Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1683533

This article is part of the Research TopicFrom a Drop to Discovery: The Potential of Peripheral Blood for Biomedical ResearchView all 3 articles

Combining immune-related adverse events and inflammatory profiles enhances prognostic accuracy in metastatic melanoma under PD-1-based therapy

Provisionally accepted
Dionysios  GarmpisDionysios Garmpis1,2Guillermo  Hidalgo-GadeaGuillermo Hidalgo-Gadea3Cornelia  MauchCornelia Mauch1,4,5Julia  TietzeJulia Tietze6Cindy  FranklinCindy Franklin1,2*
  • 1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • 2Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Cologne site, Cologne, Germany
  • 3Department of Biopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
  • 4Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
  • 5Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Cologne site, Cologne, Germany
  • 6Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes in advanced melanoma, yet predictive biomarkers for treatment response and survival remain limited. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequent during ICI therapy and have been associated with improved outcomes, while baseline inflammatory markers—such as C-Reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)—often predict poor prognosis. However, no study to date has systematically integrated irAE characteristics and blood-based inflammation profiles to evaluate their combined prognostic value across different therapy lines. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 231 patients with unresectable stage IIIC–IV melanoma treated with PD-1-based ICIs at the University Hospital Cologne (2015–2021). Patients were stratified into first-line (n=149) and higher-line (n=82) groups. We assessed the occurrence, number, type, and severity of organ-specific and non-specific irAEs, and correlated these with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) alongside baseline hematological markers (CRP, neutrophils, lymphocytes, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), NLR) using multivariate Cox regression. Results Across both therapy lines, the occurrence, higher number, and moderate severity (CTCAE I– III) of organ-specific irAEs independently predicted longer PFS and OS, whereas high-grade irAEs (≥IV) were associated with worse OS. In first-line therapy, ≥2 irAEs conferred markedly prolonged PFS (HR 0.49; p=0.007) and OS (HR 0.53; p=0.040). Elevated CRP and neutrophils predicted shorter survival, while higher lymphocyte counts and LMR were favorable; CRP emerged as the most consistent independent prognostic biomarker. Eosinophil counts predicted both irAE development and improved survival in univariate analyses only. Combining irAEs with CRP and lymphocyte-based markers improved PFS prediction, particularly in first-line therapy. Conclusion Integrating irAE characteristics with baseline inflammatory biomarkers enhances prognostic stratification in ICI-treated melanoma, especially in first-line settings. Moderate irAEs appear to reflect beneficial immune activation, whereas high-grade events may compromise outcomes. 3 CRP and lymphocyte-based indices provide additive value and should be considered in future biomarker-driven patient selection and monitoring strategies.

Keywords: immune checkpoint inhibitors, Melanoma, Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), biomarkers, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Progression-free survival, overall survival

Received: 11 Aug 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Garmpis, Hidalgo-Gadea, Mauch, Tietze and Franklin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Cindy Franklin, cindy.franklin@uk-koeln.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.