ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders: Autoinflammatory Disorders
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1685738
Clinical Study of PLA2R Epitope Spreading for Predicting Proteinuria Remission in Primary Membranous Nephropathy
Provisionally accepted- 1Wuxi People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
- 2College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, P.R. China, Hangzhou, China
- 3NHC Key Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Wuxi, P.R. China, Wuxi, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) is the predominant autoantigen in primary membranous nephropathy (PMN), accounting for approximately 70–80% of cases. Circulating anti-PLA2R IgG is a widely used biomarker for monitoring disease activity and treatment. In recent years, antibodies targeting specific PLA2R domains and epitope spreading of PLA2R have been identified and suggested to be correlated with disease severity and resistance to treatment. However, its clinical relevance remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate whether epitope spreading offers superior prognostic value compared to total anti-PLA2R IgG levels in patients with PMN. This retrospective study enrolled 74 patients with biopsy-proven PMN who underwent at least 6 months of follow-up. Clinical data and serum samples were collected at baseline (M0), 6 months (M6), and 12 months (M12). PLA2R-IgG, domain-specific antibodies (CysR-, CTLD1-, and CTLD7/8-IgG/IgG4), and anti-rituximab antibodies (ARAs) were measured using time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to assess prognostic factors and model performance. Patients were divided into cyclophosphamide (CTX) and rituximab (RTX) treatment groups. There were no significant differences in remission rates between the groups at M6 (CTX: 37.9% vs. RTX: 60.0%, P = 0.875) or M12 (61.5% vs. 75.6%, P = 0.220). However, the RTX group showed faster antibody clearance at M6 and a significantly higher immunological remission rate at M12 (96.2% vs. 65.6%, P = 0.017). In the RTX group, epitope spreading significantly decreased at M6 (P = 0.004), and four patients (22.2%) with no clinical remission were ARA-positive. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified epitope spreading This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article as an independent risk factor for non-remission at M6 (P = 0.031; AUC = 0.932). All four ARA-positive patients achieved partial or complete remission within 3-9 months after switching to obinutuzumab. Compared with CTX, RTX induced a higher rate of immunologic remission at M12. Epitope spreading of PLA2R was identified as an independent risk factor for clinical remission after 6 months of treatment with RTX.
Keywords: Primary membranous nephropathy, PLA2R, Epitope spreading, rituximab, Anti-rituximab antibody
Received: 14 Aug 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cheng, Zhou, Chen, Xue, Liu, Zhang, Zhang, Zhou, Cai, Biao, Zhang, Wang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Liang Wang, wlwxsnk@163.com
Xiaobin Liu, lxbwxsnk@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.