REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 10 November 2025

Sec. Microbial Immunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1673852

Interaction between gut microbiota and immunity in health and intestinal disease

  • 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China

  • 2. Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China

Abstract

The gut microbiota plays a fundamental role in establishing and maintaining host immune homeostasis through dynamic, bidirectional interactions with the innate and adaptive immune systems. This review synthesizes current knowledge on how commensal microbes guide the development and function of the intestinal immune system. Conversely, we examine how the host immune system, including immunoglobulin A (IgA) and T-cell responses, actively shapes microbial composition and colonization resistance. Disruptions in this equilibrium (dysbiosis) are critically implicated in pathogenesis. We explore the dysbiosis-immune axis in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and colorectal cancer (CRC), highlighting how specific microbial taxa and their metabolites influence disease progression through immune modulation. Furthermore, we discuss how acute infectious insults model the breakdown of this mutualism.

1 introduction

The mammalian organism hosts an extensive consortium of microorganisms across epithelial surfaces, notably within gastrointestinal, cutaneous, and mucosal niches, collectively designated as the microbiome (). Among these sites, the intestinal tract sustains the highest microbial density and phylogenetic diversity relative to other host compartments (). Inhabiting the human gut are approximately 1,500 bacterial species and 100 trillion microbial cells, whose collective genome encodes over tenfold more unique genes than the human genome (, ). Contemporary research underscores that gut microbiota dynamically modulates essential host physiological processes—spanning circadian regulation, nutrient assimilation, metabolic pathways, and immune function—rather than operating as inert residents (, ).

This host-microbiota interface represents an evolutionary co-adaptation spanning millennia, fundamentally characterized by mutualistic symbiosis (). Ecologically, mammals and commensal microorganisms have co-evolved to establish homeostatic equilibrium (). Through persistent immunological stimulation, the complex gut microbial community critically orchestrates the development and functional maturation of both innate and adaptive immunity (, ). In physiological states, microbiota-derived metabolites—generated via anaerobic fermentation of dietary substrates and host-microbial co-metabolites—serve as key immunomodulatory messengers (). Specifically, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and related compounds directly interface with host cellular receptors to fine-tune immune responses (). The gut immune system reciprocally influences the gut microbiota. It establishes immune tolerance toward commensal and harmless microorganisms while maintaining effective immune responses against pathogenic infections. Under healthy conditions, this host immune response to the intestinal microbiota is strictly compartmentalized to the mucosal surface (). Therefore, the gut microbiota and the host immune system exhibit significant bidirectional regulation.

However, this meticulously balanced host-microbiota symbiosis is vulnerable to disruption. Pathological alterations in the gut microbial ecosystem, termed dysbiosis, are increasingly recognized as critical factors in the pathogenesis of a spectrum of intestinal disorders (–). Critically, immune dysregulation constitutes a central mechanistic link underpinning these conditions. Mounting evidence positions the gut microbiome as a pivotal regulator of immune ontogeny, response calibration, and mucosal barrier integrity (). Consequently, disruptions in the intricate dialogue between the microbiota and the host immune system—encompassing failures in tolerance induction, aberrant inflammatory responses, and compromised barrier function—are implicated in the initiation and perpetuation of chronic inflammation observed in diseases such as IBD, IBS, and CRC. In this review, we synthesize current mechanistic insights into this bidirectional microbiota-immune crosstalk across both physiological homeostasis and major intestinal pathologies. Furthermore, we evaluate emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating this critical axis to restore health, highlighting the pivotal role of understanding these interactions for developing novel interventions against dysbiosis-associated intestinal diseases.

2 Microbiota-immune interplay in physiological conditions

2.1 Microbiota-driven maturation and maintenance of intestinal immunity

Early colonization of mucosal surfaces in mammalian hosts plays a decisive role in immune system maturation (). While debate continues regarding prenatal microbial exposure in utero, overwhelming evidence confirms a substantial microbial influx immediately after birth, predominantly derived from maternal microbiota (, ). Delivery mode critically shapes initial microbial composition: vaginally delivered infants acquire microbes resembling maternal vaginal/enteric communities (e.g., Lactobacillus, Prevotella), whereas cesarean-delivered neonates are colonized by skin-associated taxa (e.g., Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium) (). Beyond providing passive immunity through maternal antibodies, breast milk induces commensal microbiota-dependent protective immunity, as demonstrated in germ-free models (, ).

The first three years of life constitute a critical developmental window characterized by high microbiota volatility preceding stabilization into adult-like configurations (–). This plasticity increases vulnerability to environmental microbial perturbations that may disrupt immunoregulatory circuits with lifelong consequences (). Early-life microbial colonization limits the expansion of invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells, in part via production of sphingolipids, to prevent potential disease-promoting activity within the intestinal lamina propria and the lungs (). Neonatal immune immaturity manifests clinically as heightened pathogen susceptibility – with infectious diseases representing leading causes of childhood mortality – and dysregulated inflammation, exemplified by necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants (–).

Studies using germ-free mice reveal mechanistic insights into microbiota-driven immune maturation. These microbiome-deficient animals exhibit multiple immunological deficits: impaired development of gut-associated lymphoid tissues; 30% reduction in αβ/γδ intraepithelial lymphocytes; absence of intestinal lamina propria Th17 cells (inducible by segmented filamentous bacteria colonization); diminished Th1 responses compromising intracellular pathogen clearance; and markedly reduced IgA secretion – all reversible upon microbial colonization (–).

Collectively, early-life microbial colonization orchestrates immune development through three interconnected pathways: 1) Initial seeding mechanisms (birth mode and feeding) establish foundational microbiota architecture; 2) Dynamic microbiota-immune crosstalk during the plasticity window of less than 3 years directs tolerance programming; 3) Microbial antigens directly drive lymphoid tissue maturation and T-cell differentiation. Disruption of this process predisposes to either immunodeficiency or pathological inflammation, underscoring the necessity of maintaining early microbiota homeostasis for lifelong immune competence. germ-free animal models remain indispensable for mechanistic dissection, though future research must address strain-specific functions and clinical translation challenges.

Crucially, the influence of the gut microbiota on immune function extends far beyond early development and persists throughout adulthood in healthy individuals. In the mature gut, the established commensal community plays an indispensable role in the continuous maintenance, education, and fine-tuning of the immune system.

Perpetual Antigenic Stimulation & Immune Training: The diverse microbial antigens provide constant, low-level stimulation to the intestinal immune system. This persistent exposure is essential for maintaining the pool and functionality of resident immune cells, including lamina propria lymphocytes (e.g., Th17, Tregs, IELs), innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) like dendritic cells and macrophages. It trains these cells to distinguish between commensals and pathogens, reinforcing immune tolerance towards the former while preserving vigilance against the latter (, ).

Metabolite-Mediated Immunomodulation: Microbiota-derived metabolites, particularly SCFAs like butyrate, propionate, and acetate, remain critical immunomodulatory messengers in the adult gut. SCFAs signal through G-protein-coupled receptors (GPR41, GPR43, GPR109a) and inhibit histone deacetylases (HDACs) in various immune cells. This promotes anti-inflammatory responses, enhances epithelial barrier integrity, drives the differentiation and function of regulatory T cells (Tregs), and modulates macrophage and dendritic cell function towards a tolerant phenotype (–).

Maintenance of Barrier Surveillance and IgA Dynamics: The healthy adult microbiota continuously stimulates IgA production by plasma cells in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). IgA, particularly secretory IgA (sIgA), plays a vital role in coating commensal bacteria, restricting their penetration into the epithelium and lamina propria, shaping microbial composition, and neutralizing potential pathobionts. This dynamic IgA coating is a hallmark of adult immune-microbiota mutualism (, ).

Sustaining Innate Effector Functions: Commensals continue to prime systemic innate immunity in adults. For example, microbial components (e.g., peptidoglycan fragments detected by NOD1) enhance neutrophil bone marrow egress and functional readiness. Microbiota-derived signals also maintain the “inflammatory anergy” of intestinal macrophages, preventing inappropriate activation against commensals (–).

Adaptation to Environmental Changes: The adult microbiota-immune axis allows for adaptation. Changes in diet, transient pathogen exposure, or mild stressors can induce shifts in microbial composition and metabolite profiles. A well-established immune system, calibrated by the microbiota, can dynamically respond to these shifts, restoring homeostasis without triggering chronic inflammation ().

Therefore, the adult gut microbiota is not merely a passive resident but an active participant in a continuous, bidirectional crosstalk essential for sustaining immune quiescence, barrier defense, and the capacity for appropriate inflammatory responses throughout life. Disruption of this mature equilibrium (dysbiosis) can lead to immune dysfunction and contribute to disease pathogenesis, as discussed in subsequent sections.

2.2 Interactions between the innate immune system and the microbiota

The gut microbiota critically shapes innate immunity through multifaceted molecular dialogues involving both local mucosal environments and systemic immune compartments (Figure 1). Microbial-derived ligands—including Toll-like receptor (TLR) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) agonists—as well as immunomodulatory metabolites such as SCFAs and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands, engage host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to fine-tune immune activation and maintain homeostasis ().

Figure 1

2.2.1 Mucosal programming of APCs

Commensal organisms have co-evolved with intestinal immune cells to promote immunological tolerance while preserving responsiveness to pathogens. Dendritic cells (DCs) in Peyer’s patches, for example, secrete significantly higher levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10) relative to splenic DCs under comparable stimuli, reflecting niche-specific tolerogenic adaptation (). Intestinal macrophages exhibit a unique phenotype termed “inflammatory anergy,” whereby pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6) is suppressed even in the presence of TLR ligands (–). This regulatory phenotype is microbiota-dependent and essential for sustaining mucosal tolerance (). Furthermore, group 3 ILC(ILC3s) express MHC class II molecules that suppress activation of commensal-specific CD4+ T cells, serving as a checkpoint to prevent aberrant immune responses ().

Mechanistically, microbiota-derived ATP activates P2X receptors on CD70+ intestinal DCs, promoting differentiation of RORγt+ Th17 cells via IL-6 and IL-23 pathways (, ). Germ-free models reinforce this dependence: monocolonization with Escherichia coli restores depleted intestinal DC populations without affecting systemic counterparts ().

2.2.2 Systemic modulation of innate effector cells

Beyond the intestinal milieu, the microbiota exerts systemic effects on innate immunity. Germ-free mice display pronounced neutropenia, with a 30–40% reduction in circulating neutrophils, accompanied by compromised phagocytic activity and diminished production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (–). These defects are only partially reversed upon recolonization, indicating critical windows for microbial imprinting.

A pivotal role is played by NOD1, a cytosolic PRR that recognizes peptidoglycan fragments from Gram-negative bacteria. NOD1 activation enhances neutrophil myeloperoxidase activity and promotes their egress from bone marrow, effectively linking gut microbial sensing to peripheral immune readiness (). Additionally, the microbiota influences natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity and mast cell protease expression, although the underlying pathways remain incompletely elucidated (–).

2.2.3 PRRs as regulators of microbiota composition

Host PRRs not only respond to microbial cues but actively modulate microbial ecology. Mice deficient in TLR5 exhibit significant shifts in microbiota composition—specifically, expansion of Proteobacteria and reduction in Bacteroidetes—alongside increased susceptibility to colitis, obesity, and metabolic syndrome (–). Similar dysbiosis has been observed in NOD1-, NOD2-, and NLRP6-deficient models, implicating cytosolic and inflammasome-associated PRRs in maintaining microbial homeostasis (–).

Notably, inflammasome dysfunction—particularly NLRP6 deficiency—results in transmissible dysbiosis mediated by impaired goblet cell mucin secretion and reduced antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) expression. Such microbiota shifts can propagate metabolic and inflammatory disorders to co-housed wild-type animals ().

This collective evidence underscores a crucial paradigm: the innate immune system is not a passive sensor but an active architect of the gut microbial environment. Through the continuous expression of PRRs and effector molecules like AMPs, the host shapes the taxonomic composition and functional potential of the microbiota, determining which species can thrive in the intestinal niche. This active sculpting prevents the expansion of pro-inflammatory taxa and enforces a homeostatic community structure that is mutually beneficial. Thus, the dialogue between innate immunity and the microbiota is fundamentally bidirectional; innate signals educate the immune system, while immune mechanisms, in turn, mold the microbiota.

2.2.4 AMPs and microbial spatial organization

Paneth cells in the intestinal crypts secrete α-defensins and RegIIIγ, which constitute essential components of the mucosal chemical barrier. These AMPs maintain the sterility of the inner mucus layer and prevent microbial encroachment. Deficiency in these peptides disrupts spatial segregation, resulting in bacterial translocation into epithelial niches and subsequent epithelial hyperplasia via TLR signaling (–). Similarly, structural defects in the mucus layer compromise barrier integrity and foster pro-inflammatory microbial shifts ().

In summary, microbiota-derived signals program innate immunity through PRR-mediated tolerance induction, systemic effector priming, and AMPs-dependent spatial containment. Disruption of this intricate crosstalk establishes a permissive environment for metabolic and inflammatory disorders.

2.3 Crosstalk between the adaptive immune system and the microbiota

The adaptive immune system has co-evolved with the gut microbiota to establish a highly specialized and reciprocal relationship essential for maintaining intestinal homeostasis. This mutualistic interaction is evident from studies showing pronounced microbial dysbiosis in immunodeficient mice lacking functional T or B cells (). Two principal immunological axes underlie this crosstalk: T cell–mediated regulation of microbial composition and secretory IgA–dependent maintenance of mucosal equilibrium, with T cells playing a dominant role in shaping microbiota configuration (). It is increasingly clear that the adaptive immune system exerts profound selective pressure on the microbiota, effectively functioning as a sophisticated ecological filter that determines microbial fitness and enforces community stability.

2.3.1 CD4+ T cell subset differentiation orchestrated by commensals

Within the intestinal microenvironment, microbial antigens direct the lineage commitment of naïve CD4+ T cells into distinct functional subsets—including Th1, Th2, Th17, and Tregs—thereby sculpting immune tone and microbial tolerance. Conversely, the resulting cytokine milieu actively feeds back to shape the microbial landscape. For instance, the IL-17 and IL-22 produced by Th17 cells stimulate epithelial cells to secrete AMPs, which directly target specific bacteria and influence community assembly. Similarly, the anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-10 and TGF-β derived from Tregs promote a tolerogenic environment that favors the persistence of beneficial, anti-inflammatory commensals. This creates a self-reinforcing loop where microbes induce specific T cell responses, which then modify the environment to favor or suppress different microbial groups.

Th1/Th2 Axis Regulation: Germ-free mice exhibit a Th2-skewed cytokine milieu, typified by elevated IL-4 and IL-5 levels, which correlates with increased susceptibility to allergic diseases such as asthma and eczema (–79). Colonization with Bacteroides fragilis, through its capsular polysaccharide A (PSA), re-establishes Th1/Th2 equilibrium. PSA is internalized by lamina propria dendritic cells via a TLR2-dependent pathway, leading to the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into IL-10–secreting inducible Tregs (iTregs) or, in the presence of IL-23, Th17 cells (80).

Functional Dichotomy of Th17 Cells: Specific microbiota members shape distinct Th17 phenotypes. Segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) elicit homeostatic, non-pathogenic Th17 cells, whereas pathogens such as Citrobacter rodentium induce inflammatory Th17 responses (81, 82). Mechanistically, SFB colonization activates the ILC3–IL-22–SAA axis, promoting IL-17A expression in RORγt+ Th17 cells (81). Although SFB is scarcely detected in the human microbiome, other taxa such as Eggerthella lenta may assume equivalent immunomodulatory roles (83).

Tregs Expansion and Function: Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa promote colonic Tregs accumulation via SCFAs production, while PSA from B. fragilis signals through TLR2 to suppress Th17-driven inflammation (84, 85). Colonic Tregs often bear microbiota-reactive TCRs and low Helios expression, indicating peripheral induction. Moreover, T follicular helper (Tfh) and exTh17 cells in Peyer’s patches contribute to B cell class-switch recombination and sIgA production, reinforcing microbiota compartmentalization and compositional control (86, 87).

2.3.2 IgA-mediated regulation of mucosal microbial ecology

SIgA represents a critical effector of adaptive immunity at mucosal surfaces, mediating immune exclusion, neutralization, and microbial homeostasis. The functional relevance of IgA is underscored by its dependency on T cell help for class switching and antigen specificity. Crucially, IgA is a principal mechanism by which the host actively and continuously shapes the gut microbiota. Rather than simply neutralizing pathogens, IgA imposes a selective pressure that governs bacterial gene expression, metabolic activity, and spatial distribution within the gut lumen.

T Cell–Dependent IgA Induction: In T cell–deficient models, Tregs are essential for restoring microbiota-reactive IgA responses (e.g., against flagellin), while Th17 cells promote antigen-specific IgA during mucosal perturbations (88–90). SFB uniquely co-induces both Th17 differentiation and IgA coating (91, 92). Germ-free mice require colonization with ≥109 CFU of viable bacteria to initiate robust IgA secretion ().

Mechanisms of IgA-Mediated Homeostasis: IgA enforces microbial balance via several mechanisms. In AID-/- mice, which are deficient in class-switch recombination, SFB overgrowth can be reversed by IgA reconstitution (93, 94). Flagellin-specific IgA dampens bacterial flagellin expression, thereby reducing TLR5 activation and intestinal inflammation (95). Additionally, IgA suppresses Proteobacteria expansion during neonatal microbiota development (Mirpuri et al., 2014). Disruption of T cell–dependent IgA responses (e.g., via MyD88 deletion in T cells) alters IgA coating patterns, resulting in dysbiosis (96–98). High-affinity IgA not only immobilizes luminal microbes to prevent epithelial contact but also preserves microbiota diversity (87). This dynamic, antigen-specific selection is a quintessential example of the host immune system actively gardening its microbial inhabitants. The IgA repertoire adapts to the current microbial residents, and in doing so, it modulates their behavior and abundance, preventing the overdominance of any single strain and maintaining a diverse, stable ecosystem. This process is a continuous and active negotiation between the host and its microbiota.

Source and Distribution of IgA: GALT are rich in IgA+ plasma cells, which secrete up to 0.8 grams of IgA per meter of intestine per day (99). Germ-free mice exhibit marked reductions in both IgA-producing cells and intestinal IgA levels, as well as defective germinal center formation in the spleen (100, 101). They also show skewed immunoglobulin profiles, including elevated IgE and diminished IgG, indicative of a Th2-biased systemic state (102, 103). While BCR diversity is shaped by microbial exposure, the mechanisms underlying selective commensal tolerance remain incompletely understood (104).

2.3.3 Beyond CD4+ T cells and IgA: additional adaptive immune modulators

Although IgA and CD4+ T cells are central to microbiota-host dialogue, other adaptive immune components are also involved. For instance, CD8+ intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), enriched in the gut epithelium, require microbial signals for functional competence and homeostasis. In germ-free mice, impaired clonal expansion of CD8+ IELs leads to diminished cytotoxic potential, compromising mucosal immunity (105). These IELs influence peripheral compartments, including marginal zone B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (106).

In gut mucosal immunity, besides secretory sIgA, other immunoglobulins—IgG, IgE, and IgM—also contribute to immune regulation. IgG enters the lumen during barrier disruption (e.g., IBD), opsonizing microbes, activating complement, and driving inflammation, while also serving as a disease biomarker. IgE, low in healthy gut, can trigger mast cell degranulation in allergies and IBS, promoting hypersensitivity and dysmotility. IgM acts as a first-line defense and compensates for IgA deficiency via secretory IgM (sIgM), agglutinating microbes and moderating dysbiosis, though it cannot fully substitute IgA’s anti-inflammatory functions. Together, these antibodies coordinate to maintain intestinal immune homeostasis and contribute to pathology when dysregulated.

iNKT cells represent another subset regulated by the microbiota. Germ-free mice show iNKT immaturity and hypo-responsiveness, which can be reversed through colonization with B. fragilis or administration of microbial sphingolipids. These interventions enhance iNKT development and confer resistance to colitis (107).

In general, these findings underscore the intricate and dynamic interplay between the adaptive immune system and the gut microbiota. CD4+ T cell subsets—particularly Th17 and Tregs—respond to distinct microbial cues, thereby modulating intestinal immune tone and tolerance. Simultaneously, secretory IgA enforces microbial containment and compositional balance, not only as an effector of humoral immunity but also as a mediator of immune education. Additional adaptive elements further expand this regulatory network, highlighting the systemic impact of microbial signals. This bidirectional communication ensures that immune responses are appropriately calibrated to preserve mucosal integrity while accommodating the vast antigenic diversity of the gut microbiome. Understanding these interactions provides a foundation for therapeutic strategies targeting dysbiosis-related diseases, including IBD, allergies, and autoimmunity.

3 Dysbiosis-immune axis in in intestinal diseases

Mounting evidence indicates that dysbiosis-driven immune dysregulation serves as a cornerstone in the pathogenesis of intestinal pathologies (Figure 2). In genetically susceptible hosts, compromised mucosal barrier integrity—characterized by disrupted tight junctions and increased permeability—permits microbial metabolite translocation, initiating a cascade of inflammatory responses (108). This breach of intestinal homeostasis synergizes with immune imbalances: attenuated Tregs suppression, aberrant B cell activation, and skewed Th1/Th17 polarization collectively fuel chronic inflammation (109, 110). Critically, such maladaptations transcend the gut, with molecular mimicry mechanisms (e.g., microbial antigen cross-reactivity with host epitopes) linking enteric dysbiosis to systemic autoimmunity (111). While causal relationships remain under investigation, the convergence of genetic vulnerability (e.g., NOD2 mutations), environmental triggers (e.g., antibiotics/diet), and microbiome alterations establishes a permissive milieu for disease onset and progression. Below we delineate how these interactions manifest in specific intestinal and extra-intestinal disorders. an imbalance of intestinal immunity related to Th2 cytokines, while CD is associate to a Th1 and Th17 cytokine profile (Heller et al., 2005). In CD, differentiation into Th1 and Th17 occurs by induction of cytokines IL-12, IL-18, IL-23 and transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) produced by macrophages and other APC. In UC, increased secretion of IL-5, which is Th2 specific, is related to more effective activation of B cells and stimulation of immune responses when compared to the Th1 response observed in CD. Although the precise mechanisms underlying IBS remain unclear, it is widely recognized that its pathogenesis results from the interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental factors within the microbiome. This interaction, facilitated by a compromised intestinal epithelium, leads to excessive immune activation, which is thought to contribute to the clinical manifestations observed in IBD.

Figure 2

3.1 IBD: microbial triggers of immune dysregulation

IBD, encompassing CD and UC, represents chronic, relapsing-remitting inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract exhibiting escalating global incidence (112). Compelling evidence implicates gut microbiome perturbations—dysbiosis—as central to IBD pathogenesis (). Characteristically, IBD patients typically exhibit reduced bacterial diversity, with notable shifts in the abundance of specific bacterial taxa (113–115). For example, the abundances of Bacteroides, Firmicutes, Clostridia, Lactobacillus, and Ruminococcaceae decrease, while those of Gammaproteobacteria and Enterobacteriaceae increase (116, 117). Concurrently, the profiles of microbiome-associated metabolites are altered (118, 119).

To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, we turn to the role of epithelial integrity and genetic susceptibility. A critical pathophysiological event involves the breakdown of tightly regulated intestinal barrier integrity. This breach facilitates translocation of commensal bacteria into the mucosal lamina propria, triggering aberrant host immune activation and subsequent tissue damage (120). Barrier defects encompass multiple components: compromised mucus layer architecture (e.g., Muc2 deficiency, which precipitates spontaneous colitis and early dysbiosis in susceptible murine models), impaired epithelial tight junctions, and dysregulated AMPs secretion (121).

These structural vulnerabilities are further exacerbated by genetic predispositions that affect microbial sensing and immune response. Genome-wide association studies have identified >200 IBD susceptibility loci, many encoding proteins critical for microbial immune sensing and response (122). The NOD2 (nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2) mutation, the first strongly associated CD risk allele, exemplifies this link (123). As an intracellular PRR detecting bacterial peptidoglycan, NOD2 regulates commensal ecology by modulating AMPs expression and suppressing expansion of pro-inflammatory species like Bacteroides vulgatus (124, 125). Dysfunctional microbiome-immune crosstalk consequent to NOD2 mutation is thus pivotal in CD development (126). Similarly, mutations in autophagy-related 16-like 1 (ATG16L1), another CD-associated allele, impair Paneth cell exocytosis and exacerbate inflammatory responses and epithelial necrosis via dysregulated IL-22 signaling (127, 128). Inflammasome signaling further modulates this axis; NLRP6 inflammasome perturbation, for instance, heightens susceptibility to murine colitis and potentiates inflammation in IL10-/- mice (129).

Beyond innate immunity, adaptive immune components significantly shape disease course. While the role of adaptive immunity—encompassing effector T cells, Tregs, and humoral responses—in expanding IBD-associated pathobionts is well-documented (130). establishing definitive causality between microbiome alterations and inflammation remains complex (111). Nonetheless, emerging evidence supports a contributory role for dysbiosis: Fecal microbiota transplantation from CD patients into germ-free mice harboring susceptibility genes triggers CD-like inflammation (131). Microbiota from IBD patients can also induce imbalances in intestinal Th17 and RORγt+ Tregs populations in germ-free recipients (132). Furthermore, specific pathobionts isolated from IBD patients, such as Mucispirillum schaedleri and adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) strains, elicit colitis in susceptible murine models (133, 134).

In conclusion, dysregulated crosstalk between the gut microbiome and host immune system constitutes a fundamental mechanism underpinning IBD pathogenesis (Table 1). Future research must prioritize elucidating the causal directionality of these interactions to inform targeted therapeutic interventions.

Table 1

DiseaseKey microbial alterationsImmune system impactUnderlying mechanisms & evidenceReferences
IBD↓ Diversity, ↓ Bacteroides, ↓ Firmicutes (e.g., Clostridium clusters IV, XIVa), ↓ Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
↑ Gammaproteobacteria (e.g., AIEC)		↑ Th1/Th17 responses
↓ Treg function
↓ IgA coating		NOD2 mutations →↓ defensins→ bacterial translocation; AIEC activates IFN-γ/IL-23 axisOkolie et al., 2024 (126)
ATG16L1 mutations → impair Paneth cell exocytosis and disrupt IL-22 signaling → inflammatory responses and epithelial necrosisAden et al., 2018; Cadwell et al., 2009 (127, 128)
IBS↓ Diversity, ↓ SCFA producers
↑ Bacteroides, ↑ Escherichia, ↑ Clostridium spp.		Mucosal immune activation (↑ IL-1β, TNF-α)
Mast cell activation → Visceral hypersensitivity
↓ Treg function		Flagellin from Clostridium XIVa → TLR5 activation → epithelial NF-κB signalingJeffery et al., 2012 (149)
Dietary factors (high-fat/high-sugar diets) →↓ SCFAs concentrations; pro-inflammatory bacteria → impairing epithelial barrier functionAgus et al., 2016; Vojdani et al., 2020 (159, 160)
CRC↑ Fusobacterium nucleatum
↑ Enterotoxigenic B. fragilis (ETBF)
↑ Akkermansia muciniphila (context-dependent)
↓ Ruminococcus gnavus, ↓ Blautia producta		Suppressed NK & CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity
↑ Th17-driven inflammation
↑ Treg accumulation		↑ Fusobacterium nucleatum →↓NK cell cytotoxicityGur et al., 2015; Pignatelli et al., 2023 (163, 164)
↑ Fusobacterium nucleatum →↓CD3+ T cellsHamada et al., 2018 (165)
↑ Akkermansia muciniphila → synergistic interactions with commensal or pathogenic bacteria → suppress or promote carcinogenesisGubernatorova et al., 2023 (167)
BFT toxin → IL-17-dependent NF-κB pathwayChung et al., 2018 (169)
BFT toxin → E-cadherin cleavage → β-catenin activationDeDecker et al., 2021 (171)

Dysbiosis-immune interactions in major intestinal diseases.

3.1.1 Acute infectious insults as a model of dysbiosis-immune dysregulation

Acute gastrointestinal infections model how a breach in host-microbiota mutualism precipitates immune dysfunction. The intestinal epithelium is the primary barrier, fortified by the resident microbiota. GF mice and animals deficient in microbial sensing (e.g., Nod2-/-, MyD88-/-) exhibit impaired AMPs production, compromising barrier integrity and facilitating pathogen translocation (135, 136). Deficiencies in AMPs (e.g., RegIIIγ) lead to elevated mucosal bacterial colonization ().

The IL-22-regulated AMPs axis is critical for defense against enteric pathogens (137–140). sIgA, whose expression is modulated by microbiota, binds antigens and neutralizes pathogens (141–143). Systemically, the microbiota primes IL-1β for neutrophil mobilization and stimulates TH17 cell expansion, contributing to pathogen resistance (144).

3.2 IBS: gut microbiota–immune interplay and low-grade inflammation

IBS is increasingly recognized as a disorder driven by microbial perturbations and characterized by subtle yet persistent immunological disturbances (145). Unlike IBD, IBS lacks macroscopic inflammation and is instead marked by low-grade immune activation. In post-infectious IBS (PI-IBS), this is often initiated by acute enteric infections that compromise epithelial integrity, allowing microbial components to activate mucosal immunity (146). Approximately 10% of individuals who experience acute enteritis develop IBS symptoms, highlighting the link between barrier disruption and immune sensitization.

This chronic immune stimulation is frequently associated with gut dysbiosis. IBS patients often present with gut microbiota dysbiosis, characterized by reduced bacterial diversity, a depletion of beneficial taxa (e.g., Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium), and an enrichment of pathobionts like Escherichia coli, Bacteroides, and Clostridium species (147, 148). These alterations are not merely associative; many of the enriched bacterial taxa express immune-activating molecules such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and flagellin, which engage PRRs on intestinal epithelial and immune cells, particularly TLR4 and TLR5, driving mucosal immune activation and barrier dysfunction (149).

From innate activation to adaptive immune consequences, further complexity arises in the immunopathology of IBS Increased intestinal permeability following infection allows microbial antigens to reach the lamina propria, where they stimulate dendritic cells, macrophages, and mast cells, triggering Th1 and Th17 differentiation (150–152). Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines—such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)—are frequently observed, while anti-inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-10, IL-13) are often suppressed (153, 154).

Microbial metabolites, particularly SCFAs such as butyrate, acetate, and propionate, play a pivotal role in modulating intestinal immunity and maintaining mucosal homeostasis (155). Produced through bacterial fermentation of dietary fibers, SCFAs exert their immunoregulatory effects by promoting the differentiation of Tregs via histone deacetylase inhibition, activating G-protein-coupled receptors (GPR43, GPR109A), and enhancing epithelial barrier integrity (–). However, SCFAs production is diminished in IBS patients due to dietary factors and depletion of key producers such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (156). Concurrently, other bacterial metabolites (e.g., histamine, 5-HT, dopamine) can directly modulate sensory nerve function, further amplifying nociceptive signaling (157, 158).

Lastly, we consider how environmental factors amplify this dysbiosis-immune feedback loop. Dietary patterns (e.g., high-fat, low-fiber intake) and psychological stress activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, releasing corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) that triggers mast cell activation and barrier dysfunction (159, 160). These changes perpetuate a vicious cycle wherein immune activation reshapes microbial niches, worsening dysbiosis.

In summary, IBS is increasingly recognized as an immunological disorder driven by microbial perturbations. The convergence of low-grade inflammation, dysregulated metabolite signaling, and neuroimmune sensitization establishes a new paradigm for understanding IBS and guiding microbiota-targeted therapies.

3.3 CRC: microbiota-mediated immune evasion and carcinogenesis

The gut microbiota critically modulates cancer immune surveillance through dynamic interactions with host immunity (). CRC is the most common cancer of the digestive system with high mortality and morbidity rates (161). Compared to healthy individuals, patients with CRC exhibit reduced gut microbial diversity and distinct dysbiosis (162). Within the colorectal tumor microenvironment (TME), specific bacterial species actively impair antitumor immunity. A prominent example is Fusobacterium nucleatum, which accumulates in CRC tissues and directly inhibits NK cell cytotoxicity. This immunosuppressive effect is primarily mediated by the binding of the bacterial Fap2 protein to the inhibitory receptor TIGIT on NK cells (163, 164). Clinically, elevated abundance of F. nucleatum in human CRC correlates with reduced intratumoral infiltration of CD3+ T cells—a lymphocyte population associated with improved patient survival—further implicating this bacterium in promoting an immunosuppressive TME (165).

Furthermore, increased abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila in patients with epithelial tumors correlates positively with response to PD-1 blockade. This effect potentially involves the recruitment of CCR9+CXCR3+CD4+ T lymphocytes to tumors and enhanced IL-12 secretion (166). Research on A. muciniphila in CRC reveals context-dependent outcomes. Murine studies demonstrate conflicting roles: while some report protective effects, others show administration exacerbates tumorigenesis. Emerging consensus attributes these discrepancies to strain-specific properties, as A. muciniphila may degrade the mucin barrier and engage in synergistic interactions with commensal or pathogenic bacteria that either suppress or promote carcinogenesis (167).

Similarly, enterotoxigenic B. fragilis (BFT+) contributes to early carcinogenesis. Its secreted metalloproteinase toxin (BFT) is implicated in human colonic adenoma and serrated polyp formation, promotes Th17-mediated colitis in mouse models (168), and drives distal CRC in Apcmin+/− mice via IL-17-dependent NF-κB pathway activation (169). BFT+B. fragilis colonization additionally facilitates regulatory T cell accumulation, inducing IL-17-driven procarcinogenic inflammation (170). At the epithelial level, BFT cleaves E-cadherin, increasing paracellular permeability and activating β-catenin signaling to enhance proliferation (171). It further induces DNA damage through polyamine catabolism in CRC cells (172). Notably, this bacterium promotes local dysbiosis by expanding other procarcinogenic species, compromising host immunity (170), disrupting the gut barrier (171), and degrading mucin (173).

In contrast, commensals like Ruminococcus gnavus and Blautia producta enhance antitumor immunity. They degrade lysoglycerophospholipids within the intestinal niche, thereby potentiating the tumor immune surveillance function of CD8+ T cells and inhibiting colon carcinogenesis (174).

4 Conclusion and future perspectives

The intricate bidirectional interplay between the gut microbiome and the host immune system is a cornerstone of intestinal health and a key factor in the pathogenesis of a spectrum of diseases. While this review has synthesized compelling evidence of how dysbiosis drives immune dysfunction in IBD, IBS, CRC, and following infection, it is crucial to recognize the significant limitations inherent in this rapidly evolving field. A primary challenge remains establishing definitive causality rather than correlation. While animal models, particularly gnotobiotic mice, have been indispensable for mechanistic dissection, they often fall short of recapitulating the full complexity of human physiology, genetics, and environmental exposures. The widely used inbred laboratory mice possess a depauperate microbiota and an immune system calibrated for this simplified community, which may yield exaggerated or misleading effects compared to humans harboring a far more complex and resilient microbial ecosystem. Furthermore, the staggering inter-individual heterogeneity in both microbiome composition and immune responses often exceeds differences related to disease status itself, complicating the identification of universal therapeutic targets and the translation of findings from population-level studies to the individual patient.

To overcome these hurdles and move from association to mechanism, future research must embrace a multi-faceted and integrative approach:

Multi-omics Integration: Disentangling causality will require the longitudinal collection and integrated analysis of multi-omics datasets—encompassing metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metabolomics, metaproteomics, and host epigenomics—from well-characterized human cohorts. This will help bridge the gap between microbial taxonomy, gene expression, functional output, and host response, revealing the active drivers of immune modulation.

Next-Generation Animal Models: The field must transition beyond conventional laboratory mice. “Wildling” or “dirty” mouse models, which are colonized with a complex, naturalized microbiota from wild mice or human donors, offer a more physiologically relevant preclinical platform. These models exhibit immune responses closer to humans and can better predict the efficacy and safety of microbiota-targeted interventions.

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence: Machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) are poised to play a transformative role. These tools can decipher the immense complexity of multi-omics data, identify predictive biomarkers of disease susceptibility or treatment response, and ultimately build models for personalized microbiome medicine. AI can help navigate the heterogeneity problem by stratifying patients into subpopulations based on their unique microbiome-immune signatures.

Expanding the Microbiome Definition: Future studies must look beyond bacteria to fully incorporate the virome (phages), mycobiome (fungi), and archaea into the ecosystem-level understanding of host-microbe interactions. Their roles in modulating immune tone and influencing bacterial community dynamics are still poorly understood but are likely significant.

The therapeutic landscape targeting the microbiota-immune axis is promising yet fraught with challenges. While Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) has demonstrated proof-of-principle, its long-term safety, variable efficacy, and lack of standardized protocols necessitate caution. Next-generation live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) and precision prebiotics offer a more controlled approach but must demonstrate robust and reproducible effects in diverse human populations. Similarly, while postbiotic strategies (e.g., administering SCFAs) are attractive for their safety and defined nature, their efficacy may be limited by the redundancy and complexity of microbial metabolic networks in vivo.

In conclusion, while the past decade has yielded profound insights into the microbiota-immune dialogue, the path forward requires a critical acknowledgment of current limitations and a concerted effort to adopt more sophisticated, integrative, and human-relevant approaches. By harnessing the power of multi-omics, advanced animal models, and computational biology, the field can move beyond descriptive associations and toward a causal, mechanistic, and ultimately translational understanding of how to harness the microbiome for immune health. This refined knowledge is essential for developing the next generation of safe, effective, and personalized therapies for the multitude of diseases rooted in a disrupted microbiota-immune equilibrium.

Statements

Author contributions

QW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. QM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YC: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. YL: Writing – review & editing. XL: Writing – review & editing. JZ: Writing – review & editing. YM: Writing – review & editing. ZY: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation. XC: Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Project administration.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    SenderRFuchsSMiloR. Are we really vastly outnumbered? Revisiting the ratio of bacterial to host cells in humans. Cell. (2016) 164:337–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.013

  • 2

    QuigleyEMM. Gut bacteria in health and disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2013) 9:560–9.

  • 3

    LeyREPetersonDAGordonJI. Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine. Cell. (2006) 124:837–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017

  • 4

    Robles-AlonsoVGuarnerF. progress in the knowledge of the intestinal human microbiota. Nutricion Hospitalaria. (2013) 28:553–7. doi: 10.3305/nh.2013.28.3.6601

  • 5

    HacquardSGarrido-OterRGonzálezASpaepenSAckermannGLebeisSet al. Microbiota and host nutrition across plant and animal kingdoms. Cell Host Microbe. (2015) 17:603–16. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.009

  • 6

    LynchJBHsiaoEY. Microbiomes as sources of emergent host phenotypes. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2019) 365:1405–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aay0240

  • 7

    BäckhedFLeyRESonnenburgJLPetersonDAGordonJI. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2005) 307:1915–20. doi: 10.1126/science.1104816

  • 8

    DethlefsenLMcFall-NgaiMRelmanDA. An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human-microbe mutualism and disease. Nature. (2007) 449:811–8. doi: 10.1038/nature06245

  • 9

    BelkaidYHarrisonOJ. Homeostatic immunity and the microbiota. Immunity. (2017) 46:562–76. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.008

  • 10

    LathropSKBloomSMRaoSMNutschKLioCWSantacruzNet al. Peripheral education of the immune system by colonic commensal microbiota. Nature. (2011) 478:250–4. doi: 10.1038/nature10434

  • 11

    BelkaidYHandTW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. (2014) 157:121–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011

  • 12

    RooksMGGarrettWS. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. (2016) 16:341–52. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.42

  • 13

    KonradACongYDuckWBorlazaRElsonCO. Tight mucosal compartmentation of the murine immune response to antigens of the enteric microbiota. Gastroenterology. (2006) 130:2050–9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.055

  • 14

    HansenRRussellRKReiffCLouisPMcIntoshFBerrySHet al. Microbiota of de-novo pediatric IBD: increased faecalibacterium prausnitzii and reduced bacterial diversity in crohn’s but not in ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. (2012) 107:1913–22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.335

  • 15

    LittmanDRPamerEG. Role of the commensal microbiota in normal and pathogenic host immune responses. Cell Host Microbe. (2011) 10:311–23. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.004

  • 16

    SokolHPigneurBWatterlotLLakhdariOBermúdez-HumaránLGGratadouxJJet al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of crohn disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America. (2008) 105:16731–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804812105

  • 17

    MachielsKJoossensMSabinoJDe PreterVArijsIEeckhautVet al. A decrease of the butyrate-producing species roseburia hominis and faecalibacterium prausnitzii defines dysbiosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut. (2014) 63:1275–83. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304833

  • 18

    ZhengDLiwinskiTElinavE. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. (2020) 30:492–506. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7

  • 19

    GensollenTIyerSSKasperDLBlumbergRS. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2016) 352:539–44. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9378

  • 20

    Gomez de AgüeroMGanal-VonarburgSCFuhrerTRuppSUchimuraYLiHet al. The maternal microbiota drives early postnatal innate immune development. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2016) 351:1296–302. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2571

  • 21

    WangJZhengJShiWDuNXuXZhangYet al. Dysbiosis of maternal and neonatal microbiota associated with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gut. (2018) 67:1614–25. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-315988

  • 22

    Dominguez-BelloMGCostelloEKContrerasMMagrisMHidalgoGFiererNet al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America. (2010) 107:11971–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002601107

  • 23

    BäckhedFRoswallJPengYFengQJiaHKovatcheva-DatcharyPet al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe. (2015) 17:690–703. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.004

  • 24

    KoenigJESporAScalfoneNFrickerADStombaughJKnightRet al. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America. (2011) 108 Suppl 1:4578–85. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000081107

  • 25

    YatsunenkoTReyFEManaryMJTrehanIDominguez-BelloMGContrerasMet al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. (2012) 486:222–7. doi: 10.1038/nature11053

  • 26

    MacGillivrayDMKollmannTR. The role of environmental factors in modulating immune responses in early life. Front Immunol. (2014) 5:434. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00434

  • 27

    WingenderGHissMEngelIPeukertKLeyKHallerHet al. Neutrophilic granulocytes modulate invariant NKT cell function in mice and humans. J Immunol (baltimore Md.: 1950). (2012) 188:3000–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101273

  • 28

    BhuttaZABlackRE. Global maternal, newborn, and child health–so near and yet so far. New Engl J Med. (2013) 369:2226–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1111853

  • 29

    NeuJWalkerWA. Necrotizing enterocolitis. New Engl J Med. (2011) 364:255–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1005408

  • 30

    ZhangXZhivakiDLo-ManR. Unique aspects of the perinatal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. (2017) 17:495–507. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.54

  • 31

    ChungHPampSJHillJASuranaNKEdelmanSMTroyEBet al. Gut immune maturation depends on colonization with a host-specific microbiota. Cell. (2012) 149:1578–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.037

  • 32

    DamskerJMHansenAMCaspiRR. Th1 and Th17 cells: adversaries and collaborators. Ann New York Acad Sci. (2010) 1183:211–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05133.x

  • 33

    FiebigerUBereswillSHeimesaatMM. Dissecting the interplay between intestinal microbiota and host immunity in health and disease: lessons learned from germfree and gnotobiotic animal models. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. (2016) 6:253–71. doi: 10.1556/1886.2016.00036

  • 34

    HapfelmeierSLawsonMAESlackEKirundiJKStoelMHeikenwalderMet al. Reversible microbial colonization of germ-free mice reveals the dynamics of IgA immune responses. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2010) 328:1705–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1188454

  • 35

    HouKWuZXChenXYWangJQZhangDXiaoCet al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduction Targeted Ther. (2022) 7:135. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4

  • 36

    IvanovIIFrutos R deLManelNYoshinagaKRifkinDBSartorRBet al. Specific microbiota direct the differentiation of IL-17-producing T-helper cells in the mucosa of the small intestine. Cell Host Microbe. (2008) 4:337–49. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.09.009

  • 37

    WuHJWuE. The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity. Gut Microbes. (2012) 3:4–14. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19320

  • 38

    ChunJToldiG. The impact of short-chain fatty acids on neonatal regulatory T cells. Nutrients. (2022) 14:3670. doi: 10.3390/nu14183670

  • 39

    KimCHParkJKimM. Gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids, T cells, and inflammation. Immune Network. (2014) 14:277–88. doi: 10.4110/in.2014.14.6.277

  • 40

    SinghNGuravASivaprakasamSBradyEPadiaRShiHet al. Activation of Gpr109a, receptor for niacin and the commensal metabolite butyrate, suppresses colonic inflammation and carcinogenesis. Immunity. (2014) 40:128–39. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.007

  • 41

    SunMWuWLiuZCongY. Microbiota metabolite short chain fatty acids, GPCR, and inflammatory bowel diseases. J Gastroenterol. (2017) 52:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1242-9

  • 42

    WuSEHashimoto-HillSWooVEshlemanEMWhittJEnglemanLet al. Microbiota-derived metabolite promotes HDAC3 activity in the gut. Nature. (2020) 586:108–12. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2604-2

  • 43

    BrandtzaegP. Secretory IgA: designed for anti-microbial defense. Front Immunol. (2013) 4:222. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00222

  • 44

    Tejedor VaqueroSNeumanHComermaLMarcos-FaXCorral-VazquezCUzzanMet al. Immunomolecular and reactivity landscapes of gut IgA subclasses in homeostasis and inflammatory bowel disease. J Exp Med. (2024) 221:e20230079. doi: 10.1084/jem.20230079

  • 45

    DuanTDuYXingCWangHYWangRF. Toll-like receptor signaling and its role in cell-mediated immunity. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:812774. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.812774

  • 46

    SmythiesLEShenRBimczokDNovakLClementsRHEckhoffDEet al. Inflammation anergy in human intestinal macrophages is due to smad-induced IkappaBalpha expression and NF-kappaB inactivation. J Biol Chem. (2010) 285:19593–604. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.069955

  • 47

    TalwarCSinghVKommaganiR. The gut microbiota: a double-edged sword in endometriosis†. Biol Reprod. (2022) 107:881–901. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioac147

  • 48

    DesaiMSSeekatzAMKoropatkinNMKamadaNHickeyCAWolterMet al. A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell. (2016) 167:1339–1353.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043

  • 49

    ShaoTHsuRRafizadehDLWangLBowlusCLKumarNet al. The gut ecosystem and immune tolerance. J Autoimmun. (2023) 141:103114. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103114

  • 50

    IwasakiAKelsallBL. Freshly isolated peyer’s patch, but not spleen, dendritic cells produce interleukin 10 and induce the differentiation of T helper type 2 cells. J Exp Med. (1999) 190:229–39. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.2.229

  • 51

    ConstantinidesMGMcDonaldBDVerhoefPABendelacA. A committed precursor to innate lymphoid cells. Nature. (2014) 508:397–401. doi: 10.1038/nature13047

  • 52

    AtarashiKNishimuraJShimaTUmesakiYYamamotoMOnoueMet al. ATP drives lamina propria T(H)17 cell differentiation. Nature. (2008) 455:808–12. doi: 10.1038/nature07240

  • 53

    YamamotoSMatsuoKSakaiSMishimaIHaraYOisoNet al. P2X receptor agonist enhances tumor-specific CTL responses through CD70+ DC-mediated Th17 induction. Int Immunol. (2021) 33:49–55. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxaa068

  • 54

    ClarkeTBDavisKMLysenkoESZhouAYYuYWeiserJN. Recognition of peptidoglycan from the microbiota by Nod1 enhances systemic innate immunity. Nat Med. (2010) 16:228–31. doi: 10.1038/nm.2087

  • 55

    HerbMSchrammM. Functions of ROS in macrophages and antimicrobial immunity. Antioxidants (basel Switzerland). (2021) 10:313. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020313

  • 56

    OhkuboTTsudaMSuzukiSEl BoraiNYamamuraM. Peripheral blood neutrophils of germ-free rats modified by in vivo granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor and exposure to natural environment. Scandinavian J Immunol. (1999) 49:73–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00456.x

  • 57

    RiazBSohnS. Neutrophils in inflammatory diseases: unraveling the impact of their derived molecules and heterogeneity. Cells. (2023) 12:2621. doi: 10.3390/cells12222621

  • 58

    AbubakarJEdoGAydinlikNP. Phytochemical and GCMS analysis on the ethanol extract of foeniculum vulgare and petroselinum crispum leaves. Int J Chem Technol. (2021) 5:117–24. doi: 10.32571/ijct.911711

  • 59

    KuniiJTakahashiKKasakuraKTsudaMNakanoKHosonoAet al. Commensal bacteria promote migration of mast cells into the intestine. Immunobiology. (2011) 216:692–7. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2010.10.007

  • 60

    SanosSLBuiVLMorthaAOberleKHenersCJohnerCet al. RORgammat and commensal microflora are required for the differentiation of mucosal interleukin 22-producing NKp46+ cells. Nat Immunol. (2009) 10:83–91. doi: 10.1038/ni.1684

  • 61

    ZhangDFrenettePS. Cross talk between neutrophils and the microbiota. Blood. (2019) 133:2168–77. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-844555

  • 62

    CarvalhoFAKorenOGoodrichJKJohanssonMEVNalbantogluIAitkenJDet al. Transient inability to manage proteobacteria promotes chronic gut inflammation in TLR5-deficient mice. Cell Host Microbe. (2012) 12:139–52. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.07.004

  • 63

    ChassaingBKorenOCarvalhoFALeyREGewirtzAT. AIEC pathobiont instigates chronic colitis in susceptible hosts by altering microbiota composition. Gut. (2014) 63:1069–80. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304909

  • 64

    ChassaingBLeyREGewirtzAT. Intestinal epithelial cell toll-like receptor 5 regulates the intestinal microbiota to prevent low-grade inflammation and metabolic syndrome in mice. Gastroenterology. (2014) 147:1363–1377.e17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.033

  • 65

    Vijay-KumarMAitkenJDCarvalhoFACullenderTCMwangiSSrinivasanSet al. Metabolic syndrome and altered gut microbiota in mice lacking toll-like receptor 5. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2010) 328:228–31. doi: 10.1126/science.1179721

  • 66

    BouskraDBrézillonCBérardMWertsCVaronaRBonecaIGet al. Lymphoid tissue genesis induced by commensals through NOD1 regulates intestinal homeostasis. Nature. (2008) 456:507–10. doi: 10.1038/nature07450

  • 67

    ElinavEStrowigTKauALHenao-MejiaJThaissCABoothCJet al. NLRP6 inflammasome regulates colonic microbial ecology and risk for colitis. Cell. (2011) 145:745–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.022

  • 68

    Henao-MejiaJElinavEJinCHaoLMehalWZStrowigTet al. Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature. (2012) 482:179–85. doi: 10.1038/nature10809

  • 69

    WlodarskaMThaissCANowarskiRHenao-MejiaJZhangJPBrownEMet al. NLRP6 inflammasome orchestrates the colonic host-microbial interface by regulating goblet cell mucus secretion. Cell. (2014) 156:1045–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.026

  • 70

    JakobssonHERodríguez-PiñeiroAMSchütteAErmundABoysenPBemarkMet al. The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier. EMBO Rep. (2015) 16:164–77. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439263

  • 71

    SalzmanNHHungKHaribhaiDChuHKarlsson-SjöbergJAmirEet al. Enteric defensins are essential regulators of intestinal microbial ecology. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:76–83. doi: 10.1038/ni.1825

  • 72

    SalzmanNHBevinsCL. Dysbiosis–a consequence of paneth cell dysfunction. Semin Immunol. (2013) 25:334–41. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2013.09.006

  • 73

    VaishnavaSYamamotoMSeversonKMRuhnKAYuXKorenOet al. The antibacterial lectin RegIIIgamma promotes the spatial segregation of microbiota and host in the intestine. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2011) 334:255–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1209791

  • 74

    SommerFAdamNJohanssonMEVXiaLHanssonGCBäckhedF. Altered mucus glycosylation in core 1 O-glycan-deficient mice affects microbiota composition and intestinal architecture. PloS One. (2014) 9:e85254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085254

  • 75

    ZhangHSparksJBKaryalaSVSettlageRLuoXM. Host adaptive immunity alters gut microbiota. ISME J. (2015) 9:770–81. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.165

  • 76

    SutherlandDBSuzukiKFagarasanS. Fostering of advanced mutualism with gut microbiota by immunoglobulin a. Immunol Rev. (2016) 270:20–31. doi: 10.1111/imr.12384

  • 77

    El AidySHooiveldGTremaroliVBäckhedFKleerebezemM. The gut microbiota and mucosal homeostasis: colonized at birth or at adulthood, does it matter? Gut Microbes. (2013) 4:118–24. doi: 10.4161/gmic.23362

  • 78

    QianLJKangSMXieJLHuangLWenQFanYYet al. Early-life gut microbial colonization shapes Th1/Th2 balance in asthma model in BALB/c mice. BMC Microbiol. (2017) 17:135. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1044-0

  • 79

    RussellSLGoldMJHartmannMWillingBPThorsonLWlodarskaMet al. Early life antibiotic-driven changes in microbiota enhance susceptibility to allergic asthma. EMBO Rep. (2012) 13:440–7. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.32

  • 80

    FujimuraKELynchSV. Microbiota in allergy and asthma and the emerging relationship with the gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. (2015) 17:592–602. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.007

  • 81

    OmenettiSBussiCMetidjiAIsepponALeeSTolainiMet al. The intestine harbors functionally distinct homeostatic tissue-resident and inflammatory Th17 cells. Immunity. (2019) 51:77–89.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.05.004

  • 82

    WangYYinYChenXZhaoYWuYLiYet al. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by flagellins from segmented filamentous bacteria. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2750. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02750

  • 83

    TengFFelixKMBradleyCPNaskarDMaHRaslanWAet al. The impact of age and gut microbiota on Th17 and tfh cells in K/BxN autoimmune arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. (2017) 19:188. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1398-6

  • 84

    AtarashiKTanoueTShimaTImaokaAKuwaharaTMomoseYet al. Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous clostridium species. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2011) 331:337–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1198469

  • 85

    RoundJLLeeSMLiJTranGJabriBChatilaTAet al. The toll-like receptor 2 pathway establishes colonization by a commensal of the human microbiota. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2011) 332:974–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1206095

  • 86

    KatoLMKawamotoSMaruyaMFagarasanS. The role of the adaptive immune system in regulation of gut microbiota. Immunol Rev. (2014) 260:67–75. doi: 10.1111/imr.12185

  • 87

    KawamotoSMaruyaMKatoLMSudaWAtarashiKDoiYet al. Foxp3(+) T cells regulate immunoglobulin a selection and facilitate diversification of bacterial species responsible for immune homeostasis. Immunity. (2014) 41:152–65. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.016

  • 88

    CongYFengTFujihashiKSchoebTRdominantECOA. coordinated T regulatory cell-IgA response to the intestinal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America. (2009) 106:19256–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812681106

  • 89

    HirotaKTurnerJEVillaMDuarteJHDemengeotJSteinmetzOMet al. Plasticity of Th17 cells in peyer’s patches is responsible for the induction of T cell-dependent IgA responses. Nat Immunol. (2013) 14:372–9. doi: 10.1038/ni.2552

  • 90

    TsujiMKomatsuNKawamotoSSuzukiKKanagawaOHonjoTet al. Preferential generation of follicular B helper T cells from Foxp3+ T cells in gut peyer’s patches. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2009) 323:1488–92. doi: 10.1126/science.1169152

  • 91

    KlaasenHLvan der HeijdenPJStokWPoelmaFGKoopmanJPVan den BrinkMEet al. Apathogenic, intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria stimulate the mucosal immune system of mice. Infection Immun. (1993) 61:303–6. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.1.303-306.1993

  • 92

    TalhamGLJiangHQBosNACebraJJ. Segmented filamentous bacteria are potent stimuli of a physiologically normal state of the murine gut mucosal immune system. Infection Immun. (1999) 67:1992–2000. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.4.1992-2000.1999

  • 93

    FagarasanSMuramatsuMSuzukiKNagaokaHHiaiHHonjoT. Critical roles of activation-induced cytidine deaminase in the homeostasis of gut flora. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2002) 298:1424–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1077336

  • 94

    SuzukiKMeekBDoiYMuramatsuMChibaTHonjoTet al. Aberrant expansion of segmented filamentous bacteria in IgA-deficient gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America. (2004) 101:1981–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307317101

  • 95

    CullenderTCChassaingBJanzonAKumarKMullerCEWernerJJet al. Innate and adaptive immunity interact to quench microbiome flagellar motility in the gut. Cell Host Microbe. (2013) 14:571–81. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.10.009

  • 96

    KawamotoSTranTHMaruyaMSuzukiKDoiYTsutsuiYet al. The inhibitory receptor PD-1 regulates IgA selection and bacterial composition in the gut. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2012) 336:485–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1217718

  • 97

    KubinakJLPetersenCStephensWZSotoRBakeEO’ConnellRMet al. MyD88 signaling in T cells directs IgA-mediated control of the microbiota to promote health. Cell Host Microbe. (2015) 17:153–63. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.12.009

  • 98

    MaruyaMKawamotoSKatoLMFagarasanS. Impaired selection of IgA and intestinal dysbiosis associated with PD-1-deficiency. Gut Microbes. (2013) 4:165–71. doi: 10.4161/gmic.23595

  • 99

    PlanchaisCMolinos-AlbertLMRosenbaumPHieuTKanyavuzAClermontDet al. HIV-1 treatment timing shapes the human intestinal memory B-cell repertoire to commensal bacteria. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:6326. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42027-6

  • 100

    BauerHHorowitzRELevensonSMPopperH. The response of the lymphatic tissue to the microbial flora. Studies on germfree mice. Am J Pathol. (1963) 42:471–83.

  • 101

    CrabbéPABazinHEyssenHHeremansJF. The normal microbial flora as a major stimulus for proliferation of plasma cells synthesizing IgA in the gut. The germ-free intestinal tract. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. (1968) 34:362–75. doi: 10.1159/000230130

  • 102

    DurkinHGBazinHWaksmanBH. Origin and fate of IgE-bearing lymphocytes. I. Peyer’s patches as differentiation site of cells. Simultaneously bearing IgA and IgE. J Exp Med. (1981) 154:640–8. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.3.640

  • 103

    HooijkaasHBennerRPleasantsJRWostmannBS. Isotypes and specificities of immunoglobulins produced by germ-free mice fed chemically defined ultrafiltered A’ntigen-free’ diet. Eur J Immunol. (1984) 14:1127–30. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830141212

  • 104

    LiHLimenitakisJPGreiffVYilmazBSchärenOUrbaniakCet al. Mucosal or systemic microbiota exposures shape the B cell repertoire. Nature. (2020) 584:274–8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2564-6

  • 105

    KonjarŠFerreiraCBlankenhausBVeldhoenM. Intestinal barrier interactions with specialized CD8 T cells. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1281. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01281

  • 106

    CampbellCKandalgaonkarMRGolonkaRMYeohBSVijay-KumarMSahaP. Crosstalk between gut microbiota and host immunity: impact on inflammation and immunotherapy. Biomedicines. (2023) 11:294. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020294

  • 107

    WakaoHKawamotoHSakataSInoueKOguraAWakaoRet al. A novel mouse model for invariant NKT cell study. J Immunol (baltimore Md.: 1950). (2007) 179:3888–95. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.6.3888

  • 108

    YooJYGroerMDutraSVOSarkarAMcSkimmingDI. Gut microbiota and immune system interactions. Microorganisms. (2020) 8:1587. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8101587

  • 109

    KamaliANNoorbakhshSMHamedifarHJadidi-NiaraghFYazdaniRBautistaJMet al. A role for Th1-like Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Mol Immunol. (2019) 105:107–15. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.11.015

  • 110

    RaphaelINalawadeSEagarTNForsthuberTG. T cell subsets and their signature cytokines in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Cytokine. (2015) 74:5–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.09.011

  • 111

    Maciel-FiuzaMFMullerGCCamposDMSdo Socorro Silva CostaPPeruzzoJBonamigoRRet al. Role of gut microbiota in infectious and inflammatory diseases. Front Microbiol. (2023) 14:1098386. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1098386

  • 112

    KaplanGG. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2015) 12:720–7. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.150

  • 113

    BarbaraGBarbaroMRFuschiDPalomboMFalangoneFCremonCet al. Inflammatory and microbiota-related regulation of the intestinal epithelial barrier. Front Nutr. (2021) 8:718356. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.718356

  • 114

    BautzovaTHockleyJRFPerez-BerezoTPujoJTranterMMDesormeauxCet al. 5-oxoETE triggers nociception in constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome through MAS-related G protein-coupled receptor D. Sci Signaling. (2018) 11:eaal2171. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aal2171

  • 115

    XuHLiuMCaoJLiXFanDXiaYet al. The dynamic interplay between the gut microbiota and autoimmune diseases. J Immunol Res. (2019) 2019:7546047. doi: 10.1155/2019/7546047

  • 116

    GeversDKugathasanSDensonLAVázquez-BaezaYVan TreurenWRenBet al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset crohn’s disease. Cell Host Microbe. (2014) 15:382–92. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005

  • 117

    KosticADXavierRJGeversD. The microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: current status and the future ahead. Gastroenterology. (2014) 146:1489–99. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.009

  • 118

    FranzosaEASirota-MadiAAvila-PachecoJFornelosNHaiserHJReinkerSet al. Gut microbiome structure and metabolic activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Microbiol. (2019) 4:293–305. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0306-4

  • 119

    Lloyd-PriceJArzeCAnanthakrishnanANSchirmerMAvila-PachecoJPoonTWet al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature. (2019) 569:655–62. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1237-9

  • 120

    LandyJRondeEEnglishNClarkSKHartALKnightSCet al. Tight junctions in inflammatory bowel diseases and inflammatory bowel disease associated colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. (2016) 22:3117–26. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3117

  • 121

    Van der SluisMDe KoningBAEDe BruijnACJMVelcichAMeijerinkJPPVan GoudoeverJBet al. Muc2-deficient mice spontaneously develop colitis, indicating that MUC2 is critical for colonic protection. Gastroenterology. (2006) 131:117–29. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.04.020

  • 122

    NobleAJNowakJKAdamsATUhligHHSatsangiJ. Defining interactions between the genome, epigenome, and the environment in inflammatory bowel disease: progress and prospects. Gastroenterology. (2023) 165:44–60.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.03.238

  • 123

    HampeJCuthbertACroucherPJMirzaMMMascherettiSFisherSet al. Association between insertion mutation in NOD2 gene and crohn’s disease in german and british populations. Lancet (london England). (9272) 2001:357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05063-7

  • 124

    Al NabhaniZDietrichGHugotJPBarreauF. Nod2: the intestinal gate keeper. PloS Pathog. (2017) 13:e1006177. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006177

  • 125

    RehmanASinaCGavrilovaOHäslerROttSBainesJFet al. Nod2 is essential for temporal development of intestinal microbial communities. Gut. (2011) 60:1354–62. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.216259

  • 126

    OkolieMCEdoGIAinyanbhorIEJikahANAkpogheliePOYousifEet al. Gut microbiota and immunity in health and diseases: a review. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad. (2024) 91: 397–414. doi: 10.1007/s43538-024-00355-1

  • 127

    AdenKTranFItoGSheibani-TezerjiRLipinskiSKuiperJWet al. ATG16L1 orchestrates interleukin-22 signaling in the intestinal epithelium via cGAS-STING. J Exp Med. (2018) 215:2868–86. doi: 10.1084/jem.20171029

  • 128

    CadwellKPatelKKKomatsuMVirginHWStappenbeckTS. A common role for Atg16L1, Atg5 and Atg7 in small intestinal paneth cells and crohn disease. Autophagy. (2009) 5:250–2. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.2.7560

  • 129

    LevyMThaissCAZeeviDDohnalováLZilberman-SchapiraGMahdiJAet al. Microbiota-modulated metabolites shape the intestinal microenvironment by regulating NLRP6 inflammasome signaling. Cell. (2015) 163:1428–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.048

  • 130

    GeremiaABiancheriPAllanPCorazzaGRDi SabatinoA. Innate and adaptive immunity in inflammatory bowel disease. Autoimmun Rev. (2014) 13:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2013.06.004

  • 131

    SchaubeckMClavelTCalasanJLagkouvardosIHaangeSBJehmlichNet al. Dysbiotic gut microbiota causes transmissible crohn’s disease-like ileitis independent of failure in antimicrobial defence. Gut. (2016) 65:225–37. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309333

  • 132

    BrittonGJContijochEJSpindlerMPAggarwalaVDoganBBongersGet al. Defined microbiota transplant restores Th17/RORγt+ regulatory T cell balance in mice colonized with inflammatory bowel disease microbiotas. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America. (2020) 117:21536–45. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922189117

  • 133

    CarusoRMathesTMartensECKamadaNNusratAInoharaNet al. A specific gene-microbe interaction drives the development of crohn’s disease-like colitis in mice. Sci Immunol. (2019) 4:eaaw4341. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaw4341

  • 134

    QiYWuHMYangZZhouYFJinLYangMFet al. New insights into the role of oral microbiota dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Digestive Dis Sci. (2022) 67:42–55. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06837-2

  • 135

    KobayashiKSChamaillardMOguraYHenegariuOInoharaNNuñezGet al. Nod2-dependent regulation of innate and adaptive immunity in the intestinal tract. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2005) 307:731–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1104911

  • 136

    VaishnavaSBehrendtCLIsmailASEckmannLHooperLV. Paneth cells directly sense gut commensals and maintain homeostasis at the intestinal host-microbial interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America. (2008) 105:20858–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808723105

  • 137

    Satoh-TakayamaNVosshenrichCAJLesjean-PottierSSawaSLochnerMRattisFet al. Microbial flora drives interleukin 22 production in intestinal NKp46+ cells that provide innate mucosal immune defense. Immunity. (2008) 29:958–70. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.11.001

  • 138

    ZhengYValdezPADanilenkoDMHuYSaSMGongQet al. Interleukin-22 mediates early host defense against attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Nat Med. (2008) 14:282–9. doi: 10.1038/nm1720

  • 139

    KissEAVonarbourgCKopfmannSHobeikaEFinkeDEsserCet al. Natural aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands control organogenesis of intestinal lymphoid follicles. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2011) 334:1561–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1214914

  • 140

    QiuJHellerJJGuoXChen Z mingEFishKFuYXet al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates gut immunity through modulation of innate lymphoid cells. Immunity. (2012) 36:92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.11.011

  • 141

    FagarasanSKawamotoSKanagawaOSuzukiK. Adaptive immune regulation in the gut: T cell-dependent and T cell-independent IgA synthesis. Annu Rev Immunol. (2010) 28:243–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101314

  • 142

    FrantzALRogierEWWeberCRShenLCohenDAFentonLAet al. Targeted deletion of MyD88 in intestinal epithelial cells results in compromised antibacterial immunity associated with downregulation of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor, mucin-2, and antibacterial peptides. Mucosal Immunol. (2012) 5:501–12. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.23

  • 143

    SuzukiKMaruyaMKawamotoSSitnikKKitamuraHAgaceWWet al. The sensing of environmental stimuli by follicular dendritic cells promotes immunoglobulin a generation in the gut. Immunity. (2010) 33:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.07.003

  • 144

    FranchiLKamadaNNakamuraYBurberryAKuffaPSuzukiSet al. NLRC4-driven production of IL-1β discriminates between pathogenic and commensal bacteria and promotes host intestinal defense. Nat Immunol. (2012) 13:449–56. doi: 10.1038/ni.2263

  • 145

    AlmonajjedMBWardehMAtlaghAIsmaielAPopaSLRusuFet al. Impact of microbiota on irritable bowel syndrome pathogenesis and management: a narrative review. Medicina. (2025) 61:109. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010109

  • 146

    BarbaraGGroverMBercikPCorsettiMGhoshalUCOhmanLet al. Rome foundation working team report on post-infection irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. (2019) 156:46–58.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.011

  • 147

    BerumenAEdwinsonALGroverM. Post-infection irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol Clinics North America. (2021) 50:445–61. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.02.007

  • 148

    DicksvedJEllströmPEngstrandLRautelinH. Susceptibility to campylobacter infection is associated with the species composition of the human fecal microbiota. Mbio. (2014) 5:e01212–1214. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01212-14

  • 149

    JefferyIBQuigleyEMMÖhmanLSimrénMO’ToolePW. The microbiota link to irritable bowel syndrome: an emerging story. Gut Microbes. (2012) 3:572–6. doi: 10.4161/gmic.21772

  • 150

    El-SalhyMHatlebakkJGHauskenT. Possible role of peptide YY (PYY) in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Neuropeptides. (2020) 79:101973. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2019.101973

  • 151

    KimHSLimJHParkHLeeSI. Increased immunoendocrine cells in intestinal mucosa of postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome patients 3 years after acute shigella infection–an observation in a small case control study. Yonsei Med J. (2010) 51:45–51. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.1.45

  • 152

    PokkunuriVPimentelMMoralesWJeeSRAlpernJWeitsmanSet al. Role of cytolethal distending toxin in altered stool form and bowel phenotypes in a rat model of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. (2012) 18:434–42. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2012.18.4.434

  • 153

    ChenJZhangYDengZ. Imbalanced shift of cytokine expression between T helper 1 and T helper 2 (Th1/Th2) in intestinal mucosa of patients with post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterol. (2012) 12:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-91

  • 154

    SundinJRangelIRepsilberDBrummerRJ. Cytokine response after stimulation with key commensal bacteria differ in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) patients compared to healthy controls. PloS One. (2015) 10:e0134836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134836

  • 155

    SmithPMHowittMRPanikovNMichaudMGalliniCABohlooly-YMet al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic treg cell homeostasis. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2013) 341:569–73. doi: 10.1126/science.1241165

  • 156

    ZhouYXuHXuJGuoXZhaoHChenYet al. F. prausnitzii and its supernatant increase SCFAs-producing bacteria to restore gut dysbiosis in TNBS-induced colitis. AMB Express. (2021) 11:33. doi: 10.1186/s13568-021-01197-6

  • 157

    ChenMRuanGChenLYingSLiGXuFet al. Neurotransmitter and intestinal interactions: focus on the microbiota-gut-brain axis in irritable bowel syndrome. Front Endocrinol. (2022) 13:817100. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.817100

  • 158

    De PalmaGShimboriCReedDEYuYRabbiaVLuJet al. Histamine production by the gut microbiota induces visceral hyperalgesia through histamine 4 receptor signaling in mice. Sci Trans Med. (2022) 14:eabj1895. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj1895

  • 159

    AgusADenizotJThévenotJMartinez-MedinaMMassierSSauvanetPet al. Western diet induces a shift in microbiota composition enhancing susceptibility to adherent-invasive E. coli infection and intestinal inflammation. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:19032. doi: 10.1038/srep19032

  • 160

    VojdaniAGushgariLRVojdaniE. Interaction between food antigens and the immune system: association with autoimmune disorders. Autoimmun Rev. (2020) 19:102459. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102459

  • 161

    DekkerETanisPJVleugelsJLAKasiPMWallaceMB. Colorectal cancer. Lancet (london England). (2019) 394:1467–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0

  • 162

    ChenYSLiJMenonRJayaramanALeeKHuangYet al. Dietary spinach reshapes the gut microbiome in an apc-mutant genetic background: mechanistic insights from integrated multi-omics. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1972756. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1972756

  • 163

    GurCIbrahimYIsaacsonBYaminRAbedJGamlielMet al. Binding of the Fap2 protein of fusobacterium nucleatum to human inhibitory receptor TIGIT protects tumors from immune cell attack. Immunity. (2015) 42:344–55. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.01.010

  • 164

    PignatelliPNuccioFPiattelliACuriaMC. The role of fusobacterium nucleatum in oral and colorectal carcinogenesis. Microorganisms. (2023) 11:2358. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092358

  • 165

    HamadaTZhangXMimaKBullmanSSukawaYNowakJAet al. Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal cancer relates to immune response differentially by tumor microsatellite instability status. Cancer Immunol Res. (2018) 6:1327–36. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0174

  • 166

    RoutyBLe ChatelierEDerosaLDuongCPMAlouMTDaillèreRet al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Sci (new York N.Y.). (2018) 359:91–7. doi: 10.1126/science.aan3706

  • 167

    GubernatorovaEOGorshkovaEABondarevaMAPodosokorskayaOASheynovaADYakovlevaASet al. Akkermansia muciniphila - friend or foe in colorectal cancer? Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1303795. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1303795

  • 168

    WuSRheeKJAlbesianoERabizadehSWuXYenHRet al. A human colonic commensal promotes colon tumorigenesis via activation of T helper type 17 T cell responses. Nat Med. (2009) 15:1016–22. doi: 10.1038/nm.2015

  • 169

    ChungLThiele OrbergEGeisALChanJLFuKDeStefano ShieldsCEet al. Bacteroides fragilis toxin coordinates a pro-carcinogenic inflammatory cascade via targeting of colonic epithelial cells. Cell Host Microbe. (2018) 23:203–214.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.007

  • 170

    GeisALFanHWuXWuSHusoDLWolfeJLet al. Regulatory T-cell response to enterotoxigenic bacteroides fragilis colonization triggers IL17-dependent colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Discov. (2015) 5:1098–109. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0447

  • 171

    DeDeckerLCoppedgeBAvelar-BarraganJKarnesWWhitesonK. Microbiome distinctions between the CRC carcinogenic pathways. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1854641. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1854641

  • 172

    GoodwinACDestefano ShieldsCEWuSHusoDLWuXMurray-StewartTRet al. Polyamine catabolism contributes to enterotoxigenic bacteroides fragilis-induced colon tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America. (2011) 108:15354–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010203108

  • 173

    AllenJHaoSSearsCLTimpW. Epigenetic changes induced by bacteroides fragilis toxin. Infection Immun. (2019) 87:e00447–18. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00447-18

  • 174

    ZhangXYuDWuDGaoXShaoFZhaoMet al. Tissue-resident lachnospiraceae family bacteria protect against colorectal carcinogenesis by promoting tumor immune surveillance. Cell Host Microbe. (2023) 31:418–432.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.01.013

Summary

Keywords

gut microbiota, immune homeostasis, adaptive and innate immunity, dysbiosis, intestinal disease

Citation

Wang Q, Meng Q, Chen Y, Liu Y, Li X, Zhou J, Ma Y, Yu Z and Chen X (2025) Interaction between gut microbiota and immunity in health and intestinal disease. Front. Immunol. 16:1673852. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1673852

Received

26 July 2025

Accepted

27 October 2025

Published

10 November 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

Ding Shi, Zhejiang University, China

Reviewed by

Dolores Correa, Universidad Anáhuac México Campus Norte, Mexico

Feilong Guo, Nanjing University, China

Updates

Copyright

© 2025 Wang, Meng, Chen, Liu, Li, Zhou, Ma, Yu and Chen.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zihan Yu, ; Xin Chen,

† These authors have contributed equally to this work

‡

ORCID: Zihan Yu, orcid.org/0000-0002-2696-2297; Xin Chen, orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-9053

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Share on WeChat

Scan with WeChat to share this article

Article metrics