Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders

Machine learning-based prediction of response to Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using clinical data

Provisionally accepted
Yeo-Jin  LeeYeo-Jin Lee1Gyucheol  ChoiGyucheol Choi2Joongyeub  YeoJoongyeub Yeo3Jiyeong  BaekJiyeong Baek2Heeju  ChoiHeeju Choi4Minji  KimMinji Kim2Yong-Gil  KimYong-Gil Kim1Bo  Young KimBo Young Kim5*Jamin  KooJamin Koo6*
  • 1Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Republic of Korea
  • 2ImpriMedKorea, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 3Independent Researcher, New York, United States
  • 4ImpriMed, Inc., Mountain View, United States
  • 5GangNeung Asan Hospital, Gangneung-si, Republic of Korea
  • 6Hongik University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with considerable heterogeneity in treatment response, leaving many patients unable to achieve remission or low disease activity. We aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict which patients with moderate-to-severe RA would respond to Janus kinase inhibitor therapy, thereby facilitating more effective and personalized treatment strategies. Methods. We retrospectively collected data from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics therapy (KOBIO) registry and Asan Medical Centers, including adult patients with moderate or high disease activity (DAS28-ESR≥3.2) and at least 12 months of follow-up. We trained and validated gradient boosting machine-learning models (XGBoost) to predict whether patients would achieve low disease activity or remission after 6 months of Janus kinase inhibitor therapy, using prespecified baseline covariates and stratified splits for independent training and test datasets. Results. This study included 264 patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis from the Korean cohorts (the KOBIO registry and Asan Medical Centers). Of these, 247 received either tofacitinib (n=123) or baricitinib (n=124). After 6 months of treatment, 65% of patients on tofacitinib and 69% on baricitinib achieved low disease activity or remission. Our machine-learning models (trained and validated separately for each drug) achieved high predictive performance (tofacitinib: ROC-AUC 0·84, accuracy 80%; baricitinib: ROC-AUC 0·88, accuracy 88%), identifying key clinical factors such as total cholesterol, CRP, and specific joint swelling or tenderness for tofacitinib, and patient global assessment, joint swelling, and co-administration of hydroxychloroquine for baricitinib. Model-guided treatment selection could have improved outcomes for an additional 15% of patients by aligning each individual's predicted response with the more suitable Janus kinase inhibitor. Conclusion. The findings suggest that ML models can accurately predict treatment response to Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis and may support personalized therapy selection to improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords: machine learning, precision medicine, Janus kinase inhibitor, Rheumatoid arthritis, treatment response

Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 11 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lee, Choi, Yeo, Baek, Choi, Kim, Kim, Kim and Koo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Bo Young Kim, 44113795by@gmail.com
Jamin Koo, jaminkoo@alumni.stanford.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.