ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Molecular Innate Immunity
IL-9 and IL-24 biomarkers in the transcriptional signature of contact dermatitis to methylisothiazolinone
Provisionally accepted- 1Laboratory of Medical Investigation 56, Department of Dermatology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
- 2Laboratory of Medical Investigation 50, Department of Pathology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
- 3Department of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- 4Cellular, Genetic, and Molecular Nephrology Laboratory (LIM-29), Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
- 5Department of Dermatology, University of São Paulo Medical, São Paulo, Brazil
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a cutaneous inflammatory condition mediated by memory T cells specific to the allergen, triggered after prior exposure to sensitizers. Methylisothiazolinone (MI), a preservative found in industrial and cosmetic products, has been responsible for a significant increase in ACD cases, standing out as a prominent sensitizing agent in the compound Kathon CG. There are a few investigations of MI cutaneous response. This study aimed to investigate the innate immune components, such as cytokines and signaling pathways induced by MI in the skin test of individuals with MI-sensitized ACD, comparing them to healthy controls. Individuals initially testing positive only for MI were recruited at the Contact Dermatitis Clinic at Hospital das Clínicas of São Paulo, re-exposed to MI or saline, and biopsied 48 hours after exposure. Negative controls for the patch test were also exposed to MI and saline for comparison. Histopathological and transcriptomic (RNAseq) analyses identified two groups among the ACD patients: high responder to MI (ACD-A), with more pronounced histopathological features such as spongiosis and micro vesicles, and low responder to MI (ACD-B), which showed milder reactions and absence of spongiosis. In ACD-A MI, a total of 1588 genes were upregulated and 2090 downregulated in response to MI, compared to ACD-B MI. These differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were associated with innate immunity and inflammation, such as IL-24, IL-9, IL-13, and NTRK1, while IL-37 and IL-18 were downregulated. Similarly, ACD-A MI compared to the MI-negative ACD group showed 1169 upregulated and 321 downregulated genes. DEG validation in ACD-A through qPCR confirmed increased expression of NTRK1 and IL-9, with a reduction in IL-18. Protein analysis of IL-9 and IL-24 revealed higher expression in the dermal layer of ACD-A. These results indicate distinct transcriptional profiles in MI-sensitized individuals, despite positive patch tests in all cases. The observed heterogeneity, not previously described in ACD, points to as IL-9 and IL-24 be better explored, in order to understand the pathogenesis of ACD.
Keywords: Allergic contact dermatitis, Methylisothiazolinone (MI), RNA-Seq, Differentialgene expression, innate immune response, Cytokines
Received: 13 Aug 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 De Melo, Sotto, Fernandes, de Sousa, Ferreira, Simões, Ramos, Pincelli, Reis and Sato. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Maria Notomi Sato, marisato@usp.br
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
