMNs, antigen-presenting cells (APC), myeloid APCs (MyAPC), FLS, and endothelial cells were the primary sources of cytokine expression in the joint (Supplementary Figure S6D). When comparing the composition of cytokine-producing populations, we observed an increased frequency of IFNγ- and IL-10-producing PMNs, particularly in CIA mice at 24 hours post-infection (Supplementary Figures S6E, F). Notably, marked cytokine overexpression among all cell populations in CIA mice was evident for TNFα, IFNγ, IL-10, CCL2, and CCL3 as early as 24 hours post-infection (Figure 6F).

In summary, GAS infection in CIA mice was associated with hyperactivated FLS and persistent immune cell infiltration, contributing to cytokine overexpression and potentially increasing sepsis risk.

3 Discussion

Serious infections are a major cause of excess mortality in patients with RA (30, 31). While several observational studies have reported that immunosuppression caused by biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) significantly increases infection risk (21, 32, 33), data from the pre-bDMARD era suggest that RA itself may be inherently linked to an impaired immune response to pathogens (14). Moreover, retrospective single- and multi-center studies indicated that RA patients face an increased risk of developing sepsis and septic shock (17, 18), highlighting that immune responses in RA are not only insufficient for pathogen clearance but also dysregulated.

In this study, we investigated the immunological intricacies underlying sepsis in RA by employing the murine CIA model as an in vivo representation of the human disease. We demonstrated that mice with pre-existing chronic inflammatory joint disorder were unable to clear invading Streptococci. Conversely, mice without underlying autoimmunity rapidly eradicated the infection and exhibited an expansion of various lymphocyte subsets. During the early stages of infection (i.e., 24 hours post-infection), CIA mice developed peripheral lymphopenia caused by T cell depletion, while neutrophil counts remained stable. Lymphopenia is a common feature of sepsis arising from apoptosis, to which T cells are particularly susceptible, significantly contributing to immunosuppression (3436). Consequently, lymphopenia is independently associated with worse outcomes and early mortality in sepsis patients (37, 38).

In the later stages of infection (i.e., 48 hours post-infection)—when sepsis developed exclusively in CIA mice—we observed a decline in peripheral blood neutrophils coinciding with an enrichment of CD11b+Gr-1lo non-classical myeloid cells in various organs. Consistent with previous studies, we classified these cells as immature neutrophils (39, 40). For a more rigorous characterization of neutrophil development during sepsis, future studies should incorporate CXCR2 and CD101 as suggested by Evrard et al. (41). In our analyses, immature neutrophils produced fewer cytokines than their mature counterparts, suggesting reduced functionality. Neutrophils are essential for early pathogen containment due to their rapid migration to infected tissue and potent antibacterial activity (42). However, in sepsis, it has been reported that neutrophils can contribute to tissue damage through excessive extracellular trap formation and aberrant reactive oxygen species production (43, 44). In this context, immature neutrophils demonstrate increased NADPH oxidase expression, promoting oxidative bursts as discussed by previous studies (45, 46). Furthermore, according to studies on sepsis patients, immature neutrophils exhibit enhanced adhesion properties that may accelerate vascular integrity decline, while key functions such as phagocytosis and transmigration are diminished, particularly during septic shock (47, 48). These immature cells also appear more resistant to apoptosis, and their persistence may contribute to organ damage (49, 50). Accordingly, increased frequencies of immature neutrophils have been associated with a higher risk of sepsis-related death (51).

To meet the increased demand for circulating innate immune cells during infection, the stem cell compartment shifts into a state known as emergency granulopoiesis (42, 52). In our study, we linked the sepsis-induced release of immature myeloid cells, which occurred at the cost of mature neutrophil development, to an enrichment of hematopoietic stem cells and multipotent progenitors skewed towards myeloid differentiation. Conversely, the pool of common myeloid and granulocyte-monocyte progenitor (CMP/GMP) cells was markedly depleted. A previous study investigating lethal P. aeruginosa infection reported similar findings, demonstrating neutrophil depletion accompanied by expansion of hematopoietic stem cell subsets and exhaustion of myeloid-biased progenitor cells (53). While transiently reduced frequencies of CMP/GMP were also observed in the early stages of sepsis following cecal ligation and puncture, these populations expanded as the infection progressed (54). Another study using an analogous model demonstrated that sustained hematopoietic exhaustion in polymicrobial peritonitis was restricted to common lymphoid progenitors, whereas myeloid progenitors expanded (7). However, unlike our model, in which a sepsis-related lethal outcome typically occurs shortly after 48 hours post-infection (23), polymicrobial infection in the above-mentioned studies was associated with delayed mortality. This suggests that not only the mode of infection (i.e., monobacterial vs. polymicrobial) but also the trajectory of disease progression may shape hematopoietic dynamics, with persistent depletion of myeloid progenitors potentially contributing to the accelerated onset of septic shock.

While lymphopenia, the release of immature neutrophils (i.e., left shift), and distorted hematopoiesis are well-established features of sepsis (37, 45, 52), these phenomena are rarely investigated in combination and have not been studied extensively in models that reflect pre-existing autoimmune pathology. Our work addresses this gap by demonstrating that these hallmark features of sepsis emerge in a coordinated fashion in the context of chronic inflammatory disease.

Thus, our model of serious infection in the setting of underlying autoimmune arthritis recapitulates classical immunological features of sepsis while revealing additional immunopathological processes shaped by the pre-existing inflammatory disease. Notably, we demonstrated that CIA-associated lymphadenopathy and persistent synovitis correlated with an increased susceptibility to sepsis, an association that has remained underappreciated due to the lack of appropriate disease models. In particular, swollen lymph nodes, activated synovial fibroblasts, and joint-infiltrating immune cells, which are characteristic of RA (5557), harbored considerable numbers of cytokine-producing cells and may contribute to the cytokine storm observed in CIA mice upon infection (23).

Our study primarily generated correlative data, and mechanistic insights remain limited, necessitating further investigation in future studies. For instance, it remains to be investigated whether lymphadenectomy in models of arthritis or other autoimmune disorders can reduce the risk of sepsis. For instance, systemic lupus erythematosus—a systemic autoinflammatory condition—is also associated with an increased risk for serious infections (58). Therefore, it remains unclear whether the increased sepsis risk in our model arises primarily from joint and nodal pathology, or from the broader systemic effects associated with adjuvant-chaperoned immunization and CIA. Similarly, other factors not investigated in our study may confound the relationship between lymphadenopathy, synovitis, and infection-related immune dysfunction. In particular, RA-associated comorbidities—such as cardiovascular and renal disease—have been reported to significantly increase the risk of sepsis (59, 60), and similar pathologies have been observed in CIA models, where chronic inflammation is associated with endothelial and cardiac dysfunction, as well as nephropathy (6163).

Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that heat-killed M. tuberculosis, which was used as an adjuvant component for immunization in our study, can induce trained immunity in monocytes and macrophages (64). Trained immunity involves epigenetic and metabolic changes in innate immune cells following microbial exposure and activation of pattern-recognition receptors, leading to an amplified inflammatory response upon a subsequent challenge (65). While no specific data exist on enhanced immune responses against Group A Streptococcus following M. tuberculosis exposure, both pathogens share immunostimulatory motifs, particularly ligands that bind to Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)2 (6668). Thus, future studies should explore the impact of CIA-associated comorbidities and trained immunity on immune dysregulation subsequent to invasive infection.

While our study focused on the infection-induced immune landscape in autoimmune arthritis, we did not include additional control mice to characterize the immune status of CIA animals prior to infection (i.e., at t = 0 h), which represents a limitation. Previous studies have shown that during acute CIA, lymphocyte populations accumulate in peripheral blood, spleen, and joint-draining lymph nodes (6972). Although we cannot fully exclude the possibility that CIA-associated alterations in immune cell composition across different organs obscured the effect of infection, CIA was in remission in our model, and we suspect that long-term changes in immune cell composition were largely confined to the joints and joint-draining lymph nodes. Assessing baseline differences between CIA and healthy control mice remains the subject of ongoing research on immunopathophysiology in a broader context, which lies beyond the scope of the present study.

Furthermore, the translatability of our results is limited, as no observations on human subjects were included. While CIA recapitulates several key aspects of RA pathophysiology, it differs from the human disease in terms of etiology, the circulating autoantibody repertoire, disease chronicity, and heterogeneity (73). How these differences influence sepsis susceptibility remains unclear. Finally, we only studied male mice, as they are more prone to both CIA induction and GAS infection (7476). Given that RA is more prevalent in women, and that male RA patients exhibit higher sepsis-related mortality (60), future studies should address sexual dimorphism as a potential determinant of sepsis risk in chronic joint inflammation. Taken together, our study indicates that lymphadenopathy and persistent synovitis are associated with an increased risk of sepsis in autoimmune arthritis. Notably, in RA, lymphadenopathy is most pronounced in joint-draining lymph nodes (56). While DMARD therapy primarily aims to reduce synovitis, it has been reported that swollen lymph nodes also respond to anti-inflammatory treatment (77, 78). Therefore, effective disease control in RA may contribute to a lower risk of sepsis. Supporting this, retrospective cohort studies have shown that the absence of swollen joints and reduced systemic inflammation are associated with a lower risk of serious infections (79, 80). Although bDMARDs generally increase infection risk (81), TNF inhibitors, in particular, have been linked to a lower prevalence of sepsis and reduced mortality after serious infections in RA patients, according to a prospective cohort study (60).

In conclusion, achieving complete and sustained remission in patients with RA is not only the primary goal of pharmacological treatment but may also significantly reduce infection-related complications and the risk of sepsis.

4 Methods

4.1 Animal model

DBA/1J and B10.D1-H2q/SgJ (B10.Q) mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, US-ME) and continuously bred at the Rostock University Medical Center Animal Care Facility. Animals were housed in individually ventilated cages under specific pathogen-free conditions, maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle at 21 ± 2°C with 60 ± 10% humidity. Food and water were provided ad libitum. The F1 generation from a cross between female DBA/1J and male B10.Q mice was used for experiments. Male F1 mice were randomized using a dice-based random number generator into one of four groups: a control group (no immunization) or a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) group scheduled for either 24-hour or 48-hour infections. From our own experience, F1 mice develop CIA with high incidence and with a severity and disease course comparable to that observed in DBA/1J mice (23, 8284). While DBA/1J mice are the most commonly used strain for the CIA model, in our hands the incidence was consistently lower, which would have required substantially higher animal numbers. To adhere to the 3R principles and reduce animal use, we therefore chose the F1 model.

One week prior to immunization, animals at a minimum age of five weeks were transferred to conventional housing, including control mice. CIA group mice were anesthetized with isoflurane under oxygen flow. A total of 140 µg of bovine type II collagen (Chondrex, Redmond, US-WA), dissolved in 0.1 M acetic acid and emulsified in Freund’s adjuvant containing 240 µg Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, US-NJ), was subcutaneously injected at the base of the tail, as previously described (23, 84). From this point, mice received 1 mg/mL tramadol (Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany) in drinking water for analgesia until the experiment’s conclusion. Three weeks later, immunization was repeated with collagen in adjuvant without Mycobacterium. Subsequently, mice were monitored and scored for signs of arthritis, such as paw swelling and erythema, as previously reported (82).

Ten weeks after the second immunization, CIA and control mice were transferred to a facility for infection studies at the Rostock University Medical Center Microbiology Department. After another week, mice were infected with the emm1 Group A Streptococcus (GAS) strain AP1 under isoflurane anesthesia, as previously described (23, 85). In brief, bacteria were cultured in Todd-Hewitt Broth (BD) until exponential growth was achieved, washed in PBS, and approximately 2 × 106 colony-forming units (CFU) in 100 µL PBS were injected into the lateral tail vein.

Mice were subsequently monitored for signs of health impairment using an adapted murine sepsis score (23, 86). The summed score from four categories was used:

i. Weight loss:

   ≥5% (5 points), ≥10% (10 points), ≥20% (30 points, humane endpoint).

ii. General appearance changes:

    Piloerection (5 points), hunched back or filthy orifices (10 points), cold to the touch (30 points, humane endpoint).

iii. Impaired consciousness or behavior:

     Lameness (5 points), self-isolation and lethargy (10 points), apathy and no reaction to stimuli (30 points, humane endpoint).

iv. Signs of inflammation or reduced respiration:

    Localized edema (5 points), disseminated edema or labored breathing (10 points), open wounds, or gasping (30 points, humane endpoint).

After 20 or 44 hours of infection, 10 mg/kg body weight Brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, US-MO) was administered intraperitoneally. At 24 or 48 hours post-infection, mice were scored and received an intraperitoneally administered overdose of ketamine (150 mg/kg body weight, Livisto, Senden-Bösensell, Germany) and xylazine (10 mg/kg body weight, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany). Blood samples were collected via cardiac puncture and mixed with EDTA. Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation.

A medial arthrotomy was performed on both knee joints, followed by swabbing the synovium and plating the fluid on 5% sheep blood agar (BD). Inguinal lymph nodes (iLN) were removed and placed in a storage/staining buffer (SB; PBS with 0.5% BSA, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) containing 5 µg/mL Brefeldin A (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, US-MI). The spleen, liver, fore- and hind-paws were excised, and the femur was separated from the tibia. All organs were stored in SB on ice. The spleen was passed through a 70 µm strainer (pluriSelect, Leipzig, Germany). The liver was weighed, and 0.4 g was minced using a scalpel and stored for later analysis. The remaining liver was passed through a cell strainer. Blood, spleen, and liver suspensions were plated on blood agar. Agar plates were incubated at 37°C overnight and counted.

4.2 Single-cell analysis

Most of the centrifugation steps were performed at 400 × g for 5 min. Two hundred microliters of anticoagulated blood was mixed with 5 mL of an in-house erythrocyte lysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 10 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM EDTA) and incubated on a rotary mixer at room temperature (RT) for 10 min. After centrifugation, blood cells were suspended in SB. Spleen samples were processed using 1X RBC Lysis buffer according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioLegend, San Diego, US-CA). Minced liver samples were digested in 2 mL of pre-warmed RPMI - 1640 containing 10% FCS (PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany) and 1 mg/mL Collagenase/Dispase (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) at 37°C and 350 rpm for 30 min. The resulting suspension was filtered through a 100 µm strainer, centrifuged, washed, and suspended in SB. Red blood cell lysis was then performed as described for spleen samples. The iLN were passed through a 70 µm strainer and suspended in SB.

Joint cells were isolated as previously described (23). In brief, the claws of fore- and hind-paws were cut, and the skin was removed. The tendons were transected, followed by the removal of any remaining soft tissue. The paws were then separated from the brachium and tibia, and digested in 4 mL of DMEM containing 10% FCS (PAN-Biotech) and 240 U/mL Collagenase Type IV (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) at 37°C and 400 rpm for 90 min on a magnetic stirrer. Tissue debris was removed by passing the suspension through a 100 µm strainer. The flow-through was centrifuged, and joint cells were suspended in SB.

Bone marrow was isolated as previously described (87). Briefly, the epiphyses of femora were removed, and bones were placed in a perforated tube. Cells were obtained by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 15 s. The pellet was resuspended in 1X RBC lysis buffer and incubated as described for spleen and liver samples. Cell counts from all samples were determined using a hemocytometer, and 100,000 – 500,000 cells were used for subsequent steps.

Cells from all organs were washed in PBS, suspended in 1:2000 ZombieNIR (BioLegend), and incubated for 20 minutes at RT. Subsequently, cells were washed and suspended in SB. To block unspecific antibody-conjugate binding sites, cells were incubated with 10% FCS, 5% TruStain Monocyte Blocker, and 0.25 µg TruStain FcX PLUS (Hu IgG4 anti-mouse CD16/32, BioLegend) for 10 minutes on ice.

For blood, spleen, liver, and iLN samples (Panel 1), the following antibody-conjugates were added:

● 0.25 μg of CD3:BV480 (clone 17A2) and F4/80:APC/R700 (T45 - 2342, BD).

● 0.03 μg of CD4:BV650 (GK1.5), CD11b:BV750 (M1/70), I-A/I-E:PE/Fire640 (M5/114.15.2), CD49b:PerCP/Cy5.5 (HMα2), and CD45:APC/Fire810 (30-F11).

● 0.063 μg of Gr-1:SparkBlue550 (RB6 - 8C5).

● 0.125 μg of CD80:BV605 (16 - 10A1) and CD11c:PerCP (N418).

● 0.25 μg of B220:BV510 (RA3 - 6B2).

● 0.5 μg of CD25:PE/Dazzle594 (3C7, BioLegend).

● 0.15 μg of CD8α:PerCP/Vio700 (REA601) and CD86:APC/Vio770 (PO3.3, Miltenyi).

● 0.5 μg of CD127:eFluor450 (A7R34, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, US-MA).

For paw joint cells (Panel 2), the following antibody-conjugates were used:

● 0.25 μg of CD106:BV480 (429, BD) and F4/80:APC/R700 (as above).

● 0.015 μg of CD90.2:BV711 (30-H12).

● 0.03 μg of Gr-1:BV650 (RB6 - 8C5).

● 0.063 μg of CD4:SparkBlue550 (GK1.5) and CD54:PerCP/Cy5.5 (YN1/1.7.4).

● 0.25 μg of CD3:BV570 (17A2).

● B220:BV510, CD80:BV605, CD11b:BV750, CD25:PE/Dazzle594, I-A/I-E:PE/Fire640, CD11c:PerCP, CD45:APC/Fire810, CD8α:PerCP/Vio700, and CD86:APC/Vio770 (as above, BioLegend).

● 0.06 μg of CD31:SuperBright436 (390) and CD127:eFluor450 (as above, Thermo).

For bone marrow cells (Panel 3), the following antibody-conjugates were used:

● 0.13 μg of CD105:BV786 (MJ7/18).

● 0.25 μg of CD44:APC/R700 (IM7, BD).

● 0.06 μg of CD73:APC (Ty/11.8) and CD48:APC/Fire750 (HM48-1).

● 0.1 μg of CD127:PE/Cy5 (A7R37).

● 0.125 μg of KIT: BV421 (QA17A09), CD90.2:BV605 (30-H12), and CD106:PerCP/Cy5.5 (429).

● 0.25 μg of Sca-1:PE/Dazzle594 (D7).

● 0.5 μg of CD135:PE (A2F10), CD150:PE/Cy7 (TC15 - 12F12.2), and CD34:AlexaFluor647 (SA378A4).

● B220:BV510, CD3:BV570, CD11b:BV750, Gr-1:SparkBlue550, and I-A/I-E:PE/Fire640 (as above, BioLegend).

● 0.38 μg of CD38:VioBlue (REA616, Miltenyi).

Cells were incubated for 20 minutes on ice, followed by washing in SB. Bone marrow cells were centrifuged, suspended in autoMACS Running Buffer (RB, Miltenyi), and analyzed on the Aurora V16-B14-R8 cytometer running the SpectroFlo software v3.1.0 or v3.2.1 (Cytek Biosciences, Fremont, US-CA). Other cell samples were further processed using the Fixation Buffer and the 1X Intracellular Staining Permeabilization Wash Buffer per the manufacturer’s instructions (BioLegend). Unspecific antibody-conjugate binding sites were blocked as described above.

For intracellular cytokine staining, the following antibody-conjugates were added:

● 0.125 μg of TNFα:BV421 (MP6-XT22).

● 0.25 μg of IL-17A:BV785 (TC11-18H10.1), CCL2:PE (2H5), and IL-10:PE/Cy7 (JSE5-16E3, BioLegend).

● 0.075 μg of CCL3:APC (REA355).

● 0.15 μg of IL-6:FITC (REA1034, Miltenyi).

Cells were labeled for 20 minutes at RT. After washing with permeabilization buffer, cells were suspended in RB and analyzed on the Aurora cytometer as described above. Surface antigen staining using Panels 1 and 2, including intracellular labeling, was established and validated as recently described (88).

4.3 Statistics

Flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo v10.10.0. Data analysis and visualization were performed in R v4.4.1 running on RStudio v2024.09.0. Contingency tables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, with data considered normally distributed if p > 0.05. Normally distributed data were compared using ANOVA followed by the TukeyHSD test. For non-normally distributed data, the Dunn’s test was used. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material, https://sch197.med.uni-rostock.de/dl/DFG-SEPRA-IMMUN-AP1/.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by the State Department of Agriculture, Food Safety, and Fishery in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania under the file reference number 7221.3-1-018/22. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

JA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WB-E: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. BM-H: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work and JA were supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant number VO 2697/2-1).

Acknowledgments

We like to thank Karin Gerber and Mareike Degner for their participation in animal breeding and housing at the animal care facility. The graphical abstract and parts of Figures 1A, 4A, H, 6A, S2A, S4C, S6A were created with Biorender.com. The corresponding author used ChatGPT, a language model developed by OpenAI, to improve the grammar and clarity of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1671137/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Hodgin K and Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis. Curr Pharm Des. (2008) 14:1833–9. doi: 10.2174/138161208784980590

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. (2016) 315:801–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Cavaillon J, Adib-conquy M, Fitting C, Adrie C, and Payen D. Cytokine cascade in sepsis. Scand J Infect Dis. (2003) 35:535–44. doi: 10.1080/00365540310015935

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Liu D, Huang S-Y, Sun J-H, Zhang H-C, Cai Q-L, Gao C, et al. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: mechanisms, diagnosis and current treatment options. Mil Med Res. (2022) 9:56. doi: 10.1186/s40779-022-00422-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Venet F and Monneret G. Advances in the understanding and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2018) 14:121–37. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.165

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kwok AJ, Allcock A, Ferreira RC, Cano-Gamez E, Smee M, Burnham KL, et al. Neutrophils and emergency granulopoiesis drive immune suppression and an extreme response endotype during sepsis. Nat Immunol. (2023) 24:767–79. doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01490-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Terashima A, Okamoto K, Nakashima T, Akira S, Ikuta K, and Takayanagi H. Sepsis-induced osteoblast ablation causes immunodeficiency. Immunity. (2016) 44:1434–43. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.05.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Cavaillon J, Singer M, and Skirecki T. Sepsis therapies: learning from 30 years of failure of translational research to propose new leads. EMBO Mol Med. (2020) 12:e10128. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201810128

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. (2021) 47:1181–247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Schuurman AR, Sloot PMA, Wiersinga WJ, and van der Poll T. Embracing complexity in sepsis. Crit Care. (2023) 27:102. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04374-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gotts JE and Matthay MA. Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management. BMJ. (2016) 353:i1585. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1585

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Rhee C, Jones TM, Hamad Y, Pande A, Varon J, O’Brien C, et al. Prevalence, underlying causes, and preventability of sepsis-associated mortality in US acute care hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. (2019) 2:e187571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7571

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ibarz M, Haas LEM, Ceccato A, and Artigas A. The critically ill older patient with sepsis: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care. (2024) 14:6. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01233-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Doran MF, Crowson CS, Pond GR, O’Fallon WM, and Gabriel SE. Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: A population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. (2002) 46:2287–93. doi: 10.1002/art.10524

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Goldenberg DL. Infectious arthritis complicating rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic rheumatic disorders. Arthritis Rheum. (1989) 32:496–502. doi: 10.1002/anr.1780320422

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mehta B, Pedro S, Ozen G, Kalil A, Wolfe F, Mikuls T, et al. Serious infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis compared with non-inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a US national cohort study. RMD Open. (2019) 5:e000935. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000935

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Barrett O, Abramovich E, Dreiher J, Novack V, and Abu-Shakra M. Short- and long-term mortality due to sepsis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. (2017) 37:1021–6. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3694-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Krasselt M, Baerwald C, Petros S, and Seifert O. Mortality of sepsis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single-center retrospective analysis and comparison with a control group. J Intensive Care Med. (2021) 36:766–74. doi: 10.1177/0885066620917588

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Sihvonen S, Korpela M, Laippala P, Mustonen J, and Pasternack A. Death rates and causes of death in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A population-based study. Scand J Rheumatol. (2004) 33:221–7. doi: 10.1080/03009740410005845

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Thomas E, Symmons DPM, Brewster DH, Black RJ, and Macfarlane GJ. National study of cause-specific mortality in rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile chronic arthritis, and other rheumatic conditions: a 20 year followup study. J Rheumatol. (2003) 30:958–65.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Bellan M, Scotti L, Ferrante D, Calzaducca E, Manfredi GF, Sainaghi PP, et al. Risk of severe infection among rheumatoid arthritis patients on biological DMARDs: A population-based cohort study. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:2955. doi: 10.3390/jcm11112955

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Cronstein BN and Sitkovsky M. Adenosine and adenosine receptors in the pathogenesis and treatment of rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2017) 13:41–51. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.178

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Volzke J, Schultz D, Kordt M, Müller M, Bergmann W, Methling K, et al. Inflammatory joint disease is a risk factor for streptococcal sepsis and septic arthritis in mice. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:579475. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.579475

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Volzke J and Müller-Hilke B. Degenerative joint damage is not a risk factor for streptococcal sepsis and septic arthritis in mice. Life. (2021) 11:794. doi: 10.3390/life11080794

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Aroca-Crevillén A, Vicanolo T, Ovadia S, and Hidalgo A. Neutrophils in physiology and pathology. Annu Rev Pathol: Mech Dis. (2024) 19:227–59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-051222-015009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Brunsch V, Bergmann-Ewert W, Müller-Hilke B, and Aleith J. Interleukin-6 overexpression and elevated granulocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio indicate hepatic stress in experimental group a Streptococcus sepsis. Med Microbiol Immunol. (2025) 214:17. doi: 10.1007/s00430-025-00826-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Morales-Mantilla DE, Kain B, Le D, Flores AR, Paust S, and King KY. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells improve survival from sepsis by boosting immunomodulatory cells. Elife. (2022) 11:1–20. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74561

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Challen GA, Pietras EM, Wallscheid NC, and Signer RAJ. Simplified murine multipotent progenitor isolation scheme: Establishing a consensus approach for multipotent progenitor identification. Exp Hematol. (2021) 104:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2021.09.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Olender L, Thapa R, and Gazit R. Isolation of murine myeloid progenitor populations by CD34/CD150 surface markers. Cells. (2022) 11:350. doi: 10.3390/cells11030350

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. van den Hoek J, Boshuizen HC, Roorda LD, Tijhuis GJ, Nurmohamed MT, van den Bos GAM, et al. Mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 15-year prospective cohort study. Rheumatol Int. (2017) 37:487–93. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3638-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Wang D, Yeo AL, Dendle C, Morton S, Morand E, and Leech M. Severe infections remain common in a real-world rheumatoid arthritis cohort: A simple clinical model to predict infection risk. Eur J Rheumatol. (2021) 8:133–8. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2020.20172

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Singh JA, Cameron C, Noorbaloochi S, Cullis T, Tucker M, Christensen R, et al. Risk of serious infection in biological treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. (2015) 386:258–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61704-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Strangfeld A, Eveslage M, Schneider M, Bergerhausen HJ, Klopsch T, Zink A, et al. Treatment benefit or survival of the fittest: what drives the time-dependent decrease in serious infection rates under TNF inhibition and what does this imply for the individual patient? Ann Rheum Dis. (2011) 70:1914–20. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.151043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Hotchkiss RS, Swanson PE, Cobb JP, Jacobson A, Buchman TG, and Karl IE. Apoptosis in lymphoid and parenchymal cells during sepsis. Crit Care Med. (1997) 25:1298–307. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Jensen IJ, Sjaastad FV, Griffith TS, and Badovinac VP. Sepsis-induced T cell immunoparalysis: the ins and outs of impaired T cell immunity. J Immunol. (2018) 200:1543–53. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701618

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Zhang X, Zhang Y, Yuan S, and Zhang J. The potential immunological mechanisms of sepsis. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1434688. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1434688

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Adigbli D, Liu R, Meyer J, Cohen J, Di Tanna GL, Gianacas C, et al. EARLY PERSISTENT LYMPHOPENIA AND RISK OF DEATH IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT SEPSIS. Shock. (2024) 61:197–203. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002284

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Sheikh Motahar Vahedi H, Bagheri A, Jahanshir A, Seyedhosseini J, and Vahidi E. Association of lymphopenia with short term outcomes of sepsis patients; a brief report. Arch Acad Emerg Med. (2019) 7:e14.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

39. Panopoulos AD, Zhang L, Snow JW, Jones DM, Smith AM, El Kasmi KC, et al. STAT3 governs distinct pathways in emergency granulopoiesis and mature neutrophils. Blood. (2006) 108:3682–90. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-02-003012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kim M-H, Yang D, Kim M, Kim S-Y, Kim D, and Kang S-J. A late-lineage murine neutrophil precursor population exhibits dynamic changes during demand-adapted granulopoiesis. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:39804. doi: 10.1038/srep39804

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Evrard M, Kwok IWH, Chong SZ, Teng KWW, Becht E, Chen J, et al. Developmental analysis of bone marrow neutrophils reveals populations specialized in expansion, trafficking, and effector functions. Immunity. (2018) 48:364–379.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.02.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Venet F, Demaret J, Gossez M, and Monneret G. Myeloid cells in sepsis-acquired immunodeficiency. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2021) 1499:3–17. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14333

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Denning N-L, Aziz M, Gurien SD, and Wang P. DAMPs and NETs in sepsis. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2536. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02536

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Sônego F, Castanheira FV e S, Ferreira RG, Kanashiro A, Leite CAVG, Nascimento DC, et al. Paradoxical roles of the neutrophil in sepsis: protective and deleterious. Front Immunol. (2016) 7:155. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00155

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Demaret J, Venet F, Friggeri A, Cazalis M-A, Plassais J, Jallades L, et al. Marked alterations of neutrophil functions during sepsis-induced immunosuppression. J Leukoc Biol. (2015) 98:1081–90. doi: 10.1189/jlb.4A0415-168RR

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Xie X, Shi Q, Wu P, Zhang X, Kambara H, Su J, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals neutrophil heterogeneity in homeostasis and infection. Nat Immunol. (2020) 21:1119–33. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0736-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Drifte G, Dunn-Siegrist I, Tissières P, and Pugin J. Innate immune functions of immature neutrophils in patients with sepsis and severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome*. Crit Care Med. (2013) 41:820–32. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318274647d

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Endo A, Okamura M, Yoshikawa S, Otomo Y, and Morio T. Multilateral functional alterations of human neutrophils in sepsis: from the point of diagnosis to the seventh day. Shock. (2017) 48:629–37. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000883

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Margraf A, Lowell CA, and Zarbock A. Neutrophils in acute inflammation: current concepts and translational implications. Blood. (2022) 139:2130–44. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021012295

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Meghraoui-Kheddar A, Chousterman BG, Guillou N, Barone SM, Granjeaud S, Vallet H, et al. Two new neutrophil subsets define a discriminating sepsis signature. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2022) 205:46–59. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202104-1027OC

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Guérin E, Orabona M, Raquil M-A, Giraudeau B, Bellier R, Gibot S, et al. Circulating immature granulocytes with T-cell killing functions predict sepsis deterioration*. Crit Care Med. (2014) 42:2007–18. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000344

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Paudel S, Ghimire L, Jin L, Jeansonne D, and Jeyaseelan S. Regulation of emergency granulopoiesis during infection. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:961601. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.961601

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Rodriguez S, Chora A, Goumnerov B, Mumaw C, Goebel WS, Fernandez L, et al. Dysfunctional expansion of hematopoietic stem cells and block of myeloid differentiation in lethal sepsis. Blood. (2009) 114:4064–76. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-214916

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Fanti AK, Busch K, Greco A, Wang X, Cirovic B, Shang F, et al. Flt3- and Tie2-Cre tracing identifies regeneration in sepsis from multipotent progenitors but not hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. (2023) 30:207–218.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2022.12.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Hasegawa M, Sakai F, Konda N, Okabayashi A, Katsura H, and Seto Y. CT assessment of axillary lymphadenopathy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: association with disease activity and severity. Rheumatol Int. (2018) 38:1017–22. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-3992-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Rodolfi S, Della-Torre E, Bongiovanni L, Mehta P, Fajgenbaum DC, and Selmi C. Lymphadenopathy in the rheumatology practice: a pragmatic approach. Rheumatology. (2024) 63:1484–93. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead644

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. van Baarsen LGM, de Hair MJH, Ramwadhdoebe TH, Zijlstra IAJ, Maas M, Gerlag DM, et al. The cellular composition of lymph nodes in the earliest phase of inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2013) 72:1420–4. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202990

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Barrett O, Abramovich E, Dreiher J, Novack V, and Abu-Shakra M. Mortality due to sepsis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Isr Med Assoc J. (2014) 16:634–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

59. Kimbrough BA, Crowson CS, Lennon RJ, Davis JM, Strangfeld A, and Myasoedova E. Multiple morbidities are associated with serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2024) 65:152386. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152386

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Richter A, Listing J, Schneider M, Klopsch T, Kapelle A, Kaufmann J, et al. Impact of treatment with biologic DMARDs on the risk of sepsis or mortality after serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2016) 75:1667–73. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207838

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Denys A, Clavel G, Lemeiter D, Schischmanoff O, Boissier MC, and Semerano L. Aortic VCAM - 1: An early marker of vascular inflammation in collagen-induced arthritis. J Cell Mol Med. (2016) 20:855–63. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12790

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Wang C, Wei X, Wu Y, Tang H, Wang B, Wang Y, et al. CP - 25 improves nephropathy in collagen-induced arthritis rats by inhibiting the renal inflammatory response. Int Immunopharmacol. (2020) 88:106997. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106997

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Zhou Z, Miao Z, Luo A, Zhu D, Lu Y, Li P, et al. Identifying a marked inflammation mediated cardiac dysfunction during the development of arthritis in collagen-induced arthritis mice. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2020) 38:203–11. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/6kxs1o

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Minute L, Bergón-Gutiérrez M, Mata-Martínez P, Fernández-Pascual J, Terrón V, Bravo-Robles L, et al. Heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces trained immunity in vitro and in vivo administered systemically or intranasally. iScience. (2024) 27:108869. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108869

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Netea MG, Domínguez-Andrés J, Barreiro LB, Chavakis T, Divangahi M, Fuchs E, et al. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2020) 20:375–88. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0285-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Ferwerda G, Girardin SE, Kullberg B-J, Le Bourhis L, de Jong DJ, Langenberg DML, et al. NOD2 and toll-like receptors are nonredundant recognition systems of mycobacterium tuberculosis. PloS Pathog. (2005) 1:e34. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0010034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Heinhuis B, Koenders MI, van de Loo FA, van Lent PLEM, Kim S-H, Dinarello CA, et al. IL - 32γ and streptococcus pyogenes cell wall fragments synergize for IL - 1-dependent destructive arthritis via upregulation of TLR - 2 and NOD2. Ann Rheum Dis. (2010) 69:A47–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.129635k

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Wang X, Fan X, Bi S, Li N, and Wang B. Toll-like receptor 2-and 4-mediated reciprocal th17 and antibody responses to group A streptococcus infection. J Infect Dis. (2016) 215:jiw598. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw598

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Hu X, Li F, Zeng J, Zhou Z, Wang Z, Chen J, et al. Noninvasive low-frequency pulsed focused ultrasound therapy for rheumatoid arthritis in mice. Research. (2022) 2022:0013. doi: 10.34133/research.0013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Teixeira JH, Silva AM, Almeida MI, Bessa-Gonçalves M, Cunha C, Barbosa MA, et al. The systemic immune response to collagen-induced arthritis and the impact of bone injury in inflammatory conditions. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:5436. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215436

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Dahdah A, Habir K, Nandakumar KS, Saxena A, Xu B, Holmdahl R, et al. Germinal center B cells are essential for collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2018) 70:193–203. doi: 10.1002/art.40354

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Wang F, Tan W, Guo D, and He S. Reduction of CD4 positive T cells and improvement of pathological changes of collagen-induced arthritis by FTY720. Eur J Pharmacol. (2007) 573:230–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.07.029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Luan J, Hu Z, Cheng J, Zhang R, Yang P, Guo H, et al. Applicability and implementation of the collagen-induced arthritis mouse model, including protocols (Review). Exp Ther Med. (2021) 22:939. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10371

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Holmdahl R, Jansson L, and Andersson M. Female sex hormones suppress development of collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Arthritis Rheum. (1986) 29:1501–9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780291212

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Chella Krishnan K, Mukundan S, Alagarsamy J, Laturnus D, and Kotb M. Host genetic variations and sex differences potentiate predisposition, severity, and outcomes of group A streptococcus-mediated necrotizing soft tissue infections. Infect Immun. (2016) 84:416–24. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01191-15

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Medina E, Goldmann O, Rohde M, Lengeling A, and Chhatwals GS. Genetic control of susceptibility to group A streptococcal infection in mice. J Infect Dis. (2001) 184:846–52. doi: 10.1086/323292

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Çalgüneri M, Öztürk M, Özbalkan Z, Akdogan A, Üreten K, Kiraz S, et al. Frequency of lymphadenopathy in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. J Int Med Res. (2003) 31:345–9. doi: 10.1177/147323000303100415

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Manzo A, Benaglio F, Vitolo B, Bortolotto C, Zibera F, Todoerti M, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of the joint-draining lymph node complex in rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective, proof-of-concept study on treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Arthritis Res Ther. (2016) 18:242. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1142-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Accortt NA, Lesperance T, Liu M, Rebello S, Trivedi M, Li Y, et al. Impact of sustained remission on the risk of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). (2018) 70:679–84. doi: 10.1002/acr.23426

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. van Dartel SAA, Fransen J, Kievit W, Flendrie M, den Broeder AA, Visser H, et al. Difference in the risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept: results from the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) registry. Ann Rheum Dis. (2013) 72:895–900. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201338

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Listing J, Strangfeld A, Kary S, Rau R, von Hinueber U, Stoyanova-Scholz M, et al. Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents. Arthritis Rheum. (2005) 52:3403–12. doi: 10.1002/art.21386

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Ebbers M, Lübcke PM, Volzke J, Kriebel K, Hieke C, Engelmann R, et al. Interplay between P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum and A. actinomycetemcomitans in murine alveolar bone loss, arthritis onset and progression. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:15129. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33129-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Lübcke PM, Ebbers MNB, Volzke J, Bull J, Kneitz S, Engelmann R, et al. Periodontal treatment prevents arthritis in mice and methotrexate ameliorates periodontal bone loss. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:8128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44512-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Schmidt CJ, Wenndorf K, Ebbers M, Volzke J, Müller M, Strübing J, et al. Infection with clostridioides difficile attenuated collagen-induced arthritis in mice and involved mesenteric treg and th2 polarization. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:571049. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.571049

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Aleith J, Brendel M, Weipert E, Müller M, Schultz D, and Müller-Hilke B. Influenza A virus exacerbates group A streptococcus infection and thwarts anti-bacterial inflammatory responses in murine macrophages. Pathogens. (2022) 11:1320. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11111320

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Shrum B, Anantha RV, Xu SX, Donnelly M, Haeryfar S, McCormick JK, et al. A robust scoring system to evaluate sepsis severity in an animal model. BMC Res Notes. (2014) 7:233. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-233

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Amend SR, Valkenburg KC, and Pienta KJ. Murine hind limb long bone dissection and bone marrow isolation. J Visualized Experiments. (2016) 110:53936. doi: 10.3791/53936

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Aleith J, Bergmann-Ewert W, and Müller-Hilke B. Maximizing insights, minimizing animal testing: A framework for validating multiparametric single-cell cytokine analysis panels. Eur J Immunol. (2025) 55:e202451193. doi: 10.1002/eji.202451193

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: sepsis, infection, inflammation, autoimmunity, rheumatoid arthritis, hematopoiesis

Citation: Aleith J, Bergmann-Ewert W and Müller-Hilke B (2025) Lymphadenopathy and synovial hyperplasia are associated with sepsis risk in an experimental model of rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Immunol. 16:1671137. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1671137

Received: 22 July 2025; Accepted: 25 August 2025;
Published: 25 September 2025.

Edited by:

Michael V. Volin, Midwestern University, United States

Reviewed by:

Sanja Arandjelovic, University of Virginia, United States
Jia Tong Loh, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Karen Cyndari, The University of Iowa, United States

Copyright © 2025 Aleith, Bergmann-Ewert and Müller-Hilke. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Johann Aleith, am9oYW5uLmFsZWl0aEBtZWQudW5pLXJvc3RvY2suZGU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.