Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders: Autoinflammatory Disorders

This article is part of the Research TopicClinical and Immunological Phenotypic Characterization to better understand Pathogenesis and Response to Therapies in Systemic Autoimmune DiseasesView all 12 articles

Different phenotypes of severe flares in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): results of a clustering analysis in a monocentric cohort

Provisionally accepted
Elena  ElefanteElena Elefante1Davide  SchilirĂ²Davide SchilirĂ²1MARIA  LAURA MANCAMARIA LAURA MANCA2Chiara  StagnaroChiara Stagnaro1Dina  ZucchiDina Zucchi1Chiara  CardelliChiara Cardelli1Viola  SignoriniViola Signorini1Michele  MaffiMichele Maffi1Giancarlo  CascaranoGiancarlo Cascarano1Raquel  ZasRaquel Zas3Linda  CarliLinda Carli1Francesco  FerroFrancesco Ferro1Chiara  TaniChiara Tani1Marta  MoscaMarta Mosca4*
  • 1Rheumatology Unit, Universita degli Studi di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • 2Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Mathematics, Universita degli Studi di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • 3Instituto de Investigacion Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
  • 4Rheumatology Unit - ERN ReCONNET member, Universita degli Studi di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract Objectives: To describe different clinical phenotypes of severe flares in a monocentric cohort of SLE patients and to compare treatment and outcomes. Material and methods: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data on 122 severe flares occurred in 110 patients, between 2018 and 2023, and followed up for 12 months after the flare. Baseline characteristics included disease activity assessment by SELENA-SLEDAI and BILAG 2004 scores, demographic and laboratory data. A hierarchical unsupervised segmentation method was applied to cluster flares based on baseline features. Treatments and outcomes according to LLDAS, DORIS Remission and SRI definitions, were compared among clusters at different timepoints. Results: We identified 3 clusters, 2 composed mainly by extra-renal, and one by renal flares. Among non-renal clusters, cluster 1 was characterized by severe constitutional symptoms, serositis and arthritis occurring in younger patients, associated with hyper-inflammatory biomarkers and multiple autoantibodies specificities. Cluster 2 included flares with more BILAG B scores and mainly mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal manifestations, and overlapping antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Cluster 3 was the renal flares cluster. Cluster 1 and the renal cluster were treated more frequently with glucocorticoid (GC) pulses and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and presented higher daily and cumulative GCs doses at 12 months (t12). These two clusters also shared similar percentage of attainment of LLDAS (about 50%) and remission (about 35% both) at t12, compared to 73% of LLDAS and 53% of remission in cluster 2 at t12. Conclusions: We described three different clusters of severe flares in SLE in a real-life setting, identifying a hyper-inflammatory flare phenotype, that shares a comparable proportion of unsatisfying response to treatment as renal flares. Our results may represent a clinical starting point,

Keywords: Systemic lupus - erythematosus, Lupus flares, Cluster analisys, Disease outcomes, lupus phenotypes

Received: 25 Jul 2025; Accepted: 03 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Elefante, SchilirĂ², MANCA, Stagnaro, Zucchi, Cardelli, Signorini, Maffi, Cascarano, Zas, Carli, Ferro, Tani and Mosca. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Marta Mosca, marta.mosca@unipi.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.