ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1685592
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Insights of Multi-Omics into the Microenvironment After Tumor Metastasis: A Paradigm Shift in Molecular Targeting Modeling and Immunotherapy for Advanced Cancer Patients - Vol IIView all articles
Clinical and Body Composition Parameters as Predictors of Response to Chemotherapy plus PD-1 Inhibitor in Gastric Cancer
Provisionally accepted- 1Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- 2Universiteit Maastricht School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, Netherlands
- 3The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background Predicting treatment efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors is crucial for guiding optimal treatment plans and prevents unnecessary complications for cancer patients. We aimed to develop a prediction model using clinical and body composition parameters to identify gastric cancer (GC) patients who would respond to chemotherapy plus PD-1 antibody. Methods Clinical data of GC patients treated with chemotherapy plus PD-1 antibody (immunotherapy cohort, n=120) or chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy cohort, n=82) following surgical resection was reviewed as the training set. Patients treated with chemotherapy plus PD-1 antibody at an external center were collected as the validation set (n=43). Tumor regression grade (TRG) was recorded and was classified as TRG0/1 or TRG2/3 during analysis. Body composition parameters were assessed on computed tomography images at the third lumbar vertebral level using SliceOmatic software. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify parameters associated with TRG0/1, then a logistic regression model was developed to stratify patients into good and poor response groups. Results In the training set, clinical and body composition parameters between the immunotherapy cohort and chemotherapy cohort were similar. Skeletal muscle radiation attenuation (SMRA), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and weight loss ≥5% were associated with TRG0/1 in the immunotherapy cohort. Subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI) and metastasis were identified in the chemotherapy cohort. A logistic regression model was developed to stratified immunotherapy cohort patients into two response groups with an area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) value at 0.728. In the immunotherapy cohort, patients stratified as good response showed higher TRG0/1 rate (37/55, 67.3%) than poor response patients (18/65, 27.7%, P<0.001), and had better overall survival (P=0.001). In the external validation set, patients stratified by the clinical model as good response also showed higher TRG0/1 rate (14/18, 77.8%) than poor response patients (9/25, 36.0%, P=0.012). Conclusion The prediction model consisting of SMRA, NLR and weight loss could help identify GC patients who respond well to chemotherapy plus PD-1 antibody.
Keywords: gastric cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, Clinical prediction model, tumor regression grade, Body Composition
Received: 14 Aug 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Zhou, Sun, Liu, van Dijk, Xi, Jiang, Guo, Qi, Zhang, Jia, Ji, Zhu, Rensen and Olde Damink. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jun Zhang, junzhang10977@sjtu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.