Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Comparative Immunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1688761

This article is part of the Research TopicInnate immunity in fish: responses and adaptations to diverse aquatic environmentsView all articles

Comprehensive evaluation of individual and combined dietary carotenoids in Penaeus vannamei and response surface analysis for optimizing combinations

Provisionally accepted
Yucai  XueYucai Xue1,2,3Bin  HanBin Han1,2,3Yansong  XueYansong Xue1Ganfeng  YiGanfeng Yi2Meiqin  WuMeiqin Wu1Amina  Salina MossAmina Salina Moss4Xuxiong  HuangXuxiong Huang1,2,3Weilong  WangWeilong Wang1,2,3,5*
  • 1Building of China-ASEAN Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Mariculture Technology, Shanghai, China
  • 2Centre for Research on Environmental Ecology and Fish Nutrition of the Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai, China
  • 3National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
  • 4Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom
  • 5Key Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair), Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Carotenoids are essential in crustacean aquaculture, supporting pigmentation, antioxidant defense, immune function, and sensory quality. However, intensive culture restricts natural carotenoid inputs, and exclusive reliance on astaxanthin is constrained by cost and supply. Evidence to guide cost-effective formulation remains fragmented: reported optimal doses vary widely, head-to-head comparisons under a common basal diet are scarce, mixture effects are poorly defined, and rigorous multi-factor optimization is rare. In this study, Penaeus vannamei were fed iso-nitrogenous, iso-lipidic diets for 56 days that supplemented β-carotene, canthaxanthin, or astaxanthin individually, or all three in combination at literature-based levels. Outcomes included growth and feed efficiency; tissue carotenoid deposition and composition; antioxidant and digestive enzyme activities; color (CIELAB); and flavor (free amino acids, nucleotides, organic acids). A subsequent response-surface experiment varied inclusion ranges (β-carotene 200-500, canthaxanthin 100-300, astaxanthin 50-250 mg/kg) to model total astaxanthin, total carotenoids, total antioxidant capacity, and redness, followed by AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis to identify the global optimum.All carotenoid diets increased final weight and specific growth rate and reduced feed conversion ratio relative to the control, with the mixture outperforming any single carotenoid. Supplementation elevated digestive enzyme activities and enhanced antioxidant status (higher T-AOC, lower malondialdehyde), with astaxanthin the most efficient single additive and the mixture providing additional gains. Astaxanthin (> 80 % of tissue carotenoids) accumulated mainly in the hepatopancreas; β-carotene promoted greater total carotenoid and astaxanthin deposition than direct astaxanthin, and the mixture produced the highest tissue levels. Carotenoids improved color (lower L*, higher a*) with a plateau in redness, and increased umami-related free amino acids, nucleotides, and succinic acid, thereby raising the equivalent umami concentration (EUC). Optimization identified a β-carotene: canthaxanthin: astaxanthin ratio of 368: 204.5: 219.2 mg/kg as the best composite solution.This work provides a rigorously benchmarked and optimization-based formulation strategy, yielding actionable inclusion ratios that reconcile biological performance with cost-effective feed design for intensive shrimp culture.

Keywords: Carotenoids, Penaeus vannamei, optimizing combinations, AHP-CRITIC-TOPSIS, Response surface analysis

Received: 19 Aug 2025; Accepted: 23 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xue, Han, Xue, Yi, Wu, Moss, Huang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Weilong Wang, wangweilong@shou.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.