Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1687329

This article is part of the Research TopicImmunotherapy in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Clinical Advances, Access Barriers, and Optimization StrategiesView all articles

Preoperative [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET for evaluating pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma patients

Provisionally accepted
Xiao  ZhangXiao Zhang1,2,3Yuan  FengYuan Feng1,2,3Zhaoguo  LinZhaoguo Lin1,2,3Ranran  ChenRanran Chen4Yongkang  GaiYongkang Gai1,2,3Chunxia  QinChunxia Qin1,2,3XIAOLI  LANXIAOLI LAN1,2,3*
  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
  • 2Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy, the Ministry of Education, Wuhan, China
  • 4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Mindong Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Ningde, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the value of preoperative [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography (PET) for evaluating pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas who received [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR scans between February 2021 and January 2024. The enrolled patients had completed preoperative NAT, undergone contemporary enhanced CT or MR scans, and received surgery within one month after PET imaging. Clinical data, imaging evaluations, PET parameters (standardized uptake values [SUVs], SUVs standardized by lean body mass [SUL], FAPI-positive tumor volume [FAPI-PTV], and total lesion burden [FAPI-TL]), and surgical pathology results were collected. Each parameter's sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic cutoff for predicting pCR were determined via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Logistic regression analysis identified independent predictors of pCR. Results: Sixty-five patients were enrolled, and 22 patients achieved pCR according to surgical pathology. In visual evaluation, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET was limited in its ability to assess pCR, with 16 false positives and 1 false negative. The dichotomization using the FAPI-PTV cutoff value (<1.92 cm3) improved the specificity for predicting pCR to 72.7%, while retaining a high sensitivity of 93.0%. Enhanced CT or MR scans had the sensitivity and specificity of 72.7% and 93.0% in predicting pCR, respectively. According to the logistic regression analysis, a FAPI-PTV<1.92 cm3 was an independent predictor for patients who achieved a pCR (p<0.05). Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET shows promise in predicting pCR among patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas following NAT. FAPI-PTV derived from [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET may provide an effective clinical tool for guiding further treatment.

Keywords: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, Pathologic complete response, gastrointestinal cancer, neoadjuvanttherapy, Immunotherapy

Received: 17 Aug 2025; Accepted: 23 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Feng, Lin, Chen, Gai, Qin and LAN. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: XIAOLI LAN, lxl730724@hotmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.