ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders
This article is part of the Research TopicLiver Diseases – From Pathophysiology to New Treatment OptionsView all 11 articles
Clinical outcomes and Early-prognostic Biomarkers of Primary Biliary Cholangitis with Ductopenia
Provisionally accepted- 1Guangxi Hospital Division of The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Nanning, China
- 2Beijing You'an Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Ductopenia drives biochemical failure and histological progression in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), influencing its course and prognosis, but its prevalence, features, and prognosis remain unclear. This study aimed to characterize ductopenia in PBC and identify early predictive biomarkers. Methods: From August 2013 to April 2025, 518 of the biopsy-proven PBC patients were enrolled, analyzed for demographics, pathology, and clinical features, and grouped by ductopenia presence. 201 patients were followed until June 15, 2025, with liver-related adverse events (includingTIPS, splenectomy with portosystemic shunt or portoazygous devascularization, liver failure, death, or liver transplantation) as endpoints. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression assessed prognosis. Results: The overall proportion of patients with PBC and ductopenia was 56.76% (294/518), Notably, ductopenia was present in 24.83% (74/298) of patients with early-stage disease. Compared with the group without ductopenia, the ductopenia group showed significantly higher levels of cholestasis indicators (such as TBIL, ALP, GGT, and TBA) and autoantibodies (ANA, AMA anti-gp210), but significantly lower levels of liver synthetic function indicators (such as ALB and cholinesterase) and blood components (RBC, PLT, and HGB) (all P < 0.05). The median follow-up time was 7.60 years (interquartile range: 5.80–9.20 years). The prevalence of liver-related adverse events was significantly higher in PBC patients with ductopenia than in those without (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis confirmed that ductopenia (HR = 8.868, 95% CI: 1.135–69.307, P = 0.037) was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of liver-related adverse events in patients with PBC. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified that serum ANA(≥1:1000) (OR = 2.180, 95% CI: 1.261–3.769), elevated GGT (OR = 1.002, 95% CI: 1.001–1.003, P = 0.001) and TBIL (OR = 1.020, 95% CI: 1.005–1.035), lowed ALB (OR = 0.943, 95% CI: 0.896–0.993) as biomarkers for ductopenia in patients with early-stage PBC. Conclusions: Ductopenia is relatively common in patients with PBC, and its prevalence significantly increases with disease progression. Ductopenia was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of liver-related adverse events in patients with PBC. ANA(≥1:1000), TBIL, GGT , and ALB are early predictive biomarkers for ductopenia in patients with PBC.
Keywords: Primary biliary cholangitis, Ductopenia, Clinical features, prognosis, biomarkers, Alkaline Phosphatase, Antinuclear Antibodies, gamma-glutamyl transferase
Received: 11 Aug 2025; Accepted: 04 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Zhang, Liu, Lyu, Liu, Ye, Ding and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Huiguo Ding, dinghuiguo@ccmu.edu.cn
Ying Han, gladyshanying@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
