Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1688440

This article is part of the Research TopicImmuno-metabolic Approaches for the Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic TumorsView all 7 articles

Development of a Nomogram Integrating Immune Checkpoints, 1 Fibrosis indicators, and Clinicopathological Characteristics to 2 Predict Overall Survival in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective 3 Analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract 24 Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains a highly aggressive disease with 25 a poor postoperative 5-year survival of around 25%, attributable to its 26 immunosuppressive and fibrotic tumor microenvironment. Prognostic models 27 that combine immune checkpoint markers with fibrotic features are still needed. 28 Methods: We analyzed qualifying surgically resected PC specimens. 29 Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate PD-L1, CTLA-4, and α-SMA 30 expression. Extracellular matrix volume (ECV) at the tumor center (ECVC) and 31 peritumoral region (ECVP) was measured by three radiologists using single-32 energy CT. Collagen fraction (CF) was assessed via Masson's trichrome 33 staining. Multivariate Cox regression identified independent predictors of 34 overall survival (OS); a prognostic nomogram was then developed. 35 Results: Among 268 enrolled patients, divided into training (n=215) and 36 validation (n=53) sets via Five-fold cross-validation, PD-L1 expression 37 correlated positively with α-SMA, T stage, and N stage. Multivariate analysis 38 identified α-SMA H-score, Masson-CF, ECVC, ECVP, T stage, N stage, CA19-39 9, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), vascular invasion, and chemotherapy 40 as independent OS predictors. The nomogram integrating these factors 41 outperformed TNM staging in predicting OS. 42 Conclusion: 43 High PD-L1 expression is associated with enhanced fibrosis, greater tumor 44 burden, and nodal metastasis in PC. Patients exhibiting elevated PD-L1 levels, 45 significant fibrotic burden, advanced T or N stage, or increased NLR 46 demonstrate reduced OS. The developed nomogram enhances individualized 47 prediction of OS. These findings support the hypothesis that combining immune 48 checkpoint blockade, TGF-β inhibition, and chemotherapy may represent a 49 promising therapeutic strategy for PC patients with high PD-L1 expression and 50 pronounced fibrosis.

Keywords: Pancreatic Cancer, immune checkpoints, Fibrosis indexes, Extracellular volume, nomogram, overall survival

Received: 19 Aug 2025; Accepted: 02 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Qin, Huang, Yao, Jiang, Zhu, Cao and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jianzhong Cao, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
Shengping Li, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.